THE
WILTSHIRE
Irrjnentogtral anil Jiatirail Iktottj
MAGAZINE,
$3u&lMrt)rtr tmter tl;c Direction of tije
FORMED IN THAT COUNTY, A.D. 1853.
VOL. XXVII.
DEVIZES :
HUERY & PEARSON, 4, ST. JOHN STREET.
JUNE, 1894,
THE EDITOR of the Wiltshire Magazine desires that it should
be distinctly understood that neither he nor the Committee of the
Wiltshire Archaologieal and Natural History Society hold themselves
in any way answerable for any statements or opinions expressed
in the Magazine; for all of which the Authors of the several
papers and communications are alone responsible.
CONTENTS OF VOL. XXVII.
No. LXXIX. JUNE, 1893.
PAGE
Account of the Thirty-ninth General Meeting, at Cirencester
Notes on the Churches visited in 1892 : By C. B. PONTING, P.S.A 15
Broughton Gifford— Copy of Deed, belonging to the Rev. S. S. Keddle,
relating to the Tithes of Monkton Farm, in the Parish of Broughton
Gifford : Communicated by the Rev. E. W. WATSON ; translated by
Rev. ALAN BRODRICK „ 41
Notes on pre-Norman Sculptured Stones in Wilts : By the Rev. E. H.
GOEDARD 43
Notes on the Ornamentation of the Early Christian Monuments of Wilt-
shire : By J. ROMILLY ALLEN, F.S.A., Scot 50
Notes on Sections of Stonehenge Rocks belonging to Mr. W. Cunnington :
By J. J. H. TEALL, M.A., F.R.S., Sec. G.S 66
Richard Jefferies : By GEORGE E. DABTNELL 69
In Memoriam William Collings Lukis, M.A., F.S.A 99
Corrections 102
Natural History Notes 102
Archaeological Notes 103
Donations to Museum and Library 105
No. LXXX. DECEMBER, 1893.
The Battle of Ethandune : By WALTER MONEY, F.S.A. , 109
The Wilts County Court— Devizes versus Wilton : By JAMES WAYLEN 113
The Church of All Saints, the Leigh, near Cricklade : By C. E. PONTING,
F.S.A 121
Contributions towards a Wiltshire Glossary : By G. E. DARTNELL and
The Rev. E. H. GODDARD 124
Unpublished Documents relating to the Arrest of Sir William Sharington,
January, 1549 ; By the Rev. W. GILCHHIST CLARK 159
Notes on an undescribed Stone Circle at Coate, near Swindon : By A. D.
PASSMORE 171
Notes on Archaeology 174
Notes on Natural History 183
Additions to the Museum and Library — June 1st to November 1st, 1893 186
iv CONTENTS OF VOL. XXVII.
No. LXXXI., JUNE, 1894.
Account of the Fortieth General Meeting, at Warminster 193
Excavation of the South Lodge Camp, Rushmore Park, an Entrenchment
of the Bronze Age : By Li-General PiTT-RivEBS, D.C.L., F.R.S.,F.S.A. 206
A Plea for the Further Investigation of the Architectural History of
Longleat: By C. H. TALBOT 223
Notes on a Sun- Dial from the Monastery of Ivy Church, near Salisbury :
By the late Rev. ROBERT DIXON, LL.D 236
Notes on Encaustic Tiles at Heytesbury House : By HAEOLD BRAKSPEAB,
A.R.I.B.A 241
Notes on Churches in the Neighbourhood of Warminster : By C. E.
PONTINO, F.S.A 245
Notes on the Opening of a Tumulus on Cold Kitchen Hill, 1893 : By the
Rev. E. H. GODDAED 279
Notes on Food-Vessels from Oldbury Hill : By W. CUNNIN GTON, F.G.S. 291
Notes on the Discovery of Romano-British Kilns and Pottery at Brooms-
grove, Milton, Pewsey : By B. H. CUNNINQTON, F.S.A. Scot 294
In Memoriam James Waylen, with Bibliographical Notes of his Writings 301
Notes, Archaeological and Historical . 308
Wiltshire Books, Pamphlets, and Articles 316
Additions to Museum and Library 324
Illustrations.
Elevation of Saxon Doorway, Somerford Keynes, 28. Ashton Keynes, Chancel
Arch (drawn before its enlargement), 30. Fonts at Oaksey, Somerford Keynes,
Ashton Keynes, and Siddington, 32. Part of Cross (?), Wantage, 47. Photo-
print of Sepulchral Slab, G., Cricklade ; Sepulchral Stone, H., Cricklade ; and
part of Cross C, Ramsbury, 52. Diagrams of knots, Figs. 1 and 2, 52. Ditto,
Figs. 3 and 4, 53. Ditto, Fig. 5, 54. Ditto, Fig. 6, 55. Ditto, Figs. 7 and
8, 56. Ditto, Figs. 9 and 10, 57. Ditto, Figs. 11 and 12, 58. Ditto, Figs.
13, 14, and 15, 59. Ditto, Figs. 16, 17, and 18, 60. Ditto, Fig. 19, 61.
Photo-print of Four Sides of Cross B, Ramsbury, 54. Two sides of Base of
Cross A, Ramsbury ; and Stone in Knock Church, 57. Sculptured Slab,
Bradford-on-Avon, 61. Panel on Pier of Arch, Britford, and Cross Base A,
Ramsbury, 64. Photo-print of Stones : Colerne I, Ramsbury, Base of Cross A,
and Colerne J, 64. Photo-print of Sepulchral Slabs, D, E, and F, Ramsbury,
65. Saxon North Doorway, Somerford Keynes, and Sculpture of Scandinavian
type, Somerford Keynes, 65. Sculpture on Pier of Arch, Britford, 65.
All Saints Church. The Leigh— North Elevation, 121. Ditto— South Elevation,
121. Ditto— West and East Elevations, 122. Ditto— Detail of Roof, Section
through Tower looking West, and Piscina, 123. Sketch-plan of Circle of Stones
at Day House Farm, 171. Plan of Three Stones near Day House Farm, 172.
Drawing Room of Stockton House, 204. Central Panel of Chimney Piece in
Bedroom at Stockton House, 204. Plan of South Lodge Camp, Rushmore
Park, 206. Average Section of Rampart and Ditch, South Lodge Camp,
Rushmore Park, 207. Bronze, Bone, and Earthenware Objects, found in th e
South Lodge Camp, Rushmore Park, 208. Grain-rubbers found in South
Lodge Camp, Rushmore Park, 218. Stone Tables at Lacock Abbey, 226.
Ancient Sun -Dial from the Priory of Ivy Church, 236. Encaustic Tiles from
Hoytesbury House— Plate I., 241. Ditto— Plate II., 243. Hill Deverill—
Old Building and Tomb, 271. Bronze Celt from Kingston Deverill, 284.
Articles found on Cold Kitchen Hill, 1893, 285. Ditto ditto, 286. Two
Food- vessels from Oldbury Hill and two Urns found at Broomsgrove Farm,
near Milton, Pewsey, 294. Font in Hilperton Church, 308.
THE
WILTSHIRE MAGAZINE.
"MUI/TOBUM MANIBUS GBANDE LEVATUR ONUS." — Ovid.
THE THIRTY-NINTH GENERAL MEETING
OF THE
iltefjtre arrfjattlostcal an* Natural Ststors Soctetg,
HELD AT CIRENCESTER,
August 23rd, 24^, and 25M, 1893.
W. CRIPPS, Esq., C.B., F.S.A.,
PEESIDENT OF THE MEETING.
jHE Annual Meeting of 1892 was held in conjunction with
the Summer Meeting of the Bristol and Gloucestershire
Archaeological Society at Cirencester, where the Society had never
met before, though a day was spent there during the Swindon
Meeting in 1873 (vol. xiv., p. 142), somewhat later in the year
than usual, owing to the original arrangements for July having
been upset by the occurrence of the General Election.
The General Meeting of the Society was appointed for 11.30 on
the 23rd, at the King's Head Hotel, but owing to the difficulty of
getting to Cirencester so early in the day, very few Members of the
Society were present, and the Report was taken as read by THE
SECRETARY, the officers being formally re-elected for the ensuing year.
THE REPORT.
" Your Committee reports that it has met four times since the
General Annual Meeting at Wilton last year.
" At these meetings thirty-four new Members have been elected,
*#* NOTE. — In compiling this report the Editor desires to acknowledge his
indebtedness to the columns of the Wilts and Gloucestershire Standard.
TOL. XXVII. — NO. LXXIX. B
2 The Thirty-Ninth General Meeting.
raising the total number of Members at the beginning of July last
from three hundred and seventy-eight to three hundred and ninety-
eight, in spite of losses by deaths and resignations.
" We have to record amongst the former the loss of Mr.
Nightingale and Mr. Swayne, both original Members, both regular
in attendance at our Annual Meetings, and both valued contributors
to local history. Obituary notices of each will be found in No. 77
of the Magazine. We have also to deplore the loss of Mr. R. S.
Holford, a life Member ; of Miss Chafyn Grove, who added lustre
to the old Wiltshire name she bore by many good and generous
deeds ; of Mrs. Fisher, widow of Canon Fisher, an original Member ;
of Mrs. Powell ; and others, making ten in all ; whilst we are glad
to find only two have felt called upon to resign their membership.
" We hope during the ensuing year to raise our numbers to some-
thing over four hundred, and to be able to maintain that number
at least in future years.
" We are glad to announce that we have enlisted the services of
Mr. Henry Wilkins, of Calne, Mr. C. W. Holgate, of the Palace,
Salisbury, and Mr. Joshua W. Brooke, of Marlborough, as Honorary
Local Secretaries. Mr. Wilkins takes the place of Mr. Plenderleath,
whose removal from the county causes the loss of an active and
useful Member. Mr. Holgate takes the place of Mr. Swayne, and
gives promise of much assistance to us in the south of the county,
where we need help. The extraordinary collection of antiquities,
more especially of flints and Roman coins, made by Mr. Brooke in
the neighbourhood of Marlborough within a very short period of
time makes it matter for congratulation that he has consented to
take an active share in the working of our Society.
" We call attention with great regret to its being the third and
last year of office of our President, General Pitt- Rivers ; unless his
health will permit, and he can be persuaded to confer upon us the
great favour of consenting to hold office for another year.
"Numbers 76 and 77 of the Magazine have been issued during
the past year, both containing much interesting information. For
the increased number of illustrations — adding much to the interest
of the articles — we have to thank the writers who in many cases
The Report. 3
bave borne tbe cost of them. The ' Wiltshire Glossary ' is a
distinct addition to our store of local information. It will be seen
from the lists of ' Additions to the Museum and Library ' at the
end of these two numbers that our grounds for an appeal for ad-
ditional space become every year more urgent. We are almost
compelled now to decline the offer of anything which is not directly
connected with the county. Amongst the additions to the Library
we call especial attention to Mr. Nightingale's very complete work
on ' The Church Plate of the County of Wilts ' ; to the large volume
of ' Original Drawings of the Church Plate of North Wills3 ; and
to the third vol. of General Pitt- Rivers' most elaborate work
describing his Excavations of Wiltshire Earthworks.
" The Librarian of the British Museum recently made a public
appeal for copies of election literature, pamphlets, addresses, portraits,
&c. We did the same, and have received some replies.
" As to finance, the account of receipts and disbursements for the
year 1891 is printed at the end of the last number of the Magazine.
It may be observed that during the year only two hundred and
sixty-two Members paid their subscriptions for the year as against
two hundred and eighty who did so in 1890. This goes far to
account for the fact that the total amount received for subscriptions
in 1891 is about £26 less than in 1890. We would again strongly
urge upon Members the desirability of punctual payment of their
subscriptions as they fall due on the 1st of January in each year.
The amount received for payment on admission to the Museum does
not appear to show an increase of attendance in proportion to the
increase in the value and interest of our collections. Two numbers
only of the Magazine having been printed and paid for within the
year the cost of this item is less than in 1890, when three numbers
were paid for. Considerable expense had to be incurred at the
Museum in connection with the public sewers, through which rats
had worked up under our floors. The balance carried forward to
this year's account is nearly £30 less than last year, chiefly owing
to the large amount of unpaid subscriptions.
" Canon Jackson's Wiltshire Collections were referred to in our
report last year, and some discussion arose at the Meeting with
B 2
4 The Thirty-Ninth General Meeting.
respect to them. It is very desirable that we should, as a Society,
keep in mind that these collections — the work of a lifetime and the
value of which it is difficult to estimate — are deposited with the
Society of Antiquaries at Burlington House. It is hoped that they
may soon be catalogued, and that we may be furnished with a copy.
" A much needed catalogue of our books, prints, documents, and
papers is being prepared by our Librarian, Mr. Bell ; and we are
indebted to another diligent Member, Mr. Willis, for undertaking
to catalogue the tokens, which have been considerably added to of
late.
" The amount subscribed towards the cost of enlargingthe Society's
Museum as a memorial to the late Canon Jackson is not sufficient
to enable the Committee to carry out Mr. Ponting's design. The
amount promised is £259 13$., of which £12] 16s. has been paid
into the bank.
" The Committee has under consideration a modified scheme
which it is hoped to carry out. Suggestions have been made of
economical or temporary structures, but the Committee, however
much the mere acquisition of space may be an object, does not intend
to lose sight of that dignity which should be a characteristic of a
memorial of Canon Jackson. Subscribers have been requested in
the Magazine to pay their promised subscriptions to the Secretaries,
and it is hoped they will do so.
" Before concluding this report the Committee considers that it
is not travelling beyond its province if attention is called to some
notable works of preservation of ancient buildings within the county
which have been recently accomplished. The completion of the
important work of restoration — or rather of repair on most con-
servative lines — at Edington Church ; and the work now going on
at Ramsbury Church, where the fine old roof of the nave has been
happily saved, are matters for congratulation. The finding of the
Saxon stones at Ramsbury, the careful restoration of the unique
octagonal sacristy at P^nford, the work done at the Churches of
Froxfield, Upton Lovel, and Tytherington, and at the Old Manor
House at South Wraxall are all matters of interest to the archaeolo-
gists of the county. It is, moreover, a pleasure to the Committee
The Opening Meeting. 5
to record that most of these works have been carried out under the
superintendence of Mr. Ponting, a native of the county, and a
Member of the Society, to whose assistance in making the Annual
Excursions of real interest, and in many other ways, they are greatly
indebted.
" In looking forward to the future we feel that a vast deal yet
remains to be done before the subjects dealt with by the Society
can be said to be exhausted.
" New lights are constantly being cast on old material, whilst
the shadows of doubt sometimes thrown on old sources of information
need constant investigation.
" One by one our founders and supporters are removed from our
midst, but it is hoped new hands and new minds may be found to
take up the work so carefully and fondly dealt with in the past.
" We feel certain that we may look forward to an increase of
prosperity for our Society, to an increase of its Members, of its
means, and of its value and importance in the eyes of all intelligent
and patriotic Wiltshiremen."
The Gloucestershire Society having in the meantime concluded
their business meeting, the Members of the Wiltshire Society
joined them in the Town Hall at 12 o'clock, where MR. WILFRED
CRIPPS, C.B.,as Chairman of the Local Committee, gave the Members
of both Societies a very hearty welcome to Cirencester.
SIR JOHN DORRINGTON, Bart., then expressed the very great
regret of the Gloucestershire Society that General Pitt- Rivers,
F.R.S., F.S.A., the President of the Wiltshire Society, was pre-
vented by the state of his health from presiding over both the
Societies at the Meeting, and proposed that in his absence Mr.
Wilfred Cripps, C.B., the well-known author of " Old English
Plate" should be invited to act as President of the Meeting, a
proposal which MR. MEDLICOTT, on behalf of our own Society,
cordially seconded.
MR. CRIPPS then took the chair, and after referring in a few
words to the great work accomplished by General Pitt- Rivers in
many ways for the advancement of archeology, proceeded to give
an interesting address on the early history of Cirencester, stating
6 The Thirty-Ninth General Meeting.
that its occupation by the Romans could be traced by means of coins
from the time of Claudius to that of Honorius, and that it seemed
to have continued an important station down to the end of the
Roman occupation, after which, but how soon after it was difficult
to say, it was overthrown and destroyed by the invading- Saxons.
At the conclusion of the Meeting COL. FORBES, on behalf of one
hundred and twenty-eight Members of the Bristol and Gloucestershire
Society, presented a silver bowl and a purse of £80 to the Rev. W.
Bazeley, as some acknowledgment of his services to the Society in
acting as General Secretary for the last thirteen years. MR. BAZELEY
having replied, the Meeting terminated, and the Members proceeded
to the Corinium Museum, where the Curator, MR. C. BOWLY, pointed
out the chief objects of interest — almost all of them Roman remains
found in Cirencester itself. One of the two fine mosaics in the floor
is specially interesting from the fact that ruby glass tesserse are
found in the figure of Flora, for such glass tessera are rare in mosaics
in England, and these upon being analysed proved to owe their
colour to copper, and not to gold, which until lately has been used
in modern times for the production of ruby glass. MR. BOWLY
also drew attention to the well-known acrostic inscribed on a tile :—
EOTAS
OPERA
TENET
AREPO
SATOR
which nobody has been able to satisfactorily translate, but which
seems to have been a kind of charm used in many countries and in
different ages.
After lunch the splendid Parish Church was visited, under the
able guidance of the Rev. E. A. FULLER (for Mr. Fuller's description
see vol. xiv., p. 136 of this Magazine], who gave a full account of
its history and architecture — as also of the very remarkable parvise
over the south porch, which is now known as the Town Hall, and
which forms such a conspicuous object from the street. This, he
said, had been considerably altered in 1828. The blue velvet cope
of 1470 and the very interesting silver-gilt communion plate were
Places Visited in Cirencester. 1
inspected with much interest. The latter comprises two of the very
earliest examples of the Post-Reformation flagons, of the " round
bellied " shape which preceded the later tankard — these particular
specimens being hall-marked 1576 ; two chalices with paten covers,
of 1570, which have a gadrooned flange on the stem close under
the bowl and in other respects seem to follow the earlier shape in
vogue during the reign of Edward VI. But the most interesting
piece of all is the beautiful silver-gilt cup, made in 1535, which in
all probability once belonged to Queen Anne Boleyn — as it bears
her badge on the cover. (The flagons, the chalices, and this secular
cup will be found well illustrated in Cripps' Old English Plate, pp.
170, 177, and 181, third ed.)
From the Church the party proceeded to the gardens of the Abbey,
the history of which Mr. Fuller had already given them. The house
itself is a perfectly plain building, with no mark of antiquity about
it — but there is a very remarkable Roman capital of large size and
richly carved acanthus foliage and human figures preserved on the
lawn.
St. John's Hospital was next visited, of which a double arcade of
three Early English arches still roofed over remains — and the so-
called " Saxon Arch/' really the gateway of the Abbey. (See Wilts
Mag., vol. xiv., p. 145.) The party then walked a considerable
distance along the line of the earthwork which now forms the sole
remains of the ancient wall of the Roman city. This earthwork
was originally faced on the outside with masonry — but all trace of
this above ground has disappeared. At one point, now occupied by
a mill, the double ditch outside the wall is still well seen. At this
point the weather, which had been somewhat threatening all the
afternoon, grew worse and rain began to fall, and the Members
hastened back to tea, which was hospitably provided for them by
ME. and MRS. CRIPPS (Countess Bismarck).
After tea, the Roman pavement at the Barton, still carefully
preserved in situ and roofed over, was inspected, and to those who
had not seen it before this was certainly one of the chief treats of
the Meeting, for probably there are few, if any, finer mosaic pave-
ments in England — Orpheus in the centre plays his lyre surrounded
8 The Thirty-Ninth General Meeting.
by an inner circle of birds and an outer circle of beasts, amongst
which a lion, a leopard, and a tiger still remain fairly perfect — their
attitudes, expressions, and colouring being rendered in a singularly
spirited way — evidently by an artist who knew the beasts themselves
in life (see Buckman and Newmarch's " Remains of Roman Art in
Cirencester")
MR. CRIPPS also exhibited at his own house a large collection of
Roman objects, coins, fibula?, armillae, bronze and bone pins, bodkins,
spatulae, glass, and pottery, including many fine Samian examples
of bowls, &c., which had recently been found during building
operations on his property — together with choice examples of English
silver plate, and many other objects of interest.
The next proceeding was the Dinner at the King's Head Hotel,
during which a thunderstorm raged outside. The speeches were
cut short — the only toast besides that of the Queen being introduced
by the Chairman very happily by the following story. In ancient
days there was a long-standing feud between the Worshipful Company
of Skinners and the Worshipful Company of Merchant Taylors, of
London, and the quarrel became so serious that the Lord Mayor
was called in to mediate. He decided that the dispute should be
settled by each company entertaining the other in alternate years.
The Chairman said he was dining with the Merchant Taylors on
one of these interesting occasions, and the toast of the evening was
proposed in this form : u Merchant Taylors and Skinners, Skinners
and Merchant Taylors, root and branch, long may they flourish
together." In the same form he would propose the toast : " The
Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Society, the Bristol
and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society ; the Bristol and Glou-
cestershire Archaeological Society, the Wiltshire Archaeological and
Natural History Society, root and branch, long may they flourish
together ! "
The Conversazione was held in the Town Hall, the first paper
being read by MRS. BAGNALL OAKELY, on three panels in Dagling-
worth Church with Saxon sculptured figures, apparently originally
portions of a reredos. Mrs. Bagnall Oakeley called attention to the
difference of treatment of the same subjects by the Saxon, the Irish,
Conversazione at the Town Hall. 9
and the Norman artists — exhibiting many drawings lately made in
Ireland, and mentioning amongst other points in Saxon work that
both in sculptures and in illuminations St. Peter was represented as
a young man and beardless, contrary to the usual custom in post-
Saxon art. She contended that in the sculptures in the south porch
of Malmesbury Abbey St. Peter was so represented and that this
pointed to those sculptures being of considerably earlier date than
is commonly assigned to them — a conclusion with which, however,
all her audience were not inclined to agree.
THE PRESIDENT next read a paper on Kecent Roman Finds in
Cirencester, chiefly in a part of the town now known as Ashcroffc —
lately built over, probably for the first time since the Roman
occupation. Here the line of a Roman road running north and
south had been laid bare, with portions of tessellated pavements and
here and there the foundations of buildings, but the whole ground
appeared to have been dug over before in order to get out the wrought
stones of the Roman buildings — a fact which accounted for the
pavements everywhere being found alone without the walls which
originally surrounded them, for the tessera, being of no use to the
searchers for building stone, were left undisturbed. The various
objects already exhibited in the afternoon were then described, and
the most curious find of all — an article in jet, apparently consisting
of a group of a nude torso and part of a clothed figure with a pointed
hood hanging on its shoulders, but without either heads or limbs —
was commented on and handed round. It had puzzled even Mr.
Franks and other authorities of the British Museum; and nobody
present would hazard a conjecture as to what it was.
MR. CHRISTOPHER BOWLY then gave an account of what he
described as probably the most important find, in the way of Roman
inscriptions, made in the South of England for some years — a four-
sided base, 17in. square, of a memorial column: which was lately
discovered in a garden in Victoria Road. The inscription is as
follows on three sides of the stone, the fourth side being blank.
The letters in black type now exist, those in italics are supposed to
have been erased or broken off, or are the filling up of contractions.
The principal face of the stone contains a dedication to Jupiter.
10 The Twenty -Ninth General Meeting.
The second and third faces are in hexameters :—
•I'O SEPTIMIVS NVMET
L ' SEPT RENOVAT ECTAM
VPPR PRIMAE RISCARE
REST PROVINCIAE CIONECO
CIVST RECTOR VMNAM
|o»» Optimo Maximo
L SEPT*m*w [cognomen}
V*r Perfectissimvi pRaeses [prov Brit}
|VST*»<>
•vNVM ET "ECTAM
rRISCA RE'tCIONE
CO'VMNAM
SEPTIMIVS RENOVAT PRIMAE
PROVINCIAE RECTOR
" Statue and column raised by old religion, Septimius, Governor of
the first Province, renews." Dr. Hubner says the lettering on the
stone is that of the end of the third century, and this will very well
agree with the other facts. It was in the reign of Diocletian (284
to 305) that Britain was divided into Britannia Prima, Secunda, &c.,
which divisions were, with a few modifications, retained till the end
of the fourth century. This stone is the only epigraphic testimony
to the fact known to exist; it also goes far to show that Cirencester
was in Britannia Prima. Mr. Haverfield says that the mere finding
of a definitely fourth century inscription, not being a milestone, is
a notable fact in Romano-British epigraphy.
The Evening Meeting concluded with the reading of a paper by
the Rev. E. A. FULLER, on "An Illegal Merchant Guild granted
to Cirencester by Henry IV." in which he said that Cirencester
never had a Mayor or Corporation, it was still subject to-day, as it
had been all through history, to the control of the officers of the
lord of the manor.
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 24m.
The Members of both Societies left Cirencester soon after 9 o'clock
and drove direct to Fairford Church. Here, in the unavoidable
absence abroad of the Vicar, the Rev. F. R. Carbonell, they were
received by the REV. W. H. WILMOT, who conducted them round
the Church, each window being carefully examined and its particular
points of interest explained, after a paper by the Vicar on the
Excursion on Wednesday, August 2M. 11
history and the general scheme of illustration in the windows had
been read — the conclusion to which he came after noticing the
traditions (1) of the glass having heen captured at sea by John
Tame, and (2) of its being the work of Albert Durer — being that
it was made for the Church, in England, with perhaps the aid of
Flemish and German artists.
This grand series of twenty- eight windows was undoubtedly the
chief attraction of the Meeting to very many of the Members, and
a considerable time was devoted to the inspection of them. They
are now to be seen to much greater advantage than formerly, inas-
much as they have recently undergone a most careful process of
re-leading and repair — many portions which had been misplaced
having been restored to their proper positions, and in cases where
portions are altogether lost the space has been filled in with plain glass
without any attempt at " restoration " beyond showing the probable
outline of the parts of the figures lost, in lead. The good effect of
this very judicious treatment is the more apparent in comparison
with the great west window, which some time ago was " restored "
on the principle then prevalent of endeavouring to replace the old
glass with new, the result being a singularly disastrous effect.1
On the architecture of the Church itself a paper was read by MR.
F. W. WALLER, under whose careful superintendence the late works
1 In reference to coloured glass a very interesting point was mentioned by a
Member of the Gloucestershire Society, ME. F. F TUCKETT, F.B.G.S., who has
paid much attention to the matter, viz., that one infallible way of distinguishing
ancient from modern glass is by the fact that wben tbe sun shines on old glass
it transmits no colour to the walls or other objects on which the sunbeams fall,
whereas when it shines on new glass the colours are transmitted. Mr. Tuckett,
in a short paper he has written on the subject for the Clifton Antiquarian Club
(December, 1887), asserts that he has tried the experiment at Fairford itself, at
Chartres, at Oxford, Lichfield, Bristol, &c., always with the same result, and
that although the fact is by no means generally known, he is fully confirmed in
his statement by others who have specially studied the finest specimens of old
glass at Chartres and elsewhere. He attributes this fact not so much to any
inherent difference between the make of the old glass and the modern — though
the more ancient glass was certainly less clear than the modern — but to the fact
that glass when exposed to the atmosphere undergoes a slow but certain de-
composition on its outer side, the effect of which is to render it impervious to the
sun's rays so far as the transmission of colour is concerned, even though the
colours of the glass itself may appear as brilliant as ever to the eye.
12 The Thirty-Ninth General Meeting.
of repair have been carried out — and, though the windows are the
chief point of attraction, yet there is much in the fabric that merits
attention also. The present building was dedicated in 1493, though
there are some small remains visible of an earlier building of the
thirteenth or fourteenth century. MR. WALLER called attention
especially to the richly-carved screens with their delicate cresting,
the handsome roofs, the good work of the stalls, and the very
picturesque tomb of the founder.
After luncheon, to which nearly one hundred members of the party
sat down, a start was made for Kempsford — ME. WALLER again
acting as cicerone to the very interesting Church, with its Norman
nave, and fine central tower and chancel. Here, in addition to many
other points of interest, an excellent opportunity was afforded of
comparing the very good modern glass with the fine examples of
sixteenth century work just seen at Fairford, and in the opinion of
many, Mr. Kempe's fine series of windows at Kempsford, of which
the Vicar, Canon St. John, is justly proud, did not appear to dis-
advantage in the comparison.
Cricklade was the next point made for — the Church of S. Sampson,
with its splendid central tower, singularly interesting as being of so
late a date, being first visited. Here THE VICAR (the Rev. H. F.
Morton) read a short paper from Notes and Queries, by Mr. R. Kinneir,
on what the writer regards as a set of four playing cards sculptured
amongst a host of other emblems — heraldic, sacred, and nondescript
—on the inside walls of the tower; but inasmuch as the "club" is
plainly a quatrefoil, and the " spade " bears no resemblance to the
figure on the card, it seemed to the majority of those present that
the erudite and occult meaning sought to be imported into these
emblems was somewhat far-fetched.
MR. PONTING followed with a description of the architecture, and
then the party divided between the Vicarage of S. Sampson and
the Rectory of S. Mary's, where MRS. MORTON and MRS. McKAYE
most kindly provided tea.
St. Mary's Church and its beautiful cross was then visited ; MR.
PONTING again pointing out its chief features — after which the
carriages started for Siddington.
Excursion on Thursday, August ZM. 13
MR. BOWLY'S grounds were first visited to see the newly-discovered
Roman inscription — on which he had read a paper the night before
— and also a Roman tombstone now preserved there. The very
interesting Church was afterwards seen, with its very curious and
rich transition Norman chancel arch, its tall tub font with network
ornament covering it, and the fine south doorway with its sculptured
tympanum and beak head and chevron-ornament round the arch.
The sculpture in the tympanum presents a difficulty in the kneeling
figure on the right side. The figure opposite is plainly S. Peter
receiving the key from the Saviour, and it was suggested that
probably the other kneeling figure may be that of the donor or
builder of the Church.
Here some ancient glass was exhibited which had once belonged
to the Church, but was now lying loose in the house of one of the
Churchwardens, and the REV. W. BAZELY called attention to it and
expressed, in the name of the Members of the Gloucestershire
Society, the earnest hope that measures would at once be taken to
have it re-inserted in the windows. This ended the programme for
the day, and the carriages brought the party back to Cirencester by
7.30, after an excursion which a fine bright day without dust, for
the rain the day before had laid it, and the country looking its best,
combined with the places visited to render very delightful to those
who took part in it.
THURSDAY, AUGUST 25ra.
For this day two excursions had been arranged, which were open
to Members of either Society — the larger number of the Gloucester-
Members going by train to Marlborough, and driving thence to
Silbury and Avebury, whilst the smaller party, consisting mostly
of our Wiltshire Members, numbering twenty-seven, started to visit
a series of Churches in the extreme north of Wiltshire which had
never been visited by the Society before and could not readily be
reached from any centre within the county itself.
Leaving Cirencester at 9. 15, the first stoppage was at the charming
little hamlet Church of Shorncote, where, as throughout the day,
MR. PONTING acted as the Society's architectural guide.
14 The Thirty-Ninth General Meeting.
Somerford Keynes, a much-scraped and " restored " Church, but
retaining a most interesting bit of Saxon work in its north door,
came next, and here, by the kindness of THE RECTOR (the Rev.
C. W, Faussett), the party was shown over the fine old manor-
house adjoining the churchyard, still retaining two rich Jacobean
mantelpieces of circa 1600 — the one downstairs showing the arms
of Strange impaling those of Hungerford.
The fine Church of Ashton Keynes was next on the programme,
with its remarkable Norman font, Norman chancel arch (enlarged
recently), reredos over the arch of the north aisle, and other points
of interest. Having seen this the party adjourned to the vicarage,
where the REV. M. J. MILLING had most kindly arranged his very
large and valuable collection of Battersea enamels for their inspection,
as well as much good china, and many other things of interest.
Lunch at the inn followed, and then a move was made for Minety
Church, chiefly interesting for its good wood-work, late fifteenth
century screens, and Jacobean pulpit and reading-desk. Here the
REV. J. MELLAND HALL read some notes on the architecture written
by Sir Stephen Glynne, Bart., in 1858, and THE VICAR (the Rev.
W. Butt) contended that neither the chancel screen nor the pulpit
belonged originally to this Church, as he said the initials on the
panels of the later did not correspond with those of any Minety
churchwardens.
To those Members whose tastes extended to flowers and gardening
a great treat was afforded by the rich herbaceous garden belonging
to the Vicar, adjoining the churchyard. There was, however, no
time to see half the excellent things it contained, for half-an-hour
might have been well spent where only five minutes were available.
Oaksey Church, with its curious clerestory windows, without a
north aisle, and Kemble Church, with its good thirteenth century
features (replaced carefully when the Church was re-built some
years ago) , were the last items on the programme, and after tea —
most kindly offered to the party at the Manor House by LADY
CHARLOTTE BIDDULPH— the Excursions of 1892 came to an end,
and the Members either returned to Cirencester or waited at Kemble
Station for the trains to convey them home.
15
on % Cjjttwjts ftistttb in 1892.
By C. E. PONTING, F.S.A.
S. SAMPSON'S. CRICKLADE.
H IS Church is in many respects a very remarkable one — it
is striking in its proportions and it has features and types
oTwork which are not commonly found.
There was probably a Church here at a very early period if we
mav — as I think we are fully justified in doing — take the two stones
now over the inner doorway of the north porch, dating perhaps from
the tenth century, as evidence of it.1
There is, however, no part of this early Church in situ. The
present building is cruciform, and consists of a nave with north
and south aisles of three wide bays, north porch, central tower with
north and south transepts, and chancel with a chapel on the south.
The eastern part of the nave arcades (two bays on the north and
one on the south) is the earliest work, and may be put down at
circa 1180; in this the Transitional marks are very pronounced.
The arches are pointed and have the unusual number of three orders
of chamfers, the two outer chamfers are carried down the responds,
the inner one springs from half-round engaged shafts with foliated
capitals and square abaci (the latter carried round the responds),
whilst the base mouldings show a decidedly late tendency. The
west bay of the north arcade has the Early English feeling further
developed, there is the same early type of label as before, but the
carved terminals are not earlier than 1220, and the mouldings of the
capitals support this conclusion. In the two western bays of
the south arcade the style is fully developed, the clustered shafts
and the mouldings of the labels and capitals indicate their date as
1 On the visit of the Society to the Church I gave a description of these
stones, but as they are to be dealt with more fully in the current number of the
Magazine by Mr. Romilly Allen, I need say nothing on the point. — C.E.P.
16 Notes on the Churches visited in 1892.
being about the middle of the thirteenth century. There are two
striking peculiarities in these arcades — the great width of the bays
and the height of the bases. That these peculiarities have been
observed in the later parts seems to indicate that the latter were re-
built on older foundations and were not extensions of the old building.
The south aisle, with the exception of the west end, was re-built
when the Church was restored in 1864, but the door and the three-
light window in the south wall are old features reinstated. The
three single-light windows are, probably, also old (although the
scraping and renovation they have undergone renders identification
impossible), if so they would point to this aisle having been built
at the time of the completion of the south arcade, and to the three-
light windows in the south and west walls having been inserted
some thirty or forty years later, when the west end of the nave was
erected. Taking the south aisle as the earliest part to be erected
at, say 1240, it is pretty clear that the whole of the outside walls,
nave, aisles, transepts and chancel were built at various stages
between this and the end of the thirteenth century.
There is no evidence of what existed between the Transitional-
Norman nave and the later chancel, both of which, as well as the
transepts, existed before the erection of the present tower — there is
little doubt, however, that there was an early central tower.
The three-light window on the south of the south aisle and the
somewhat similar one in situ in the west end, as well as the one in
the west end of the nave, exhibit remarkable types of form and
detail : the former one is very richly moulded and the mullions are
carried up to the arch as in Perpendicular work, but the mouldings,
the circular piercings, and the inside shafts indicate the date as
being about 1270 or 1280. The nine roof corbels of this aisle are
coeval, but have probably been collected from different parts and
re-used here. It will be seen on the outside that the old roof was a
lean-to, rising to the nave cornice, and not a span as at present ;
the roof of the nave was also of a higher pitch than now. A
somewhat remarkable string-course of quite a late section is
carried across under the west window of the nave and south aisle
on the outside, and it has been continued along the south in the
By C. E. Ponting, F.S.A. 17
modern re-building1. Near the east end of this aisle, inside, is a
coeval piscina, also a squint of large size, cut through the deep
eastern respond of the arcade — the direction of this squint is west-
ward, and it can only have been for use between nave and aisle. (A
modern similar squint has been cut through the respond on the north
side ) The arch between the south aisle and transept is a modern
one, but old bases have been re-used.
The north aisle has features distinct from the rest, the doorway is
richer and the two single lancets westward of it with the inner
splays carried round the arch, the moulded inner arch and angle
shafts, are of a different type, the moulded string below the sills was
formerly carried across the west end on the inside, and on the outside
the sill string and the label are similarly returned, although the
latter has been cut away for the insertion of the later west window.
The eastern part of the north aisle appears to have been re-modelled
late in the fourteenth century, when it was probably dedicated as a
special chantry — it is called the Widhill aisle and belongs to Lord
Radnor as lord of the manor of that name, and it was formerly screened
off from the rest. Two windows were then inserted in the side wall
(the earlier outside string-course having been lowered for the purpose),
the piece of wall between was re-built and the altar-tomb erected.
A west window of five lights was inserted at the same time and the
gable over re-built. The tomb is recessed into the wall and has
flanking pinnacles and crocketted canopy, the arch of which is
cusped and enriched with the ball-flower ornament; the front has
quatrefoiled panels. The effigy, until quite recently, lay in the
churchyard. Tradition states it to have been taken from this tomb,
and it certainly appears to correspond to it in dimensions and — so far
as can be judged from its mutilated appearance — in style. The
chancel was also re-modelled at about this time (circa 1350 — 70),
the lower part of the east wall with the string under the window
and the priests' door on the north remain of the thirteenth century
work, but the rest was re-built with the exception of the two angle
buttresses, which have obviously been added to the earlier wall and
may be a century later — probably coeval with the chapel. The three-
light windows on the north and south of the sanctuary are similar
VOL, XXVII. — NO. LXXIX. C
18 Notes on the Churches visited in 1892.
in design to those in the Widhill Aisle, and although the mouldings
are different there are the same bosses and general type of tracery
(The east window of the chancel is an insertion of 1864, and the
roof is also modern). The north transept retains its thirteenth
century wall and single lancet on the east side; the south transept
has portions of a thirteenth century buttress left, but the rest has
been re-built within recent times. Both transepts were re-modelled
in the fifteenth century, when the parapets with crocketted pinnacles
were added; the buttress at the north-east angle of the north
transept is evidently an addition to the earlier wall, the adjoining
parts of which have been re-built ; this was probably done and the
north window inserted at the same time. A wall with late doorway
in it now divides the north aisle from the transept — the latter has a
Decorated piscina in the east wall.
The south chapel was erected during the last quarter of the fifteenth
century, probably by Sir Edmund Hungerford, who died 1484, and
was the first of the family to reside at Down Ampney ; like all the
work done at about this time by that family of great Church-builders
it is rich and good. The chapel has four-centred moulded arches
on the north and west walls communicating with the chancel and
transept, and four-light windows in the south and east. The east
window has an elaborately enriched niche on each side, the corbel of
which is supported by hollow-sided semi-octagonal shafts starting
from the floor. The latter has been much raised, and the bases are
hidden, the whole of this rich work has unfortunately shared in the
scraping process which has destroyed the interest in so much of the
work here. On the south niche is the initial letter " H," and on
the north are the letters " M — R )} blended, probably the monogram
of the Blessed Virgin Mary. It is interesting to note that the inner
mouldings of the jambs are cut away up to about the height of
the figures, and apparently for the purpose of admitting them. The
coeval piscina exists under the south window, although its bowl is
gone ; the low level of this feature also indicates the raising of the
floor; there is a recess for the altar under the east window. A good
Elizabethan table now stands here, it might have been substituted
when the stone altar was removed.
By C. E. Pouting, F.S.A. 19
A curious feature exists at the south east angle of this chapel— a
detached buttress with a flying arch carried across to the angle of
the building, and bearing the date 1569. This seems to indicate a
laudable desire on the part of Sir John Hungerford to support the
chapel erected by his ancestors : if so, however good his intention,
it has not had the effect he desired, for the buttress was recently
falling away from the wall and the arch had to be wedged up to
prevent its falling.
The nave appears to have been re-roofed in the fifteenth century,
for, although the roof has given way to a modern one, the corbels
remain. The nave has no clerestory. The font is an octagonal one
of the fifteenth century with panelled sides to both bowl and shaft.
The porch might have been erected when the tower was built —
the abacus and label of the arch indicate a similar mixture of styles,
and the niche (or stoup) in the west wall exhibits the same coarseness
of detail. There is a quatrefbil light in the east wall with a niche
over which looks like late fifteenth century work.
The tower is a marvellous specimen of post-Reformation Gothic
work : the Vicar has kindly undertaken to describe it and to point
out how the heraldry fixes its date at between October, 1551, and
August, 1553. I need, therefore, only say a few words on its
architectural features. The proportions of the tower are magnificent,
and the precedents set by those of Mere and S. Peter's, Marlborough,
have been followed in the bold octagonal buttresses surmounted by
pinnacles ; the pinnacles and the wall space between them are
panelled and the latter ornamented by a deep pierced parapet ; the
belfry windows are singularly small and are evidently intended to
appear more as part of the system of panelling than as distinct
features. Inside there are arches on the four sides with a lantern
stage above, having a three-light window in each of the north,
south, and west faces, and a two-light with niche between in the
east face, open to the interior ; the ceiling over this is groined, and
there are various devices on the bosses which will be dealt with by
Mr. Morton. Catholic symbols are largely displayed in the details j
the west side towards the nave has been treated as a reredos of three
niches on each side of the central arch — these niches are shallow
c 2
20 Notes on the Chiwches visited in 1892.
and never had figures in them, but the central one has a projecting1
canopy and a cresting is carried along over the whole. There was
evidently a rood screen with the loft eastward of the eastern arch ;
access to the loft was gained by a door from the turret staircase,
and the corbel which supported it still remains in the south wall of
the chancel : there are also marks of the beams in the jambs of the
arch, and the mouldings stop at the point where the cove, or floor
of the loft, would begin. There is an arched opening for the sanctus
bell on the north side near the top, in such a position that the
attendant on the floor of the Church might see the priest either at
the high altar or that in the Hungerford Chapel. The general
effect of all this work is fine and dignified, but the details are coarse
and exhibit a free use of those employed in the thirteenth, fourteenth
and fifteenth centuries. The builders of this tower evidently had
before them the tower of Fairford, which had probably only been
erected a short time previous. There is a striking resemblance in
the inside arrangement of the lantern, the cusped panels across the
angles between the piers, the shallow sham niches and the coarseness
of the details — these parallels can hardly have been accidental.
The frescoes on the stonework at Fairford bespeak a somewhat earlier
date than this. As showing the way in which local types were
followed I may mention Kempsford as a third instance of the
internal angles of the tower being cut off to form an irregular
octagon on plan.
There are the remains of two crosses in the churchyard — both of
fifteenth century date. The richer and more complete one was
formerly a market or village cross, and was removed to its present
position ; it has an octagonal shaft and base, with quatrefoil panels
on the sides of the latter. The head is an oblong on plan — each of
the sides has a double canopied niche, and each end a single one — all
the figures are missing. There are buttresses at the angles supported
by angels holding shields, the pinnacles are broken away. There
are only the plain base and part of the stem of the original church-
yard cross left, near the north entrance to the Church.
By C. E. Pouting, F.S.A.
Note on tfje PJeratorg of tfje Cotoer of S. Sampon%
Olrickla&c.
I am indebted to the kindness of the Rev. H. J. Morton, Vicar of S. Sampson's,
for the use of the following notes by Dr. R. Kinneir on the evidence as to the
date of the tower from the heraldry carved upon it. [EDITOB.]
In the lantern of the tower over the south arch is the well-known cognizance or
badge of the Earls of Warwick, the " Bear and Ragged Staff " ; and near this is
the badge of the Dukes of Northumberland, viz., " the Orescent." Over the
eastern arch is the banner of Warwick, " the Silver Saltire and Red Rose ; " and
alongside it the "Checquey" banner of Northumberland — each banner staff
resting on and supported by a heart.
Britton, in his Topographical Sketches of North Wilts, says that the tower
was re-built by subscription, and that many persons of distinction possessing
property in Cricklade and the neighbourhood contributed largely to it, and he
mentions the Earls of Warwick, whose device he says is sculptured on the tower.
Britton was unable to say which of the Earls of Warwick was the benefactor.
The presence of the silver crescent, however, proves that it was John Dudley,
who was created Earl of Warwick in February, 1547, Duke of Northumberland
in October, 1551, and beheaded August 22nd, 1553 : for no other Earl of
Warwick was ever entitled to bear the badge and banner of Northumberland.
The building of the tower is, therefore, probably fixed between October, 1551,
and August, 1553. John Dudley, son of Edmund Dudley, a lawyer convicted
of high treason and beheaded in 1510, was created Lord Lisle by Henry VIII.
and named one of the executors of his will. Gaining great influence over Edward
VI. he was by him created Earl of Warwick and Duke of Northumberland. He
married Jane, daughter of Sir Edward Guildford, Lord Warden of the Cinque
Ports. The badge of the Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports, " a Rose in the
Sunbeams," is sculptured near the '' Bear and Ragged Staff " over the southern
arch.
John Dudley, one of his seven sons, married Anne, daughter of the Protector,
Edward, Duke of Somerset, and in 1549 had a grant from the Crown of the
manors of Little Chelworth and Calcutt in the parish of Cricklade.
Sir Walter Hungerford, of Farley Castle— son of Sir Thomas, who purchased
the manor of Down Ampney in 1374 and died in 1398 — married Catherine,
daughter of Sir Thomas Peverell, who owned property in Cricklade. He was
created Baron Hungerford, of Heytesbury, in 1426, was made K.G., Steward of
the Household, High Treasurer, and Lord High Admiral, and in 1427 obtained
from the Crown a grant of the manor of Cricklade, including the advowson of
S. Sampson's Church. He died in 1449, leaving by his will the advowson of
S. Sampson's, the Parsonage Farm, the rectorial tithes, as well as the manor of
Abington Court (a manor within the manor and borough of Cricklade), to the
Dean and Chapter of Salisbury, who are the present patrons. He also bequeathed
lands and premises in Cricklade for the perpetual maintenance of an obit (or
anniversary service) to be held in the Lady Chapel of S. Sampson's Church.
[After the Reformation, by an order from the Lord Chancellor in 1566, these
22 Notes on the Churches visited in 1892.
lands, &c., were conveyed to certain feoffees in trust to expend the annual rents
in repairing and maintaining the highways in and about the town of Cricklade.
This trust still continues in operation.] He bequeathed the manor of Down.
Ampney to his second son. Sir Edmund Hungerford, who died in 1484, leaving
a son, Sir Thomas, who died in 1494. His son, Sir Anthony, was living at
Down Ampney and was lord of the manor of Cricklade in the reigns of Henry
VIII., Edward VI., and Mary, and doubtless contributed largely to the building
of the tower, as his arms and badges testify. He died in 1558. His son, Sir
John Hungerford, built the existing flying buttresses of tbe Lady Chapel in
1569, as well as a market house in the High Street which was pulled down in
1812.
The original badge of the Hungerfords was the sickle— this, allied with the
pepper garb of Peverell, formed the Hungerford crest : — out of a ducal coronet,
or, a pepper garb of the first between two sickles proper. This can be seen
over the north arch of the tower — as well as the admiral's flag ship of Walter,
Lord Hungerford, on which is displayed his banner and arms.
On the outside of the tower is the " Catherine Wheel," another Htingerford
"badge (cf. Hutching'* Dorset, vol. iii., p. 422, new edition).
S. MARY'S. CRICKLADE.
By comparison with S. Sampson's this Church is a somewhat
unpretending structure, but it can claim seniority as regards work
in situ, although not as regards the collateral evidence afforded by
portable relics, and it well repays careful study.
The plan consists of nave with north and south aisles, south porch
and western tower, and chancel with north chapel.
The oldest work is the chancel arch, which is a richly-wrought
specimen of the purest Norman period — circa 1120 to 1150. The
arch is a semi-circular one of two orders, enriched on the west face
only — the inner order has a plain flat soffit, and on the face are the
roll moulding and a kind of stud ornament ; on the outer order is
cut the usual chevron, the pattern diminishing in size from the
springing upwards. Each order is supported by engaged shafts
worked on the jambs, the bases being moulded and having the so-
called stud ornament, with square plinth below.
The work next in date is that of the two lower stages of the tower,
which are evidently late thirteenth century — the arch by which the
lower stage communicates with the nave has chamfers dying on to
the square jambs, the latter has a chamfer below with pretty traceried
stop, the west window is a single lancet with trefoil head, and there
By C. K Pouting, F.S.A. 23
are two plain lancets in the middle stage; the buttresses were
apparently added and the top stage erected circa 1400. The latter
has single light windows in the north and south faces, the original
roof does not exist.
The walls of the north aisle appear to be thirteenth century work,
and there are two lancet windows in the south aisle, but as this
part of the Church was apparently re-built when the debased
Perpendicular windows were put in both aisles, it is impossible to
say that they are in their old positions. Much of this work has
since been renewed. There is also a lancet window in the east
gable of the chapel, but this is also set in a later wall, and has a
wooden inside arch.
No Decorated work is traceable in this Church.
The nave arcades of three bays each and the roofs of nave and
aisles appear to have been constructed at about the middle of the
fifteenth century. The arcades have somewhat depressed arches
which look later, but the period I name is seen in the moulding of
the caps and bases ; the columns are octagonal and stand on high
plinths; the east responds are deep, and pierced with openings
7ft. Gin. high and 3ft. 3in. wide to clear the coeval squints which
exist on either side of the chancel arch, and are splayed in the
direction of the high altar. The roof of the nave is a plain one of
trussed rafters with tie-beams in three bays; those of the aisles are
divided into four bays — the principals and panelled cornice only
remain. The west windows of the aisles appear to be coeval with
this work, and earlier than those in the side walls.
The chapel is of unusually small dimensions, and was probably
re-erected about 1450 ; the arch between it and the aisle shows that
a chapel stood here prior to that date : it is apparently a semicircular
arch with flat soffit and small chamfers on the edges ; it extends
beyond the north wall of the aisle— the present chapel is 2ft. wider
than the aisle. A flat buttress outside, opposite this arch, looks
earlier than the rest of the wall and the diagonal north-east buttress.
There is a three-light square-head window in the side wall, and the
lancet before referred to is built into the east gable. The roof is a
good specimen with moulded principals, purlins and ridge-piece;
24 Notes on the Churches visited in 1892.
the rafters also have a cavetto mould on the edge. The arch opening
into the chancel is coeval with the re-building-.
The south wall of the chancel has been re-built, and new windows
inserted here and in the east wall ; the remainder is late Perpen-
dicular work, including the two-light window on the north and the
priests'* door on the south. The walls and roof of the porch are old
work of this date, but the framing is modern. The bowl of the
font is a thirteenth century one, apparently reduced in height, and
set on a new base. The pulpit is a good specimen of Jacobean work
—its door has been taken off and put away in the tower.
The churchyard cross is an unusually complete one, and is similar
in design and date to the village cross now standing in S. Sampson's
churchyard, but more complete. It stands on three steps, the base
is square but worked to an octagon at the top ; the shaft is octagonal
and the head is oblong in plan and has buttresses (which have lost
their pinnacles) at the angles springing from cherubs holding
shields j the central finial is missing. The sculptured subjects
remain almost intact, although weather-beaten ; on the south, facing
the path, is the Assumption of the Virgin ; on the north a bishop
holding his crozier j on the west a crucifix with S. Mary and S.
John ; and on the east a queen and a knight. It is probable that
this head has been reversed, for the crucifix would almost certainly
have been originally placed on the east face, towards the road.
ALL SAINTS'. SHORNCOTE.
Although very small this Church is of exceeding interest. It
was apparently erected at about 1120—30 as nave and chancel only,
and the only additions to this simple plan are a chapel on the north
of the nave and a porch on the south, both built during the latter
half of the fourteenth century, when some re-modelling of the older
work took place. With the exception of the parts disturbed for
this the Norman walls remain. Thus the north, south, and east
walls of the nave and the north wall of the chancel are Norman
work. This is somewhat difficult to trace in the chancel, but by a
close inspection of the north wall it will be seen that there are traces
of the base of the pilaster buttress at the north-east angle (with
By C. E. Pouting, F.S.A.
25
this exception, by the way, there is no buttress about the building),
and that the later windows are evidently inserted in an older wall —
different mortar being used ; there is also a piece of an early window
sill between these ; moreover there exists on the inside of this wall
some thirteenth century colour decoration, which indicates a wall
older than the windows which now appear. The chancel archway
is the most remarkable of the Norman features. It is only 3ft. 7in.
wide between the jambs, whilst it is 7ft. lOin. high from the nave
floor to the springing of the arch, where there is a moulded impost.
A filleted roll serves as shafts on the west angles of the jambs, and
it is carried on as a plain roll round the arch, the soffit of which is
otherwise plain ; the arch is slightly pointed and the label has the
billet mould. The north and south doorways of the nave are of the
same date— the latter is a plain one, but the former has shafts with
carved capitals and moulded bases at the outer angles of the jambs
and^a filleted roll carried round the arch and outside label.
The west wall of the nave was evidently re-built when the two-
light window was inserted circa 1370 — the date to which I assign
the re-modelling and additions above referred to. A two-light
window was at the same time inserted in the south wall near the
pulpit, and this retains its old stanchion bars with arrow-head
terminals. The gabled bell-turret of the same date over the east wall
of the nave is a beautiful feature — -it consists of two arched bays
with quatrefoil openings in the gables over them ; the mullion on
each side between the arches is in the form of a buttress ; a similar
feature occurs on each side against the solid end. A modern iron
cross and cock have taken the place of the ancient terminal, which
was probably of stone, and only one of the two bells remains.
The north chapel opens from the nave by means of a plain slightly
pointed arch with the chamfers carried down the jambs. There is
a two-light pointed window in the north gabled wall with heavy
cusped inner arch ; the west window is a two-light square-headed
one. A nice piscina with semi-octagonal bowl and a shelf is formed
in the respond of the arch, and a rude niche (which looks very late)
built up of old stones occurs in the east wall.
The south porch of about the same date (circa 1370) has the capitals
26 Notes on the Churches visited in 1892.
of Norman shafts re-used at the springing of the outer archway ;
there are no shafts and the later jamb mouldings stop under these
capitals.
The chancel has two north and two south (the latter differing
slightly in detail) two-light square-headed Perpendicular windows,
and in the sill of the one on the south of the sanctuary a square
piscina is inserted, the bowl somewhat rudely carved with three
fishes, this carving was evidently returned on the sides before the
bowl occupied its present position ; the east window is a pointed one
of two lights with semi-circular inner arch, on the north of this
exists part of a heavy chamfered string-course, Gin. thick, which
was doubtless carried across under the previous Norman window and
formed a ledge some Hin. wide. With the exception of this north
part of the east wall both it and the south wall were re-built at the
date of the windows. A priests' door was at the same time built in
the south wall and between this and the sanctuary window is a
square aumbry which once had a shutter.
Between the two north windows is a broad low-arched recess, some
8ft. wide, 1ft. 9in. high to the springing, and lOjin. into the wall,
the arch is richly cusped and the sill is some 4ft from the present
floor. This must have been let into the Norman wall. It is difficult
to assign any use to it excepting as an Easter sepulchre, or aumbry.
The roofs, which were put on throughout when the Church was
altered and enlarged (circa 1370), are well preserved. Those to the
nave and chapel are of the trussed-rafter type with cavetto mould
on principal ribs, purlins and ridge-piece. That to the chancel is a
plastered barrel vault divided into panels by oak ribs having carved
bosses at the intersections. This was probably intended to receive
colour.
Between the jambs of the chancel arch are a pair of late Decorated
doors — doubtless part of the rood-screen which once came in front
of the arch : the staircase to the rood-loft has been removed, but
traces can be seen in the south wall of the nave, the doorway having
a wooden arch. Parts of coeval stall ends are made up in the prayer
desk now in the nave. The pulpit with sounding board is of the
time of Queen Anne. Over the chancel arch are the royal arms of
jSy C. E. Pouting, F.S A. 27
the reign of George I. or II. The font is a plain circular one with
moulded deep base — perhaps of thirteenth century date.
On the north and east walls of the chancel are the remains of
colour decoration before referred to. It is of the masonry pattern
usual in the thirteenth century and has a foliated band along the
top, a cross is painted in the centre of the north wall, evidently a
restoration of an older painted cross, traces of which are seen. The
glass of the east window bears the Berkeley arms. There are
thirteenth century gravestones or coffin slabs in the sill of the
chancel window, in the jamb of the west window of the nave, and
in the outside quoins of the chapel.
The Norman work has suffered much from subsidence of the
foundations and the spreading of the walls ; that this is of old
standing is shown by the south-west quoin having been re-built in
the fourteenth century to a vertical line against the leaning older
wall.
There are two rude sun-dials cut on the inner doorway of the
porch, which indicates that their date is anterior to that of the porch
itself; two others are on the south wall of the nave; a late niche
occurs over the south door.
In the wall of a cottage near the Church is a stone containing
one bay of an arcaded pattern — this is very small and might have
formed part of the side of a font of Norman work.
ALL SAINTS'. SOMEEFORD KEYNES.
Nave with south porch and two-bay north aisle, chancel with
north chapel, and western tower.
This Church contains the earliest work to be found in situ in any
Wiltshire Church we visit during this Meeting. There can be no
question that the western half of the north wall of the nave and the
doorway (now blocked up) are pre-Norman, and I am of opinion
that the plaster to be seen on the outside is the original Saxon
coating, for it appears to have been an almost invariable practice in
the pre-Norman period to coat the whole of the exterior of the walls
with plaster, and the composition of it in this case is similar to
that found elsewhere and proved to belong to that early time.
28 Notes on the Churches visited in 1892.
The doorway itself is a very typical piece of Saxon work — it
has the usual long-arid-short work in the jambs, an impost of two
rudely-worked chamfers ; the head formed out of a single stone
rudely shaped as an arch, with two raised cable-pattern bands over,
stopping on a plain roll. The form and proportions of the opening
are characteristic : the width is only 2ft. 5in. at the base, and it
tapers to 2ft. 4in. at tjie impost, while the width of the arched part
above the impost is only 1ft. 9in.
The building of the tower has obliterated the quoin at the north-
west, but the work up to the tower buttress is Saxon. The piece
of sculpture placed inside the doorway appears to be coeval — two
heads biting a ball.
At about the end of the twelfth century a north aisle of two bays
was thrown out from the eastern half of the nave, and the chancel
and chancel arch built, or the whole of the nave and chancel, except
the part before described, may have been re-built at this time. The
chancel arch has two orders of chamfers on both arch and jamb,
with square impost and no label; the arches of the arcade are
pointed and similarly chamfered. The shaft and base of the central
column are cylindrical, whilst the carved capital is octagonal ; the
arches are carried at the responds on corbel shafts with capitals of
similar date (one of which has been renewed) . The aisle itself has
been quite recently renewed.
Of the chancel of this period only portions of the north and east
walls remain, with one small lancet window in situ in the former.
This window has its sill high up from the floor, and the opening is
only 7in, wide ; it has no label, and the deep splay on the inside is
carried round the arch. The rest of the chancel, including the east
window, has been re-built, and much of it is new work. A new
organ chamber with its arch occupies part of the north side. The
inside arch of the east window of this is old. A two-light thirteenth
century window has been replaced in the south wall of the sanctuary,
and its inner sill carried down as sedilia; near it is a coeval piscina
with trefoil arch and circular bowl.
The south side of the nave, although re-built, is full of interest.
The doorway is apparently coeval with the aisle arcade and chancel
Elevation of Saxon Doorway, Somerford Keynes.
[From the Illustrated Archaeologist, June, 1893.]
By C. E. Pouting, F.S.A. 29
arch ; its arch is slightly pointed, and there is an unusual sunk
moulding carried round the arch and jambs. There is a label outside
with head terminals. The three two-light windows eastward of the
porch are insertions of varying dates, and afford quite a study in the
advance of tracery. The easternmost one, which I date at 1240,
has the earliest form of tracery, known as " plate " tracery. The
heads are tref oiled, and a circular opening is cut through between
them ; the middle one is probably fifty years later, and indicates a
distinct advance — the heads of the openings are still trefoiled, but
the cusping is detached, and the central piercing is a trefoil. The
one next the porch is a late Decorated (almost Transitional) window
of circa 1360; the lights have ogee-arched heads with cinquefoil
piercings over. The two windows near the west end in the north
and south walls are modern, as also are the roofs throughout.
The tower is a late Perpendicular one of three stages with diagonal
buttresses, parapet and pinnacles. The three-light west window is
a good type, with transom in the tracery ; the rest of the work is
very debased. The arch is new, but the old jambs remain, and they
look earlier than the tower.
The bowl of the font is a plain circular one of fifteenth century
type ; the base is coeval, but the shaft new.
Parts of a later fourteenth century oak screen are preserved in the
chancel arch.
An interesting relic remains in the sixteenth century hour-glass
stand, still rivetted to the jamb of the easternmost window on the
south of the nave.
HOLY CROSS. ASHTON KEYNES.
This Church consists of nave and aisles of four bays, north and
south porches, and western tower ; and chancel with north chapel.
The earliest work is that of the two easternmost bays of the north
arcade, these have octagonal columns with capitals, and arches of
two orders of chamfers without labels. The abacus moulding and
the carving of the capitals indicate a period of about the middle of
the twelfth century. The north aisle was not then built further
westward, as the respond in that direction still remains as the flat
30 Notes on the ChurcJies visited in 1892.
central pier of the four bays, and indicates a change of intention.
The aisle was continued some thirty or forty years later by adding
two bays, the arches being similar to the earlier ones, but the
columns, with their caps and bases, are circular. The south arcade
appears to have followed soon after this — the four bays are of one
date, circa 1200, the columns are circular and have moulded caps
and bases ; the arches pointed and of two orders of cavetto, which,
like those on the north, are without labels. The chancel arch was
erected together with the earlier part of the north arcade ; it has
been re-built to a wider span, but the old caps, bases, and sufficient
of the voussoirs and labels remain to indicate the design.1 It is not
improbable that, notwithstanding the change of intention in the
length of the north aisle, the parts named were a continuous work
rather than alterations of an existing structure. The north doorway
of the same date as the arcade shows that the outside walls were
also included in the scheme then carried to completion. The font
is coeval, it is a remarkable specimen of the circular vertical-sided
' ' tub " form, with chevron ornament and Transitional foliage, but
no trace remains of the chancel of the Transitional Norman Church,
although the early character of the arch opening into the north
chapel from the aisle seems to show that not only was there a coeval
chancel, but that it had a chapel on the north. The present chancel
was erected in the earlier half of the thirteenth century, and the walls
of that date have been for the most part retained, with the fine
piscina and lancet window in the south wall of the sanctuary ; this
window has undergone two alterations — one in the fifteenth century
when the head was re-modelled, and a second during a nineteenth
century restoration of the Church, when its inside sill was cut down
to form sedilia. A rude sun-dial is cut on one of the outside
jambs of the priests' door and arranged for early hours only.
The next work in order of date is the charming double chapel on
the north of the chancel — each division has its arch opening into
the chancel (the western arch having shafts with moulded caps and
1 The accompanying plate, from a pencil drawing made many years ago by
Mr. P. St. Aubyn, shows the arch as it appeared before it was enlarged.
ASHTON KEYNES, CHANCEL ARCH
DRAWN BEFORE ITS ENLARGEMENT
By C. E. Ponting, F.S.A. 31
bases, and the eastern one springing1 from a corbel on the east side,
whilst on the west side the jamb is flush with the inner order of the
arch), each also has its separate piscina with shelf — the piscina of
the west chapel being the richer. In the north wall is a window to
each bay — the eastern being a three-light pointed one — with label
on outside, each light has a trefoiled head, the outer ones are narrow
— only GJin. wide; the other window in the same wall is of three
lights, with square head, but it is probably coeval — there is no
indication of its having been inserted. The east wall is in a line
with that of the chancel, and there is no dividing buttress, but the
existence of some of the north-east quoins of the chancel show that
the walls of the latter are earlier. The chapel may be put at circa
1290. The east window and gable over are fifteenth century work
and the north door is modern. The roof of the chapel is Elizabethan
in feeling.
There is a somewhat unusual amount of fourteenth century work
in the Church. The north aisle was re-built soon after 1350,
although traces of the earlier work exist at the north-west angle ;
the middle one of the three north windows exhibits very remarkable
tracery with semi-circular head to each light. The west window is
a Perpendicular insertion of about 1425. At the east end is a group
of features of special interest : over the early arch opening into the
chapel is a beautiful reredos of three bays enclosed within a panel
with flat pointed head ; in the centre is a vesica with symbols of
the Evangelists carved in the four spandrils ; each of the side bays
is a canopied niche; the whole is very elaborate, with carved paterae
in the mouldings, and the vesica is richly cusped ; each of the three
bays has a corbel for a figure. This appears to have been the reredos
of a rood-loft altar, for the loft only appears to have existed here — •
the staircase starts immediately in front of the arch and the exit
door is in the aisle only — none being on the nave side. On the
outside of the north wall is a small square-headed window, now
blocked up, which was probably inserted to give light to this altar.
The south aisle was re-built about twenty to thirty years later and
the two side windows of two lights each and the doorway belong
to this period ; the east window is an insertion circa 1425, Both
32 Notes on the Churches visited in 1892.
aisles have their fourteenth century roofs, without principals ; the
roof of the nave is of about the same date, and of the trussed-rafter
type, but with moulded principal ribs, longitudinal purlins, and
ridge-piece, and plates with carved paterae : it has also tie-beams
with traceried braces and carved central bosses ; good stone corbels
with alternate male and female heads in various characters. The
north porch and tower are also late Decorated work, the former has
diagonal buttresses with a two-light window in each side ; the latter
is of three stages with good five-light west window in the lower
stage, a two-light window in each face of the belfry, and a single
light in the west and south faces of the middle stage. The
staircase only reaches the latter; there are diagonal buttresses. The
arch opening into the nave is a plain one of two orders of chamfers
and chamfered impost.
Few alterations were made here during the great period of activity
in building and re-modelling Churches — that of the fifteenth century.
The Ashton Keynes people had already {< restored " their Church
and resisted the prevailing tendency to make further alterations.
With the exception of the few points previously mentioned the
Perpendicular work here is confined to the south porch (which has
its old roof of barrel-vaulted form), a two-light square-headed
window and priests* door in the south wall of the chancel, and an
east window of three lights (the greater part of which has been
renewed), a diagonal buttress at the south-east angle added to the
Early English wall and a three-light window in the south aisle — in
the inner sill is what appears to be the bowl of a piscina, and the
outer sill bears traces of having been raised.
There are fragments of coeval glass in the Perpendicular window
of the south aisle — the principal emblem is that of the Trinity, a
seated figure of God the Father holding a crucifix, with left hand
raised in blessing : the usual dove representing the Holy Ghost is
not visible. Another piece probably commemorates the founder — a
figure holding the model of a Church, and with an indistinct in-
scription which is apparently JESU MARCI.
There are here, as in so many of the Churches in this locality,
'several twelfth and thirteenth century coffin slabs — and it is to be
OAKSEY
SOMERFORD KEYNES
ASHTON KEYNES
SIDDINGTON
By C. E. Pouting, F.8.A. 33
wished that they were placed under cover where they would be
belter preserved. In the churchyard is the good octagonal base of
a cross with quatrefoil panels in the sides and bold stops at the
angles, and the stump of the stem, which has been sawn off —
probably because it was too securely leaded in to be easily otherwise
displaced. There are remains of four other crosses about the village.
A fine old rectorial tithe barn stands near the Church. The
approach to the Church is through a winding avenue of fine elm trees.1
ALL SAINTS'. THE LEIGH.
This interesting Church was also visited, but as it is proposed to
fully illustrate it in the next number the description is postponed.
ALL SAINTS'. OAKSEY.
There are here no traces of work earlier than the second quarter
of the thirteenth century. The Church built at that time consisted
of nave and south aisle of three bays, chancel and western tower, all
on the present lines, and notwithstanding many later alterations the
original fabric remains to a great extent, and I will first describe its
various remaining features. The arcade between nave and aisle has
well-proportioned arches of two orders of chamfers without labels;
cylindrical shafts with moulded caps and bases — the responds have
corbel shafts with carved heads, and are unusually deep, so that,
although the arcade is of three bays only, the later roof and clerestory
were divided into five bays. The walls of the south aisle, south
porch, and chancel, and the two lower stages of the tower are also
parts of this Early English Church. Two of the lancet windows
remain in the aisle — one in the west end with a bonnet arch (the
splay of the jamb being carried round) and one in the south wall
west of the porch with a segmental inner or curtain arch. The
outer doorway of the south porch remains. The chancel retains two
of its original windows in the north wall (one more acutely pointed
than the other) with curtain inner arches — none of the lancet
windows have labels. There are no buttresses to the aisle but there
is a coeval one at the south-east angle of the chancel and a curious
1 The Society is indebted to the kindness of the Rev. M. J. Milling, Rector of
Ashton Keynes, for the gift of the plate of the chancel arch,
VOL. XXVII. NO. LXXIX. D
34 Notes on the Churches visited in 1892.
one under the east window. At the west end of the nave, com-
municating with the tower, is a two-centred archway of two orders
of chamfers carried down to the floor — the inner ring of the arch
has disappeared ; above this is a lancet window with bonnet inner
arch on the nave side, the object of which it is difficult to conjecture.
The tower has buttresses to the lower stage only, with deep
plinths and unusually long weatherings -, a string divides the two
lower stages, in the lower there is a semi-arched west door, and in
the middle stage a lancet in west and south sides. The font of this
date has been removed from the rectory garden by the present
Rector, who, I am glad to learn, proposes to restore it to its place,
from which it was doubtless removed to make way for the modern one.
Late in the thirteenth century a two-light window was inserted
near the east end of the aisle, with trefoiled heads and a quatrefoil
piercing over — the inner arch being of the two-centred segmental
form — there is no label on either face. With this exception there
is no work of the Decorated period in the Church.
The next stage in the history of the building was the re-building
of the lower stage of the north wall of the nave and the erection of
the porch, which took place near the end of the fourteenth century
— at the commencement of the Perpendicular period. At first sight
the square heads and the form of tracery make the windows appear
later, but it is evident that the porch and nave wall were erected at
the same time, as one of the buttresses of the latter starts from the
side wall of the porch and is coeval with it. The combination of
the earlier type adopted for the porch and the later for the aisle is
interesting. The lower nave wall has good bold buttresses at its
lower stage. The porch has an outer doorway with ogee arch, the
label of which is carried up to a point without the usual foliated
terminal; there are small square side lights, buttresses standing
square with the walls, and the original roof with richly-moulded
plates. Over the inner doorway is a niche containing a mutilated
figure.
At about the middle of the fifteenth century the Church under-
went a great scheme of re-modelling. The usual Perpendicular
clerestory of five bays with three-light pointed windows with outside
By 0. E. Panting, F.8.A. 35
labels was erected over the nave arcade, and this was repeated on
the north side by raising the wall which had been erected sixty or
seventy years before. The north side has, therefore, two stages of
windows — the lower square and the upper pointed — a set-off with
weathering in the wall showing the point of alteration. The corbels
of the roof put on at that time remain, but the roof has given way
to a flat ceiling which is a great disfigurement to the Church. The
upper stage of the tower was added at the same time with the
clerestory — it has a two-light square-head window in each side and
embattled parapet with good gargoyles at the angles. The nave
has a cornice and an embattled parapet carried up over the east
gable and returning along the sides to the tower. The gable cross
is missing.
A further work carried out at this time was the addition of the
chapel at the south of the chancel as a continuation of the aisle— •
the line at which the Early English work stops and the Perpendicular
begins can be traced, but there is no dividing arch. The date 1633
is cut on the wall at this point. There is a three-light square-head
window in the south wall with a wood lintel inside, also a four-light
east window having cusping only to the central compartment of the
tracery. The archway between the chancel and chapel is a good
four-centred one with semi-octagonal jambs having caps with carved
paterae. With the erection of this chapel a re-modelling of the aisle
took place, a similar window to that in the former was inserted
in about the centre of the south wall of the latter, and a uniform
cornice with parapet was carried round both. The chapel, like the
earlier work of the aisle, has no buttress. (The old roofs have
disappeared and flat ceilings taken their places.) At this time a
rood-screen was erected, which was reached by a staircase formed in
the east respond of the nave arcade and projecting into the aisle.
The staircase remains but the doorways are blocked up. A part of
this screen is retained to divide the aisle from the chapel; other
portions are made up in the choir stalls. This work is of a most
refined type, the carving of the vine and other foliated patterns
being beautifully designed, crisp and well cut,
t There are many fragments of old glass left. In the tracery of
D 2
86 Notes on the Churches visited in 1892.
the fourteenth century windows of the nave are coeval figures of
angels in situ. The easternmost window is filled with fragments
collected from diverse subjects — some of which can be traced,
amongst them being, in the centre light, a kneeling female figure
(the red robe seems to indicate this as representing the donor or
founder) with the legend " SCE NICHOLAS ORA PRO NOBIS." In one
side light is another part of the same subject — one of the children
in a tub. There are also various figures of bishops and the head of
a female with nimbus. In the right hand light is a kneeling male
figure wearing a red robe (probably the companion to the figure
named above) with the motto " . . . . NOBIS " and underneath
" OIBUS BNI FACTORIES." Other symbols such as the rose, chalice
and wafer, &c., are in the tracery. There is a bit of fifteenth
century glass in the quatrefoil of the early Decorated window in the
aisle; and in the window of the chapel is glass coeval with the
window, representing a pelican and young, S. Anne teaching the
Blessed Virgin Mary to read (or the Virgin teaching the Holy Child
to write), S. Catherine with the wheel, the head of a female saint, &c.
Aubrey (Jackson's Aubrey, p. 277) records the arms of Swynnow
and Baynton in the windows, and states " In a north window is
Only ' ORATE PRO AIA .... MILITIS BENEFACTORIS ' " ', (this
appears to have been since lost, and he does not mention the pieces
described above). He quotes an inscription on the great bell — viz. :
" JESUS NAZARENUS REX JUDEORUM MISERERE NOBIS " with a Crowned
head between each word. He also states that " in a close adjoining
the churchyard are yet to be seen the ruins of an old seat of the
Duke of Lankaster's and a Chapell : it is now called Court and
Chappell Close " : these ruins seem to have disappeared.
The chancel arch and east window, also the inner arch and
windows of the south porch, are modern.
Outside the north wall of the nave, east of the porch, is a curious
piece of sculpture of a very debased type.
ALL SAINTS'. KEMBLE.
Kemblc formerly belonged to the Abbey of Malmesbury by grant
made in 682 by Cedwalla, King of Wessex.
By C. K Pouting, F.S.A. 37
The Church appears to have been originally erected with
foundations insufficiently prepared for the clay soil on which it
stands. As the result of this the structure had become so dilapi-
dated that it was almost wholly re-built in 1877. The parts of the
original building then left undisturbed are a portion of the north
wall of the chancel, and the entire tower and spire. Many of the
old features appear to have been replaced in their former positions,
so that the history of the Church can be fairly well read, and its
interest is preserved. It is very gratifying to be able to record a
restoration involving so much necessary disturbance of old parts of
which this can be said, and in which the ancient faces and tool
marks have escaped the mason's " drag." It may assist us in
picturing the original plan of the Church if we first note that in
1877 the north aisle of two bays was added, and with it the arched
recess between the aisle and the north chapel was formed — the
recumbent effigy beneath the arch being removed from the south
chapel. The whole of the remainder of the Church (with the
exception of the spire) was probably erected between the years
A.D. 1200 and 1250, and it consisted of nave, chancel, western
tower, which was probably then surmounted by a roof covered with
tiles or oak shingles ; a small chapel on the north side of the eastern
part of the nave, a larger chapel opposite on the south side and
extending for half the length of the chancel, and a south porch at
the west end of this chapel.
It is not difficult to follow the order in which the Church was
erected, if we except the chancel no features of which remain : we
may presume that this was first built ; then came the nave; north
chapel, and tower, both of which bear distinct evidence of the
Transitional period and may be set down at about the year 1200.
At first sight the south door of the nave looks distinctly Norman,
but a closer examination shows that between the chevron members
of the outer order is a roll moulding of the Early English " filleted "
type, and that the caps, bases, and label distinctly bear the later
feeling. This doorway is thus an instructive feature and a valuable
instance of the late survival of the chevron. The tower also has
the flat pilaster-like buttresses of the earlier style combined with
38 Notes on the Churches visited in 1892.
the mouldings, in bases, arches, and windows, of the later.1 This
tower is of fine proportions and is of three stages — in the lower is
a doorway on the west having the outer order of the arch moulded
and carried on attached shafts ; also a beautiful and grand archway
in the east wall which formerly opened into the nave, but has been
blocked up apparently ever since the sixteenth century, probably to
arrest the settlement of the side walls ; this archway is richly
moulded and has a moulded label on the tower side with carved
terminals. The middle stage has a single-light window in the south
wall, and the upper stage has single lights on south and west sides
and double-light windows on the north and east — the arch of the
latter having been removed. On the inside of the west wall is a
singular-looking groove extending the whole height of the belfry
stage and dying out at the top ; it has the appearance of having
been occupied by a wooden support for the early roof erected on the
top of the middle stage and the upper stage being built around it.
It is remarkable that there is no structural staircase to the tower,
and that many stones with earlier working on them are built up in
the walls, including four twelfth century coffin slabs in the east
buttress on the south side, parts of two on the adjoining buttress
on the east face, two others forming the lintel of the south window
of the middle stage, and another built into the east jamb of the
upper window on the south side. The original cornice remains,
with outlets for water about 4ft. apart, but the parapet was probably
removed when the spire was added.
The north chapel was prepared for when the nave was built, if
not actually erected at the same time, for the archway giving access
to it is of the same early type as the south doorway — it is of two-
orders of chamfers, the inner carried on corbel shafts with caps
(without abacus) of a distinctly Transitional type.
The east window of this chapel is a charming feature, consisting
of a small triple lancet with richly-moulded inner arches supported
1 Canon Jackson states that the porch was built by William de Colerne, Abbot
of Malmesbury, about 1280. He puts the inner door at circa 1100, and in this
he was doubtless misled by the chevron member without considering the later
mouldings with which it is associated,
By C. E. Ponimg, F.S.A. 39
©n shafts and with a string carried across below the sill. This
group is contained within a large inner moulded arch of two orders
carried on shafts having bases some 3ft. from the floor — the space
between them being recessed for the altar. Tradition states that
this window was brought from Salisbury Cathedral, but this arises
probably from the similarity of type, and it is so evidently designed
for its place in this tiny chapel that it would not be adapted to any
other. The west arch and the north door and window in this chapel
are modern. The south chapel is called the "Ewen1 Aisle" —
probably after the hamlet of that name about a mile distant. This
and the porch were probably added after the rest of the Church was
finished, but not later than circa 1250. The chapel overlaps both
nave and chancel, and has two arches of similar design opening into
both — these are of two orders of chamfers, the inner being carried
on corbel shafts, and there are labels on both faces. In the south
wall is a beautiful recessed tomb, probably that of the founder ; it
contains a stone coffin, and the effigy of a cross-legged knight now
in the north chapel is reported to have been removed from here in
1877. The tomb has a segmental canopy richly moulded and cusped
with crocketted label ; shafts with carved caps — the one on the east
having two female heads and the opposite one the head of a man ;
the four cusps of the arch terminate in carved heads. The canopy
surmounting the head of the effigy in the north chapel has similar
cusps to these, which seem to identify the effigy with the tomb.
Aubrey records a tradition that the name of this knight was Allam
or Hallam — there was a cardinal of that name who was Cardinal
and Chancellor of Oxford and Bishop of Salisbury. Eastward of
this is a two-bay recess — the two arches springing at the same level
but the eastern bay is the narrower and the apex lower ; it has also
a string across the back which might be the remains of a shelf ; a
quatrefoil is cut in the spandrel between the two arches.
The porch is so large and rich that it might be said of it with
1 This, according to Canon Jackson, should be spelt " Ewelme," from the Anglo-
Saxon JEwelm, a fountain. The materials of this chapel are supposed to have
been taken from a chapel formerly existing at the hamlet of Ewen, and r$-erected
here.
40 JSotes on the Churches visited in 1892.
greater fitness than of the chapel window that it was " brought from
Salisbury Cathedral/' or Christchurch. The inside dimensions are
lift. Gin. wide and 14ft. long, and 15ft. high to the wall-plate.
The outer arch is a magnificent one of two orders of deeply-cut
mouldings, carried on three detached shafts to each jamb standing
on a deep bench-table base. The niche on the outside is coeval and
retains its corbel for the figure. In the east wall is a double
doorway, now blocked up, but which formerly opened into the
chapel — it has the appearance of having been intended more for
seeing through than for means of access, as the openings are only
2ft. wide and there is a deep splayed sill standing above the floor
level — each opening has a trefoil arch with roll moulding on the
angle, and they are divided by a mullion 7in. thick. These are
contained within a larger and richly-moulded arch, and both this
and the inner arches are supported on shafts. Another twelfth
century coffin slab is inserted over the doorway into the nave.
The font is the only bit of fourteenth century work in the Church,
it is a plain octagonal one.
In the fifteenth century (circa 1450) the two three-light four-
centred arched windows were inserted in the south wall of the chapel,
and the roof of trussed rafters with moulded ribs was put on. The
present four-light east window is of the same date, but it is said to
have been transferred here from the east end of the chancel in 1877.
In this window are six figures of coeval glass in new setting.
The spire was added to the tower at this time, arched squinches
being thrown across the angles to support the diagonal sides — these
have since been re-built in corbelled-out form, probably owing to
the settlements in the tower.
The rood-loft stair of unusual width was formed in the fifteenth
century, and starts from the north chapel. There are fragments of
fifteenth century screen work framed into the modern choir stalls.
The chancel arch and all windows here are modern.
There are five bells, the third of which is a mediaeval one with an
inscription which I was not able to take on my visit, and it does not
appear in Mr. Lukis' schedule.
The Church loses one of its chief features internally by the tower
Broughton Gifford — Copy of Deed. 41
being walled off — it is a pity that the foundations should not be
strengthened so as to admit of the removal of the filling and of the
fine arehway being opened out.
The yew tree on the west side of the tower is probably older than
the fabric — the trunk measures 18ft. 6in. round at a height of 6ft.
from the ground; it is hollow for some 9ft or 10ft. high, and in the
centre is the distinct stem of a smaller tree which has become merged
into the main trunk.
NOTE.— The Illustrations.— For the drawing' of the remarkable Norman font
at Siddington, in Gloucestershire, the Society is indebted to the kindness of the
Kev. W. Bagnall Oakley. The other illustrations are from drawings in the
Society's possession made years ago by Mr. St. Aubyn.
diftortr.
Cop of ieefr, belottging to tlje let £. IS- ftebble,
nlattnj to i\z aitfees of Honkton farm, in i\t farisf} of
Communicated by the Rev. E. W. WATSON ; translated by the Rev. ALAN
BRODRICK.1
2Anno ab incarnacione Mo CCo tri- In the year of our Incarnate Lord,
cesimo secundo. Cum inter dominam 1232, when, between the Lady Abbess
Abbatissam et Conuentum sancti Ed- and Convent of S. Edward, on the one
wardi ex una parte et Priorem et Con- part and the Prior and Convent of Far-
uentum Farlegh ex altera super iure leigh on the other part, a dispute arose,
1 Monkton Manor in Domesday was held by the Saxon Rainburgis — then by
Ilbertus de Chat, whose tomb found at Farleigh and transferred to Lacock records
that he gave (Little) Broughton to Farleigh Priory. Hence Little Broughton
came to be called " Monkton," the name which it now bears. At the Dissolution
it was given to the Earl of Hertford. In 1615 it was sold to Edward Long ; in
1669 it was sold again to Sir James Thynne, of Longleat. From him it passed
to John Hall, whose granddaughter and sole heiress married the first Duke of
Kingston. The second Duke sold it to his steward, Samuel Shering, whose
brother left it to John Keddle, Esq., of Fordington, Dorset, in whose family the
property still remains (see Wilts Magazine, vol. v., p. 326). The fine old
gabled house — now a farm — is of various dates, and still retains a vaulted
chamber known as the priest's chamber.
2 The Abbey of Shaftesbury, founded by King Alfred about 888 A.D., was at
first dedicated to the Virgin Mary— but after the burial there of S. Edward,
King and Martyr, it was called also by his name commonly in records, &o. The
Lady Abbess of Shaftesbury was patroness of the Rectory of Broughton Gifford.
Broughton Gifford — Copy of Deed.
about the right of patronage of the
Chapel of Little Broughton, at length
the parties compromised the matter into
the hands of Robert, Lord Bishop of
Sarum ; and Stephen the Reverend
Archdeacon of Wilts ; who indeed)
having held somewhat full deliberation
and advice about the said right, which
the several parties claim over the afore,
said Chapel, thus decided :— To wit —
that the said Chapel of Little Broughton
shall pertain to the patronage of the
aforesaid Abbess and Convent of S. Ed-
ward as though a part of Great Brough-
ton ; But that the aforesaid monks shall
for ever be reckoned free from payment
of the tithes, on the two hides of land
which they hold within the bounds of
the said parish, of which the tithe was
wont to be paid to the said. Chapel :
Provided, that the said monks have free
ingress to the said Chapel, if they wish
to celebrate the divine mysteries in the
same ; saving in all ways the rights of
the Rector of the said Chapel for the
time being ; yet, that this indenture
shall remain binding in future time
with the consent of Roger Harding, the
then Rector of the said Chapel, who has
placed his seal to present deed ; signed,
sealed, and delivered by the said parties
by an official deed signed in duplicate
by the aforesaid Lord Bishop of Sarum
and Stephen, Archdeacon of Wilts, with
their signatures on this side and that.
The seal of Bishop Robert Bingham, in white wax, is very fairly preserved.
The Archdeacon's seal is lost.
patronatus capelle de parua Brochtun'
controuersia mota esset tandem partes
in dominum Robertum Sarum Episco-
pum et dominum Stephanum l Archi-
diaconum Wilteshir compromiserunt.
Qui uero postmodum habito tractatu et
consilio pleniore super ipso iure quod
parfces in dicta capella se habere dicunt
taliter ordinaverunt. Videlicet quod
ipsa capella de parua Brochtun' ad don-
acionem predictarum Abbatisse et
Conuentus Sancti. Edwardi in per-
petuum spectabit tanquam membrum
maioris Brochtun'. Predicti autem
Monachi 2 a prestacione decimarum dua-
rum hydarum terre quas habent infra
limites Parochie illius capelle de quibus
scilicet decima consueuit prestari in per-
petuum censeantur immunes. Monachi
uero ipsi in ipsam capellam liberum
habebunt ingressum ut diuina si volunt
celebrent in eadem. Salua omnimoda
indempnitate Rectoris ipsius capelle qui
pro tempore fuerit. Ut autem hec
ordinacio stabilis et inconcussa futuris
temporibus preseueret de consensu
Rogeri Harding' 3 tune rectoris ipsius
capelle qui signum suum presenti scripto
apposuit confectum est inter partes
cyrographum bipartitum sigillis ipso-
rum necnon et dictorum domini R.
Sarum Episcopi et S. Archidiaconi
Wilteshir hinc inde signatum.
1 Tanner's " Notitia," under Monkton Farleigh, gives the following references :
Cart. II., Hen. III., p. I.M.,134 ; Claus. 12,Hen.III.,m.5.,''d.proii.hidisterrse
in Broughton Parva " ; Claus. 13 Hen. III., m. 13, " de maner de Broughton Parva."
2 Stephen, Archdeacon of Wilts. See Jones' Fasti, list of archdeacons, p. 170.
He was present in 1227 at the election of Robert Bingham as Bishop of Sarum,
was still Archdeacon in 1243, but died before 1245. He was also Rector of
Easton, and is said to have founded the priory there, see Jackson's Aubrey, p. 382.
3 For pedigree and connection of the Hardings with Broughton Gifford see
Rev. J. Wilkinson's History of JJroughton. Gifford, Wilts Mag., vol. vi., p. 11.
43
|Jote$ on
in mt*
By the Rev. E. H. GODDAED.
JHE study of the pre-Norman Christian art of England has
received a great impetus of late from the researches of
Canon G. F. Browne, F.S.A., and Mr. Romilly Allen, F.S.A. Scot.
— to the latter of whom we are indebted for the accompanying
valuable paper on the stones recently brought to light in Wiltshire.
A few words by way of preface to this paper seem desirable. The
only examples of pre-Norman sculpture in Wilts hitherto noticed in
the Magazine are the two angels over the chancel arch of the Saxon
Church at Bradford-on-Avon, illustrated in vol. v., p. 248 ; the
panels of interlaced work and twining foliage on the piers of one
of the early arches in Britford Church, described and illustrated in
vol. xvii., p. 248 ; and the curious stone in Codford St. Peter Church,
described and illustrated by Dr. Baron in vol. xx., p. 138.
Mr. Romilly Allen, in his very excellent little book, The Monu-
mental History of the Early British Church, published by the
S.P.C.K. in 1889, stated that, at the time he wrote, there were
about two hundred and thirty localities in England where stones
with Hiberno-Saxon decoration were known to exist, the number
of specimens being about four hundred. Of these very few indeed
are to be found in this part of England — the number of localities
noted by him being : in Dorsetshire and Berkshire (0), Hampshire (1),
Somerset (5), Devonshire (2), Gloucestershire (1), and Wilts (2).
On the other hand, in those counties which in the ninth century
constituted the southern halves of Northumbria and Strathclyde and
the northern half of Mercia, they are far more numerous ; Yorkshire
heading the list with sixty-six localities, Cumberland (20), Durham
(19), Derbyshire (16), Northumberland (15), Northampton and
Lincolnshire each (11), Staffordshire (9), and Cheshire (8).
44 Notes on pre-Norman Sculptured Stones in Wilts.
In Celtic Cornwall they are found in eighteen localities, in Wales
there are sixty-four stones, and in Southern Scotland they are
numerous, whilst the finest and most elaborate of all are found in
Ireland, where as many as two hundred and fifty sepulchral slabs
and forty-five high crosses are known.
During the extensive works of restoration and re-building at
Kamsbury in 1891, however, no less than six of these early sculptured
stones were found, either built into the foundations of the south
pier of the chancel arch and the east wall of the south aisle adjacent
to it, or lying buried close by, near the line of what seemed to be
the wall of an earlier Church, running outside the present south
wall of the chancel.
The largest of the stones (A) had to be sawn in two parts to be
removed and the bottom of it is broken into several pieces. The
upper part is, however, but little injured and is richly sculptured on
all four sides. Unfortunately, however, the stone is temporarily
placed in such a position that a photograph could only be taken of
the one side here given, and its size and weight were too great to
allow it to be moved without danger of chipping the broken pieces
of the base. Two of its sides are covered with interlacing knot-
work of the same pattern, of which I am only able to give here
tracings made from rubbings, and as the position of the stone made
it impossible to get a rubbing of the bottom on one side it appears
blank in the illustration. The fourth side of this stone is covered
with fine interlacing dragonesque work, of which a plate is given
from a drawing by Mr. Bomilly Allen.
Stone (B) measures 35jin. in height by 15in. wide at the base on
two sides and 14in. on the others, and an inch less at the top, which
has four dowel holes, each 4 Jin. deep. All four sides are covered
with sculpture and are all perfect except the lower half of one side
which has been much defaced. As will be seen, two sides are covered
with interlacing work, and the other two with three circular me-
dallions of beasts biting their own tails. This stone doubtless formed
part of the shaft o£ a cross, perhaps of the same as that of which
(A) formed the base.
The other cross stone is that marked (C), much smaller than the
By the Rev. E. H. Goddard. 45
other two, and only now showing- sculpture on one side and that a
good deal injured and defaced. The other sides have been cut away,
and the hack has been hollowed slightly as though it has at some
time formed the voussoir of an arch. The sculpture on it is of a
dragonesque intertwining animal, very similar to that on the front
of (A).
The next two Ramsbury monuments are recumbent body stones
— neither of them, unfortunately, perfect. (D) and (E) are of the
coped type, which has not hitherto been noted in Wessex, and are
therefore, together with the somewhat similar coped stone at
Cricklade, of special interest. The Ramsbury specimens differ
slightly from the coped stones found in other parts of England ; the
cross section being semi-circular with a sort of plinth at the bottom
instead of being like the gable end of a house, or boat-shaped, as is
more usually the case. The larger of these (D) measures 38in. in
length by ISjin. at one end and 17in. at the other in breadth, and
it is 7iin. thick. The shorter one (E) is 29in. long by 18in. broad,
and 7in. thick.
Stone (P) about 30in. long, has a Latin cross in high relief on
its face — the intersection of the arms being occupied by a couchant
beast which looks at first sight like a lion, but which probably is
intended for the Agnus Dei, close inspection revealing traces of
what seems to be a halo round its head. A panel with an incised
cross (?) or perhaps a key pattern (?) occurs on the stem of the
cross, and lower down what may be a beast of some kind. The
sculpture at the sides of the shaft is too much defaced to make out
— a bit of foliage is visible and possibly signs of an interlacing
dragon. In the spaces above the arms are winged beasts — at least
there is one on the left, the right-hand space is doubtful.
In addition to these newly-discovered Ramsbury stones I am able
to give here illustrations of others, which, though not strictly
speaking newly-discovered, have not, I believe, hitherto been figured
or described.
Two of these (G) and (H) are now built into the wall over the
door in the north porch of S. Sampson's Church at Cricklade. Until
a few months ago they had remained ever since they were discovered
46 Notes on pre-Norman Sculptured Stones in Wilts.
during the restoration of the Church some years ago, built in on
either side of the porch — on the level of the floor with half their
length buried underground — and presenting convenient projections
on which the dirt or snow might be kicked off the boots of the
congregation as they came into Church. The present Vicar, how-
ever, the Rev. H. J. Morton, on his attention being called to the
matter, at once had them removed and placed in their present
position, where they are out of harm's way and can be seen to far
greater advantage.
Stone (G) is about half of a sepulchral slab, measuring 21in. by
15 Jin. It is coped and has a cable moulding running up the centre
and dividing into two branches which run out to the corners — the
outside edge having also a border of the same moulding. The panels
at the sides and end are filled with interlacing work, which is roughly
executed.
The second stone (H), measuring 20iin. by 9in., looks at first
sight like a bit of a cross, but there was no sign of sculpture on
either of the other sides, which were quite rough — and as it seems,
from the bit of border at the bottom to be the whole stone, it is
perhaps more probable that it was a small and thick recumbent
body stone — a stone of much the same size and thickness now
forming one of the steps to the rood loft at Ashtpn Keynes with an
incised cross on it being evidently a child's coffin slab of the
thirteenth century.
The two Colerne stones (I) and (J) were also discovered built
into the walls during the " restoration " of the Church some years
ago, and are now preserved loose in the Church with some other
curious bits of later carving. Although they are now only rough
irregular slabs with only one face they have evidently formed two
faces of part of a cross. They measure respectively 15in. by 13in.
and 19in. by 13^in., and both are covered with fine dragonesque
sculpture, the character of which is seen in the illustrations.
The Knook example is a long narrow stone now built into the
east wall of the chancel, which was found built up in this wall when
it was re-constructed some years ago. My attention was called to it
by the Rev. W. J. Swayne. It does not seem to have been noted
By the Eev. E. H. Goddard.
47
before. Possibly it may be the side panel of a slender cross shaft.
The Bradford- on- A von examples are preserved in the Saxon Church
of that place. One of them, " a massive sculptured slab was found
in some restorations of the Parish Church, and has no doubt at one
time been the reveal of a doorway/7 (Canon G. F. Browne,
Somerset Archaeolog. Soc. Proceedings, 1890, Pt. II., p. 77.) Those
at Britford are, as before stated, built in as panels on the pier of an
early arch.
Although not in Wiltshire I am glad, through the courtesy of
the Publisher of the " Antiquary " to be able to give an illustration
of the very interesting fragment lately discovered by Mr. J. Denis
de Vitre at Wantage, which is supposed to have come from the
materials of an ancient chapel in the churchyard, destroyed some
years ago.
Part of Cross (?), Wantage.
It seems to be a portion of the circular shaft of a cross, being broken
off flat at the back. The sides show the beginning of other panels
similar to the one shown on the front.
48 Notes on pre-Norman Sculptured Stones in Wilts.
These examples, of which illustrations are given (with the angels
over the chancel arch of the Saxon Church at Bradford, the stone at
Codford St. Peter), and a small fragment of two dragon's heads
biting a ball, found in connection with the remarkable Saxon north
door of Somerford Keynes Church, comprise the whole of the
sculptured stones of pre-Norman date at present known in Wiltshire,
so far as I am aware.
A curious stone which has formed the top of a very small window,
found during the restoration of Broad Hinton Church and referred
to in a previous number of the Magazine as Saxon (vol. xix., p. 11 6),
is pronounced to be Norman by Mr. Romilly Allen, from the
character of the diaper ornament, which, together with some
peculiar foliage, is carved upon it — whilst the age of a very small
sculptured fragment now built into the porch of Avebury is doubtful.
The origin of this " Hiberno-Saxon " interlaced ornament has
been much discussed. From the perfection to which it is carried in
Ireland an idea arose that it originated there and was carried by the
Irish missionaries to Italy and other countries — but in face of the
fact that in many districts of Italy, more especially in Lombardy,
ornament of the kind is found of an earlier date than any known in
Ireland, and that it prevailed throughout Lombardy in the seventh
century,1 the best authorities now hold that its origin is either
Italian or Byzantine ; some tracing the key patterns and interlacing
work to an elaboration of the fret and guilloche patterns of the
Roman mosaics — others holding that the style came both to Italy
and to Ireland from Byzantium, and the East, where, as Mr.
Romilly Allen has shown, it is still in use amongst the Nestorians.
The marble well-head in the centre of the court at Wilton House
is an example of the way in which ornament of a similar kind was
used in Venice in the tenth and eleventh centuries. And the re-
markable font at Siddington — seen during the Society's Cirencester
excursion and illustrated in this number of the Magazine — shows the
same motives lingering on in Norman work in England.
As to the date of these stones Mr. Jlomilly Allen writes : — " In
1 See Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries, 1891, pp. 256 and 270.
By the Rev. E. H. Goddard. 49
the present state of our knowledge it is impossible to give exact
dates to pre-Norman stones. Very few are, however, in ray opinion,
earlier than A.D. 700, or later than A.D. 1000."
Perhaps we should not be wrong in assigning most of the Wilts
specimens to the later halt' of this period, and those found at
Ramsbury especially to a date subsequent to A.D. 909, when that
place was made the see of the bishopric for the counties of Wilts
and Berks.
NOTE. — As regards the illustrations, three of the Ramsbury photo-prints are
from photographs most kindly given by Mr. H. Baber. The other six Ramsbury
photo-prints and the two from Colerne are from photographs taken specially for
the Magazine by Mr. B. "W. Bradford. The Knock stone is from a tracing of
a rubbing kindly taken by the Rev. W. J. Swayne, Vicar of Heytesbury. The
diagrams of knots and the plates of the Bradford-on-Avon and Britford stones and
one face of the Ramsbury cross base are from drawings and tracings of rubbings
by Mr. Romilly Allen. For the loan of the block of the Wantage stone the
Society is indebted to the kindness of the Publisher and Editor of the Antiquary,
in the January number of which it first appeared.
The Ramsbury stones have been described and illustrated in a paper by Mr.
H. F. Stewart, in the Report of the Marlborough College Natural History
Society for 1891, p. 94, and also partially by Mr. E. Doran Webb, F.S.A.,
in the Salisbury Field Club Transactions, vol. i., part ii., p. 90.
[P.S. — Since the above has been in print I have had an oppor-
tunity of visiting Knook Church. I find that the stone with knot-
work ornament, of which a plate is given, is only old at one end for
about one-third (some 18in.) of its length, the remainder having
been copied from this to form an ornamental ledge above the altar.
There are here also two very remarkable capitals now on either
side of the chancel arch, covered with shallow foliage decoration very
much resembling the early Byzantine work on the capitals of S.
Vitale, at Ravenna. It is hoped that these as well as the tympanum
of the door on the south side, sculptured with beasts with interlacing
tails in very low relief, may be illustrated in a future number of the
Magazine.
Probably I ought also to have included in the Kst of sculptured
work in Wilts of pre-Norman date the rude carving on the capitals
of the tower arches of Netheravon — which I believe in the opinion,
of Mr. Micklethwaite is rather Saxon than Norman.
E. H. GODDARD. May 10th, 1893.]
VOL. XXVII. — NO. LXXIX. B
50
on % Ornamentation of % €avlg
Cjjristian |$lonmnent8 of Miltsljiit.
By J. EOMILLY ALLEN, F.S.A. Scot.
jN 1885, when, with the assistance of the Rev. Canon G. F.
Browne, F.S.A., I compiled a " List of Stones with
Interlaced Ornament in England," which was published in the
"Journal of the British Arch&oloyical Association" (vol. 41., p.
351), there were only two localities in Wiltshire, namely, Bradford-
on-Avon and Britford, where monuments of pre-Norman date were
known to exist. The recent discoveries of other examples at Colerne
(2), Cricklade (2), Knook, Ramsbury (6), and Somerford Keynes
add five new localities and twelve new stones to those, previously
known. The amount of fresh material thus brought to light entirely
revolutionises the notions we had hitherto formed of the character of
Christian art in the ancient kingdom of Wessex before the Norman
Conquest. As long as it was supposed there were only two localities
throughout the whole area where stones with Hiberno-Saxon ornament
were to be found, it was only natural to conclude that these were not
indigenous to the area in question, but were outliers from some
neighbouring group of monuments, such as those of Mercia on the
north, or of Devon and Cornwall on the west. Now, however, it
appears that stones of this class are almost as evenly distributed
over the length and breadth of the ancient kingdom of Wessex as
over other parts of Saxon England — the only district where they
are conspicuously absent being Middlesex and the surrounding
counties.1 In the light of our newly-acquired knowledge we must
re-consider conclusions previously arrived at with regard to the
1 The absence of early monuments here may perhaps be explained by there
being no good stone available for sculpture in the Home Counties. As time goes
on further discoveries may be made in this area which will modify our views
with regard to the geographical distribution of the stones.
Ornamentation of the Early Christian Monuments of (Fills. 51
origin and peculiar local developments of early Christian art iu
England.
The circumstances of the recent discoveries of pre-Norman.
sculptured stones in Wiltshire having been already fully detailed I
propose to add a few notes on the ornament, which may be classified
as follows : —
Geometrical Ornament.
Interlaced work.
Step-patterns.
Spirals.
Ornament derived from Natural Forms.
Zoomorphic ornament.
Foliageous ornament.
NOTE. — There are no instances on the Wiltshire pre-Norman
monuments of the occurence of the divergent spiral, key-patterns,
or figure subjects.1 There are, however, cases of Saxon figure-
sculpture, not associated with Hiberno-Saxon ornament, at Bradford-
on Avon and Codford St. Peter's.
Interlaced work. The most elementary kind of interlaced work
is the plait,2 and from it all the more complicated forms are derived
by introducing breaks at regular intervals. The places where the
breaks occur may be easily seen by placing a piece of tracing-paper
over the pattern and drawing a regular plait on the top of it.
There is no case of a regular plait being used for purposes of
decoration on the Wiltshire stones, except at Britford, where two
bands are twisted together so as to form a circular garland.
Of knot-work patterns derived from the plait we have examples
at Cricklade (G) and (H) and Ramsbury (B two faces) and (E).
The knotwork on the two sloping sides of the fragment of a
coped-stone at Cricklade (G) is somewhat irregular; the bands are
double-beaded3; foliageous terminations are introduced where the
1 Except the mutilated representation of an angel on stone (F) at Ramsbury.
2 This includes the twist which is looked upon as a plait of two cords.
3 i.e., there is an incised line along thre"ceutre of each baud, making the cross-
section like that of a double bead moulding.
E 2
62 Notes on the Ornamentation 0/ the Early
pattern has to adapt itself to the sharp angles formed by the hipped
end of the stone ; and a diamond-shaped pellet occurs in one place
to fill in the space between the knotwork and the border. The
pattern, as far as it can be made out, seems to consist of the figure-of-
eight knot (Fig. 1) arranged in a single row.1 The ornament on the
99
0.
Fig. 1.
triangular hipped end of this monument is of a very unusual kind,
having the general appearance of interlaced work, but when ex-
amined closely it is found to be composed o£ triple-beaded bands
making undulating curves systematically on each side of a central
tree-like figure.
The knotwork on the stone at Cricklade (H) presents some
remarkable peculiarities. The bands are very wide and flat, un-
relieved by double-beading, so that the work looks rude and coarse.
The spaces between the knots in the middle, and between the knots
and the border at the top and bottom are ornamented with circular
pellets. This is not a common practice, although there are a few
other instances of it elsewhere. The pattern is composed of a single
spiral knot 8 (Fig. 2) in the middle and two different terminal
Fig. 2.
1 See my "Analysis of Celtic Interlaced Ornament," in the "Proceedings of
the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland," vol. 17, p. 242, Knot G.
2 Knot C in my " Analysis," p. 242.
Christian Monuments of Wiltshire. 53
knots * (Fig. 3) at the top and bottom. The bands forming the
Fig. 3.
knot at the top do not seem to join up properly.
Upon two of the stones at Ramsbury [the cross-shaft (B) and the
coped stone (E)] are excellent examples of the figure-of-eight knot2
arranged in double rows8 (Fig. 4). This is one of the commonest knots
Fig. 4.
made use of in Hiberno- Saxon ornament, because it can be so easily
derived from a four-cord plait by making breaks along the centre of
the plait at every third crossing-point of the cords.4 A double row
1 Knot No. 50, " Analysis," p. 239. This knot is frequently used as the
termination of any pattern derived from a four-cord plait and also on the arms,
of cross heads, as at Brompton and Northallerton in Yorkshire^
2 "Analysis," p. 242, knot G.
3 Ibid, p. 254, pattern No. 140.
4 Ibid, p. 236, Fig. 35.
64
Notes on the Ornamentation of the Early
of figure-of-eight knots may in a similar way be derived from an
eight-cord plait. Stone (B) at Eamsbury is interesting as showing
two different ways of terminating the pattern at the top and
bottom. The terminal knots at the bottom (Fig. 3) are the same as on
stone (H) at Cricklade. It will be noticed that on all four sides of
the cross-shaft (B) at Ramsbury the designer has in a most in-
genious way adapted his patterns to the length of the stone, instead
of getting a larger stone to suit his patterns, as would be done now-
a-days by a less conscientious artist to save himself trouble. The
figure-of-eight knot arranged in a double row, as at Ramsbury,
occurs elsewhere at Meigle, in Perthshire ; Llanynnis, in Breck-
knockshire; and elsewhere. Sometimes the number of rows is in-
creased to three, as at Manby, in Lincolnshire ; and at Govan and
Jordanhill, near Glasgow; or to five, as at Dolton, in Devonshire;
or to six, as at St. Peter's, Northampton .
Upon the cross-shaft (B) at Ramsbury is also to be seen a
variation of the twist-and-ring pattern * I do not remember to have
noticed anywhere else. Both the twist and the rings are composed
of triple bands (Fig. 5), but where the bauds of the twist cross in the
Fig. 5.
centres of the rings the outer bands are joined up together in pairs,
leaving only the middle ones to cross each other. In the portion of the
twist in the spandrils between the circular rings and the border the
bands are made to cross over and form a plait, instead of running
1 "Analysis," p. 232, pattern No. 13.
o
m
co
O
-n
r/D
TI
H
O
-n
O
33
O
en CO
• W ';?^-^S. - - /•' TW ls§
r '^vi^^^^S^
Christian Monuments of Wiltshire. 55
parallel. The length of the face of the shaft is only about two
and three-quarter times its breadth, so that there is not room for
three complete rings. The clever method of finishing the pattern
at the top, so as to get over this difficulty commands our admiration.
The circular medallions containing beasts may perhaps have suggested
the twist-and-ring pattern of the interlaced work to the mind of
the designer. Anyhow, the ornament on all four sides of this shaft
must have been set out in the same way, by drawing two complete
circles and three-quarters of a circle at the top. The nearest approach
to the pattern on the Ramsbury stone (B) is on a stone at Durham
Cathedral, but the bands are double, not triple.
The only other ordinary knot which occurs on the Wiltshire
monuments is on the fragment of the coped stone (E) at Ramsbury.
Here the tongues of the serpentine creatures whose bodies form the
ridge and hips of the stone, are tied together in a Stafford knot1
(Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.
In my " Analysis of Celtic Interlaced Ornament " in the " Pro-
ceedings of the Soeiety of Antiquaries of Scotland" (vol. 17, pp. 211
to 271), already frequently referred to, I have termed a particular
class of interlaced ornament "circular knotwork," on account of the
predominance of bands making circular curves throughout the
patterns of this description. I have no doubt in my own mind that
this particular development of interlaced work was originally in-
vented on the Continent, and probably in Italy, where so many
examples of it are to be found.2 The Celtic artists improved upon
'"Analysis," p. 242, knot A.
2 Grado, in Dalmatia ; Milan and Como, in Italy ; and Grandson, in Switzer-
land.
56
Notes on the Ornamentation of the Early
many of the patterns, but all the same they are as much indebted
to a foreign source for the first idea of circular knotwork as they are
for the conventional way of representing the Evangelists at the
beginning- of each of the Gospels.
The decoration of the stone at Knook and the cross-base (A) at
Eamsbury is worthy of careful study as showing the way in which
the circular knots may have been derived from the simpler class of
knots founded on the plait. The pattern on the Knook stone
consists of knot D (Fig. 7) (in my "Analysis, p. 242) arranged in a
Fig. 7.
double row facing each other1 (Fig. 8). Knot D arranged in a
Fig. 8.
1 " Analysis," p. 251, pattern No. 123.
TWO SIDES OF BASE OF CROSS'A) RAMSBURY.
I I
\
KNOCK CHURCH.
Christian Monuments of Wiltshire.
57
single row can be derived from a four-cord plait (see " Analysis," p.
236, No. 36) and therefore a double row can be derived from an
eight-cord plait. By making pointed ends to the loops forming the
knots and "sweetening" the curves of the bands between each
knot the appearance of the whole is changed and its development
from the plait disguised. Almost all geometrical ornament is capable
of conveying several different impressions to the mind according to
the way it is observed by the eye for the time being, and the in-
tellectual pleasure which a pattern gives is most probably dependent
on the infinite variety of these kaleidoscopic changes. Taking the
Knook stone for example, if the attention is concentrated upon the
portions of the pattern between each of the points where the bands
cross in the centre, it will seem as if the whole was formed of repe-
titions of knot D (Fig. 9) ; but if the attention be now directed
Fig. 9.
towards the portions lying between the middle points of each of
the knots, the pattern will appear to consist entirely of circular
curves with two diameters crossing each other diagonally (Fig. 10.)
Fig. 10.
Turning to the cross-base (A) at Ramsbury it will be seen that
the ornament is produced, on one face by doubling the pattern on
58 Notes on the Ornamentation of the Early
the Knook stone (Fig. 11), and on the other by trebling it. The
Fig. 11.
circular curves now assume much greater prominence. The next
stage in the development of circular knot-work is attained by intro-
ducing a second smaller circular ring within the outer and larger
one. There is no example of this in Wiltshire, but at Wantage (cf.
p. 47) in the neighbouring county of Berkshire, a fragment has been
recently discovered, on which the pattern consists of circular knot
(No. 179 in my "Analysis ") arranged in a single row (Fig. 13).
Fig. 12.
The circular rings are seldom complete, having breaks where the
bands turn inwards, or sometimes cross over each other.
Christian Monuments of Wiltshire.
59
It has just been shown that the simplest kind of circular knot (Fig.
10) is derived from Knot D (Fig. 7), arranged in a double row.
The more elaborate kinds of circular knots are obtained from the
simpler one (Fig. ] 0) by combining it with a complete circular ring,
either enclosing the four pointed loops (Fig. 13), or passing over them.
No. 13.
(Fig. 14). Other variations can be produced from these by severing
Fig. 14.
the bands in places and joining different parts of the loops to the
rings much on the same principle that breaks can be made in a
plait. The connection between Figs. 13 and 15 and Figs. 14 and
Fig. 15.
16 will at once become clear if the knots are drawn on tracing
60
Notes on the Ornamentation of the Early
Fig. 16.
paper and then placed one over the other.
There remains now only one other kind of interlaced work to be
considered, and to this I have given the name of " triangular knot-
work," because the space to be decorated is divided into triangles
by the setting-out lines and a knot fitted into each triangle. A
border pattern of triangular knotwork occurs at Bradford -on -A von
(Fig. 17), and two square panels of the same class of ornament are
Fig. 17.
to be seen at Britford (Figs. 18 and 19).
Fig. 18.
Sculptured Slab, Bradford-on-Avou.
Christian Monuments of Wiltshire.
61
Fig. 19.
Step-patterns. On the Wiltshire stones the key-patterns which
are usually associated with interlaced work are conspicuous by their
absence. The nearest approach to a key-pattern is the stepped
ornament on the slab at Bradford-on-Avon. This is a very un-
common form of decoration in sculptured stonework, although much
the same kind of thing occurs on the cross at Irton, in Cumberland.1
It resembles more nearly than anything else the silver plates pierced
with cruciform openings that are used in the decoration of the Irish
metal book shrines.3
Spirals. The only instance of spiral ornament on the Wiltshire
stones is on the slab at Bradford-on-Avon. The pattern is set out
by dividing the surface into squares by parallel lines running
diagonally in two directions at right angles to each other and
cutting the margin at an angle of 45°. The squares are filled in
with quadruple spirals and connected by C-shaped bands.3
Zob'morphic Ornament. It is not an easy matter to attempt to
classify the various animal forms which were used for decorative
purposes in Hiberno-Saxon MSS., metal-work, and sculpture, for
they partake alternately of the nature of the quadruped, the bird,
and the reptile. The simplest way of transforming the ordinary
1 Lyson's " Magna Britannia," vol. 4, p. cci.
2 As, for example, the cover of the Book of Dimma at Trinity College, Dublin.
8 See " Notes on Celtic Ornament — Key Patterns and Spirals," in Proc. Soc.
Ant. Scot., vol. 19, p. 298, pattern No. 80. The same pattern occurs on the font
at Deerhurst, in Gloucestershire, and on the fragment of a cross-shaft at Penally,
in Pembrokeshire.
62 Notes on the Ornamentation of the Early
four-footed beast into a mythical creature is to give it wings. If,
in addition to this, it has the beaked head of a bird substituted for
its own it becomes a griffin ; or, if the hind-quarters are changed
into the looped or knotted tail of a serpent, it may be looked upon
as a dragon. The term dragonesque ornament is often quite mis-
applied to designs entirely composed of quadrupeds or birds.
The chief peculiarity of the zoomorphic decoration of the Irish
MSS. is the great attenuation and extension of the bodies of the
beasts or the necks of the birds, and the wonderfully complicated
•way in which every part of the design is interlaced. Were it not
for the heads and claws of the animals peeping out here and there,
the general appearance is that of interlaced work composed of broad
and narrow bands; the former being the bodies of the beasts, and
the latter their long drawn out limbs, tails, and ears,1 making a
kind of background to the rest. If the design consists of a single
beast standing in a natural attitude, the interlacements are generally
confined to the tail, which is looped and knotted in various ways.'3
This is the most usual way of treating the beasts on the early
Christian monuments in England, but in the Irish MSS. further
complications are produced by bending the body of a single beast
into all sorts of unnatural attitudes, or by arranging several beasts
symmetrically in pairs so that their bodies cross over each other.
The Wiltshire stones with zoomorphic ornament upon them are
Ramsbury (A), (B), (C), (E), and (F), Colerne (I) and (J). and
Somerford Keynes.
The designs on the cross-shaft (B) at Ramsbury and the fragment
of a coped stone (E) are almost identical, and consist of little beasts
enclosed within circular medallions. They are evidently intended
for quadrupeds, although only one foreleg and one hind leg are
shown. In three cases, on Ramsbury (B) and in two cases on
Ramsbury (E) the beasts have their heads bent backwards and are
1 The ears are prolonged to a most extraordinary extent, looking like a crest
coming out of the top of the head.
2 For good examples of this see the " Commentary on the Psalms by Cassio-
dorus," at Durham, illustrated in Prof. Westwood's Miniatures of the Anylo-
Saxon and Irish MSS.," pi. 18.
Christian Monuments of Wiltshire. 63
biting the ends of their tails. In the remaining two cases on
Ramsbury (B) the heads are shown in full face, instead of in profile,
and point towards the ground ; the tails being curved over the back,
o portions of the beasts are interlaced. The spandrils between
the circular medallions and the margin are ornamented with small
rosettes, or leaves. The ridge of the coped stone (E) at Ramsbury
divides into two branches at the hips and terminates in two beast's
heads whose tongues are united in a Stafford knot. On stone (F)
at Ramsbury is a beast with its neck bent over biting its back,
very much defaced.
The zoomorphic designs on stones (A) and (C) at Ramsbury, and
(I) and (J) at Colerne are to some extent of the Irish type, but
present peculiarities found almost exclusively in the West of England.
The characteristic feature of the decoration of these stones is the
elaborate way in which the bodies of the beasts are ornamented with
various conventional patterns, probably intended to convey some
idea of the texture of the skin. Other instances of this occur at
Rowberrow * and West Camel,2 in Somersetshire; at St. Oswald's,
Gloucester ; 3 and at Dolton, in North Devon. The same kind of
thing is also to be seen on the ivory casket in the Ducal Museum
at Brunswick, which, according to the Runic inscription upon it,
was carved by Nethii for the most noble Aeli in Montpellier of Gaul.4
On the early Christian monuments of Scotland the bodies of the
beasts are either left quite plain, or at most have the outline of the
body emphasised by an inner line, and the junction of the legs with
the body conventionally indicated by spiral curves, but there is
seldom any attempt to represent the texture of the skin. In Ireland,
also, the surfaces of the bodies of the beasts are left quite plain.
The only instances I can find of beasts with scaly skins on pre-
Norman sculptured crosses in England are at Crofton,5in Yorkshire,
1 Pooley's " Stone Crosses of Somerset," p. 8.
2 Ibid, p. 157, and Somerset ArchceoL Soc. Proceedings, 1890, Part II., p. 70.
* Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucester ArcTi&ol. Soc., vol. 13, p. 118.
4 Prof. G. Stephens' "Handbook of Old Northern Runic Monuments," p. 119.
5 Proc. Soc. Ant. Lond.} 2nd Ser., vol. 4, p. 33.
64 Notes on the Ornamentation of the Early
and at Kirk Braddan,1 in the Isle of Man. The bodies of the beasts
have a double outline on the cross-shaft from St. Alkmund's, Derby,
now in the Derby Museum 2; on the font at Wilne,8 in Derbyshire;
on the cross-shaft at Collingham,4 in Yorkshire ; and on the coped
stone at Hickling, Notts.
We will now examine the beasts on the Wiltshire stones one by
one.
One face of the cross-base (A) at Ramsbury has upon it a single
serpentine creature, apparently without any legs. The head, which is
at the top of the panel, is shown in plan (i.e., as it would be seen
looking down from above upon the two eyes and pointed snout). The
upper part of the body is tied into a Stafford knot, and the lower part
forms an S-shaped curve. The remainder of the body is fined down
to a narrow band which fills up the background with interlaced
work. The broad part of the body has a double outline, and is
ornamented with a chevron pattern made with two incised lines.
The narrow part is double beaded. Another of the faces of the same
cross-base (A) at Ramsbury shows a serpentine creature, similar in
general appearance to that just described, but differing somewhat in
the details, the head with the jaw biting the body being represented
in profile, with a fine array of teeth.
Fragment (C) at Ramsbury is of exactly the same type as the
one first mentioned. The head is shown in plan, crossing the body
on the right side of the stone, and the body is ornamented with
chevrons.
Fragment (I) at Colerne has upon it the upper portions of two
beasts placed symmetrically with their necks crossed and heads
shown in profile facing outwards over each other's shoulders. The
two fore legs of each beast point upwards and are crossed over the
necks and interlaced. The ends of the two tails pass through the
1 Cumming's " Runic Remains of the Isle of Man."
2 Rev. J. Charles Cox's " Churches of Derbyshire," vol. 4, p. 122.
3 Ibid.
4 Prof. G. Stephens' " Old Northern Runic Monuments," vol. 1, p. 391.
Panel on pier of Arch, Britford.
Cross-Base A, Ramsbury.
•^^H^^ • ^ . f
* ''-
! «!<?:•
. I*--
7 .'f
- . W77 rrrrfk* ,1^
•£;-|:,:^'>cL^
,
LU
n
s
Sculpture on Pier of Arch, Britford.
Christian Monuments of Wilts/tire. 65
jaws and form a triquetra knot in the triangular space above the
heads. The bodies of the beasts are more elaborately ornamented
than in any other case that has come under my notice. There are
spirals just below the ears and on the thighs. The decoration of
the body consists of a mid rib with cross ribs branching out from it
and sloping down at an angle at each side from it. The teeth, eyes,
ears, claws, and all the other details are shown with remarkable
clearness.
Fragment (J) at Colerne has upon it portions of one or two
dragons. The head of one is plainly visible at the top of the stone
and its claw in the middle of the left side. The body is ornamented
with a mid rib having a pelleted chevron on one side and cross ribs
on the other. The interlaced work in the background is formed by
the tails of the dragons, which are narrowed down to bands of the
same width throughout.
Upon the fragment at Somerford Keynes are sculptured the heads
and necks of two beasts facing each other, their mouths touching
and holding a round ball. The outline of the stone corresponds
partly with the outline of the beasts, the bodies of which are or-
namented front and back. The tufts of hair round the edges are
conventionalised by making them end in little spiral curls. The
rest of the bodies are covered with Scandinavian decoration like
that on the Runic-inscribed slab found in St. Paul's Churchyard,
and now in the Guildhall Library.
Foliageous Ornament. There are only two examples of stones with,
foliageous ornament upon them in Wiltshire — at Britford, and on
the fragment of a coped stone (D) at Ramsbury.
The foliage at Britford consists of scrolls branching out on each
side of an undulating stem, and having a large leaf in the centre of
each scroll. The sculpture is in extraordinarily good preservation
. and all the details beautifully executed.
The foliage on the coped stone (D) at Ramsbury consists of two
sets of scroll-work, like that at Britford, one on each of the rounded
sloping faces of the monument, the scrolls being interlocked with
each other where they intersect along the central ridge.
YOL. XXVII. — NO. LXXIX. F
66
IJote on Sbtdwm of ^tonejenge **
Monging to |$fe. M, Cmmingtoii/
By J. J. H. TEALL, M.A., F.R.S., Sec. G.S.
jS these rocks have been described by such able petrologists
as Professor Nevil Story- Mask elyne and the late Mr.
Thomas Davies (Wills Mag., vol. xvii., p. 147), any detailed
description of them is quite uncalled for. I will, therefore, deal
only with facts bearing on the possible source from which they were
obtained. The slides submitted to me for examination have been
taken from rocks which may be classified as follows :—
Diabases, 40, 71, 21, 63, 56, 55, 35, 48, 36, 22.
Felsites, 52, 51, 65, 67, 50, 66.
Calcareous Chloritic Schists, 58, 6, 70, 70, 53, 59, 74.
Grits and Sandstones, \, 1, 69, 45, 61.
Un-named RocJcs, all of one type, 73, 68, 57, 60, 19, 33.
In the above classification I have adopted the names already in use.
Diabases.
These rocks have been described by Professor Nevil Story-
Maskelyne, and to his description it is only necessary to add the
statement that they are typical ophitic diabases such as occur in
many parts of the West of England associated with the Palaeozoic
sediments. In British Petrography, p. 232, I have recorded the
occurrence of rocks of this type at Yealmpton Rock, Park House
near Dartington, Pollaphant, Catacleuse near Padstow, south of
Anstie's Cove near Torquay, and at South Petherwin. The col-
lections of the Geological Survey contain specimens of the same
rock from many other localities, e.g., south of Dittisham Corn Mill,
1 Numerous specimens of the stones of Stonehenge have been obtained by me
during the past half -century ; mostly, with rare exceptions, as noted, from or
under the turf within the area of the building. Sections have been cut from
many of them for microscopic observation, and these having been lately submitted
to Mr. Teall for examination, he has favoured the Society with the following
important communication. — WILLIAM CUNNINGTON, London, April, 1893.
Notes on Sections of Stonehenge RocJcs, 67
Knowles Hill, near Newton Bushel, south-east of Woodleigh, and
Combe Wood near Christow. The above list of localities might be
considerably increased, but enough has been said to prove that
ophitic diabases of the Stonehenge type are widely distributed in
the West of England.1
Felsites.
Felsites with flow structure — " rhyolites" of some authors — also
occur in the West of England, but they have not attracted so much
attention as the diabases, and are probably not so common. My
colleague, Mr. Ussher, has sent up some specimens from the
neighbourhood of Wastor Wood, between Kingston and Modbury,
which are closely allied to, but not identical with, the Stonehenge
rocks. These rhyolitic felsites must not be confused with the
well-known " el vans " (microgranites), which occur so abundantly
as dykes in Devon and Cornwall.
Calcareous Chloritic Schists,
The specimens included under this head are merely schistose green
rocks containing chlorite, calcite, leucoxene and other minerals
common in decomposed basic igneous products. They are in no
sense true crystalline schists. Some (No. 58) show traces of
vesicular lapilli and are undoubtedly cleaved basic tuffs. Rocks of
this type also occur in Devon and Cornwall ; but owing to their
decomposed condition they have not been frequently cut for micro-
scopic examination, and I am not able to quote many localities.
Specimens sent up by Mr. Ussher from Fowelscombe House quarry
and from Whitcombe Road quarry, south of Kingsbridge Road
1 The slide of diabase No. 71 is from the stump of the obelisk discovered in
1881 by the late Mr. H. Cunnington. Its position is marked S. 57 on the map,
Wilts Mag., vol. xxi. Mr. Teall describes its composition as follows: — "A
typical ophitic diabase. The original minerals were a pale-coloured augite,
felspar (probably labradorite), and titaniferous iron ore. The secondary minerals
are epidote, chlorite, and leucoxene."
Of a section, No. 35, which was obtained many years ago, by Mr. J. Britton,
from the stone of the inner circle (No. 27 on map), Mr. Teall remarks that it is
so similar to the above that it might have been a part of the same mass. The
diabases of the inner circle and those in the inner horseshoe are thus shown to
"be similar.
68 Notes on Sections of Stonehenge Rocks.
Station, present many points of resemblance to the Stonehenge
specimens.1
Grits and Sandstones.
These do not seem to be in any way remarkable, and with the
exception of No. 61, could, I have no doubt, be matched amongst
the palaeozoic sediments of Devon and Cornwall.2
(No. 61 contains glauconite grains and foraminifera. It is quite
distinct from the others and probably formed a part of some green-
sand deposit. See Wilts Mag., xxi., 144.)
Un-named Rocks.
These are of igneous origin, and of intermediate composition.
They are in a very unsatisfactory state as regards preservation.
From the foregoing remarks it appears that the ophitic diabases,
rhyolitic felsites, and calcareous chloritic schists belong to types of
rock which are undoubtedly represented in the West of England.
My knowledge of that district is not sufficient to enable me to point
to any one locality where all these rocks occur together ; but if such
a locality can be found the rocks occurring in it should certainly be
compared most carefully with those from Stonehenge.
1 The specimen No. 70 is from a stump also discovered by Mr. H. Cunnington
in 1881 (S. 28 on map, vol. xxi.). This variety of rock had been frequently
found in and around Stonehenge, but it does not belong to any of the stones now
above ground, and was unknown as part of the structure till 1881. Mr. Teall
describes it as follows : — " A calcareous chloritic schist. The minerals are not
as a rule well developed, but carbonates, chlorite, and iron ores, including pyrite,
may be recognised. The rock is probably a cleaved and decomposed basic tuff,
but the forms of the original fragments cannot now be distinctly seen."
2 The black quartz-grit is not the material of any stone now in situ, above the
surface, at Stonehenge, though many pieces have been found. The probability
that it does belong to the building is the greater from the fact that a good sized
fragment was found in Barrow 41, about a mile from Stonehenge, accompanied
by a specimen of the calcareous schist, which, at that time unknown, has since
been proved to be one of the original stones. So the exact locality of the black
grit will probably be some day found, by careful search. It would be curious if
it should prove to be on the dark side of the temple — furthest from the rising sun.
No. 69 is a fine-grained grit or sandstone composed of angular grains of quartz
and some decomposed felspar ; chlorite and iron ores are also present, but only
in small quantity. It was found in a hole near 29 on map.
69
By GEOBGE E. DAETNELL.
I.
THE BUST.
?HU)HEN, some five years ago, all that was mortal of Richard
Jefferies was borne through the softly- falling rain to that
ast resting-place which he had chosen for himself, not in the dismal
over-crowded burial ground at Goring, but amidst the grass and
flowers of sunnier Broadwater, it was given him GO find in death a
wider recognition than life had ever brought him. The long hard
struggle for bare existence was over at last : the cup in which so
much that was bitter had been mingled was drunk to the dregs.
Fame he had certainly had, and that in no small measure — but it
came with empty hands: friends — but they were either powerless
to help, or knew little of his extremity. And now, when it was
too late, the world began at last to realise what it had lost in him,
and to express it in various ways, practical and otherwise. Of Mr.
Besant's generously appreciative Eulogy we shall have much to say
hereafter, but we must first speak of the latest and by no means
the least proof of the feelings with which Jefferies is now regarded,
the fine bust by Miss Thomas which has recently been placed in the
north transept of Salisbury Cathedral.
Love of country should have its local as well as its national de-
velopment. It is well to be proud of our empire and the great men
to whom she has given birth. It is well also to be proud of our
native county and her share in them, however small it be. Our
Wiltshire Worthies may not have played as famous a part on the
world's stage as their neighbours of Devon and Somerset, but that
is no reason why their names should be without honour among us.
And so — though in life his best years were spent elsewhere — though
70 Richard Jefferies.
in death his place is not with the tombs of his forefathers — it has
already, somewhat unjustly, been made a matter of reproach to us
that there should be no memorial of Richard Jefferies here in our
own Cathedral. That reproach has now been done away, thanks to the
efforts of the committee which, at Mr. Arthur King-lake's suggestion,
took the matter in hand some two or three years ago. The execution
of a bust, to be placed in the north transept, was entrusted to Miss
Margaret Thomas, who has succeeded in producing a fine, though
perhaps somewhat idealised, likeness, not unworthy of its place near
works that bear the names of Chan trey and of Flaxrnan. The
bracket on which it stands is by Mr. Thatcher, of Taunton, and
bears the following not too happily worded inscription : —
" To the Memory of l Richard Jefferies, born at Coate, in the Parish of
Chiseldon, and County of Wilts, 6th November, 1848. Died at Goring, in the
County of Sussex, 14th August, 1887. Who observing the works of Almighty
God with a Poet's eye, has enriched the literature of his country and won
for himself a place amongst those who have made men happier and wiser."
The ceremony of unveiling took place on Wednesday, the 9th
March, 1892, at noon. The weather was dark and stormy, and
consequently but a small congregation assembled in the north
transept at the appointed hour. Mrs. Jefferies was amongst those
present, but owing to some misunderstanding Miss Thomas did not
arrive in time. Some collects appropriate to the occasion having
been read by the Dean, the Bishop, before unveiling the bust and
handing' it over to the custody of the Cathedral authorities, briefly
explained the purpose for which they were met together, and the
pleasure with which he himself had taken part in this " somewhat
tardy justice " to the memory of a great Wiltshireman, " one in
whom we recognise a gift of insight into the beauties of Nature,
given him by God — one who bore sickness and trial and great
sorrow patiently, and whose soul was still struggling upwards
towards the light."
The Dean then delivered a short address, in which he touched
1 It may here be observed that he was christened John Richard, but was
always known only by his second name.
By George K Dartnell. 71
very happily on the peculiar appropriateness of the unveiling" of this
bust of one whose works breathed the very spirit of the famous
lines : —
" To me the meanest flower that blows can give
Thoughts that do often lie too deep for tears "
by a Bishop who himself bore the honoured name of Wordsworth.
It was well said by de Quincey that life had had many a new
pleasure added to it since Shakespeare lived and wrote ; and
assuredly not the least of these was the pleasure that lovers of the
country and its associations derived from the works of Richard
Jefferies. No man of our own time, save perhaps Charles Kingsley ,
possessed such a combination of minuteness and fidelity, such a
power of revealing to us the beauties of Nature. The story of his
life was a very sad one, full of doubt and sorrow and poverty, of
vain attempts to solve the problems of existence. No kindly patron
ever came forward, to release him from the daily drudgery for mere
bread, and so set his genius free to develop itself. But, after that
long struggle with disease, despair, and poverty, at eventide there
was light, and he passed away listening with faith and love to the
gospel story. A great gulf of generations lay between us and
Chaucer, the morning-star of English song, but the spirit which
inspired him had never departed from the sons of England, and
there had never yet been lacking among us men who, like William
Barnes in poetry and Richard Jefferies in prose, could mould into
noble words the sights and sounds of country life.
After the address a few prayers were offered, and the Bishop then
gave the benediction, thus bringing a most interesting ceremony to
a close.
The committee appointed to carry out Mr. Kinglake's suggestion
comprised many well-known names, as the Bishop and Dean of
Salisbury, Mr. Walter Besant, Mr. A. Buckley, Mr. Burdett-Coutts,
Mr. A. Chatto, Mr. Ambrose Goddard, Mr. H. R. Haggard, Mr.
F. G. Heath, Mr. Andrew Lang, Mr. C. Longman, Mr. J. W.
North, Mr. C. C, Osborne, Mr. W. Pollock, Mr. C. P. Scott, and
Mr. G. Smith, Mr. Kinglake himself acting as Treasurer.
72 Richard Jefferies.
II.
THE EULOGY.
The main facts of a somewhat uneventful life have already been
set forth in sufficient detail by Mr. Besant, and it is therefore un-
necessary to say much about them here. Thanks to the affection
with which Jefferies always regarded his native place, we know far
more of his boyhood, and how it was spent, than we do of his
maturer years. Look at Bevis, at Amaryllis, at After London, at
The Story of My Heart, at the opening- chapters of The Amateur
Poacher, to say nothing of a hundred casual allusions elsewhere.
All are full of those early days at Coate. Be the names of the actors
what they may — Bevis and Orion, Felix and Oliver — they are but
Richard Jefferies and his brother. Their whole out-of-door life is
spread out before us. Now they are canoe-building, now exploring
the wild jungles and desolate islands which their fancy pictured for
them on the broad reservoir near : now with a score of playmates,
armed with wooden swords and spears, they are acting over again
some old-world battle-scene ; and now the desire of rivalling Ulysses
seizes upon them, and with light heart and lighter purse they must
steal away over seas.
All this time he was drinking in half unconsciously the influences
and the knowledge that would be of such importance to him a few
years hence. But those with whom he was brought into daily
contact knew little of the boy's inmost thoughts and cared less for
them. Our Wiltshire rustics have a fine contempt for what they
call " wonderments," and are not slow to express it : so you may be
sure that his odd unpractical ways brought down on him the charge
of " wondermenting," with all its direful consequences.
But soon a change came over him. A new world — that of books
— was revealed to his wondering eyes. From reading he was not
long in passing to writing, and while still but a lad he found em-
ployment as a reporter and paragraph-writer for the Swindon and
Cirencester papers. Most of his work in those days was of course
of an utterly ephemeral character, and would now be impossible to
identify, even were it worth the trouble. In the summer of 1866
"By George B. Darlnell. 73
several short stories appeared under the signature of " Geoffrey " (a
very transparent disguise) in the North Wilts Herald. They were
somewhat of the " Penny Dreadful " type, and are hardly worth
considering even as curiosities. But a better and more ambitious
piece of work — The History of Malmesbury — soon followed, under
the same nom de guerre. This great work (which Mr. Besant is
probably alluding to, when he speaks of a story called " Malmesbury^)
was in twenty-one chapters, the first of which appeared in the issue
of 20th April, 1867. It was indeed a " task/' and when we consider
that the writer was then only in his nineteenth year, the wonder is
that he " performed " it as well as he did. In the opening chapters
the old monkish records were a storehouse from which he drew very
largely, but when he came down to more recent times everything
had to be hunted out and examined personally. In his search after
a certain book founded on a local legend, he tells us in one of his
letters that he had walked fifty miles to no purpose. One such
search of his was afterwards described in Round About a Great Estate.
Of course the style is hardly above the ordinary level of a country
paper, though here and there a paragraph rises to something
better. A large show is made of his erudition, and allusions to
Homer and Plato, Ahriman and Ormusd, Faust and Don Quixote,
are lavishly scattered about. As a compilation it is not at all a bad
piece of work ; and it contains much that is interesting — indeed,
with a few necessary corrections as regards names and dates, it might
be worth reprinting.
About this time he began working at a similar History of Swindon,
allusions to which will be found among his letters for the next five
years. The materials ready to his hand were apparently so scanty
that he made little or no progress with the work, some portions of
which eventually appeared as the Goddard Memoir. In 1872 his
great opportunity came, but he failed to take advantage of it. The
Times printed three long letters of his, upon the subject of the
Wiltshire labourer from a tenant-farmer's point of view, which
attracted widespread attention. Several years after his death they
were reprinted, with other early uncollected work, in the Toilers
of the field volume. Had he followed up this hit, his after-life
74 Richard Jefferies.
might have been very different from what it came to be. But he
let his opportunity escape him. Perhaps his powers were not yet
mature enough ; perhaps he did not realise what such a success
meant. At any rate the next six years of his life were mainly
devoted to work of quite another kind, from which he seldom derived
either gain or fame. The first of these publications was a small
handbook on REPORTING, EDITING, AND AUTHORSHIP, which appeared
in 187 tf. It throws much light on his own experiences, methods,
and aspirations, and with all its faults is by no means badly done.
Next came the GODDARD MEMOIR, which, as we have already
observed, had grown out of the materials collected towards a work
on Swindon. He had had this publication in view for ten or twelve
years past, but it was only in November, 1872, that it was actually
completed.1 Several unpublished letters relating to the subject are
now lying before us, from which we gather that Mr. Besant's re-
marks as to the family setting him to write their history, and
omitting to pay for it, are by no means justified by the facts of the
case. Whatever Jefferies wished for, both as regards information
and pecuniary aid, was freely given him. The book was absolutely
his own idea. All he desired was that the payment of a few pounds
should be guaranteed, in the event of his being unable to meet the
whole of the printer's bill immediately that it fell due, as some
portion of his funds were just then engaged in another publication.
This was at once done. More than this he would not have accepted :
he was too proud a man to take assistance from others unless he
absolutely needed it. The book must have paid its small cost
(estimated by the printer at £20) very fairly, as not long after
publication he writes that he has only thirty-three copies left on
hand, which he considers "a very good sale indeed for a work ap-
parently of only local interest/'' There was some demand for it in
America. Its literary merit is but small as compared with its local
value. He had at one time contemplated either reprinting it in an
enlarged form, or else bringing out a supplementary volume, but,
1 The first distinct mention of it that we have come across in his letters is in
September, 1869.
By George E. Dartnell. 75
like many other projects of his, this came to nothing. So late as
November, 1875, he writes that the second volume " is begun, and
shall be finished."
The following year he wrote several articles on agricultural life,
and planned out a great work on the same theme, much of which
was eventually worked up into Hodge and his Masters. Of these
scattered articles those on Field-faring Women and Marlborougk
Forest are the best. In them his style is already matured. About
the two pamphlets which belong to the same period, JACK BRASS
and SUEZ-CIDE, we know nothing, but they were probably of little
value. Between 1874 and 1877 he did an immense amount of work,
of which the greater part appears to have gone from publisher to
publisher, till at last it found a resting-place in his waste-paper
basket. He also published three trashy novels, THE SCARLET SHAWL,
RESTLESS HUMAN HEARTS, and WORLD'S END, and wrote THE
DEWY MORN, which however was not published until seven years
later. GREENE FERNE FARM probably also belongs to this period.
All of them are failures, the characters being mere puppets, the
plots poor and forced, and the execution generally crude and coarse.
He knew absolutely nothing of the life that he attempted to depict
in them, and there is very seldom a passage that one would care to
quote as at all characteristic of him.
Up to this time he had produced, or to speak more precisely, had
published, very little work of importance. A volume of a hundred
pages would probably contain all that was of any real value. But
now a great change was at hand. In 1877 he moved to the neigh-
bourhood of London, and from thenceforth gave himself up almost
entirely to the work for which his genius was best fitted. The
following year saw the first of that wonderful series of books on
country life, to which we turn with ever-renewed pleasure. Taking
them as a whole, no better work of the kind has ever been done,
and it will be long before the world sees their equal again. Others,
as we have already said, could on occasion surpass him, but then
their nights were shorter and less sustained.
Five of these volumes followed in quick succession, and as many
more after a short interval. The Saturday Review, with its usual
76 Richard Jefferies.
acumen, observed of one of them that it was " a multum in parvo
encyclopaedia of country sights and country matters.1" Exactly so :
it was a contribution towards one or other of those four or five
encyclopaedias on Shooting, on The Country Squire, on The Agricultural
Labourer, on what you will of a similar character, that were always
shaping- themselves in his mind, but never to be completed as he had
planned them. They have a fault inseparable from their origin,
being often a series of more or less isolated paragraphs, lacking the
master-touches that would bind them into a whole. The canvas is
overcrowded with detail. Kingsley has given us exquisite open-air
pictures now and again, as in My Winter Garden, and elsewhere,
but they form only a part of his many-sided work. He, however,
could say in a sentence or two what Jefferies took a page over.
Look, for instance, at that wonderful idyll of Zeal-for-Truth
Thoresby. How every touch of the fen-land landscape tells ! There
is not a word too little or a word too much. The whole scene
stands out clearly before us. Jefferies would have given us every
leaf on the abele, every reed-rond in the fen, and though we should
have learned much that was new the impression left on our minds
would have been somewhat blurred and indistinct.
One thing is very noticeable in all these books. Let their nominal
scene be where it may, it is of Coate and its surroundings that they
tell. Those who know the locality as it was twenty or thirty years
ago could probably identify every field, every mound, almost every
tree, in these pages. If a sheep-dog stares from a gap in the hedge,
if an over-ripe apple falls thud on the orchard greensward, if a
church-key grates as it turns cumbrously in the ancient lock, we
feel at once that it is an actual dog or apple or key of those old
days that he is speaking of. All are drawn directly from his own
experience. Look at those note-books of his, from which Mr. Besant
quotes a few pages. They are actual transcripts of Nature, jotted
down on the spot in a kind of verbal shorthand. Add but a word
here and a word there, and they would be ready at once to take their
place in one of his papers. From one point of view his writings, as
literature, suffer from this habit of his, though looked at from another
point it is among their greatest charms. The Laureate, in a letter
By George fi. DartnelL 77
to the author of A Canadian Study of the Princess, confesses that
he too once used to chronicle mentally, in four or five words or so,
whatever might strike him as picturesque in Nature. But the
difference between the two men was that the poet, when, perhaps
years after, he came to use these notes, so thoroughly blended them
with the- context, that old and new became one flawless whole,
whereas the prose-writer was only just attaining such a power when
he died. Sometimes page after page shows clearly that it is made
up of separate jottings on separate slips. The caliida junctura is
everywhere visible. Now and then the slips get misplaced, and we
have lines at the foot of a page that should clearly stand at its head.
Now and then, also, some long episode, which should have found
place elsewhere, breaks the continuity of the narrative. He never
really attained the gift of selecting and proportioning his materials,
and so working them up into one harmonious whole. Hardy can
do better in this line — if he chooses. Take The Woodlanders, for
example. The plot (as also with Jefferies) is not the pleasantest
part of the book, but when we escape from it to the hayfield or the
winter woodlands what wonderful pictures he gives us! He can
subordinate the lesser to the greater — as that tree-planting episode
proves. Jefferies could have bettered it here and there, and yet the
effect produced would have been less decided and vivid.
To speak more particularly of these books — there is hardly a word
of THE GAMEKEEPER AT HOME that we could spare. It comes very
near perfection of its kind. It was originally published in the Pall
Mall Gazette. THE AMATEUR POACHER is perhaps not so good as
a whole ; but some of the sections, as " the First Gun," " the Old
Punt," and " Oby and his System/1' are particularly interesting.
The opening chapters afterwards afforded him much of the framework
of Bevis. The next — WILD LIFE, is in his best style. Note par-
ticularly the chapter on "the Waggon and its crew." There is
enough matter in the book to make half-a-dozen ordinary volumes,
and it is written more on a distinct system than some of its com-
panions appear to be.
ROUND ABOUT A GREAT ESTATE is, for Jefferies, a wonderfully
short book, but it is none the worse for that. Its three predecessors
78 Richard Je/eries.
were nothing if not practical, but here we first recognise an added
poetical touch, which lies however rather in the treatment than in
the actual wording, for there is no highly-wrought passage from
first to last. Some of the sections, as " Cicely," " the Brook/' and
that delightful visit to Uncle Bennett, are perfect in their way.
To our thinking it is his best book, taken all round.
HODGE AND HIS MASTERS comes very near being the ideal work
on the subject. It deals with things as they actually are. There is
not a so-called poetical touch in it from first to last, and yet look at
the chapters on " the Solicitor " and " the County Court/' and see
how true to Nature and how graphic they are ! In this volume, for
once, the human element predominates.
The first — and perhaps the greater — of the two country-life cycles
ends here. Its chief characteristics were minuteness and thorough-
ness of detail, absolute truth to Nature, a plain and telling style,
and a freshness which could only have been caught from the open
air. The first series is eminently practical, the second aims at more
than this. The first seldom or never contains a passage whose
diction and rhythm verge on the poetical ; the second is full of
such passages. One says what it has to say at great length, and
with remarkable evenness of merit. The other consists mainly of
short articles, often with little but their common theme to con-
nect them, and of very unequal value, now rising to the highest
point ever attained by his genius, now falling below the average.
To account for this we must remember that his later years were full
of suffering. The iron grip of hell, as he himself says, was on him,
and long-sustained work was virtually impossible.
Between series and series came two books, nominally only intended
for boys, though one of them was somehow first published as a
three-volume novel, no doubt to the great bewilderment of subscribers
to Mudie's. Of these, WOOD MAGIC is not altogether a success.
Few care to wade through the wars and intrigues among the beasts
and birds of the story. Kapchack and Choo Hoo are not very
interesting acquaintances, though touches here and there, notably
the hawk's death in the trap, and the retribution which falls on the
keeper, as well as little Bevis's own rambles and talks with the
By George E. Dartnell. 79
hare and the wind, perhaps go far to save the situation. The sequel,
BEVIS, suffers from its great length. It would be all the better if
at least half were pruned away — but then what a delightful half
would be left. We know few more interesting bits than the making
of the match-lock, the cruises about the reservoir, and the Robinson
Crusoe sort of life which the boys lead in their cave on the island.
In spite of home being almost within sight all the time you feel
with the boys that you are really cast away somewhere among
savages, and you are as much bewildered as they by the nocturnal
visits of the supposed tiger.
With THE STORY OF MY HEART we have little to do. It reveals
much of his own inner life and aspirations, and is written in his
poetical manner, but is too morbid and mystical to arrest our
sympathy, or to secure our convictions, much as Mr. Besant and
others may praise it. The book readily laid itself open to the charge
of atheistical tendencies, by its insisting upon " the existence of an
inexpressible entity infinitely higher than deity " ; and its strongly
worded craving for fulness of all sensuous pleasure also gave offence
to many. For us its chief value lies in those scattered passages that
record so vividly the thoughts and aspirations of his boyhood.
Of the books that follow, THE DEWY MORN has already been
alluded to. AFTER LONDON opens with a vivid picture of how a
country can fall back into wilderness and barbarism. Such story as
it possesses is fantastic and impossible, but for all that, when ifc
breaks off, half told, it leaves us with a strong wish that the rest
had been given us. One of the best scenes in the book is perhaps
that brief skirmish with the Gipsies, in which Felix demonstrates to
his Shepherd-allies the long- forgotten power of the yew-bow in a
practised hand. The perilous visit to that awful scene of desolation
and rottenness, guarded by deadly vapours, which was once the site
of London itself, is finely imagined. In the strongly-contrasted
pair, Felix and Oliver, we again recognise the author and his brother.
RED DEER does not in any way fall within the Wiltshire cycle,
but is a thoroughly delightful treatise, and as accurate as it is
charming and picturesque. That brief holiday in the West Country-
gave us also more than one of Jefferies' best short papers.
80 Richard Jefferies.
AMARYLLIS AT THE FAIR may here be taken somewhat out of its
proper order. It was the last book published during his life. We
may say of it, as of After London, that, fragment as it is, it still has
no small charm for us, and that we would willingly have had the
rest of the story told. It deals entirely with the Coate neighbour-
hood, and most of the characters in it are sketches of his own
relatives. Iden, for instance, is evidently his father. Miss Thomas
mentions that the latter told her that two of the best passages in
the book, the potato-planting and the choosing the leg of mutton,
were drawn from life in all their details.
There now remain only the four T volumes of collected essays and
papers, one of which was not published until after his death . These
four books, with Red Deer, make up the second great series dealing
with country life, but they contain little that distinctly belongs to
Wiltshire. THE LIFE OE THE FIELDS is chiefly remarkable for
three articles, of which the first to be mentioned is " The Field- Play "
one of the saddest things ever written, beginning with sunshine and
brightness, and passing away into unredeemed tragedy and darkness
at the close. Crabbe might have told the story well, but Jefferies
has done more than this — has almost attained perfection. Next
comes the oft-quoted Pageant of Summer, which is in his finest
poetical manner. Lastly Village Miners, a capital paper on curious
dialect words, mostly Wiltshire, which makes us wish he had given
us more of the same sort. He knew our folk-speech thoroughly,
but apparently did not recognise its real historical and philological
value — to say nothing of its picturesqueness and rough vigour —
until too late in his career to give us the full benefit of his knowledge.
Of the remaining volumes, THE OPEN AIR deals almost entirely
with Sussex and the neighbourhood of London. The resemblance
between parts of the fine paper on Wild Flowers and Kingsley's
Winter Garden is worth noting, Its mere title would show that the
volume on NATURE NEAR LONDON lies somewhat outside our range ;
but in his last essays, collected after his death under the title FIELD
AND HEDGEROW, there are a few distinctly Wiltshire touches, as in
1 THE TOILERS OF THE FIELDS is not here included, as it mainly belongs to
his earliest period.
By George E. DartnelL 81
Hours of Spring, Field Words and Ways, Cottage Ideas, and My Old
Village. It contains several papers in his best manner. Every line
of Hours of Spring, for instance, has the true ring about it, and were
we to be asked to select the finest passage in all Jefferies' writings,
its first few pages would at once occur to us. The July Grass is
also a fine piece of work. Its last paragraph may be compared with
Emerson's Each and All. In Nature in the Louvre he surprises u's
with a new phase of his genius. Walks in the Wheatjields and
Summer in Somerset are both of great excellence, though there is a
touch of unexpected bitterness in the former which might well have
been spared. My Old Village is as rambling as the hamlet itself,
but for all that it has a wonderful charm, touched with sadness, and
the end is in his best style. People, he says, deny now that there
ever was such a village as he has been describing. Well, perhaps
they are right. The evidence all goes against him. No one else
seems to have seen anything worth seeing there, so that perhaps
after all he was mistaken, and no such place ever existed. Perhaps,
too, after death, he will find out that there never was any earth.
When those words were dictated to his wife the end must have
been drawing very near. Six weeks before they were given to the
world, in the October number of Longman's, the great writer was
laid to rest, in the quiet spot which he had himself chosen. The
long martyrdom was over, the short day's work was done. We dare
not here speak of these last few years of pain and poverty and devoted
love. Some record of them will be found in Mr. Besant's pages,
but the half is not told there, nor should it ever be told, for such
things are too sad, too sacred, for speech.
The seal of Death has been set on his work, and when all is said
and done his name will still stand high in the long roll of those
whom England holds in honour, and higher still among those whom
we are proud to claim as our Wiltshire Worthies.
III.
BIBLIOGRAPHY.
i.
Reporting ; Editing & Authorship ; Practical Hints for
VOL. XXVII. — NO. LXXIX. G
8£ Richard Jefferies.
*JU
Beginners in Literature. By R. Jefferies. Pp. 33. 12mo.
Half cloth boards. London : John Snow & Co., 2, Ivy Lane,
Paternoster How. Swindon : Alfred Bull, Printer, Victoria
Street. N. D. [July, 1873.] 1*. Described in British
Museum Catalogue as 16mo.
A handbook in three chapters, the first, on Reporting, being full of
practical hints drawn from personal experience ; the second briefly sketching
the general working of a country newspaper office ; and the third laying
down those mistaken ideas as to authorship and publication which were to
cost him so dearly in after years.
A copy of this work was sold in 1892 for £3 10s. It is extremely scarce.
II.
A Memoir of the Goddards of North Wilts. Compiled
from Ancient Records, Registers, and Family Papers.
By Richard Jefferies, Coate, Swindon. One vol., pp. 56. Small
4to. Blue cloth, lettered <T>^SD3i;O on side. N. D. [1873]
7*. 6<tf. [Privately printed by Simmons & Botten, Shoe Lane,
E.G.]
Contents : — Origin. The Senior Branch. The Swindon Branch. Minor
Branches. Miscellanies. Pedigrees. Apparition of Edward Avon, Father-
in-law of Thomas Goddard, Marlborough.
A work of no great literary merit, but useful as a basis for some future
work on the history of the family. It was very severely handled in the
Athenaeum.
Extracts from unpublished letters : —
(a) " For s ome years past I have interested myself more or less in
archaeology, and more particularly in the antiquities of my immediate neigh-
bourhood, and of course the position occupied by the family of Goddard has
often attracted my attention to their antecedents, but beyond what is con-
tained in Burke I have not hitherto been successful in my enquiries. . . .
If you can .... give me any information .... I shall feel
it to be an act of courtesy and kindness on your part .... there are
a hundred little facts which are not recorded in Burke, but which would be
very interesting to me .... ." — Letter to Rev. F. Goddard, 9th
September, 1869.
(b) " You may remember giving me a number of particulars respecting
the Goddard family. At the time I did not mention the reason why I wished
By George E. Dartnell. 83
to collect them: it was this. For some ten or twelve years I have been
assiduously collecting materials for an account of Swindon (itself alone), and
having had peculiar opportunities I think I have at last succeeded in my
researches : and I am now thinking of early publication .... It was
absolutely necessary that in an account of Swindon the fullest particulars
should appear of the Goddard family which lias been associated with it for
so many years, so many generations. After exhausting all other sources
. I called upon you, and you received me with the greatest kindness
. , . . I have been engaged in weaving the materials I had collected into
.a history of the Goddard family, & the MS, is at last completed. In pub-
lishing this little work I do not anticipate or desire any profit, but it is
natural to wish to escape absolute loss . . . . The contemplated cost
will not exceed £20, perhaps less — half of which I am willing to risk myself,
and a lady who is interested in the matter is ready to risk £5, leaving a
margin of £5, I think I am justified in believing that the sale will repay
the cost of production : but .... I am anxious the printer should be
guaranteed against loss .... May I ask as a special favour that the
subject of this communication may be kept a profound secret ? It is my
especial desire that not the slightest knowledge of my intention to publish
may escape, until the MS. is actually printed," — Letter to H. N. Goddard,
Esq., 25th November, 1872.
(c) " I am much indebted for your kind offer of assistance in the cost of
publication. I have no doubt myself that it will ultimately repay the
expenses ; but it is very possible that it may not do so before the printer's
bill falls due. My great object, therefore, is to feel satisfied in my own
mind that I can meet his claim the moment it is made. Out of an estimate
of £20 I have now £15 guaranteed ; leaving £5. If I might go so far as
to suggest that you should assist by kindly guaranteeing half of this, or
£2 10s., the margin left would be a very small risk indeed." — Letter to
the same, 27th November, 1872.
(d) "You were kind enough yesterday to enquire as to the sale of
" Goddard." I find this morning that I have only thirty copies left at
home, and there are three at Miss Woodham's, the bookseller, in Swindon.
I think this is a very good sale indeed for a work apparently of only local
interest. But I have been very much surprised at the widespread acquaintance
there appears to be with the name of Goddard. Copies have been sent for
from almost all the Midland aud Southern Counties ; in fact, four. fifths of
the copies sold have been sent long distances. An American gentleman .
. ordered five copies .... Several gentlemen have started
the idea of a second edition, & a printer the other day offered to print it,
& wait till the sale repaid the outlay for his money .... I have
G 2
84 Richard Jefferies.
sometimes thought that it would be better to publish a second volume, con-
taining the additional information that has been sent me .... and
to finish with complete and exhaustive pedigrees .... But this is
only an idea as yet. Should it ever ripen to a design I must again ask your
advice & especially to revise the MS." — Letter to the same, 14,th November,
1873.
(e) " I have commenced the second edition, or second volume as it will in
effect be, of ' Goddard,' but I cannot say at what date it will appear, for my
time is now so occupied with literary work. However it is begun, and shall
be finished .... It is my desire to make the book as complete as
possible, & as reliable as possible." — Letter to Rev. F. Goddard, 23rd
November, 1875.
Also see letter to Mrs. Harrild, 7th May, 1873, quoted in The Eulogy,
ch. iii., p. 95.
Very scarce. Copies have recently been sold at from 30s. to 63s. See
paragraphs in G-lobe, llth June, 1892, and previously,
III.
Jack Brass, Emperor of England. 8vo. T. Pettit & Co.,
Soho. 1873.
A political pamphlet, about which no further particulars are forthcoming.
Has fetched 42s. and upwards at a recent sale.
IV.
The Scarlet Shawl : a Novel.
First Edition, one vol., pp. 310. 8vo. Tinsley Bros. 1874
[July]. 10*. 6rf.
Second Edition, one vol. 8vo, 1877. Is.
Unfavourably noticed in Athenaum, Graphic, and G-lobe. Crude,
incoherent, and unwholesome. Published at his own expense. " This
book affords not the slightest indication of genius, insight, descriptive, or
dramatic power." — Eulogy, p. 147.
V.
Restless Human Hearts : a Novel. By Richard Jefferies,
author of " The Scarlet Shawl/' etc. Three vols. 8vo. Tinsley
Bros. 1875 [February]. 31s. U.
Noticed unfavourably in Graphic and other papers. Belongs to the
" desperately wicked nobleman " school of fiction.
By Georgn E. Dartnell. 85
VI,
Suez-cide. John Snow & Co., London. 1876.
A political pamphlet, which I have not seen.
VII.
World's End: a Story in Three Books.
? First Edition, three vols., crown 8vo. Tinsley Bros., 1877.
? Second Edition, one vol. 1877. 6s.
In B-. M. Cat. and Eulogy quoted as three vols. Advertised as one
vol. Probably, therefore, two editions were published.
" The Queen, the Graphic, and the Spectator spoke of it with measured
approbation, but no enthusiasm." — Eulogy, p. 161.
" The story centres round the great property at Birmingham, considered
to be worth four millions, which is without an owner. A year or two
ago there was a family council at that city of a hundred claimants from
America, Australia, and other places. But it is still in Chancery." —
Letter from JefEeries, Eulogy, p. 160.
VIII.
The Gamekeeper at Home; or, Sketches of Natural
History and Rural Life^
First Edition. One vol. Cloth. Crown 8vo. Smith, Elder,
& Co. 5*. June, 1878. Anonymous.
Second Edition. Crown 8vo. November, 1878. Anonymous.
Bt,
Third Edition. Crown 8vo. January, 1879. Anonymous.
5*.
First Illustrated Edition. Large crown 8vo, cloth, bound by
Burn, forty-one illustrations by Charles Whymper. January,
1880. 105. 6d. [Now priced at 24*. to 38*.]
New Edition, with all the illustrations. Crown 8vo. No-
vember, 1890. 5*.
Originally published in the Pall Mall G-azette. Noticed in Edinburgh
Review (July, 1879), Standard, Daily Neius, World, Saturday Review,
Spectator, John Bull, Nonconformist, Albion, Whitehall Review, etc.
86 Richard Jefferies.
In advertisements the word POACHING almost invariably appears in the
sub-title.
Contents: — I. — The Man himself — his House and Tools. II. — His
Family and Caste. III. —In the Fields. IV. — His Dominions: the
Woods— Meadows— and Water. Y. — Some of his Subjects : Dogs, Rabbits,
"Mice and such small deer." VI. — His Enemies: Birds and Boasts of
Prey — Trespassers, VII. — Professional Poachers — the Art of Wiring
Game. VIII.— The Field Detective— Fish Poaching. IX.— Guerilla
Warfare — Gun Accidents— Black Sheep.
One of the best books of its Rind that has ever been written. Style
plain but forcible : no fine writing whatever. Subject practically treated,
and kept within reasonable bounds.
For a sketch of the keeper's house, near Coate, see Art Journal,
January, 1893, p. 17.
The first edition has fetched 47*. 6d., and the first illustrated edition
from 24*. to 36*., according to condition.
IX.
Wild Life in a Southern County. By author of " The Game-
keeper at Home."
First Edition. One vol. Crown 8vo. Smith, Elder, & Co.
March, 1879. 7*. 6d. [Has fetched 425. recently.]
Second Edition. One vol. Crown Svo. Christmas, 1879,
Is. Gd.
Third Edition. One vol. Crown Svo. November, 1887.
Is. 6rf.
New Edition. One vol. Crown Svo. April, 1889. 6s.
American Edition. Roberts Bros., Boston, 1879.
*Contents :— 1.— The Downs. II.— A. Drought. III.— The Hillside
Hedge. IV.— The Village. V.— Village Architecture. VI.— The Hamlet :
The Waggon and its Crew. VII.— The Farmhouse. VIII.— Birds of
the Farmhouse. IX. —The Orchard. X.— The Woodpile. XI.— The
Homefield. XII. -The Ash Copse : Heron's Mead. XIII.— The Warren :
the Forest. XIV.— The Rookery. XV.— Rooks returning to roost. XVI.
—Notes on Birds. XVII.— Notes on the fear. XVIIL— Snake-lore :
* Only the leading titles of the chapters are given here.
By George E. Dartnell. 87
The Brook. XIX.- Course of the Brook: the Lake. XX.— Wildfowl of
the Lake : Frost and Snow.
In the Preface the author sketches briefly the definite plan of this work.
The subjects it deals with are so closely connected that he finds it best
to arrange them under the districts to which they belong most. The
chapters " correspond in some degree with the contour of the country,"
starting with the Downs, and descending thence, along the course of the
brook, to hamlet, water-meadow, farm-house, copse and forest, each with
their characteristic animals and birds, till the end is reached in the vale
itself.
Mostly in his best style, but occasionally somewhat disjointed. Con-
tains enough matter to make half-a-dozen volumes, and would perhaps have
gained by being so divided.
Noticed in Saturday Review, Athenceum, Standard, John Hull,
Scotsman, Bailey's Magazine, Academy, Graphic, Field, Edinburgh
Review (July, 1879), Scribner's Magazine (August, 1879, p. 632), etc.
X.
The Amateur Poacher. By author of " The Gamekeeper at
Home/'
First Edition. One vol. Crown 8vo. Smith, Elder, & Co.
November, 1879. 5s. Anonymous. [Is now priced at about
New Edition. Crown 8vo. 1889. 5s.
American Edition. Roberts Bros., Boston, 1879.
Contents :— I.— The First Gun. II.— The Old Punt : a curious " Turn-
pike." III. — Tree-shooting: a Fishing Expedition. IV.— Egg-time : a
"Gip-trap." V.— Woodland Twilight: Traitors on the Gibbet. VI.—
Lurcher-land: "the Park." VIL— Oby, and his System: the Moucher's
Calendar. VIII.— Churchyard Pheasants : Before the Bench. IX.— Luke,
the Eabbit-contractor. X.— Farmer Willuin's Place : Snipe-shooting.
XT.— Ferreting : A Rabbit-hunter. XII. -A Winter's Night : Old
Tricks: Pheasant-stalking: Matchlock versus Breechloader : Conclusion.
Written in same style as the Gamekeeper, but hardly so well put
together. Chapters I., II., and VII. are excellent. The first two of these
afterwards gave him the framework of much of Bevis.
Noticed in Daily News, Saturday Review, Scotsman, Graphic,
Examiner, British Quarterly Review, John Bull, Albiout Scribner's
(March, 1880, p. 362), etc.
88 Richard Jefferies.
XI.
Greene Feme Farm : A Novel. By author of " The Game-
keeper at Home."
One vol., pp. 290. Crown 8vo. Smith, Elder, & Co. Feb.,
1880. 75. 6d. [Now priced at about 30*.]
Originally appeared as a serial in Time, beginning in No. 1, April, 1879.
Noticed in Athenaum, Spectator, Scotsman, Examiner, etc.
Contents :— I. — Up to Church. II. — " The sweet new Grass with Flowers."
III.— The Nether Millstone. IV.— The Wooden Bottle. V.— Evening.
VI.— Night. VII.— Dawn. VIII.— A-Nutting. IX.— Gleaning. X.— A
Fray. XI. — A Feast— Conclusion.
The plot is weak and badly worked out, and the characters are mere
puppets ; but here and there we meet with a fine piece of descriptive writing,
as in Ch. VII.
" Neither short, bright, dramatic, nor amusing." — Eulogy, p. 201.
XII.
Hodge and his Masters.
First Edition. Two vols. Crown 8vo, pp. 660. Cloth.
Smith, Elder, & Co., April, 1880. 12s. [Now priced at 21$.
to 28*.]
New Edition. One vol. Crown 8vo. November,, 1890. 7s. Qd.
Originally appeared in the Standard. Frequently advertised as "Hodge
and his Master." Noticed by Academy, British Quarterly Review,
Field, Examiner, Graphic, Standard, etc.
Contents : — I. — The Farmers' Parliament. II. — Leaving his Farm. III.
—A Man of Progress. IV. — Going Downhill. V. — The Borrower and
the Gambler. VI.— An Agricultural Genius— Old Style. VII.— The Gig
and the Four-in-hand. A Bicycle Farmer. VIII. — Haymaking. " The
Juke's Country." IX. — The Fine Lady Farmer. Country Girls. X. —
Mademoiselle, the Governess. XI. — Fleeceborough. A " Despot." XII. —
The Squire's " Round Robin." XIII.— An Ambitious Squire. XIV.—
The Parson's Wife. XV.— A Modern Country Curate. XVI.— The
Solicitor. XVII.— "County Court Day." XVIIL— The Bank. The Old
Newspaper. XIX. — The Village Factory. Village Visitors. Willow-
work. XX.— Hodge's Fields. XXI.—A Winter's Morning. XXII.—
The "Labourer's Children. Cottage Girls. XXIII.— The low "Public."
By George E. Dartnell. 89
Idlers. XXIV.— The Cottage Charter. XXV. -Landlords' Difficulties.
The Labourer as a Power. Modern Clergy. XXVI. — A Wheat Country.
XX VII. -Grass Countries. XXVIII.— Hodge's Last Masters. Conclusion.
Probably the best work existing on the subject. Style plain, but very
graphic and forcible.
XIII.
Round about a Great Estate.
First Edition. One vol. Crown 8vo, cloth, pp. vii. 204.
Smith, Elder, & Co. August, 1880. 5*. [Now priced at 18s.
to 25^.]
flew Edition. One vol. Crown 8vo. (? 189-—.) 5*.
Noticed by JBritisk Quarterly, Echo, Globe, Public Opinion, Queen,
etc.
Contents :— Okebourne Chace. Felling Trees. II.— Cicely. The Brook.
III. — A Pack of Stoats. Birds. IV.— Hamlet-folk. V. - Winci-anemones.
The Fishpond. VI.— A Farmer of the Olden Times VII.— The Cuckoo
Fields. VIII.- Cicely's Dairy. Hilary's Talk. IX.— The Water-Mill.
Field Names. X. — The Coomb-Bottom. Conclusion.
The shortest, but perhaps the most delightful, of his country books.
XIV.
Wood Magic : a Fable.
First Edition. Two vols. Post 8vo, pp. 490. Cassell,
Petter, & Galpin. June, 1881. 21s. [Now priced at 21s. to
425.]
New Edition. One vol. Extra crown 8vo, pp. 499. Nov.,
1882.
New Edition. One vol. 1888. 6s.
Noticed in Harper's Magazine (December, 1881, p. 153).
In Eulogy the first Edition is quoted as being in one vol.
Very unevenly written, a few passages being in his best style. Contains
Bevis's adventures as a child.
XV.
Bevis : the Story of a Boy.
First Edition. Three vols. Post 8vo. Sampson, Low, &
90 Richard Je/eries.
Co. June, 1882. 31*. §d. [Now priced at 25s. to 47*. 6</.]
New Edition. One vol., illustrated, pp. 362. 1891. 6*.
Noticed in Harpers, January, 1883, p. 392, as " Two vols., 12mo." Was
this an English second edition, or an American reprint?
Also very unevenly written and badly proportioned. The Eobinson Crusoe
life on the island is mostly excellent. The story appears to have been
developed from the earlier chapters of the Amateur Poacher.
XVI.
Nature near London.
First Edition.. One vol. Crown 8vo. Cloth extra, pp. vi.
242. Chatto and Windus. April, 1883. [Now priced at 21*.]
Second Edition. 1887. 6*.
New Edition. 1889. Post 8vo, pp. 242. Cloth limp. 2*. Qd.
New Edition. Handmade paper, bound in buckram with gilt
top. 6*. In press, January, 1893.
Noticed in St. James's Gazette, Pall Mall, Athenaum, Tablet, Satur-
day Review (19th May, 1883), Harper s Magazine (January, 1884, p.
322), etc.
Contents : — Woodlands. Footpaths. Flocks of Birds. Nightingale
Road. A Brook. A London Trout. A Barn. Wheatfields. The Crows.
Heathlands. The River. Nutty Autumn. Round a London Copse.
Magpie Fields. Herbs. Trees about London. To Brighton. The South-
down Shepherd. The Breeze on Beachy He id.
Reprinted from the Standard. Short sketches, aimed at showing that
wild birds and animals— contrary to the general idea— are almost as abun-
dant near London as in distant country places.
XVII.
The Story of My Heart : My Autobiography.
First Edition. One vol. Post 8vo. Cloth, pp. 188. Long--
mans, Green, & Co. November, 1883. 5*. [Now priced at
30*. to 42*.]
Second Edition. One vol. Crown 8vo, pp, xii. 206, with
portrait and new preface by C. J. Longman. Silver Library.
1891. a*. 6<*.
Tty George E. Darlnell. 91
" I have just finished writing a book about which I have been meditating
seventeen years .... it really is an autobiography, an actual record
of thought." — Letter to Mr. Longman, 22nd June, 1883.
" This book is a confession. The author describes the successive stages
of emotion and thought through which he passed, till he arrived at the
conclusions which are set forth in the latter part of the volume. He claims
to have erased from his mind the traditions and learning of the past ages,
and to stand face to face with nature and with the unknown. The general
aim of the work is to free thought from every trammel, with the view of
its entering upon another and larger series of ideas than those which have
occupied the brain of man so many centuries. He believes that there is a
whole world of ideas outside and beyond those which now exercise us ...
For himself, for the individual, the author desires physical perfection — he
despises external circumstances. From all nature — from the universe — he
desires to take its energy, grandeur, and beauty. He looks forward to the
possibility of ideal man .... is anxious that the culture of the soul
should be earnestly carried out . . . . considers the idea of duty in-
ferior, and believes that there is something higher. He ends as he commences
with prayer for the fullest soul-life." — From Author's Analysis, in Notes on
SooJcs, 30th November, 1883.
XVIII.
Eed Deer.
First Edition. 0ne vol. Crown 8vo, pp. 207. Longmans,
Green, & Co. February, 1884. 4*. 6d. [Now priced at 30*.]
Second Edition, with frontispiece by H. Tunaley, and sixteen
illustrations by John Charlton. One vol. Crown 8vo, pp. 248.
Silver Library, March, 1892. 3s. 6d.
Contents : — I.— Red Deer Land. II.— Wild Exmoor. III.— Deer in
Summer. IV. — Antler and Fern. V. — Ways of Deer. VI. — Tracking
Deer by Slot. VII.— The Hunted Stag. VIII.— Hind-hunting. IX.— A
Manor House in Deer Land. X. — Game Notes and Folk Lore.
" A minute account of the natural history of the wild deer of Exmoor, and
of the modes of hunting them." — Letter to Mr. Longman, 1883.
The best work in existence on its subject.
XIX.
The Life of the Fields.
First Edition. One vol. Post 8vo. Cloth extra, pp. viii.
92 Richard Jefferies.
262. Chatto & Windus. June, 1884. [Now priced at 24*.]
New Edition. Post 8vo. Cloth limp, pp. 262. April, 1888.
2*. 6fl7.
New Edition. Handmade paper. Buckram, with gilt top.
6*. In press, January, 1893.
Short sketches, collected from sources indicated below.
Contents :— The Field-Play— (1) Uptill-a-Thorn. (2) Rural Dynamite
{Time]. Bits of Oak Bark— (1) The Acorn-gatherer. (2) The Legend of
a Gateway. (3) A Roman Brook [Longmans']. The Pageant of Summer.
[Longmans, June, 1883]. Meadow Thoughts [Graphic]. Clematis Lane
[Standard]. Nature near Brighton [Standard], Sea, Sky, and Down
[Standard]. January in the Sussex Woods [Standard]. By the Exe
[Standard]. The Water-Colley [Manchester Guardian]. Notes on
Landscape Painting [Magazine of Art]. Village Miners [Gentleman's].
Mind under Water [Graphic]. Sport and Science [National Review],
Nature and the Gamekeeper [St. James's]. The Sacrifice to Trout [St.
James s]. The Hovering of the Kestrel [St. James's]. Birds climbing
the Air [St. James's]. Country Literature : — (1) The Awakening.
(2) Scarcity of Books. (3) The Villager's Taste in Reading. (4) Plan
of Distribution [Pall Mall]. Sunlight in a London Square [Pall
Mall]. Venice in the East End [Pall Mall]. The Pigeons at the British
Museum [Pall Mall]. The Plainest City in Europe [Pall Mall].
Noticed in Derby Mercury, Society, Saturday Review (12th November,
1884), Nature Notes (April, 1893), etc.
Contains some of his best work, as The Field Play, and The Pageant
of Summer ; also Village Miners, his only article on dialect.
XX.
The Dewy Morn. A Novel.
First Edition. Two vols. Post 8vo. Bentley. August,
1884. 21*.
Second Edition. Two vols. 1889.
Third Edition. One vol. Crown 8vo, pp. 396. 65. "Bent-
ley's Favourite Novels/' June, 1891.
Noticed in John Bull, Vanity Fair, Morning Post, Academy, Satur-
day Review (18th October, 1884), etc.
'By George E. Dartnell. 93
Frequently advertised as "In a Dewy Morn" and "In the Dewy Morn."
Written about 1875, and then declined by Tinsley Bros.
Like Greene Feme Farm, mostly crude and weak, with a few good
passages.
XXI.
After London; or, Wild England.
First Edition. One vol. Crown 8vo, pp. vii. 442. Cassell
& Co. 1885. J0«s. Qd. [Now priced at 24s. to 30,?.]
New Edition. One vol. November, 1886. 3s. 6d. [Now
priced at 7*. 6^.]
In two parts: — Part I. The Eelapse into Barbarism. Part II. Wild
England.
Noticed in Harper's (October, 1885, p. 804), Saturday Review (llth
July, 1885), etc.
An attempt at depicting an imagined relapse of England into semi-
barbarism. The story stops short in the middle, leaving us in doubt whether
Felix succeeds in his efforts to re-establish order, or falls a victim to his
enemies.
XXII.
The Open Air.
First Edition. One vol. Post 8vo. Cloth Extra, pp. 270.
Chatto & Windus. 1885. 6*. [Now priced at 16s. 6d. to 18s.]
New Edition. Post 8vo. Cloth limp. 1890. 2s. Qd.
New Edition. Handmade paper. Buckram with gilt top.
In press, January, 1893. 6s.
Contents : — Saint Guido [English Illustrated, December, 1884), Golden-
brown. Wild Flowers. Sunny Brighton. The Pine Wood. Nature on the
Koof. One of the New Voters. The Modern Thames. The Single-barrel
Gun. The Haunt of the Hare. The Bathing Season. Under the Acorns.
Downs. Forest. Beauty in the Country. Out of Doors in February.
Haunts of the Lapwing. Outside London. On the London Eoad. Ked
Hoofs of London. A Wet Night in London.
Short papers, collected from Chambers' s Journal, English Illustrated,
Good Words, Longmans, Manchester Guardian, Pall Mall, St. James's
Gazette, and Standard.
94 Richard Jefferies.
XXTIT.
Amaryllis at the Fair : a Novel.
First Edition. One vol. Crown 8vo. Cloth extra, pp. 260.
Sampson, Low, & Co. March, 1887. 75, QcL [Now priced
at 7*. Qd. to 12*. 6d.].
Noticed in Saturday Review, 9th April, 1887.
The best of his so-called novels. The scenery is that of Coate, and the
characters are mostly drawn from his own relatives. Like After London,
it stops short just as the plot should be developing itself.
XXIV.
Field and Hedgerow : being the Last Essays of Richard
Jefferies, collected by his Widow.
First Edition. One vol. Crown 8vo. Cloth, pp. viii. 331,
with portrait. Longmans, January, 1889. [Now priced at
155. to 185.]
Large Paper Edition, limited to two hundred copies, with
etched portrait by W. Strang, half vellum, imperial 8vo, gilt
top, January, 1889 (price on application). [Now priced at
18*. to 30*.]
New Edition. Crown 8vo. Portrait. In Silver Library,
August, 1891. 3s. 6d.
Noticed in Saturday Review (9th February, 1889), Morning Post, etc.
Contents: — Hours of Spring [Longmans, 1885], Nature and Books
[Fortnightly], The July Grass [Pall Mall], Winds of Heaven [Chambers'*
Journal], The Country Sunday [Longmans, June, 1887], The Country-side :
Sussex [Manchester G-uardian], Swallow-time [Standard], Buckhurst
Park [Standard], House-martins [Standard], Among the Nuts [Stan-
dard], Walks in the Wheat-fields [English Illustrated, July and August,
1887], Just before Winter [Chambers' s]t Locality and Nature [Pall Mall],
Country Places [Manchester G-uardian], Field Words and Ways [Cham-
bers^], Cottage Ideas [Chambers's], April Gossip [St. James's], Some
April Insects [Pall Mall], The Time of Year [Pall Mall], Mixed Days
of May and December [Pall Mall], The Makers of Summer [Pall Mall],
Steam on Country Roads [Standard], Field Sports in Art: The Mammoth
Hunter [Art Journal, April, 1885], Birds' Nests [St. James's], Nature in
the Louvre [Magazine of Art], Summer in Somerset [English Illustrated,
Sy George E. Darlnell. 95
October, 1887], An English Deer-Park [The Century, October, 1888], My
Old Village [Longmans, October, 1887], My Chaffinch [Pall Mall].
Collected papers from sources indicated above.
Contains some of his finest work, as " Hours of Spring," " The July
Grass," "Walks in the Wheat-fields," " Summer in Somerset," and "My
Old Village," also what is perhaps his only acknowledged piece of verse,
"My Chaffinch," in which we find a style curiously reminding us of certain
of Miss Ingelow's narrative poems.
XXV.
The Toilers of the Field.
First Edition. One vol. Crown 8vo. Cloth, with paper
label, pp. 327. Longmans. November, 1892. 6s. With
portrait from the bust by Miss Thomas in Salisbury Cathedral,
photographed by Mr. J. Owen, of Salisbury.
Large Paper Edition, November, 1892, limited to one hundred
and five copies (price on application to publishers).
New Edition. One vol. Crown 8vo. 6s. Third thousand,
April, 1893.
Contents : — Part I. : The Farmer at Home : The Labourer's Daily Life :
Field-faring Women : An English Homestead ; John Smith's Shanty [all
from Frasers, 1874] : Wiltshire Labourers [Letters to the Times, 1872] :
A True Tale of the Wiltshire Labourer. Part II. : The Coming of Summer
[Longmans, December, 1891] : The Golden-crested Wren [Longmans] :
An Extinct Race [Longma-ns~\ : Orchis Mascula [Longmans'] : The Lions
in Trafalgar Square [Longmans, March, 1892].
Noticed in Devizes Gazette, 1st and 8th December, 1892.
A True Tale was written about 1867, and rejected by several magazines
aud papers, eventually falling into the hands of Mr. George Harmer, of
Cirencester.
IV.
MISCELLANEA.
MAGAZINE AND OTHER ARTICLES, NOT YET REPRINTED.
1866. "Pour short stories by " Geoffrey/' in North Wilts Herald :—
A Strange Story.
96 Richard Jefferies.
Henrique Beaumont.
Who ivill win ? or} American Adventure.
1867. The History of Malmesbury, by " Geoffrey," twenty-one
chapters, with appendix, North Wilts Herald, 20th April, etc.
Its appearance was thus announced by the Editor : — "To OUE READERS.
The antiquity of Malmesbury and its many historic associations render it of
more than ordinary interest. With a view of making our readers familiar
with many facts in their own locality, we have arranged for the publication
in hebdomadal instalments of a * HISTORY OF MALMESBURY,' from earliest
to modern times. The task will be performed by a gentleman of considerable
ability and much knowledge of county lore. The proprietor trusts that this
effort to render the ' Herald ' additionally attractive will be appreciated by
the extensive circle of readers in the Malmesbury and Tetbury district."
The History of Swindon would seem to have appeared in
instalments in the local papers about this time.
Jefferies once proposed to issue this by subscription at 1*. 6d., and names
were to be sent to the Author, or to Mrs. Booth, bookseller, Swindon.
1873. On Swindon, its History and Antiquities, a paper read before
the Wilts Archaeological Society, and published in Wilts Arch.
Mag., xiv., p. 180.
The Future of Farming \Fraser s~\.
1874. The Works at Swindon [Erasers'] .
1875. Allotment Gardens [New Quarterly, November].
Field-faring Women [Graphic}.
Marlborough Forest.
Village Churches.
The Average of Beauty-
Village Organization [Mark Lane Express],
The Cost of Agricultural Labour [Standard] .
The Power of the Farmer {Fortnightly} .
1883. An Analysis of The Story of My Hearty in Longman's
" Notes on Books," 30th November.
1884. A King of Acres [Chambers 3 February].
After the County Franchise [Longmans, February] .
1886. Out of the Season. Published in " The Dove's Nest and
By George E. Dartnell. 97
other Tales," by Joseph Hatton, R. Jefferies, H. S. Clarke, etc.
Vizetelly, 1887.
Preface to White's " History of Selborne," in Camelot
Classics, 1886.
The above list is by no means exhaustive. I have met with several other
papers, of which I have no note.
UNPUBLISHED MATTER.
(Works mentioned by Mr. Besant, but never published.)
1868. Casar Borgia ; or, the King of Crime. A tragedy.
1870. Verses on the Exile of the Prince Imperial.
1872. Only a Girl. A novel; offered to Tinsleys.
1874. The Agricultural Life. Offered to Longmans.
1875. In Summer Time. A novel.
1875. The New Pilgrim's Progress; or, a Christian's Painful
Progress from the Town of Kiddle Class to the Golden City.
1878. The Proletariate-, the Power of the Future. Planned.
1878. The History of the English Squire. Planned.
1878. A work on Shooting. Offered to Longmans.
1882. A series of Short Story -Sketches of Life and Character,
Incident and Nature.
1885. A Bit of Human Nature. A novel.
ARTICLES, ETC., RELATING TO JEFFERIES.
(in addition to those mentioned in Section III.)
(a) THE EULOGY OP RICHARD JEFFERIES. By Walter Besant.
Chatto & Windus. 1888.
First Edition. One vol. Post 8vo. Portrait. 10*. 6d.
Second Edition. One vol. Crown 8vo. Cloth extra. Photo-
portrait. 6*.
A thoroughly charming and sympathetic sketch of life and works, which
should be valued by all admirers of Jefferies.
Noticed at considerable length in Salisbury and Winchester Journal,
29th December, 1888, also in Daily News and British Weekly in November,
(b) Paragraphs relative to the Goddard Memoir in Globe, llth June,
1892, and previously.
VOL. XXVII. — NO. LXXIX. H
98 Richard Jefferies.
(c) The Unveiling of the Bust. Articles in Saturday Review, 12th
March; Nature Notes, iii.j 87 ; Salisbury Journal, 2nd April;
and Sarum Diocesan Gazette, April, 1892.
(d) " Kichard Jefferies in Salisbury Cathedral/' by Miss Thomas,
with illustrations, Literary Opinion, April, 1893 ; also some
notes in same number.
(e) "Richard Jefferies," Marlburian, 16th November, 1892.
(/) " Richard Jefferies," a poem, by Mary Geoghegan, Temple Bar,
January, 1892 :—
"Boom in his heart for all!
For striving stitchwort as for oak-tree tall ;
Koom for the chickweed at the gate, the weed upon the wall;
Still as the page was writ
'Twas Nature held his hand and guided it ....
Vague longings found a tongue ;
Things dim and ancient into speech were wrung ;
The epic of the rolling wheat, the lyric hedgerow sung ....
No bird that cleaves the air
But his revealing thought has made more fair ;
No tremulous dell of summer leaves but felt his presence there.
So though we deem him dead,
Lo ! he yet speaketh ! and the words are sped
In grassy whispers o'er the fields — by every wild flower said."
Stanzas 2, 3^ 4, 9, 10.
(a) " Richard Jefferies/' a poem, by W. H. A. E., [Rev. W. H. A.
Ewance, Twickenham,] in Wilts County Mirror, 8th April,
1892 :—
" Shire of the rounded hills ! . . . .
Shire, where the fountain fills
The streamlet and anon the tiny fall
Past mounded hedgerows, lined with poplars tall,
Hazel, and old gnarled yew-trunks, winds in play
To Avon or to Kennet's wider way ;
Shire that he loved to tread,
Guard in thy storied fane his carven form,
Think of the wanderer past life's heat and storm,
Thine still, though cold and dead ! " — Stanza 3,
In Memoriam, William Callings Lukis, M.A., J?.S.A. 99
(h) " Round about Coate," by P. Anderson Graham, Art Journal,
January, 1893, witb nine illustrations by H. E. Tidmarsh.
(i) Biography, by Dr. Garnett, in Dictionary of National Biography,
vol. xxix.
(k] " The Books of Richard Jefferies," Nature Notes, i., 194.
NOTE,
The Bibliography is probably still far from complete, and I shall be glad
to have any additions or corrections. My memoranda as to articles relative to
Jefferies have been mislaid, and I can therefore only quote a few here. I take
this opportunity ,of thanking those who have kindly helped me in various ways,
especially W. Cunnington, Esq., for the loan of the History of Malmesbury ;
H. N. Goddard, Esq., for that of several hitherto unpublished letters ; the
Rev. A. Smy the- Palmer, D.D., for collating my list with the British Museum
Catalogue (which appears to be very deficient in editions of Jefferies) ; and
Messrs. Brown & Co., of Salisbury, for allowing me to look over several years of
the Bookseller and other papers.
it IJUmrchrar, Milliam Colling
the death of the Rev. W. C. Lukis our Society has lost
another of its oldest officers, for at the inauguration of the
lociety in 1853 (now very nearly forty years ago) Mr. Lukis and
Canon Jackson jointly undertook the office of General Secretaries,
and to their united efforts we are indebted for the excellent start
which they gave to the Society.
Mr. Lukis was a born archaeologist and naturalist, inheriting his
scientific knowledge from his father, Colonel Lukis, who was dis-
tinguished for his careful researches into the construction and uses
of the rude stone monuments of Brittany and this country, and
also for his profound acquaintance with the natural history, in all
its branches, of the Channel Islands, where his home lay.
The subject of this memoir was born in Guernsey in 1817, and
1 Many of the details of this memoir are derived from the Biograpk for 1881,
vol. vi., pp. 37—39.
100 In Memoriam, William Collins LnJcis, M.A., F.S.A.
was educated partly at Elizabeth College in that island, partly in
France (where he acquired a perfect knowledge of the French
language), and subsequently at Blackheath, passing on to Trinity
College, Cambridge, in 1836, where he graduated in honours in 1840.
In 1841 he was ordained deacon at Salisbury by Bishop Denison,
and held the Curacy of Bradford-on-Avon under Canon Harvey ;
and subsequently he held successively the livings of East Grafton,
Great Bedwyn, and Collingbourne Ducis, all in this Diocese, and
lastly Wath, in Yorkshire, to all of which he was in turn presented
by the patron who appreciated him, the then Marquis of Ailesbury.
In every one of these parishes he either restored the Church or re-
built the schools, and in most of them he accomplished both these
works. He was also an active Rural Dean, as well in the Diocese
of Ripon as in that of Salisbury. He died at Wath Rectory, after
a prolonged illness, on December 7th, 1892, aged 75.
As to his archa3ological work (which more especially belongs to
these pages) Mr. Lukis was indefatigable in his exertions both in
this country and in France. While at Cambridge he was one of the
early members of the Camden Society, which indeed he helped to
originate; and while Curate of Bradford he published a quarto
volume of f ' Ancient Church Plate" which was the precursor of the
Instrumental Ecclesiastica> edited by the Ecclesiological (late Camden)
Society, under the able superintendence of Mr. Butterfield, the
well-known architect. Next he published two addresses to the rural
deans and churchwardens, on the necessity of examining the condition
of Church bells, with a view to their preservation, and the security
of Church towers. This was followed in 1855 by a paper read before
our Society at Salisbury on the same subject, and which subsequently
culminated in the excellent volume well known to us all, entitled
" An Account of Church Bells"
But perhaps it was as a barrow-digger and cromlech explorer that
Mr. Lukis laboured hardest as an archaeologist. His first diggings
were in the Guernsey cromlechs, and he explored many of the Brittany
dolmens. Our Magazine contains notes of his excavations at Col-
lingbourne, and we have ourselves seen him and indeed taken part
in his work both in opening barrows and investigating the interior
In Memoriam, William Collins LuJcis, M.A., F.S.A, 101
of a cromlech in this county. In Yorkshire, too, he did much good
work in this direction. In 1870 he read before our Society at
Salisbury a carefully-prepared paper on the " Stone Avenues of Carnac,"
and in 1875 he published a very useful " Guide to the principal
Chambered Barrows and other Prehistoric Monuments of South
Brittany.33 Previously to this he had read papers at Nantes " Sur
la Denomination des Dolmens ou Cromlechs" and on " Monuments
Megalithiques en Algerie." In fine he from time to time contributed
to the publications of several French as well as English antiquarian
societies, including amongst the latter the Journal of the " Royal
Archaeological Institute of Great Britain," the Journal of the
" British Archaeological Association," and above all the " Archa-
ologia 33 of the " Society of Antiquaries," of which he was elected a
Fellow in 1853, and which enlisted his services during many summer
holidays, to make accurate plans of rude stone monuments in several
counties in England ; notably in Devon and Cornwall, as well as
our own pre-eminent Abury and Stonehenge, of both of which he
made not only very careful plans, but also an accurate portrait of
every stone, done to scale, in the measurements of which the writer
of this memoir assisted. These plans are now at Burlington House,
in the care of the Society of Antiquaries, who, we sincerely trust,
will be induced to publish them, at no distant date. Mr. Lukis
also edited some of the volumes of the Surtees Society, and while
at Cambridge and subsequently, was a member of the Ray Club,
and took some part in their publications.
Thus well known as an archseologist of no mean attainments, both
at home and abroad, it is no wonder that he was elected, in 1847,
a Fellow of the " Royal Society of Northern Antiquaries," in
Copenhagen; in 1867 a Member of the " Societe Archeologique
de Nantes " ; and in 1872 a Corresponding Member of the " Societe
de Climatologie Algerienne." He was also, as shown above, a
member of all our great archaeological societies in this country, but
by none more honoured than by those who worked with him during
his residence in Wilts, the earlier members of the "Wiltshire
Archaeological and Natural History Society/'
A. C. S.
102
Commons.
ROMAN VILLA AT Box.
Since writing the notes on "Boman remains at Box," which were printed in
vol. xxvi., p. 405 of the Magazine, I have seen an account of this villa in vol.
xliii., part i. of the Journal of the British Archaeological Association, in,
which a plan of the buildings adjacent to the mosaic pavements uncovered in
1881 is given, and some additional details not previously known to me are men-
tioned.
ED. IL GODDABD.
JANE LANE.
At page 281, line 33, of vol. xxvi. of the Magazine, in my paper on " Jane
Lane," for martlets read mullets.
C. PENBUDDOCKE.
FLIGHT OF SISKINS.
Mr. H. Toppin reports that towards the end of December, 1892, he saw a flight
of Siskins (C. Spinus), some twenty in number, in an alder bed in Blacklands
Park, near Calne. He shot two cock birds and a hen.
OCCURRENCE OF WHITE MlCE AND B,ATS.
Mr. Toppin also states that as some corn ricks at the Manor Farm at Calstone,
occupied by Mr. Joseph Maundrell, were being threshed on January 16th, 1893,
great numbers of white mice were killed. It is said that some are found on the
farm every year. In this connection the Editor is reminded that some twenty-five
years ago a large number of white rats were killed on several farms in Hilmarton
parish and the neighbourhood. They appeared to be abundant that one year, but
few, if any were seen either in preceding or succeeding years.
GOLDEN BALL HILL.
Mr. C. E. Ponting writes that in 1889 he noticed that this hill appeared from
the Pewsey Vale of a bright yellow colour, caused by a mass of yellow Ladies'
Natural History and Archaological Notes. 103
Fingers (Lotus corniculatus P) in flower, with which the whole hill was covered.
He suggests that this is the origin of the name.
ROBINS NESTING IN A BLACKBIRD^ NEST.
Mr. A. B. Fisher writes from Potterne :— "A pair of Blackbirds began to
build a nest in the ivy growing against the wall of my house early in March of
this year ; but being disturbed by the cutting of the ivy, though what was growing
near the nest was left, they deserted, the nest being just completed. About
a week ago I noticed a pair of Robins collecting moss and carrying it into the
same ivy, and yesterday (April 4th) I found they had taken up their quarters in
the deserted Blackbirds' nest, having well lined it and built it into a comfortable
size. This morning (5th) the first egg was laid. Five more were added, and
all were hatched, and the young birds got away in safety.
" Within a few days of the flight of the young birds the hen began to lay
again in the same nest, and is now (May 25th) sitting on five eggs.
" I fancy that it is unusual for Robins to take to other birds' nests, and so I
communicate this note.
" I saw a Jack Snipe on the 3rd of April, but could never find him again. I
believe that this is very late to see the bird."
LIST OF LEPIDOPTERA FOUND IN THE MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT.
The Report of the Marlborough College Nat. Hist. Society for 1892 contains
an extremely useful list of one thousand and ten species of Lepidoptera which
have occurred within ten miles of Marlborough. It is compiled by Mr. E.
Meyrick, F.Z.S., an acknowledged authority on entomology.
HUISH CHURCH.
Mr. G. E. Dartnell reports that during the digging of the grave for the
interment of the late Rector, at Huish, what were apparently the ancient
foundations of the Church, some 5ft. to the east of the present chancel wall,
were found — some of the stones being sarsens weighing two or three hundred-
weight. During the restoration of the Church in 1879 these old foundations
were also found on the north side of the chancel, on the site of the present vestry,
which was then built. Some bits of moulding, a portion of the robes of a
probably recumbent figure, and also another fragment which evidently formed
part of a dog with curly hair— which probably lay at the feet of the figure — were
also found ; pointing to the existence of a sepulchral monument, and possibly to
a chapel on the north side of the chancel. Some of these fragments are now-
built into the vestry wall.
104 ArcJiaological Notes.
GREEK COIN OP ANTINOUS.
The large brass Greek coin of Antinous, the favourite of Hadrian, now presented
to the Museum by Mr. H. N. Goddard, was found many years ago by a labourer
whilst turnip-hoeing at Bupton, in the parish of Clyffe Pypard, and was brought
by him to Mr. Goddard. This coin is rare.
SEAL OP WOOTTON BASSETT.
The seals which belonged to the former Corporation of Wootton Bassett had
disappeared for many years, and all attempts to recover them had proved fruitless
until a month or two ago, when at the sale of the effects of an old gentleman
who had long lived in the High Street of that ancient borough, an ivory-handled
steel-headed seal turned up among a lot of " sundries," which proved to be one
of the long lost seals of the borough. It bears the arms of Wootton Bassett :
a chevron between three lozenges, surrounded by the inscription : " Minor
sigillum Wootton Bassett als Wootton Vetus." It is also inscribed round the
neck : " Ex douo Prenobil. L. Comitis Rochester 1682." It was purchased by
Mr. B. C. Trepplin with the intention of placing it with other objects of interest
connected with the town in the picturesquely-restored Town Hall.
STONE CIRCLE NEAR SWINDON.
Mr. A. D. Passmore, of Swindon, has lately called attention to what appears
to be the remains of a hitherto unnoticed circle of stones at Day House Farm, at
Coate, about two miles from Swindon. The stones themselves are not large, but
the circle when complete must have been of considerable dimensions. The Editor
hopes that a full account of this circle may be printed in the next number of
the Magazine,
SCULPTURES IN THE SOUTH PORCH OP MALMESBURY ABBEY.
In vol. xvi. of the Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucestershire ArchcB-
ological Society is printed a paper by Mrs. Bagnall-Oakeley on these well-known
groups of sculpture, in which she argues that they are of much earlier date than
that (the early thirteenth century) commonly ascribed to them. From their
style, the character of the key carried by St. Peter, and other features, the writer
contends that they belong to the earlier Saxon Church built by Athelstan in 937,
which preceded the present Norman building.
EXCAVATIONS AT MARLBOROUGH COLLEGE.
The Eeport of the Marlborough College Natural History Society for 1892
contains an account of recent excavations during building operations on the site
of the ancient castle moat, with illustrations of the principal objects discovered,
keys, horseshoes, iron arrow-heads, ring, pin, &c.
FLINT IMPLEMENTS.
In the same report is an account by Mr. J. W. Brooke of the many localities
in the neighbourhood of Marlborough where he has found flint implements in
such large numbers, and of the different classes of implements found on the
several sites on which he supposes they were originally manufactured. Mr.
Brooke has been extraordinarily successful in the search for flints, having
acquired during the last five years no less than five thousand four hundred and
twenty specimens from the Marlborough neighbourhood alone.
105
onHttona to tettm wto
THE MUSEUM.
Presented by Mr. H. N. GODDAKD :— Wiltshire Seventeenth Century Tokens—
Wootton Bassett Gabrell Arman (2); Marborough, William Pureur;
Swindon, Henry Restall ; Wootton Bassett, John Knighton ; Lacock,
Richard Gryst ; Aldbourne, Edward Witts ; Malrnesbury, Elias Ferris ;
Clack, Robert Goodman.
Marlborough Old Bank Token, Qd. Bristol and Wiltshire Token, 6d., 1811.
Roman Coins— Second brass, Faustina, Maximianus.
Third brass, Carausius, Victorinus (2), Gallienus, Valens (2
types), Constantinus (8 types), Constantius.
Silver, Constantius, Julia Augusta.
Large brass, Antinous (rare).
Saxon— Eadred, penny.
English — Henry II., penny ; Edward I. or II., pennies (5) ; Edward III.,
groat (2), half groat ; Henry VI. (P), groats (2) ; Henry
VIII., sixpence (2 types), penny (2 types) ; Edward VI.,
shilling ; Elizabeth, shilling, sixpence (3 types), fourpence,
twopence; James I., half-sovereign, shilling (2 types),
sixpence (Irish), sixpence (2 types) ; Charles I., shilling (3
types), sixpence, twopence, copper farthings (5 types) ;
Charles II., half-crown, fourpence, threepence (2), twopence,
penny ; James II., fourpence, threepence (2), twopence ;
William and Mary, half-crown, fourpence, threepence :
William III., crown, shilling, sixpence ; Anne, sovereign,
half-crown, shilling, sixpence, fourpence, twopence ;
George I., shilling, sixpence, penny ; George II., half-crown,
shilling (2 types), sixpence, fourpence (2), penny ; George
III., shilling, sixpence, fourpence, threepence, penny, bank
token Irish tenpence, halfpenny (copper) ; George IV.,
shilling (Colonial, 1822) ; William IV., penny ; Victoria,
half-crown, sixpence, threepence, half -farthing (copper).
Medals— Admiral Vernon, capture of Portobello —Growing Arts adorn
Empire, George reigning, Caroline protecting.
Presented by Mr. C. ADYE :— South Wraxall Token, Valentine Stevens.
Presented by Rev. E. H. and Rev. C. V. GODDABD :— Three slabs of an oak coffin
found about thirty-five years ago near the Foss Way, in the neighbourhood
of Grittleton.
Framed Portraits— Bishop Hamilton, mezzotint, G. Richmond, pinx., R.
Jackson, sc. ; T. Sotheron Estcourt, 1863, mezzotint ; Joseph Neeld,
mezzotint, Shee, pinx., Cousins, sc.
Medals— William Beckford and Sir Francis Burdett.
106 Donations to Museum and Library.
Presented by Eev. F. H. DuBouLAY :— Elizabeth 2c?., found at Heddington.
Presented by Mr. J. W. BROOKE : — Tokens, Marlborough, Robert Butcher;
Marlborough, E. Delamaine.
Presented by Mr. GOEE :— Medal of Home Tooke.
Presented by Mr. J. A. RANDELL :— A Flail.
Purchased:— Wilts Tokens— Road, Richard Tucker; Malmesbury, Nico Jaffris.
THE LIBRAEY.
Presented by Mrs. WEST AWDBY : — Two Sermons preached on death of Capt.
John Neilson Gladstone, at Bowden Hill, by Rev. A. Blomfield and Rev.
A. Fane, and Memoir by H. A. Merewether. Pamphlet, 1863.
Debate upon the Borough of Chippenbam in the House of Commons, 1831;
Pamphlet.
Roundway Hill, a Poem by T. Needham Rees, Surgeon in Devizes. Quarto
Pamphlet, Devizes, 1787.
Record of the Great Flood in Bath and the surrounding District, 1882.
Quarto pamphlet.
Chittoe Church, S.E. View; lithograph, M. D. W. del. et lith. Rood
Ashton Entrance Hall ; lithographed by Day & Haghe Stonehenge
looking N.E. ; lithograph published by Clapperton, Salisbury.
Presented by Rev. E. H. and Rev. C. V. GODDABD -.—Drawings and Prints—
Foxham old Church; small litho. Manningford Bruce Church before Res-
toration ; small litho. — Calne New Town Hall ; photo-litho. Bromham
Church, N. side ; woodcut Wootton Bassett Town Hall, Restored ; cut
Swindon New Town Church; small cut Marlborough, View of
Street and St. Peter's ; small engraving — — Ramsbury Church, S. side,
before Restoration ; photo-process Rodbourne Cheney Church, New,
Interior and Exterior; litho., 1848 Hilmarton, Memorial Window to
Rev. F. Fisher; litho. Wilts Friendly Society Form of Enrolment ;
engraving Salisbury, the King's House; engraving by T. Fisher
The Old Town Hall, Devizes ; cut Salisbury, the Halle of John Halle ;
cut Broad Town Church ; litho., 1845 Free Grammar School,
Marlborough, destroyed 1790 ; litho. Highway Church, East Window,
1879 ; drawing Castle Eaton Church, Carved Oak Pillar with Goddard
arms; pen-and-ink Lucknam, Fete Champetre, 1834; litho. Sir
Francis Burdett, Election Cartoon, " Grinding Young" ; 1837, litho.—
Stockton House ; pencil sketch Logan Stone, Newbridge, Glamorgan ;
sepia drawing Portraits, half-length, J. Davis (Sen.), mezzotint,
Kirkby, pinx., Angell, sc. ; J. Davis (Jun.), on horseback, engraving,
Spode, pinx., Engleheart, sc. Edington Church exterior, S. side ; S.W.
view; E. end ; — interior, chantry; S. transept; and S. porch ; ink photos.
Pamphlets, fyc.— Caldas, a story of Stonehenge, by Julia Corner Hiring
Fairs or Mops, a Letter to the Rt. Hon. T. H. S. Estcourt, M.P., by the
Rev. R. V. Law Henry Drury, Funeral Sermon by Bishop Hamilton,
1864 Sermon preached at Wincanton on death of Rev. R. Nicholson,
by Rev. W. P. S. Bingham N. Wilts Election, 1865, Pedigree of Sir
G. Jeukinson, by J. T. Schomberg Sale Catalogue of the Manor of
Hilmarton and Goatacre, 1802 Happy in Life, Peaceful in Death, or
Donations to Museum and Library. 107
the Happy Wiltshire Farmer (small tract) Catechism of the Fall and
Restoration of Man, by Rev. G. N. Gray Lawson, 1859 Order of Service
for Laying Foundation Stone of School by Bishop Hamilton, 1860—
Ditto for Opening a School, 1860 Ditto for Confirmation, 1865
Ditto at Consecration of Churches, Chapels, and Burial Grounds, 1868
Ditto for Laying Foundation Stone of a Church, 1860 Ditto for
Re-opening a Church after Restoration, 1892 The Church and the
People, Lay Help in Church Work, by Rev. R. S. Hutchins, 1870
Swindon, Calne, and Cricklade Turnpike Roads Act, 1866 Bishop
Hamilton, Sermon on the death of, by H. P. Liddon, 1869. Warminster,
two Sermons on Death of Rev. W. Dalby, 1862 Order of Service used
at Opening of Edington Church, 1891 Ditto for Dedication of Bells
and West Window, Wootton Bassett, 1890 Proceedings at Enthroni-
zation of Bishop Moberly, 1869 Ditto of Bishop Wordsworth, 1885
Poll Book, 1868, Cricklade Election Money Kyrle, Rev. J. S.,
Correspondence in Refutation of Calumnies, 1846 Poynder v. Attorney-
General and Hulbert, re drain at Hartham, &c., 1866 Chippenham
Agricultural Association, Rules, &c., 1880 Swindon Roads Act, 1833
Commission of Peace and List of Acting Justices for Wilts, 1878, 1885,
1890 Broad Town Charity, particulars, &c., by J. E. G. Bradford,
1882 Rules for the County Prison, 1871 Rules and Standing
Orders of Wilts Sessions, 1870 Electoral Divisions, Order of Quarter
Sessions determining, 1888 Account of Treasurer of County of Wilts,
1889 Memoir of Rev. Francis Fisher, by Rev. H. Drury, 1858
There is one Thing Needful, by Rev. F. Fisher (tract) Chippenham,
1850, Sermon by Rev. G. N. Gray Lawson Rev. H. Maundrell, Journal
of Voyage, 1864 Liddon, H. P., Ordination Sermons at Salisbury,
1865, 1866 Bishop Hamilton, Charges, 1861, 1864, 1867 Bishop
Wordsworth, Pastoral Letters, 1885, 1886, 1887 Possible Re-union
of Deaneries of Malmesbury, &c., to Diocese of Salisbury, 1892—
Archdeacon Buchanan, Charges, 1878, 1883, 1887, 1890 ; Considerations
on Tithe Rent Charge, 1886 Bishop Denison, Memoir of Caswell,
Rev. H., Convocation and its possibilities, 1852 Meade, Rev. E., Office
of Readers in Church of England, 1867 Bishop Denison, Charge, 1845
—^Harris, Rev. H., Review of Moberly's Bampton Lectures, 1869—
Hautenville, Rev, R. W., Visitation Sermon, Chippenham, 1855 —
Eastern Crisis, Sermon, Chippenham, 1854 Morrice, Rev. W. D.^
Sermon, Church Union Society, 1867 Drury, Rev. H., Sermon at
Consecration of Bishop Hamilton, 1854 Jackson, Canon J. E., Sermon,
Consecration of St. Paul's Church, Chippenham, 1855 ; Sermon, Chippen-
ham, for A. C. S., 1854; Sermon, Visitation, Chippenham, 1854
Lansdowne, Lord, Speech on Irish Land Law Bill, 1881 Archdeacon
Harris, Charge, 1866.
Books — The Abbess of Shaftesbury, or the Days of John of Gaunt, 1846
(scene of story laid at Lyddington)— Bishop Burnet's Discourse of the
Pastoral Care, 14th edition, with Portrait and Life of the Author, 1821—
Walter Kerr Hamilton, Bishop of Salisbury, a Sketch, by H. P. Liddon,
1869.
108 Donations to Museum and Library.
Presented by Mr. G. E. DABTNELL :— Map of Wilts, small, T Kitchin Stage
Waggon Advertisement Card Sarum Almanack, 1879—91 Large
number of .cuttings from South Wilts papers for ten years Archdeacon
Daubeny, Lectures on Church Catechism, 1819 Sale Catalogue of Home
Farm, Oare, 1887 Catalogue of Salisbury and S. Wilts Museum, 1870.
Pamphlets— Kingsbury, Rev. T. L., Sermon on Death of Marquis of
Ailesbury, 1878 — De Quetteville, Rev. W., Sermon on Death of Rev.
J. D. Hastings, 1869 Drury, Rev. H., Sermon at Warminster, Friendly
Society. 1862 Beaufort, Duke of, Cassell's National Portrait Gallery
"Why?" Temperance pamphlet, Pewsey Friendly Societies, by
J. Chappell.
Presented by Mr. A. SCHOMBEKG : — Life and Letters of Joseph Allein, of
Devizes, 1822, post 32mo.
Presented by Miss CUNNINGTON :— MS. by S. Yockney, 1801, on King's Barrow,
Battlesbury, the position of Verlucio, Robin Hood's Harbour, Bratton, &c.
Presented by Mr. H. E. MKDLICOTT -.—Devizes Gazette, parts of 1870-1887
Bacon's Liber Regis.
Presented by Mr. B. WULLINGS :— Two parts of Note Books of Sir R. C. Hoare,
Stonehenge and Tumuli on Wilsford Down, 1807.
Acquired by Exchange :—
Official Year Book of Scientific and Learned Societies of Great Britain
and Ireland, 1893.
Royal Irish Academy, Historical References on Tumuli at New Grange,
Lowth, and JZnowth.
Ditto, Transactions, vol. xxx., parts 3 and 4.
Ditto, Todd Lecture Series, vols. iii. and iv.
Society of Antiquaries of London, Proceedings, vol xiv., part 11.
Royal Society of Antiquaries, Ireland, Journal, vol. ii., 5th series.
Bureau of Ethnology, U.S.A., Reports for 1885 and 1886.
U.S. Geographical and Geological Survey, Rocky Mountains, vol. vii.
Smithsonian Report, 1890.
British Archceological Association, Journal, vol. xlix., part I.
Essex Naturalist, March, 1893.
Montgomeryshire Collections, vol. xxvii., part 52.
Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, Transactions.
Somerset Archceological and Natural History Society, Proceedings^
1892.
Bristol Naturalists' Society, Proceedings, vol. vii., part 1.
Hertfordshire Natural History Society, Transactions, vol. vii., parts 3
and 4. .
Marlborough College Natural History Society, Report, 1892.
Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, Proceedings, 1891 and 1892.
HURRY & PEARSON, Printers and Publishers, Devizes.
QO^
"*0
99
6D§
o 3
S sla
52 C>^ e3
J.rHO
THOOrH 0
-,il
ate
«
51
CO O
r-t O Ol O
So oo o
•
n- «
«-« CO CO «O O CM O O O O O
«••»
1*1
^ O CO <M <N CO «O
§ OT «5
-22
-
li
(VjCO CM
«
Gene
gs B
D.
tenth to
ce in Savi
on
an
F
By
Ba
H ! '
H 1"^
3 I?
^,
-
o
S - 8
THE
WILTSHIRE MAGAZINE.
MULTOEUM MANIBUS GKRANDE LEVATUE ONUS." — Ovid.
attle of tifftankne.
By WALTEE MONEY, F.S.A.
[Reprinted from The Antiquary, vol. xxvii., p. 146, New Series.]
tlie year 878 — that is, seven years after the battle of
Ashdown and the traditional cutting- of the White Horse
at Uffington — the battle of Ethandune was fought (or, as it is
variously written, "Edderandun," " Assandune," and "Edendune").
A considerable difference of opinion prevails as to the place of this
battle, in which the Danes were defeated. Lysons, on the authority
of Dr. Beke, a contemporary Professor of Modern History in the
University of Oxford, considers Eddington, near Hungerford, to
have superior claims to be considered as the Ethandune of the ninth
century.
" From Asser we obtain the following outline of Alfred's move-
ments : Leaving Athelney, and following the route of the King,
we have no difficulty in identifying the place where Alfred was met
by the troops of his subjects who flocked to him, and called Egbert's
or Egbricht's Stone, with Brixton-Deverill, a small village about
half-way between Hindon and Warminster. Thence the army
marched the next day at daybreak, in the middle of May, to ^Eglea,
about the locality of which place writers are not agreed — and the
next day he marched to Ethandune. "
Dr. Beke supposes that the day before the action Alfred made a
long and forced march of about thirty-five miles over the Downs
with his cavalry, and reached ^Eglea, and that the next morning he
attacked the Danish army by the road from Shefford. He bases
VOL. xxvii. — NO. LXXX. i
110 The Battle of Ethandnne.
his opinion chiefly on the circumstances that Edington, in Wilts
(generally accepted as the site of the battle), was much too near to
Brixton for Alfred to have stopped to pass the night at after a
march from early dawn,1 and that .^Eglea or Inglea in all probability
gave its name to the hundred of Eglei, in Berkshire, which lies to
the north of Eddington, and is now united to the ancient hundred
of Cheneteberie, under the name of Kintbury-Eagle. The names,
too, of Danefordj (now Denford), and the hamlet of Englewood
(now Inglewood), on the opposite side of the Kennet, he considers
to refer to some considerable engagement between the two forces.
Local topography further bears out the theory advanced by Pro-
fessor Beke in the name of Dane's Field, in the immediate neigh-
bourhood of the supposed locality of this battle.
The Berkshire Eddington has also another argument in its favour
as the site of the battle, on account of its proximity to so many
ancient camps, barrows, and other relics of the wars, which a
thousand years ago were waged with such persevering fury between
the Saxons and the Danes. On the plateau of the summit of the
Berkshire Downs above Kintbury, and about five miles from
Eddington, we have an extensive and strongly fortified encamp-
ment, known as Walbury Fort, forming a most formidable military
position, being about 1000 feet above sea-level; and it might with
good reason be suggested that Walbury was " the fortification to
which the Danes fled, and held out a siege of fourteen days." Or,
again, Chisbury Camp, on the W'ansdyke, a few miles from Hunger-
ford, enclosing within ramparts, 45 feet in height, partly double,
partly treble, an area of 15 acres; or Membury Fort, also a strongly
1 Upon the point as to the probable distance of Ethandune from Brixton-
Deverill, some light may be gathered from the Metrical Version of Geoffrey
Gaimar, who says that on quitting Brixton, the Saxon army "rode through the
whole night and the next day as far as they could, until they came to JEglea,
that they went on that night, and the next day at nine o'clock they had reached
Edensdone." Now in no way is it intelligible that a march (in the whole) of
twelve miles, from Brixton to Edington, in Wilts, should be thus described as
occupying two entire nights and one day. It is, moreover, doubtful whether the
battle did not take place on the third, instead of the second, day ; for this is
expressly stated by Simeon of Durham, and is not inconsistent with Asser's
narrative.
By Walter Money, F.S.A. Ill
fortified post, on the borders of Berks and Wilts, partly in Lamborne
and partly in Ramsbury parish, may either of them well have been
the entrenched camp of Asser and the Saxon chronicler.
Whether or not there are sufficient grounds for considering the
Berkshire Eddington (the Mddevetone of Domesday) as the site of
the battle must remain an open question ; but there seems little
reason to doubt its being the same with Ethandune, which King
Alfred left by will to his wife, Ealhswith, inasmuch as it is men-
tioned in the same clause with the manors of Waneting (Wantage)
and Lamburnam (Lamborne), the former of which is but a few
miles to the north, and the latter joins the parish in the north-west
point. The three form Alfred's bequest to his wife, and seem to
have comprised all his private estate in Berkshire.
Since the above was written the writer has incidentally met with
some interesting notes on this subject from the pen of the late
Canon Jackson, F.S.A., appended to an article on " The Sheriff's
Turn, co. Wilts," in the Wilts Archaological Magazine, vol. xiii.,
pp. 108-110. In referring to a lively discussion which was conducted
some years ago in this magazine, Canon Jackson observes that
Brixton (Deverill) could scarcely have been " Ecgbryght's stone,"
for in Domesday Book Brixton is distinctly called " Brictric's Town/'
from its owner, Brictric, a Saxon Thane, who, it is conceived, in the
days of Edward the Confessor, had been his ambassador at the Court
of Flanders. He further calls attention to the existence of an
ancient stone a few miles north-west of Warminster, marked on
Andrews and Dury's county map of Wilts, 1773, which, being close
to the border of two counties, would not have been an unsuitable
place for muster, and a ride of thirty miles through Selwood would
have brought the King and his staff to it from Athelney.
" The secret of Alfred's success," Canon Jackson goes on to say
(like that of Joshua against the Amorites), " lay in the rapidity of
a forced march. Alfred did not, indeed, go up ' all night/ but he
( went up ' from break of dawn all day till he reached ^Ecglea. . . .
It must surely have been an unusual distance." Summarizing the
arguments for and against, the Canon concludes strongly in favour
of the battle having been fought within the Berkshire hundred of
112 The Battle of Ethandune.
Eglei, and trusts that some Berkshire Archaeologist may some day
discover the exact spot from which the old "hundred" took its
name, suggesting that it may possibly be found under the disguise
of " Eggle, Aggie, Edgelease, Engle, Oakley, or Oxley, or some
name of similar sound." He further remarks that if the hundred
of Eglie in Berks anywhere touches the boundary of Wilts, a forced
march of thirty-five miles would have brought Alfred's men of
valour from Ecbright's stone on the western frontier of Wilts to
^Ecglie on the eastern in the course of the second day.
Now, in the ancient hundred of ^Ecglie or Eglei, now united to
the ancient hundred of Cheneteberie, or Kintbury, under the modern
name of Kintbury-Eagle, with which it coincides for the most part,
we have JZnglewood or Inglewood, Inlease, and many other names
which might easily have become degraded by the local dialect from
the original ^Ecglei. Eddington, near Elungerford (the Eddevetone
of Domesday, and the locality, we believe, where the battle of
Ethandune was fought), is within the hundred of Kintbury-Eagle,
and, moreover, is on the boundary of Wilts. The " County Cross"
is also in this neighbourhood, on " King's Heath," near Inholmes,
Lambourn Woodlands, and close by is Dane's Field ; while close to
Eddington we have the name of Daneford, now Denford.
The Eddington of which we write is that mentioned in King
Alfred's will, already referred to as one of his own estates, and, as
Canon Jackson observes, " nothing is more likely than he should
have secured to himself the very soil on which he crushed the Danish
power and secured his throne."
Exception will naturally be taken by the supporters of Edington,
near Westbury, Wilts, to the identity of Ethandune with the
Berkshire Eddington or Edington. " But why so ? " asks Canon
Jackson. Alfred's expedition was a master-stroke, the sudden
pouncing of a hawk upon its prey. It required energy and celerity.
Tardy movements of a few miles a day, almost within sight of the
enemy, would never have answered his purpose, and in this respect
the Berkshire Eddington seems to satisfy the most essential demands
of the case."
The learned Canon, although laying the scene of the battle within
The Wilts County Court — Devizes versus Wilton. 113
the hundred of Eglei, has unintentionally strengthened his argument
by mentioning Yattendon, a village seven miles north-east from
Newbury, as the place referred to by Dr. Beke as the site of the
action ; but it is Eddington, near Hungerford, which the latter
suggested, and some fourteen miles nearer Ecbright's stone.
;ilts Cottntg Court.
®tmy& «w*fw
By JAMES WAYLEN,
changes which the last two hundred years have brought
about in the judicial machinery of courts and polling places,
quite remove from the discussion which the above heading may seem
to indicate, anything like the ignominious element of local rivalry.
With all this we have now done. But the story of the transfer of
the County Court may still have attractions for the archa3ological
mind ; the more so as it has hitherto received very little notice from
our local annalists.
The first thing to be noted is that in the great Civil War the
Parliament's cause had not a more ardent adherent in Wiltshire than
Robert Hippisley, of Stanton Pi tz warren : and that in after days
he became so attached to the Protector Oliver as to be spoken of by
his adversaries as one of Cromwell's creatures. The same epithet
was applied to another gentleman in that part of the county, namely
Isaac Burgess, of Marlborough. Now, both of these gentlemen
were in turn sheriffs of the county during the transition period
before and after Cromwell's death, and both of them interested
themselves in getting the County Court transferred from Wiltoii to
1 A portion of this paper has already appeared in " G-illman's Devizes
Almanack and Directory for 1892,"
114 The Wilts County Court — Devizes versus Wilton.
Devizes; principally, no doubt, on the ground of general convenience,
but possibly also to give greater expression to the liberal element
for which Devizes was then conspicuous. Be this as it may, there
seems good reason- to trace the hand of Cromwell in the affair, and
thus again to account for the haste with which the action of the
advance party was systematically reversed, here as elsewhere, at the
Restoration. Eventually the Wilton folk recovered their lost
privilege or appanage, though theoretically it was still dependent
on the personal will of the sheriff for the time being. This was
shown soon after by the fact that at the ensuing general election,
when the sheriff of that year, Sir James Thynne, of Longleat, was
anxious to get a nominee of his own returned for Wilton, he
threatened the Wilton burgesses that unless they would pleasure
him therein he would take his own course, which they understood
to be the again removal of the Court to Devizes. The burgesses of
Wilton replied to the sheriff that they had already made their
election and meant to adhere to it. Sir James does not appear to
have pushed matters to extremity on this occasion ; it is nevertheless
true that in the next reign, when James II. was inviting the Non-
conformists to take part with himself in treading down the Anglican
party, the proposition for going back to Devizes was again in the
air. The subsequent history of the Court we need not further
pursue. Let the above suffice as introductory to the ensuing docu-
mentary evidence.
The Wilton Petition to recover the County Court.
To THE RIGHT WORSHIPFUL SIR JAMES THYNNE, KNT., HIGH SHERIFF
OF THE COUNTY OF WILTS.
The humble petition of the Mayor, Burgesses, and other the inhabitants of the
Borough of Wilton, — Humbly showeth that in this late intestine war the in-
habitants of the said borough have suffered much prejudice to tbe great im-
poverishment of the said inhabitants. Yet to add more, one Hippisley, late
Sheriff of this county, was pleased to add a further prejudice, the removing of
the County Court from us to the Devizes ; which hath been continued by his
successor [Isaac] Burgess, notwithstanding the right honourable Earl of Pembroke
was pleased in the behalf of the said borough to write his letter to the said
Burgess for the return thereof, which he slighted,— the said Hippisley and him-
self being the creatures of Oliver late Protector. Besides, the inhabitants of the
Devizes made one Captain Scotteu (being a States' captain) one of their Burgesses,
to serve in Parliament, of purpose to be instrumental for the continuance of the
By James Way leu. 115
said Court at the Devizes. — May it therefore please your Worship to cause your
under sheriff at the next Court to be held at the Devizes, to adjourn the said
Court to the borough of Wilton, where it had its foundation, being the Shire-
town, and so continued until these last Sheriffs' times. And not only ourselves
shall rest very thankful ; but we are confident that the Earl of Pembroke, when
it is done, will give you thanks also ; whose letter, if time had permitted, would
have been written unto you, to this purpose.
The Devizes Counter Petition to the Sheriff. 4>tk December, 1660.
MAY IT PLEASE YOU; — The .absence of the Mayor of our borough, he being
now at London, hath been the cause of retarding our making a more timely
application unto you concerning the County Court, which, through the good
inclination of the two last Sheriffs unto the common good and their well-wishing
unto this our town, hath been holden and kept in this our borough these five
years past, it being the centre of the county, to the great ease and contentment
of the inhabitants of all the north part, and middle part also, of this county,—
who, in case the Court should be kept in the skirt of the Shire, must of necessity
be compelled to travel, some of them thirty, some forty, and some fifty miles or
near thereabout, unto the Court. And in regard thereof, they would rather pay
unjust debts than take so far a journey ; where, having no acquaintance, they
may be put to great straits in case of arrests — WE, the inhabitants of the said
borough of Devizes whose names are here underwritten, do in tbe name of the
whole borough, and in behalf also of the inhabitants of the county, whose hands
we have heretofore had upon the like occasion to the number of many hundreds
of them, humbly desire your worship to be pleased to continue the County Court
to be kept here at the Devizes during your sheriff wick ; or [else] every other
Court at the Devizes and the other at Wilton ; on which Court-days all persons
having business to Court shall, as in time past, come free and go free without
any arrest out of our Town-Court ; unless your worship with the Justices of
peace of the County shall be pleased to give way for arrests under £5, in case
the defendants shall come to out-swear their creditors of their due debts which
they owe them. And we hope there shall be no complaints made against the
Court ; there having in truth very few or none been made against it these five
years. Thus having made bold to solicit you in this behalf, as well knowing it
to be your just right to dispose thereof, we refer it to your grave consideration,
and remain,
Your Worship's humble servants to serve you,
William Allford Thomas Long Philip Strong
John Burnett John May Richard Smith
John Eyles, jun. William Naish William Thurman
William Filkes Edward Paine John Tidcombe
Henry Flower Edward Pierce Robert Walker, Jun.
Thomas Flower Richard Pierce John Watton
John Gaysford Christopher Pullen Richard Watton
John Glas John Rose Richard Webb
Thomas Grubb William Sayer John White
William Hayes John Sloper John Wintworth
John Hicklouss Robert Sloper John Worsdall
Robert Ings. John Smith Cornelius Wyrt
116 The Wilts County Court — Devizes versus Wilton.
Certificates of Justices of the Peace in North Wilts.
To THE EIGHT WORSHIPFUL SIR JAMES THYNNE, KNT., SHERIFF OF THE
COUNTY OF WILTS.
WE, whose names are here underwritten do hereby certify that we conceive
the Devizes (being a town fitted for entertainment and seated in the centre of
of the county) to be a very fit place for the keeping of your County Court there ;
which will he to the great ease and contentment of the inhabitants both of the
north part and of the middle part also, of the county ; referring it to your con-
sideration.
THOMAS GRUBB WILLM. YORKE
WILLIAM GALLEY RICHARD BROWNE
The like Certificate signed by
LAWRENCE WASHINGTON and JOHN ESTCOURT.
Second Appeal Jrom Devizes after the Removal lack to Wilton had
taken place.
To THE SHERIFF.
MAY IT PLEASE YOU : — Whereas, for causes best known to yourself you have
been prevailed with to remove your County Court from our borough, being the
centre of the county, unto Wilton, being a place remote and in the skirts of the
shire, which we well know to be your just right to dispose thereof at your
pleasure, and against which we have not one word to speak ; yet seeing that the
inhabitants of the north part and of the middle part also of this county do often
by their expressions in our hearing take to heart the loss of such a common good,
being already sensible of the inconveniences and pressures that do and will ensue
thereupon, wherein as they are mainly concerned, so we also your petitioners are
in a special manner concerned therein ; — WE, the inhabitants of the borough of
Devizes whose names are here underwritten for and in the behalf of the whole
Corporation, relying upon your good inclination to the public good and 3rour
well-wishing unto this our town, do again embolden ourselves to make application
unto you as in like manner we have lately done, — THAT you would vouchsafe to
adjourn your Court to be kept again at the Devizes ; and to be pleased to
condescend so far as that there may be arrests out of our Town-Court for small
debts not exceeding five pounds against such as shall out- swear their creditors of
their just debts (if you think good) ; which thing is much wished by the in-
habitants of the county. — And you shall oblige us who are,
Your Worship's at your service to be commanded,
JOHN TAYLER, Mayor.
William Allford William Blandford Nath. Comely
William Bancroft Robert Bruusden John Gorton
Richard Barker Edward Bryant Thomas Critter
Richard Batt Philip Butcher Peter Crooke
Samuel Batt John Clarke John Drewe
Stephen Bay ley Richard Clarke Michael Drewe
George Bayly Thomas Clarke Henry Durnford
Thomas Baylye Worsted Comber John Eaton
Robert Bennet Thomas Collier John Eyles
By James Waylen.
117
John Filkes
Thomas Filkes
William Filkes
John Fitzall
Henry Flower
Thomas Flower
Nicholas Forerth
John Freeme
Philip Godfrey
Francis Goulding
Walter Goulding
William Hayes
Robert Heal
Richard Hillier
William Hoole
Edward Hope
Robert Ings
John Long
Thomas Long
Walter May
John Munday
Roger Nevinson
Job Palmer
Francis Paradice
John Paratt
Edward Payne
Edward Pierce
Richard Pierce
William Poole
Edmund Potter
Francis Potter
Thomas Potter
William Powell
William Pullen
Michael Reade
Benjamin Richards
John Rogers
John Sainsbury
William Sayer
Andrew Scott
Roger Scott
George Sloper
Robert Sloper
John Sloper
Ambrose Smith
Edmund Smith
Edmund Smith, Jun.
John Smith
Richard Smith
Robert Somner
William Somner
John Stevens
Benjamin Street
James Smith
Samuel Tayler
John Tidcombe
William Thurman
Robert Walter
Robert Watters
John Watton
Richard Watton
William Watts
John Webb
Richard Webb
Richard Webb, Jun.
Anthony West
Robert West
John White
Jeremy Williams
John Willis
John Wintworth
John Worsdall
Ambrose Zeally
In the petition from inhabitants of North Wilts, the arguments
put forth are so like those from Devizes that recital is unnecessary.
The subscribers' names here following1 cover, as will be at once seen,
only about a dozen miles north of Devizes ; and were probably
gathered by some agents from the town, who, had they penetrated
a little further north, might no doubt have expanded the list at
least three-fold.
Thomas Adlam of Allcannings
Samuel Alborne of Chippenham
Ralph Aldridge of Coulston
Thornel Amor of Charlton
Christopher Angel of Chippenham
Thomas Arthington, of Eastcott,
Urchfont, clerk
William Audris of Calne
Charles Aven of Erlestoke
John Axford of Rowde
John [Bale ?] of Chippenham
William Barker
Leonardo Barnes of Cannings
Anthony Bartlett of Allcannings
Edward Bayliffe of Melksham
John Bayly of Lavington
Thomas Beard of Castlecombe
Thomas Berket of Erchfont
Edward Bishop of Calne
John Bishop of Chippenham
Robert Bond of Chippenham
John Brewer of Chippenham
Ambrose Broakeway of Coulston
Robert Brothers of Bishops Cannings
118 The Wilts County Court — Devizes versus Wilton.
Christopher [BrunellP] Vicar of Mar-
ket Lavington
Henry Bull of Potterne
Eichard [Bund ?] of Chippenham
William Chappel of Wilsford
Michael Chappel of Bishops Cannings
Robert Child, of Heddington
John Clack of Lavington
John Clarke of Calne
Henry Crawley of Lavington
William Crawley of Conock
Richard Cripps of Conock
Thomas Cripps of Berwick Bassett
Bartholomew Cromwell of Melksham
Thomas Crooke of Erchfont
Robert Crue
Christopher Gulliver of Chippenham
Jonathan Derke of Chippenham
Henry Drewe of Poulshot
John Durnford of Allcannings
William Dyer of Chippenham
Robert Dyke of Horton
Francis Ellyott of Rowde
Thomas Ellyott of Rowde
Richard Elwes of Calne
Richard Filkes of Rowde
Edmund Fooch of' Pewsey
Henry Ford
John Forman of Calne
Walter Forman of Calne
Charles Fry of Chippenham
Samuel Gage of Chippenham
John Gale of Chippenham
William Gale of Chippenham
James Gaysford of Lavington
William Gilbert of Erchfont
Jeremy Giles
Nicholas Giles
George Glass of Potterne
William Glass of Littleton
Richard Godsett
Nicholas Gough of Fiddington
Gabriel Goulding of Chippenham
John Hancock of Seend
William Harding of Chippenham
Edward Hayward of Great Cheveril
Thomas Hayward of Little Cheveril
John Hill of Seend
John Hinton of Enford
William Hisken of Easterton
Thomas Hobbes of Chippenham
William Holloway of Lavington
William Horad of Melksham
Christopher Hoscock of Lavington
Richard Huchence of Rowde
John Hudden of Worton
Maurice Jarvis of Allcannings
John Jefferey of Chippenham
Charles Jones of South Wraxhall
Edward Jones of North Bradley
William Jordan of Keevil
William Langraster of Lavington
Richard Lee of Chippenham
Edmund Light of Chippenham
Thomas Long of Worton
William Long of Bromhain
John Loudlee [Ludlow ?] of Stoke
John Lovegrove of Christian Malford
Thomas Loving of Rowde
Thomas Manning of Wedhampton
William Martin of Lavington
John Mayo of Calne
Nicholas Melksham of Bishops Can-
nings
Richard Merritt of Christian Malford
John Minty of Worton
William Moggeridge of Potterne
Thomas Moose
John Moone of Chippenham
John Moxham of Corsham
Nicholas Munday of Shrewton
John Musprat of Erchfont
John Nash of Chippenham
John Nash of Conock
Thomas Nash of Chippenham
John Neate of Coate
Jonathan New of Marston
George Newell
John Nordin
Simon Oram of Worton
Edward Page of Potterne
William Page of Calue
William Palrnore
Richard Paty of Calne
William Patye of Potterne
Nicholas Pearce of Poulshot
By James Waylen*
119
Thomas Phippen of Horton
William Powell of Bedborough [St.
James's, Devizes]
Francis Preste
George Reynolds [qu. Blacklands]
Thomas Reynolds of Chippeahain
Anthony Rogers of Stocke
John Rogers of Heddington
Henry Rogers of Heddington
Moses Ruddall of Lavington
John Ruddle of Hewish
Eobert Raddle of Horton
Adam Rutty of Melksham
John Rutty of Melksham
William Sainsbury of Allcannings
Humphrey Scott of Heddington
John Scott of Calne
Richard Seager of Calne
William [Selfe ?] of Calne
Henry Sheppard of Worton
Thomas Simes of Allington
Thomas Sims of Poulshot
John Slade of Market Lavington
Matthew Smith of Corsham
Robert Smith of Chippenham
Eobert Smith of Laviugton
Vincent Snooke of Erchfont
Edward Somner of Rowde
William Somner of Rowde
Edward Stephens of Chippenham
Thomas Stevens of Poulshot
Robert Still of Potterne
Thomas Still of Market Lavington
John Stokes of Seend
Joseph Street of Chippenham
William Strong of Lavington
John Taylor of Rowde
Nicholas Terrel of Chippenham
Edward Therunt of Erchfont
John Tucker of Lavington
Robert Tucker of Steple Ashton
Robert Ward of Orcheston St. George
John Wayte of Lavington
Edward Webb of Rowde
John Webb of Chippenham
Thomas Webb of Little Cheveril
William Webb of Little Cheveril
Thomas Weston of Horton
John Whatley of [Lavingtou ?]
Stephen Whetiker of Lavington
Thomas Wilde of Chippenham
John Wilks of Enford
Thomas Wiltshire of Chippenham
Henry Withers of Uphaven
Shildery Worman of Calne
NOTES respecting some of the above names : —
Robert Child, of Heddington, has been long regarded as the father of the
modern banking system.
The Tayler (not Taylor) family of Devizes, apparently the ancestors of Admiral
Taylor, the supporter of Admiral Durham, the Tory candidate for Devizes, in
1832, were such vehement anti- Royalists at the Civil War period that in 1661
Charles II. wrote to the Mayor of Devizes, directing him to eject John Tayler
from the office of Town Clerk, in favour of Robert Foote, who had suffered in
the Penruddocke rising.
Cromwell. — There was a considerable group of this family scattered about
Laycock, Bath, Keevil, Seend, Melksham, and Devizes (deriving from Sir Philip,,
the uncle of the Protector P) Those in Bath were master stone quarriers, those
in Wiltshire cloth manufacturers. The will of John Cromwell, of Roundway,
Devizes, dated 1746, constitutes as executor his brother, Philip Cromwell, cloth
worker, residing in Bedborough [now known as the London Road]. Philip's own
will is dated 1747, the witnesses being Solomon Hughes and Mary Walters.
Hippisley. May it not be assumed that Robert Hippisley was the benevolent
gentleman who had the courage to relieve, on their weary march to Oxford jail,
120 The Wilts County Court — Devizes versus Wilton.
the unfortunate Marlborough burgesses, when some of the King's officers, taking
their cue from Prince Rupert, presumed to treat England as a foreign conquered
country ; setting the town of Marlborough on fire and sending off the principal
inhabitants in a body to Oxford Castle, there to languish and (in many instances)
to die. The refreshment administered to the captives took place (we are told),
near Lambourn, and Lambourn is some miles from Stanton Fitzwarren, the
Hippisley seat. But then the family of Hippisley is associated also with
Lambourn (see the Charity Reports}. Besides, the distance of a few miles
would form no barrier to Hippisley generosity.
The authority for the statement above made, as to Sir James
Thynne's endeavour to influence the Wilton electors, will be found
in the following letter : —
To 'JOHN NICHOLAS, ESQ., AT MB. SECRETARY NICHOLAS'S LODGINGS IN
WHITEHALL, WESTMINSTER.— POST PAID 2o.
Netherhampton, 24th March, 1660/1.
SIR. — Yours with those enclosed I have received ; and must confess myself
in a strait what is fittest to be done in that affair. I find all at Wilton very
confident in their first resolutions as to yourself and Mr. Mompesson ; and
am afraid that if .you should be chosen at Salisbury it would be a very hard
matter to get Mr. Denham elected at Wilton; by which means my lord's
interest will be utterly laid aside there, and some other unknown person on
the Sheriff's account elected ; who hath upon the matter signified to the
borough that in case they refuse to pleasure him in that election, he will take
his course, which they understand to be the removing of the County Court
lately by him brought thither from the Devizes. The Mayor of Wilton, with
the rest there, have answered the Sheriff that they were pre-engaged before
they were acquainted with his desires, and cannot possibly pleasure him at
present. And, for aught I can understand, they resolve to speed the election ;
being unwilling to have a stranger put upon them, which is much feared in
case you will stand for Salisbury, as is too much noised abroad here. Sir
on these considerations, I must beg your favour to give me leave to keep
yours in my hands till I hear from you again ; and shall in the mean time
inform myself further of the proceedings in both places and give you accouiit
thereof ; and thus leave it to your own judgment to accept of which you
think most fit. Could I find any probability of pleasuring Mr. Denham at
Wilton, it would be a good encouragement to prosecute your desires at Sarum
more comfortably; but the quite contrary appears to
Sir, your most humble servant,
WILLIAM GAUNTLETT.
In effect, the Wilton burgesses carried their two men, namely,
John Nicholas, Jun., and Thomas Mompesson.
121
Cjraulj of p Saints,
By C. E. PONTING, F.S.A.
following- brief description of this Church was given by
me on the occasion of the joint visit of the Wiltshire and
Gloucestershire Archaeological Societies in August, 1 892. At that
time it was hoped that the Church, which has fallen into a sad
state of dilapidation and unfitness, might be repaired and secured
for many centuries on its present site : but, owing mainly to the
difficulties of access in winter, the parishioners and others responsible
deem it necessary to remove it to a more convenient place. If this
scheme be carried out the chancel will be repaired and retained as a
mortuary chapel, and the nave and tower taken down and re-erected
— each worked stone and each piece of timber in roof and framing1
will be first separately marked, and a corresponding mark put on
its counterpart on drawings of the various parts so as to ensure its
occupying its ancient position in the re-built structure. A suitable
chancel will be added to this. Although this will require great
care it is quite practicable, and it will be a work of much interest.
With this in view careful measured drawings of the Church in its
present state have been made, some of which accompany this paper.
This structure consists of nave and chancel, the former having a
south porch and a western tower constructed of timber. The walls
of the nave are of thirteenth century date, and are entirely without
buttresses, but the various features have been subsequently altered
and the chief distinguishing marks of the early work are the piece
of string-course and the lancet opening for the bell (the marks of
the gudgeons of which can be traced) in the east gable of the nave,
and the chancel arch, which is a low one of two orders of chamfers
carried down to the floor. Late in the fourteenth century the porch
was constructed, and it still retains its original roof, doorway, a^d
niche with pedestal for figure in the east wall. The original door
is stowed away under the gallery. At the same time a
The Church of All Saints, The Leigh, near Cricklade.
window was inserted in the south wall of the nave eastward of the
porch, the tracery of which has been disturbed by a lowering- of the
walls and window-head — probably to receive the new roof in 1688.
At about the middle of the fifteenth century a great alteration took
place in this Church. The interesting (and in some respects unique)
wooden tower, with its massive postvS and braces rising from the
ground inside the nave walls, was erected, the west gable was re-
built and a new three-light window introduced, two similar windows
of two lights each and a second doorway were inserted in the north
wall of the nave, and the cross on the east gable renewed.
At the same time the chancel was entirely re-built with the
diagonal buttresses characteristic of the period. The three-light
window in the south wall of the sanctuary, with its inside sill carried
down as sedilia, and the charming piscina in the east jamb, are
coeval with the re-building ; the east window (a good three-light
one temp. Edward I., with early cusping and the nail-head ornament
on outside label) and the priests' door, which is of late fourteenth
century date, were, however, parts of the previous chancel, re-built
with the walls at this time.
The roof of the chancel is concealed by a coved plaster ceiling,
and it has a modern tie-beam ; but its ancient pitch is retained, and
the old roof probably exists. Shortly after this a rood-loft was
erected, and, although it does not still remain, traces of its former
existence may be seen in the cutting away of the label of the
chancel arch and the insertion of the small square window to light
it. A two-light square-head window was also inserted in the south
wall of the nave westward of the porch.
The roof of the nave is an absolutely unique feature in a Parish
Church so far as my experience goes, and its Gothic character at so
late a period may be attributed to the revival in the Church which
took place at the time of Archbishop Laud. On the wall-plate on
the north side is carved the inscription : —
"W + T T + W H + N Carppenters."
(with a fleur-de-lys between each pair of initials.)
" Blanchadin Wake : John Waldron :
Churchwardens : 1638."
The Church of All Saints, The Leigh, near Cricklade. 123
And this is doubtless the date of the construction of the roof. On
one of the south purlins is cut the inscription T. T. IL. C. W. 1783,
and on the collar of the east truss is cut the further inscription : —
" John Waldron and John Painter,
Chappelwardens 1717 and 18. John Flux Painter."
The latter two doubtless refer to some repairs or alterations, and the
last I conjecture is the date when the panelling in the east bay was
put up. The principal- trusses of this roof are of " collar " form, with
moulded braces pierced with openings of quatrefoil shape. The
purlins and collars are surmounted by an embattled member. The
trusses have beneath them rudely-carved angels in an attitude of
prayer. All the work, although Gothic in its general forms, is
distinctly Jacobean in detail, and the late date can be discerned in
the rudeness of the workmanship, the flatness of the mouldings,
and the peculiar wavy form of the wind-braces. The eastern bay
of this roof has a panelled oak ceiling following the lines of the
braces, and with moulded ribs and carved bosses. This seems to
have been put up at a later date, but it is very Gothic in style.
Some of the seating near the west end is of coeval date, but
without any Gothic feeling; the rest of the seating is modern, and
of deal.
The pulpit with sounding-board dates from the earlier half of the
eighteenth century, and is in good condition ; the font is a small
one of about the same age. A modern window has been inserted
in the north wall to light the pulpit. A gallery has been erected
at the west end under the tower, and dormers inserted in the roof
to light it.
Bits of fifteenth century glass are preserved in one of the north
windows and in the altered tracery of the south window of the nave.
The altar rails are of oak in a modern pattern of fretwork ; there
are two steps at this point at present, but apparently only one
formerly existed. Some post- Re formation colouring is discernible
on the north wall of the nave (texts of two dates), also on the
walls of the chancel.
124
Contriktions tofoarte a MiltsMre
Q
By G. E. DAETNELL and the REV. E. H. GODDABD.
[For previous Word-lists see Vol. xxvi., p. 84, and p. 293.]
few pages of Addenda to the Wiltshire Word-lists
which have already appeared in vol. xxvi. of this Magazine
must not be taken as by any means exhausting the subject. We
have no doubt that many very characteristic words and phrases will
prove to have been overlooked by us, however diligent we may have
been in our researches : and any additions to our list will always be
most acceptable. There are some parts of the county from which
we have as yet obtained little or nothing that is worth recording,
and others from which the yield, although by no means inconsider-
able, has as yet fallen far short of expectation. However, taking
the three lists together, enough materials have now been collected
to warrant the publication of the Word-list as a separate volume,
and it is with much pleasure that we take this opportunity of an-
nouncing that the English Dialect Society has very generously
undertaken to include it in their valuable series of County Glossaries,
and to publish it at the Clarendon Press this autumn. Our thanks
are due to many kind helpers, amongst whom may be mentioned
Mr. R. Coward, Mr. J. U. Powell, the Rev. C. Soames, and Mr.
F. M. Willis, for their assistance in collecting the words here given,
which must be taken as forming part of the lists which appeared in
vol. xxvi., pp. 84-169 and 293 — 314. The abbreviations here used
are as before, viz. : — (A) Akerman, (B) Britton, (D) Davis, (H)
Halliwell, (Wr.) Wright, (N. & S. W.) North and South Wilts,
etc., words with which we are not personally acquainted being
marked with an asterisk (*). A few very interesting words have
been gleaned from a small Glossary of Wiltshire Words, by Mr.
Edward Slow, of Wilton (the well-known author of Wiltshire
Rhymes), which has recently been published.
Contributions towards a Wiltshire Glossary. 125
Abear. To bear, to endure. N. & S.W.
Afeard. Add-.— S.W.
*Agalds. Add :— This has no connection with aglets. The d is excrescent.
It stands for 'agle, i.e., hagle or haigle, a diminutive of Jiague or haw.—
Smy the- Palmer. See Folk-Etymology, p. 630.
Agg. (1) Add :— S.W.
(2) Add :— To irritate, to provoke. N. & S.W.
Ailes, Eyles, lies, etc. The awns of barley. N. & S.W.
All-amang. Add •— S.W.
*Anan. Add :— 'Nan is still occasionally used in N. Wilts.
Any more than. Add-— s.w.
Apple-owling. See Howlers.
Arg. Add:-S.W.
*Atter-COp. Add :•— Mr. Willis mentions that EdderJcop is still in use in
Denmark.
Away with. Endure. This Biblical expression is still commonly used iu
Wilts. " Her's that weak her can't away with the childern at no rate ! "
BaCOn-and-EggS. Linaria vulgaris, Mill., Yellow Toadflax. N. & S.W.
*Badge. v. To deal in corn, etc. See Badger. Obsolete.
"1576. Md. that I take order of the Badgers that they do name the
places where the Badgers do use to badge before they resieve their lycens.
. . . . Md. to make pees [process] against all the Badgers that doo
badge without licence." — Extracts from Records of Wilts Quarter Sessions,
Wilts Arch. Mag., xx., 327.
Bake. See Beak.
Bams. Add:— "The old man .... had bams on his legs and a sack
fastened over his shoulders like a shawl." — The Story of Dick, ch. xii.,
p. 141.
Bandy. Add-.-s.w.
Bannis. Add-.— *Bramstickle (Slow). S.w.
Barken. Add: — Barton was formerly in very common use, but has now
been displaced by Shed.
Baskets. Plan tago lanceolata, L., Ribwort Plantain. S.W. (Little Langford.)
*BawSy, Borsy, or Bozzy. Coarse, as applied to the fibre of cloth or
wool. " Bozzy-faced cloth hain't good enough vor I." S.W. (Steeple
Ashton, etc.)
Baulk. Add:— (2) A line of turf dividing a field. "The strips [in a
"common field"] are marked off from one another, not by hedge or wall,
VOL. XXVII. — NO. LXXX. K
126 Contributions towards a Wiltshire Glossary.
but by a simple grass path, a foot or so wide, which they call ' balks ' or
'meres.' "—Wilts Arch. Mag., xvii., 294. N.W.
Beak. (3) After " near Heytesbury," add " in Norton Bavant parish. In
the Deverills parts of many of the down farms are known as the Bake?
or more commonly the Burn-bake."
Bearsfoot. Hellebore. N.W. (Huish, etc.)
Beetle. (1) Add:—"0n another [occasion] (2nd July, 25 Hen. VIII.)
. , . . William Seyman was surety . , . . for the re-delivery of
the tools, 'cuncta instrumenta videlicet Beetyll, Ax, Matock, and Showlys.' "
—Stray Notes from the Marlborough Court Books, Wilts Arch. Mag.,
xix., 78.
Bird-batting. Add-.— Bird-battenen (Slow.) S.w.
Black-Bess. See Black-Bob.
Black-Bob. A cockroach (Slow). Black-BeSS on Berks border. S.W.
Blades. The shafts of a waggon (Slow). S.W.
Blinking. Add : — " 'Twas a little one-eyed blinking sort o' place." — Tess
of the I? Urbervilles, vol. i., p. 10.
Blood-alley. Add :-s.w.
Bluen or Blooens. Add •.— N. & S.w.
Bob. Add : — In Canada " bob-sleds " are used for drawing logs out of the
woods.
Bobbish. Add-.-s.w.
*Boreshore. A hurdle-stake (Slow), S.W. P A corruption of Fold-shore.
Bottle. Add-.-s.w.
Box or Hand-box. The lower handle of a long sawyer's pit-saw, the
upper handle being the Tiller. N.W. (Clyffe Pypard).
*Bramstickle. See Bannis.
Brandy-bottles. Nuphar lutea, Sm., Yellow Water-lily. S.W. (Mere, etc.)
Brevet, Brivet, Privet. (1) Add :—" Brivet, a word of ten applied to
children when they wander about aimlessly and turn over things." — Leisure
Sour, Aug., 1893. N.W. (Castle Eaton, etc.)
*(2) To pilfer. "If she'll brevet one thing, she'll brevet another."
N.W. (Mildenhall.)
BrOW. Add :— Also FroW, easily broken.
Brushes. Add :— S.w.
Bunt. (4) After " person," add " as a nickname." S.W.
Burl. Add : — Still used in S. Wilts of trimming up cloth and felt, removing
the knots and rough places, etc.
By G. E. Dartnett and the Rev. E. H. Goddard. 127
*Butter- teeth. The two upper incisors. N.W.
Butty, A mate or companion in field-work. N. & S.W.
*Caa~vy (PCalfy). A simpleton (Slow). S.W.
Caddie. Add:— (6). v. To mess about, to throw into disorder. "Idon'fc
hold wi' they binders [the binding machines], they do caddie the wheat
about so." N. & S.W.
Caddling. Add :— Meddlesome. N. & S.W.
Cag-inag. Bad or very inferior meat. N. & S.W.
Cains-and-Abels. Ayuilegia vulgaris, L., Columbine. S.W. (Farley).
*Calf-white. See White.
Call home. To publish the banns of marriage. S.W.
" They tells I as 'ow Bet Stiugymir is gwain to be caal'd whoam to Jim
Spritely on Zundy." — Slow.
Canker-berries. Add -.— Conker-berries (Slow). S.W.
*CappenC6. The swivel-joint of the old-fashioned flail. Capel in Devon. N.W.
Cass'n. Add-.— S.W.
Cat's-ice. White ice, ice from which the water has receded. N. & S.W. (Steeple
Ashton, etc.)
" They stood at the edge, cracking the cat's-ice, where the water had
shrunk back from the wheel marks, and left the frozen water white and
brittle."— The Story of Dick, ch. xiii., p. 153.
*Cats'-paW8. Catkins of willow while still young and downy. S.W.(DeverilL)
Cawket. Add-.— Cawk, S.W. Caa-kin (Slow).
Chain. Add-.— s.w.
Charm. Add :— Also used of hounds in full cry. N.W.
Add : — (3) v. To make a loud confused noise, as a number of birds, etc.,
together. N. & S.W.
*Chemise. Convolvulus septum,!*., Great Bindweed. S.W. (Little Langford).
This name was given us as Chemise, but would probably be pronounced
as Shimmy.
Chiddlins or Chiddlens. Pigs'-chitterlings. N. & S.W.
Chilver-hog. Add : — " The word hog is now applied to any animal of a
year old, such as a hog bull, a chilver hog sheep. ' Chilver ' is a good
Anglo-Saxon word, ' cylfer,' and means female, so a chilver hog sheep
simply means, in the dialect of the Vale of Warminster, a female lamb a
year old."— Wilts Arch. Mag., xvii., 303.
Chitterlings. Add •.— Chiddlens. N. & S.W.
128 Contributions towards a Wiltshire Glossary.
Christian Names. The manner in which a few of these are pronounced
may here be noted -.—Allburt, Albert ; Allfurd, Alfred ; Charl or Okas,
Charles ; Etlierd, Edward ; RicVt or Bicket, Eichard ; Robbut, Robert ;
etc.
Clacker, The tongue (Slow). S.W.
Clackers. A pair of pattens (Slow). S.W.
ClaVJ. Add :— An architectural term, probably from Lat. clavis.
Clothes-brush. Dipsacus sylvestris, L., Wild Teasel. S.W.
Clout. <1) Add:-S.W.
Add :— (2) v. To strike. N. & S.W.
*Clumper, Clumber. A heavy clod of earth. N.W. (Marlborough.)
Clums. Add :-ClumpS is so used of the feet in S.W.
*Cluster-of-five. The fist. Cluster-a-vive (Slow). s.w.
Clyders. Gralium Aparine, L., Goosegrass. S.W.
*Coath. Add :— s.w.
*Cockagee, Cockygee (g hard). A kind of small hard sour cider apple.
Heard at Deverill, S.W. In use in West of England.
Cockles. Seed-heads of Arctium Lappa, L., Burdock. N.W. (Clyffe Pypard).
*Cod-apple. A wild apple (Wilts Arch. Mag., xiv., 177).
Comb. Grease from an axle-box, soot, dirt, etc. KoOlIlb (Slow). S.W.
Come of. To get the better of, to grow out of. "How weak that child is
about the knees, Sally !" " Oh, he'll come o' that all right, Miss, as he do
grow bigger." N. & S.W.
Comical. Add :— S.W. to (1), (2), and (3).
Add : — " A cow he's a comical thing to feed ; bin he don't take care he's
very like to choke hisself." N.W. (Marlborough.)
It should be noted that Marlborough folk are traditionally reputed to call
everything he but a bull, and that they call she !
Corruptions. Add: — Other common perversions of words are Patty Carey,
Hepatica ; Chiny Oysters, China Aster ; Turkemtime, turpentine ; Absence,
abscess (Cherhill) ; Abrupt, to approve (Hutfch) ; Tiddle, to tickle ; Cribble,
a cripple; Strive (of a tree), to thrive (Steeple Ashton) ; Hurly-gurly, a
hurdy-gurdy (S.W.) ; Midger, to measure ; Cherm, to churn (Sloiv, S.W.) ;
Rumsey-voosey , to rendezvous, as " He went a rumsy-voosing down the lane
to meet his sweetheart " ; Dapcheek, a dabchick.
* COW -baby. A childish fellow, a simpleton (Slow). S.W.
*Cow-white. See White.
*Crandurn. The throat (Slow). s.w.
By &. E. Dartnell and the Rev. E. H. Goddard. 129
Crazy. Add:— In Deverill the term Craizies is restricted to the Marsh
Marigold.
Crazy-Bets. (1) Add :— Crazy Betsey at Little Langford, S.w.
Mr. Slow says it is applied to the " buttercup " in S.W.
Crazy-moir. (1) Ranunculus repens, L., Creeping Buttercup. More or
Mar=i-oot or. plant.. N.W. (Devizes; Huish.)
(2) At Clyffe Pypard, N.W., and probably elsewhere, Crazy-mar
is applied to a plant of any kind of buttercup.
Crease. A ridge-tile. " From the top of Aland's house .... a slate
ridge-crest (or crease, as it is provincially termed) .... was carried
northwards about 40 yards."— The Great Wiltshire Storm, Wilts Arch.
Mag., vol. vi., p. 378.
Creeping Jenny. (2)Lysimachia ^wmw/aHa,L.,Moneywort. N. & S.W.
Crick-crack. Add-.— s.w.
Crink. A crevice or crack. N.W.
Critch. A deep earthen pan. Also used in Hants. Fr. cruche. S.W.
CrumplingS, Crumplens. Small imperfectly grown apples. N.W.
Crowdy. Add:— s.w.
Crow-peck. Add:— (2) Ranunculus arvensis,'L., Corn Crowfoot. N.W.
(Clyffe Pypard.)
Cubby-hole. -4^ :— Coopy-house, a little house (Slow). S.W.
* Cur die. A curl of hair (Slow). S.W.
Cushions. Add •.— S.W.
Cut-finger-leaf. Valeriana, L., All-heal. N.W. (Huish, etc.)
The leaves are good for application to sluggish sores, whitlows, etc. Mr.
Cunnington quotes it as V. dioica.
Daglet. Add-.-S.w.
*Dane. Daner. In Kingston Deverill there was an old man who called
red-haired men " Danes," or " Daners," as " Thee bist a Dane." This being
in the centre of the Alfred district, the term may be a survival. In Somerset
red-haired men are often said to be " a bit touched with the Danes."
Daudy-gOslingS. Add •.— Dandy-goshen is used at Little Langford,
S.W.
Dap. (1) v. To rebound, as a ball. N. & S.W.
(2) - n. The rebound of a ball. N. & S.W.
Dapster. A nimble boy. S.W. (Deverill.)
Dawk. Add : — Also used of a baker marking loaves : —
" Prick it and dack it and mark it with T,
And put it in the oven for baby and me." — Nursery Song^.
130 Contributions towards a Wiltshire Glossary.
Deaf-nettle. Lamium album, L., The Dead Nettle. S.W.
Deaf-Hut. A rotten or empty nut. Ztea/==useless5 inactive. S.W.
*Dee-gee. Mr. William Cunnington writes us as follows : — " ' Twas a Dee-gee '
was the name of a kind of dance, which our old nurse taught us as children,
mostly performed by moving sideways and knocking the feet together."
This would seem to "be a survival of the Elizabethan heydeguies. See
Spenser, Shepherd's Calendar, June.
DeviPs-ring. Hulvet is a misprint for Huloet.
DeW-beater. Add :— One who turns out his toes (Slow). S.W.
Dew-pond. See Mist-pond.
Dibbs. Add:— S.W.
Dicky-birds. Fumaria officinalis, L., Common Fumitory. S.W.
Diggled. Add:— *DiggleS, plentiful (Slow). S.W.
Dog, llOW beest ? This phrase seems worth noting. At Clyffe Pypard
a person complaining of loneliness, or the want of sociability or kindness
amongst the neighbours, will say, " There isn't one as '11 so much as look
in and say, ' Dog, how beest P ' '
Dogged. Add-.— s.w.
Doner, Add •.— s.w.
Doom. Add: — Durn. At Warminster applied only to the sides of a
door-frame. S.W.
Double. " He is a double man," i.e., bent double with age or infirmity. S.W.
Down-arg. Add :— s.w.
Down-dacioUS. Audacious. " She be a right down-dacious young
faggot." S.W.
*Down-haggard. Disconsolate (Slow). S.W.
DoWSe. Add :— S.W.
Drashel. Add : — S.W. The correct term for a flail is a drashel, but " a
pair o' drashells " is more commonly used. of. " a pair of trucks," a
barred hand-cart on two wheels.
*Drattle. Much talk (Slow). S.W.
Draught. A cart-shaft (Slow). S.W.
Drave. " I be slaving an' draving for he, night and day." N. & S.W.
Drawn, Drawing. Add: — "Many of the meadows on either length abound
in ditches and ' drawns.' "—Fishing Gazette, 18th July, 1891, p. 40, col. 2.
"I .... descried three birds, standing quite still by the margin of
a flooded ' drawing.' "—Wilts Arch. Mag., xxi., 229.
By G. E. Dartnell and the Rev. E. H. Goddard. 131
Drock. * (2) Add :-N.W. (Castle Eaton, etc.)
* (3) Omit "probably a mistake," and add :— N.W. (Castle Eaton, etc.)
*Dromedary. (1) Centaurea nigra, L., Black Knapweed. S.W. (Bar-
ford St. Martin.)
(2) Centaurea Scabiosa, L., Hardheads. S.W. (Barford St. Martin.)
Dlickstone. A game played by boys with stones. S.W.
EaSS, sometimes YeGS. An earthworm. S.W.
Eel-SCrade. A kind of eel-trap. " A trap used to catch eels, placed near a
weir. The water is turned into the scrade when high, and the fish washed
up to a stage through which the water finds an outlet, the fish, however,
being retained on the platform by a piece of sloping iron." — F. M. Willis.
Eel-sticher. An eel-spear. " Wishing to secure [a Little Grebe] in summer
plumage, I asked the old ' drowner ' in our meadows to look out for one for
me— and this he very soon did, fishing one out from under the water between,
the spikes of his eel-sticher, as it was diving under the water." — Wilts Arch.
Mag., xxii., 193.
Elms. Add : — About Marlborough usually pronounced as Yelms, but at
Clyffe Pypard there is not the slightest sound of y in it. Elsewhere it is
frequently pronounced as Ellums.
En. (i) Add-.— Facen.
(2) Add :— GlaSSGH. "There's some volk as thinks to go droo life
in glassen slippers."
Boarden, made of boards.
*Falarie. Disturbance, excitement, commotion. "'Look'ee here, there' ve
bin a fine falarie about you, Zur.' He meant that there had been much
excitement when it was found that Bevis was not in the garden, and was
nowhere to be found." — Jefferies, Wood Magic, ch. 2.
Falling, n. A downfall of snow. "I thinks we shall have some vallen
soon." Only used of snow. N. & S.W.
Falling-post. The front upright timber of a gate. Occasionally heard at
Huish, Head, however, being the more usual term there. N.W.
Falsify. Of seeds, young trees, etc., to fail, to come to nought. N.W.
Fantag, Fanteague, etc. n. Fluster, fuss. (Slow.) Also used of
vagaries or larks, as " Now, none o' your fantaigs here ! " At Clyffe Pypard,
N.W., " a regular fantaig " would be a flighty flirting lad or girl, a " wonder-
menting or gammotty sort of a chap." N. & S.W.
Favour. To resemble in features, etc. " He doesn't favour you, Sir . . . .
He is his mother's boy." N. & S.W*
132 Contributions towards a Wiltshire Glossary.
FeSS. Add:— (2) Proud, stuck-up. S.W.
Fingers-and-Thumbs. Blossoms of Ulex Europaus, L., Common Furze
(Slow). S.W.
Fitty. In good health. " How be *ee ? " " Ter'ble fitty." N.W.
*Flabber-gaster. ». idle talk (Slow). s.w.
Flake. Add:-— "Flake" hurdles are used for cattle, the ordinary sheep
hurdles being too weak for the purpose.
Flamtag. A slatternly woman. N.W. (Huish, etc.)
Flick, Fleck, (i) Add-.-s.w.
* (2) Add:—v. To flare (Slow). S.W.
Flitmouse. The bat. N.W. (Marlborough.)
Floppetty. adj. Of a woman, untidy, slatternly in dress or person. S.W.
Flucksey. adj. " A flucksey old hen," i.e., a hen who makes a great fuss
over her chickens. S.W. (Bishopstrow, etc.)
Cope's Hants Glossary has : — " FlucJcs, to peck in anger like a hen."
Flunk. ^<ta -.— Vlonker (Slow). s.w.
Fog, v. To give fodder to cattle. N. & S.W.
Fog off. To damp off, as cuttings often do in a greenhouse. N.W. (Marl.
borough.)
Folly. Occasionally used of a circular plantation of trees on a hill, as " Harn-
ham Folly." This seems distinct from its more general use as applied to
a tower or other building. S.W.
Fore- eyed. Fore-seeing, apt to look far ahead. S.W.
Fore- Spur. A fore-leg of pork. S.W.
*Fodge (rarely Fadge). In packing fleeces of wool, when the quantity
is too small to make up a full " bag " of 240Bbs., the ends of the bag are
gathered together as required, and the sides skewered over them, thus
forming the small package known as a " fodge." N.W.
FoSSel, Foldsail. Place this under Foldsail, and add:— "A fold
stake, locally called a 'fossle.' "— Wilts Arch. Mag., xxi., 132. The
" fossels " means the fold-shores, or the stakes to which the hurdles are
shored up, and fastened with a loose twig wreath at the top." — Ibid, xvii.,
304.
Froar. Add •.— s.w.
Fur. This should be struck out, as being general English.
Froughten. Add :— s.w.
Fuzz-ball. A dd :— s. w.
Galley-crow.
By G. E. Dartnell and tie Rev. E. II. Goddard. 133
*GallllS. " Ee's a gallus chap," i.e^ plucky.
Gaily. Add :— S.W. Pret. gallercd is also used in S.W.
Gambrel. ^rf^-Gamel (Slow). S.W.
Gam el. See Gambrel.
Gaminock. See Gannick.
Gander-flanking. To go off larking or " wondermenting." Perhaps
a corruption of gallivanting. S.W. (Upton Scudainore)
Gandi-gOslillgS. Add •.— See Candlegostes in Folk-Etymology.
Gannick. ^4c?<2:— Gammock at Marlborough.
Garley-gut. A gluttonous person.
L' ' Let's go to bed,' says Heavy-Head,
' Let's bide a bit/ says Sloth,
* Put on the pot,' says Garley-gut,
' We'll sup afore we g'auf " [go off],
Nursery Rhyme.
Perhaps from gorle, to devour eagerly. Cf. gorbelly, gorell, etc. — Smythe-
Palmer.
Gawney. Add-.— S.W.
Ghastly, Gashly*> Add:— The word is used in many ways, as "Thick
hedge wur gashly high, but it be ter'ble improved now." N.W. (Huish.)
Giggley. See Goggley.
Gin-and- Water Market. "Some towns have only what is called a
' gin-and-water ' market : that is, the ' deal ' is begun and concluded from
small samples carried in the pocket and examined at an inn over a glass of
spirits and water."— The Toilers of the Field, p. 28.
Gipsy -rose. Scaliosa atropurpurea, L., the Garden Scabious. N.W.
*GloX. Add : — An onomatopoeia, like the synonymous ILai. glut-glut, whence
fflutio, to swallow. — Smy the- Palmer,
Gllltcher. The throat. N. & S.W.
*Gnaa-pOSt» A simpleton (Slow). Perhaps a perversion of non compos. S.W.
Gnaing. To mock, to insult. Also used in West of England and Sussex. S.W.
Go-now, GenOW, Good-noW. Used as an expletive, or an address to
a person. " What do'ee thenk o' that, genow ? " Also used in Dorset. S.W,
Gob. *(1) n. Much chatter (Slow). S.W.
(2) v. To talk. S.W.
134. Contributions towards a Wiltshire Glossary.
Goggle. Add :— How are you to-day, Sally p » « Lor', Zur ! I be all of a
goggle." " What on earth do you mean ? " " Why, I be zo ter'ble giggly,
I can't scarce kip my lags nohow." S.W. (Steeple Ashton.)
Goggly. Add:— sometimes Giggly is used.
Good-now. See GO-HOW. Used at Downton, etc.
Goosey-gander. A game played by children. N. & S.W.
Gramfer. A dd :— s. W.
Grammer. Add •.— S.W.
*Granny-jump-OUt-of-bed. Aconitum Napellus, L., Monks-hood.
S.W. (Deverill.)
*GrOpsing. Add :—" Both came unto the sayd Tryvatt's howse in the
gropsing of the yevening." — Wilts Arch. Mag., xxii., 227. Obsolete.
Ground-rest. Add :— This was part of the old wooden plough.
Grouty. Of the sky, thundery, threatening rain. It looks " ter'ble grouty '*
in summer when thunder- clouds are coming up. N.W. (Clyffe Pypard.)
G ullet-hole, A large drain-hole through a hedge-bank to carry off water. N.W.
H. It should be noted that the cockney misuse of Sis essentially foreign to
our dialect. Formerly it was the rarest thing in the world to hear a true
Wiltshire rustic make such a slip, though the townsfolk were by no means
blameless in this respect, but now the spread of education and the increased
facilities of communication have tainted even our rural speech with cockney-
isms and slang phrases.
Hag-rod. Add :— *Haig-raig, bewildered (Slow). S.W.
Hain. Add: — " Three acres of grass .... to be hayned by the farmer
at Candlemas and carried by the Vicar at Lammas." — Hilmarton Parish
Terrier, 1704.
Hakker. Add-.-S.w.
Hand-box. See Box.
Hand-staff. The part of the " drashell " which is held in the hand.
Hang-gallows. Add •.— s.w.
Haines. Add-.— S.W.
*Hank. Dealings with (Slow). S.W.
Hanging-post. The hinder upright timber of a gate, by which it is hung
to its post. Frequently heard, although Har is much more commonly
used. N.W. (Huish).
Har. The hinder upright timber of a gate, by which it is hung to its post.
Icelandic, hjarri, O.E., herre, the hinge of a door. See Head and
Hangillg-pOSt. "We wants some rnoro heads and bars cut out."
By G. E. Dartnell and the Rev. E. H. Godrlard. 135
Carpenters about Marlborough usually reduce the word to a single letter in
making up their accounts, as : — " To a new R to Cow-lease gate, etc." N.W.
(Marlborough ; Huish ; Clyffe Pypard.)
Hatch. (3) Add (after " door ") : — over which you must step to enter.
Hay-llOme. " It was the last day of the hay -harvest— it was ' hay-home '
that night."— R. Jefferies, A True Tale of the Wiltshire Labourer.
Hay-making1. Add : — Roller is pronounced as if it rhymed with collar.
Hay is " put in rollers," or '* rollered up."
*He-body. A woman of masculine appearance. S.W. (Deverill.)
He-WOman. The same as He-body. N.W. (Clyffe Pypard, etc.)
Head. The front upright timber of a gate. See Ear and Falling-
pOSt. N.W. (Marlborough ; Huish ; Clyffe Pypard.)
Heartless. " A heartless day " is a wet day with a strong south-west
wind. S.W.
Heater (pronounced Setter}. A flat-iron. N. & S.W.
Helyer. A tiler. An old word, but still in use.
Here and there one. " I wur mortal bad all the way [by sea] and as
sick as here and there one." N. & S.W.
Here-right. Add •.— This very spot (Slow). S.W.
Hike off. Add-.-s.w.
Hit. v. To pour out or throw out. " You ought to het a quart o' drenk inta
'ee." " Hit it out on the garden patch." N.W.
Hodmedod. A snail. N.W. (Mildenhall.)
Hog. (2) Add : — " We have wether hogs, and chilver hogs, and shear hogs
. . . . the word hog is now applied to any animal of a year old, such
as a hog bull, a chilver hog sheep." — Wilts Arch. Mag., xvii., 303.
" 1580 .... Una ovis vocata a hogge." — Scrope's History of
Castle Combe.
HogO. (Fr. haut gout). A bad smell (Monthly Mag., 1814). Still fre-
quently used of tainted meat or strong cheese. N. & S.W.
Home, to be Called. To have the banns of marriage published. S.W.
Hook. Of a bull, to gore. N. & S.W.
Hookland. Add : — Sometimes defined as " land tilled every year."
Horse-stinger. Add -.— s.w.
*HorseVleg (Hase's-laig). A bassoon. S.W.
Houssett, Add :— Mr. F. M. Willis points out that Swedish husera and
Germ, hausen both have "to make a noise " among their meanings. See
article on The Wooset in Wilts Arch. Mag., vol. i., p. 88.
136 Contributions towards a Wiltshire Glossary.
Howlers. See Owlers.
Hud. (1) Add :— The skin of a gooseberry, the shell of a pea or bean, etc.
N. & S.W.
(3) ^^:-Aiso Huddick.
Hullocky. Add :— s.w.
Humstl'Um. A home-made fiddle (Slow). Sometimes applied also to a
large kind of Jew's-harp. S.W.
Bunch about. To push or shove about. S.W.
Hurdle-footedo Club-footed. s.w.
Hurkle. To crowd together. An old form of hurtle. " Hurtelyn, as too
thyngys togedur (al. hurcolyn, hurchyn togeder). Impingo, collido." —
Prompt Parv., c. 1440 (Smy the- Palmer}.
In-a-doors. No one in Wilts is ever to be found " in doors." The expression
used is invariably "in-a-doors."
*Ivors. Hanging woods (Slow). S.W.
There would appear to be some misunderstanding here. The word may
may refer to the coverts on the hillside above Longbridge Deverill, which
are known as The Ivors, the farm below being Long Ivor Farm. At
Wroughton a field is called " The Ivory" but this is perhaps a family name.
Iron Pear. Pyrus Aria, L., White Beam. N.W. (Heddington, etc.)
Iron-Pear-Tree Farm, near Devizes, is said to take its name from this tree.
Izzard. The letter Z. Still in use in S.W.
*Jack. A newt. N.W. (Swindon.)
*Jiffle. At Bishopston, N. Wilts, an old bell-ringer was recently heard to
accuse the younger men of having got into a regular " jiffle " (? confusion)
while ringing. We have not met with the word elsewhere, but Hal. and
Wright have jiffle, to be restless, var. dial., an&jirble, to jumble, Nhumb.
Jiggery-poke. Add •.— Jiggery-pokery. Unfair dealing. N. & S.w.
Jigget. v. To ride or walk at a jog-trot. " Here we go a jiggettin'
along." N. & S.W.
Jiggetty. (1) Shaky. " This be a ter'ble jiggetty train." N.W.
*(2) Fidgetty (Slow). S.W.
Jimmy. Add :— S.W.
Johnny Chider. Add :— Jan Chider (Slow). S.W.
Jumping Jesuses. The long-legged water flies which skim along the
surface of streams. N.W. (Hilmartou).
*Jut. To nudge. S.W.
Keeker. Add :-s.w.
By G. E. Darlnell and the Rev. E. H. Goddard. 137
Kitty Candlestick. Ignis fatuus, Will-o'-the-Wisp. S.W. (Deverill.)
Knap. Add :— (2) n. A little hill, a steep ascent in a road. This is really
a Devon use. S.W. (Dorset bord.)
Knit. Of fruit, to set. " The gooseberries be knitted a'ready." N.W. (Clyffe
Pypard.)
Knitch. (2) Add :— Compare " He's got his market-nitch."— Tess of the
D'Urbervilles, vol. i., p. 19.
LadieS-and-Gentlemen. Arum maculatum, L., Cuckoo-pint. N.&S.W.
LadyVFinger. (2) Arum maculatum, L., Cuckoo-pint. S.W. (Barford
St. Martin.)
*Lady's-Glove. " The Greater Bird's-foot." S.W.
Lady's-Shoe. Fumaria officinalis, L., Common Fumitory. S.W. (Barford
St. Martin.)
*Latter Lammas. Unpunctual (Slow). s.w.
Lane (a broad). A strip of grass, generally irregular, bounding an arable
field. N.W. (Devizes.)
Lanshet. See Linch.
Lay. (4) Add: — Davis's lain is probably a contraction of lay in. At
Mildenhall you often hear of laying or laying in a pickaxe, and the word
is to be traced back for a century or more in the parish accounts there. N.W.
Learn. To teach. " I'll learn 'ee to do that ageau, you young vaggot ! " In
general use in this county. N. & S.W.
Libbet. Add-.- s.w.
Limbers. The shafts of a waggon. Mid. & S.W.
Linch. Add :— Lanshet (N.W.), and Lytchet (S.W.), are variants of
this word.
" Another British coin, found on the ' lytchets ' at East Dean, has passed
into the cabinet of Dr. Blackmore." — Wilts Arch. Mag., xxii., 242. For
articles on Lynchet, Linchet, or Linch, see Wilts Arch. Mag., xii., 185, and
xv., 88. Also articles and letters in Marlborough College Natural History
Report and Marlborough Times, 1892.
Lollop. (2) Add:—8.W.
Lolloper. A lazy lout. N. & S.W.
Long wood. The long branches which are bent down and used to weave in
and bind a hedge when it is being laid. N.W.
Longful. Add-.-S.W.
Loppetty. Weak, out of sorts. N.W.
* Lot tie. v. To sound as water trickling in a small stream (Mr. W.
Cunnington) N.W.
138
Contributions towards a Wiltshire Glossary.
Luce. (1) Luke-warm. S.W.
*(2) A sore in sheep. S.W.
Lug. (2) Add :—
" Olde Freeman doe weare ruggs [coarse cloth],
And Thomas Lord doe goe to the woods to steal poles and luggs."
Seventeenth century doggrell rhymes from Wroughton,
• quoted in Wilts Arch. Mag., xxii., 216.
Lug- WOod. Lops and tops of trees, S.W.
Lumper. Of a pony, to stumble. N.W. (Pewsey.)
Omit *, and add :— S.W.
Lump Work. Piece work, N.W. (Clyffe Pypard.)
Lytchet. See Linch.
Mace. " This is a style still used by the lower classes in North Wiltshire to
tradesmen and sons of farmers. Thus at Ogbourne St. George, a brick maker
whose name is Davis, is called 'Mace Davis,' and sons of farmers are
called ' Mace John,' or ' Mace Thomas,' the surname being sometimes
added and sometimes not."— Wilts Arch. Mag., i. 338.
This seems a misapprehension. The word used is simply Mais' (before
a consonant), a shortened form of " Maister." " Mais' John " is short for
Maister John. Before a vowel it would be Mais' r or Maistr1 — as " Maistr'
Etherd" [Edward].
Madell (a broad), Medal, etc. The game of " Merrills " or " Nine Men's
Morris." Also known as Puzzle-Pound. Several varieties of Madell
are played in Wilts, known respectively as Eleven-penny (strictly
The Merrills), Nine-penny, Six-penny, and Three-
penny, according to the number of pieces used. " Eleven-penny " is
played with eleven pieces each side, instead of nine, the game being in other
respects identical with " Nine Men's Morris " as described in Strutt's Sports
and Pastimes. The players move alternately, and the general principle is
Nine Men's Morris,
or Eleven.permy Madell.
Nine-penny Madell,
or, The Merrills.
By G. E. Dartnell and the Rev. E. H. Goddard, 139
Six-penny Madell.
Three-penny Madell.
to get three pieces together in a line anywhere on the dots or holes, while at
the same time preventing your adversary from making a line. " Nine-
penny," " Sixpenny," and " Three-penny " differ only in the number of
men each side and the form of the board (see diagrams) . The " board " is
scratched or chalked out on paving-stones, drawn on the slate, cut deep into
the turf on the downs or the top of the corn-bin (with holes instead of dots),
in short, made anywhere and anyhow. The " men " or " pieces " may be
anything available, sticks being played against stones, beans against oats,
etc. N. & S.W. (Devizes, etc.)
*Maggottillg. Meddling (Slow).
Maggotty. Add:— S.W.
*Mammoek. t>. To pull to pieces.
S.W.
(Leisure Hour, August, 1893).
N.W. (Castle Eaton, etc.)
0, I warrant, how he mammocked
" He did so set his teeth and tear it
it ! " — Shakespeare, Coriolanus, i., 3.
Mar, More. Add:— s.w.
Occasionally Moir in N. Wilts, as in Oazy-moir.
Mealy. Add \ — An interesting word, akin to Prov. Germ. Mollig, Mulig,
Fries. Mollig, soft, Prov. Eug. melsh, soft and mild (of the weather),
mellow, Lat. Mollis, etc. ; and so explaining "mealy-mouthed." — Smythe-
P aimer.
Meggy. Add :— Meg. s.w.
Mere. A boundary line or bank of turf. N. & S.W.
A turf boundary between the downs on adjoining farms : formed by
cutting two thick turves, one smaller than the other, and placing them,
upside down, with the smaller one on top, at intervals of about a chain along
the boundary line. N.W. (Devizes.)
" The strips [in a ' common field '] are marked off from one another,
not by hedge or wall, but by a simple grass path, a foot or so wide, which
they call ' balks ' or ' meres/ "—Wilts Arch. Mag., xvii., 294.
" Two acres of arable, of large measure, in Pen field, lying together and
bounded by meres on both sides." — Hilmarton Parish Terrier, dated 1704.
" Mere stones " often mark the boundaries of holdings or properties.
140 Contributions towards a Will shire Glossary.
Messenger. A sunbeam reaching down to the horizon from behind a cloud
is sometimes said to be the sun " sending out a messenger." Cf. Cope's
Hants Glossary.
Mickle. Add-.— s.w.
Milkmaids. Add : — In common use in Hill Deverill and Longbridge
Deverill.
Mist-pond. A pond on the downs, not fed by any spring, but kept up by
mist, dew, and rain. Such ponds rarely fail, even in the longest drought.
More commonly called Dew-ponds. S.W. (Broadchalke, etc,)
MlZ-maze. Puzzle, perplexity, confusion. S.W.
Miz-mazed. Thoroughly puzzled, stupified. S.W.
Mizzy-mazey. Confused. Used of print swimming before the eyes. S.W.
Monkey-musk. Add :— S.W.
Moucher, Moocher. Add-.— (3) Moochers, fruit of Rubus
fruticosus, L., Blackberry. S.W.
Berry-mouchers, q.v., in N.W.
Mote, Maute. Add:—S.W. (formerly).
Mound. (2) Add:— The Churchyard .... to be mounded partly by
the manor, partly by the parish and parsonage except only one gate to be
maintained by the vicar " : — 1704. Hilmarton Parish Terrier.
Mouthy, adj. Abusive, cheeky, impudent. S.W.
*Mucker. A miserly person (Slow). S.W.
Muggle. (1) Add:— S.W.
Add:— (2) v. To live in a muddling haphazard way. N.W.
Cf.:—" Most on us 'ad a precious sight rather work for a faermer like
the old measter, an' have our Saturday night reg'lar, than go muggling the
best way we could, an' take our chance." — Jonathan Merle, xxxvii., 412.
Muggle-pin. The pin in the centre of a want-trap. S.W.
Muddle-fuSS. A persistent meddler with other people's affairs. N.W. (Steeple
Ashton.)
*Naked Nanny. Colchicum autumnale, L., Meadow Saffron. See
Naked Boys. S.W. (Deverill.)
Narration. Add-.— Also Norration. s.w.
*Naumpey. A weak foolish -minded person. N.W.
Nessel-tripe, Nessel-trip, NuSSel-trip. The smallest and weakest
pig in a litter. Commonly used in the Deverills and elsewhere. S.W.
Neust alike, This should be denned as "nearly alike."
By G. E. Dartnell and the Rev. K H. Goddard. 141
Nine-holes. Add -.— This is mentioned among the " illegal games " in the
Castle Combe records.— Wilts Arch. Mag., iii., 156. " 1576. Lusum
illicitum vocatum nyne holes." — Scrapes History of Castle Combe.
Nineter. Add:— *(2) A skin-flint (Slow). S.W.
Nit. Add :— S.W. Slow defines Neet as " not yet." It is more often " nor
yet."
Noodle along1. To lounge aimlessly along, to move drowsily and heavily,
as a very spiritless horse. N.W.
Nut. The nave of a wheel. S.W.
Nyst, Niest. Often used in Mid Wilts in same way as neust, as "I be
nyst done up," i.e., over tired. (Mr. W. Cunnington.)
Oaves. (2) Add:— "A good old form. Mid. Eng. ovese (Old English
Miscellany, E. E. T. S., p. 15, 1. 465),=0. H. Ger. opasa (Vocabulary of
8. Gall.y—Smythe-Palmer. S.W.
Of. With. " You just come along o' I ! " N. & S.W.
Offer. " To offer to do a thing," to make as though you were going to do it,
or to begin to do it. " He offered to hit I," i.e., did not say he would, but
put up his fists and let out. N.W.
Owling. Add : — " Howlers. Boys who in former times went round wassailing
the orchards." — Parish, Sussex Glossary.
"The wenches with their wassail bowls
About the streets are singing;
The boys are come to catch the owls." — G-. Wither.
The " owls " here would seem to be the apples which were thrown about
the hall at Christmas, to be scrambled for.
" If the suggestion that owfo=apples is well-grounded, a connection might
be traced with the Celtic words for apple very similarly pronounced, viz. :
Irish uball, aball, Corn, auallen, Old Welsh aballen." — Smy the- Palmer.
Pank. Add-.-S.W.
Panshardo " In a panshard," out of temper, in a rage. S.W.
Also used in the New Forest. " Cf. ' in a pankin,' in a violent passion :
Yorks. Perhaps connected with panic, to pant, or breathe hard." — Smythe-
Palmer.
*ParaSol. Sanguisorbaofficinalis, L., Salad Burnet. S.W. (Little Langford.)
Parson. In carting dung about the fields, the heaps are shot down in lines,
and are all of much the same size. Sometimes, however, the cart tips up a
little too much, with the result that the whole cartload is shot out into a
large heap. This is known as a " Parson." N.W. (Clyffe Pypard.)
Peaked. Add :-S.W.
Peart. (1) Add-.-s.w.
VOL. XXVII. — NO. LXXX. L
142 Contributions towards a Wiltshire Glossary.
*Pecker. The nose (Slow). S.W.
Pelt. A passion. Add:— S.W.
*Perseen. To pretend to (Slow). S.W.
* Peter-man. " At Kington Langley .... the revel of the village
was kept on the Sunday following St. Peter's Day (29th June), on which
occasions a temporary officer called ' the Peter-man ' used to be appointed,
bearing the office, it may be presumed, of master of the sports." — Wilts
Arch. Mag., xxiv., 83. See Jackson's Aubrey, p. 11. Obsolete.
Picked. (2) Add-.— S.W.
Pickpocket. Add:— S.W. (Mere.)
Pigeon-pair. When a woman has only two children, a boy and a girl, they
are called a " pigeon-pair." N. & S.W.
" So in the North of England ' a dow's cleckin,' i.e., a dove's clutch, is
used of two children." — Smy the- Palmer.
Pig meat. The flesh of the pig in Wilts, is, if fresh, " pig meat ; " it is never
"pork" unless the animal is specially killed as a "little porker."
*Pig-muddle. Disorder, mess. N.W.
Pit-hole. Add :— "They lies, the two on 'em, the fourth and fifth i' the
second row, for I dug pit-holes for 'em." — The Story of Dick, vi., 66. N.
&S.W.
Pitch. (7) Add :— Still in use in N. Wilts.
Plan. " In a poor plan," unwell, in a poor way, etc. N.W. (Seend.)
Plash. Add:— N.W.
PleaclierS. Live boughs woven into a hedge in laying. S.W.
Plim. Add: — (2) Many years ago, near Wootton Bassett, old Captain
Goddard spoke to a farmer about a dangerous bull, which had just attacked
a young man. The farmer's reply was: — "If he hadn't a bin a plimmin'
an' vertiri wi' his stick — so fashion — (i.e., flourishing his stick about in the
bull's face,) the bull wouldn't ha' run at un." No further explanation of
these two words appears to be forthcoming at present.
Plough. (1) Add: — "The team of oxen that drew the plough came to be
called the plough, and in some parts of South Wilts they still call even a
waggon and horses a plough. This is needful for you to know, in case your
man should some day tell you that the plough is gone for coal." — Wilts
Arch. Mag., xvii., 303.
Add:— (2) For the various parts of the old wooden plough see as fol-
lows : — " I should like to hear a Wiltshire boy who had been three years at
plough or sheep fold, cross-examine one of Her Majesty's Inspectors of
Schools, and ask him, in the article of a plough, to be so good as to explain
By G. E. Dartnell and the Rev. E. H. Goddard. 143
the difference between the vore- shoot and back-shoot, the ground rest, the
bread board, the drail, the wing and point, and the whippence." — Wilts
Arch. Mag., xvii., 303.
Plurals. (1) The old termination in en is still much used, as Housen,
Hips en, etc. See En. (1)
(2) Plurals in es are very commonly used, as beastes,ghostes, nestes, pastes.
Very often a reduplication takes place, as beastises. ghostises, etc. N. & S.W.
(3) Plurals are used sometimes instead of singulars. Examples : — "Nows
and thens," "A little ways," "You'll find uu a little ways furder on," etc.
" These should rather be considered as an adverbial use of the genitive, like
ahvays, now-a-days, needs, whiles, etc." — Smy the- Palmer.
(4) Plant-names are usually plural, even when only a single blossom is
spoken of, as, "What is that flower in your hand?" "That's Robins
(Poppies, Night-caps, Cuckoos, etc., as the case may be)." N. & S.W.
*Podge. Anything very thick and sticky. Cf. Stodge.
Polly, A pollard tree. S.W.
A Wiltshire man, on being told by the hospital surgeon that his arms
would have to be amputated, exclaimed, " Be I to be shrowded like a polly ? "
Popple-Stone. A pebble (Slow). S.W.
PotS- and- Kettles. Fruit of Buxus sempervirens, L., Box. S.W. (Bar-
ford St. Martin.)
Pot-walloper. After Wootton Bassett insert Hindon.
Preterites. Add-.— crope, crept; brung, brought.
Privet. See Brevet.
Pronged. A scythe-blade with a small flaw in the edge, which may develop
into a serious crack, is said to be " pronged." N.W. (Clyffe Pypard.)
Proof. Add : — A thriving tree is said to be "in good proof." S.W. (Steeple
Ashton.)
Proofey. Stimulating, fattening.
" The Monkton pastures used to be of good note in Smithfield, from the
very feel of the beasts. There are no more ' proof ey' fatting grounds in
Wilts."— Wilts Arch. Mag., vi., 29.
*Pud-beggar, Pudbaiger. The Water Spider (Slow). S.W.
A very interesting word. Q.^i.padda, a toad, paddock, Dev. and East
Anglia. O.E. pode, tadpole, Icelandic padda, used of any beetles or insects
that inhabit stagnant water. — Smy the- Palmer.
Pussy-Cats. Hazel catkins. N. & S.W.
Puzzivent. Add-.— Pussyvan. (Slow). S.W.
Puzzle-pound. The game of Mad ell, q.v. S.W. (Loiigbridge Deverill,
etc.)
Quar. Add-.-S.W.
L 2
144 Contributions towards a Wiltshire Glossary.
* Qliean. "The Saxon word quean, woman, is still used without any ob-
jectionable meaning, but its use is rare." — Leisure Hour, Aug., 1893. N.W.
(Castle Eaton.)
Qlliddle. (1) n. A fussy person ; one hard to satisfy in trifling matters
of diet, etc. S.W.
(2) n. To make a fuss over trifles. S.W.
*Quiet Neighbours. Centranthus ruber, D.C., Red Spur Valerian. S.W.
(Longbridge Deverill.)
Quiff. Add: — "Mr. F. J. Kennedy, secretary of the Belfast Angling
Association . . . . ' worked a quiff,' to use a slang phrase, on a well-
known Lagan poacher."— Fishing Gazette, 20th Aug., 1892, p. 154.
Quill. Add:— See note in Folk-Etymology, p. 310. To "Quill a person "
in the language in use at Winchester College is to please, or humour him.
This is very near the Wilts use.
Quilt. (1) Add: — This is used of swallowing in the natural way, while
glutch is to swallow with difficulty. (C.)
Quirk. Add: — To grunt (Slow). A frog often quirks, and a toad some-
times. S.W.
Quob. Add:— W. of Eng. quob, a bog ; quob-mire, Salop ; O.E. quave, to
shake.
Randy. (1) Add : — A woman who used to be a regular attendant at all the
tea-meetings and other gatherings of the kind in her neighbourhood in N.
Wilts was usually spoken of as being '' a randy sorto' a 'ooman" — randy
apparently being there applied to such gatherings.
Add:— S.W. to both (1) and (2).
Ramp. A curve. S.W.
Rapid. " A rapid pain," " rapid weather," i.e., very violent. Always so used
at Clyffe Pypard. " This may be compared with the Latin use of rapidus.
Cf. Virgil's rapidus oestus (Bucol. ii., 10), and rapidus sol (Georg. ii., 321),
—strong, violent." — Smy the- Palmer. N.W.
*Rattle-basket. Erica cinerea P Heath. Heard only from one person. S.W.
(Deverill.)
Raves. Add-.-s.w.
Hed-Robins. Lychnis diurna, Sibth., Red Campion. N. & S.W.
Reed. Unthreshed and unbroken straw reserved for thatching. A Somerset
and Devon word. " Reed " is seldom used in Wilts, where ordinary threshed
straw, made up into elms, is the common material. S.W.
Revel. Add : — There was a revel held at Cley Hill formerly, on Palm Sunday,
and one at Kington Langley on the Sunday following St. Peter's Day.
By G. E. Dartnell and the Rev. E. H. Goddard. 145
Ehaa. Hungry, ravenous. See Rhan. N.W. (Clyffe Pypard, rarely.)
Rhan (pronounced Khaan). To eat voraciously. A f orm of raven. Cf. West
of Eng. ranish, ravenous. S.W.
Rhine. Add •. — Mr. Powell mentions a Wiltshire poem, which begins : —
" There once were a frog that lived in a ditch,
Or 'twere may be a rheen, it don't matter which."
Ridge-tie. A back chain for shafts. S.W.
Rig. Add:— "To rig about" is commonly used in S. Wilts of children
clambering about on wood-piles, walls, etc.
Rough . ( 1) A dd : — " There, she was took rough as it might be uv a Monday,
and afore Tuesday sundown she was gone, a-sufferin' awful." — The Story
of Dick, viii., 85.
*Round-tail. v. To clip the dirty locks of wool off the tail and legs of
sheep, previously to shearing. Very commonly used in many parts of the
county. N. & S.W .
*Round-tailingS. The locks so dipt, which are washed and dried, and
usually sold at half-price. N.W.
RowleSS-thing, Add •.— Sir Fras Dowse, of Wallop, is said to have been
possessed of " another thing called the Broyl [Bruellii= woods] of Colling-
bourne." See Wiltshire Compounders, Wilts Arch Mag., xxiv., 58. In
the New Forest a " rough " is a kind of enclosure. "Philips promised to
feed the horse in a ' rough ' or enclosure .... which was well fenced
in, but the bank foundered and the animal got out." — Salisbury Journal,
Aug. 5th, 1893.
Rough Band. Ahousett. See Wilts Arch. Mao., i. 88.
Rubbly. adj. Of soil, loose from being full of broken bits of chalk.
(Agric. Survey.}
Rumpum-Scrumpum. A rude kind of musical instrument, made of a
piece of board, with an old tin tied across it as a bridge, over which the
strings are strained. It is played like a banjo, or sometimes with a sort of
fiddle-bow. N.W. (Clyffe Pypard.)
Sar, Add:—s.w.
Sauf. Add :— S.W.
Scaut- (2) Add:— S.W.
Scoop (? Scope). Allowance or start in a race, etc.. "How much scoop be
you a going to gie I ? " " Alwaies dyd shroud and cut theyre fuel for that
purpose along all the Eaage on Bra}'den's syde alwaies taking as much skoop
from the hedge as a man could through [throw] a hatchet." — Perambulation
146 Contributions towards a Wiltshire Glossary.
of the Great Park of Fasterne (near Wootton Bassett), 1602. The original
document is in the Devizes Museum. N. & S.W. (Baverstock, etc.)
Scotch. Add:— N.W. (Huish.)
Scramb. Add-.-s.W.
*Scran. Add •.— S.W. Mr. Slow defines this as " victuals," but it is really
the bag in which the food is carried.
Screechetty. Creaky. s.w.
Scriggle. To take the last apples. See GriggleS. N.W.
Scrump. (l) Add-.-s.W.
Scrupet. Add :— Scrupetty, Scroopedee (Slow), S.w., and
Scripet, N.W.
Seg, Sig. Urine. S.W.
Seg-Cart. The tub on wheels in which urine was collected from house to
house for the use of the cloth mills. S.W.
Sewent. Add :— Suant is still in frequent use in S.W.
*Shab off. TO go off (Slow). s.w.
Shackle. (1) A hurdle wreath or tie. Add :— S.W.
(2) ''All in a shackle," loose, disjointed. N. & S.W. (Devizes, Huish,
Salisbury, Clyffe Pypard, etc.)
Shaft-tide or Shrift. Shrove-tide. S.W.
Shaggle. Of a bough, etc., to shake. S.W.
*Shandy. (? Shindy.) A row about nothing (Slow). S.W.
Shape (pronounced Shap). To manage, arrange, attempt, try. " I'll shap to
do't," try to do it. Compare the common use si frame. N.W. (Devizes.)
Shard. Add : — " 1636. Itm. to Robert Eastmeade for mendinge a shard in
Englands ijd." — Records of Chippenham, p. 207.
Sharps Add-.— s.w.
Sharpish. Considerable. "I be eighty- vive to-year, an' 'tis a sharpish
age." N.W. (Huish, etc.)
Sheep. "In the article of sheep what strange nomenclature ! Besides the
intelligible names of ram, ewe, and lamb, we have wether hogs, and chilver
hogs, and shear hogs, ram tegs, and theaves, and two-tooths, and four-tooths,
and six-tooths. So strange is the confusion that the word hog is now applied
to any animal of a year old, such as a hog bull a chilver hog sheep. ' Chilver '
is a good Anglo-Saxon word, ' cylfer,' and means female, so a chilver hog
sheep simply means, in the dialect of the Vale of Warmiuster, a female
lauib a year old." — Wilts Arch. Mag., xvii., 303.
By G. E. Darlnell and the Rev. E. H. Goddard. 147
*Sheep4)ed (Ship-bed}. When a labourer had drunk too much, he would
" take a ship-bed," i.e., lie down like a sheep to sleep in a grass-field, till he
was sober. N.W., obsolete.
Shepherd's-Thyme. Add :— S.W. (Bishopstone, Little Langford, etc.)
Shillibier. A bier on wheels. N.W. (Clyffe Pypard, etc.)
*Shimmy. Convolvulus sepium, L., Great Bindweed. Reported to us as
" Chemise." S.W. (Little Langford.)
*Shirt-buttons. Flowers of Stellaria Holostea, Greater Stitch wort. S.W.
(Deverill.)
Shitsac. Add-.-S.W.
SllOg. To sift ashes, etc., by shaking the sieve. N.W. (Devizes, Huish, etc.)
Shore. Add : — " A Mearstone [mere-stone] lying within the Shoore of the
dyche." — Perambulation of the Great Park of Fasterne, 1602.
Shoulder, to put OUt the. At Clyffe Pypard and Hilmarton it is
customary to ask a man whose banns have been published once — "How his
shoulder is P " — because you have heard that it has been " put out o' one
side," owing to his having " vallen plump out o' the pulput laast Zunday."
Next Sunday will " put'n straight agean." This implies that the banns were
formerly published from the pulpit.
Shrammed. Add :-s.W.
Shrift. See Shaft-tide.
*Shriggillg. Hunting for apples (Slow). See Griggles and Scriggle.
S.W.
Shrimps. A particular kind of sweets. N. & S.W.
Shrowd. (1) To trim off the lower boughs of a tree. N. & S.W.
(2) To cut a tree into a pollard. N. & S.W.
Shucks. Husks of oats, etc. S.W.
Sibilated words. These are somewhat common in Wilts, as Snotch, notch ;
Spuddle, puddle ; Scrunch, crunch ; Spyzon, poison ; Spicter, picture.
Sig. See Seg.
Sinful-ordinary. Plain to the last degree in looks. " I once knew a young
gentleman in the Guards who was very ordinary-looking — what is called in
Wiltshire ' sinful ordinary.' " — Illust. London News,23i:d March,1889. N.W.
Skillet. A round pot to hang over the fire. N.W,
Skilling. Add:— S.W.
Skimmer-cake. A cake made of odd scraps of dough. See Skimmer-
lad. S.W.
Sklppet. The long-handled ladle used for filling a water-cart, emptying a
hog-tub, etc. N.W. (Clyffe Pypard.)
148 Contridutions towards a Wiltshire Glossary.
Slack. Impudence, cheek. " I'll ha' none o' your slack ! " S.W.
Slammock. Add :— N.w.
Slail. Add :— N.W. (Castle Eaton, etc.)
Slewed, Slewy. Drunk. N. & s.w.
*Slize. Add .—To look askance at anyone. N.W.
Slommakin. Add :-s.W.
Sly. " A sly day " looks bright and pleasant, but the air has a chill nip in it.
"Sly cold" is the treacherous kind of cold raw weather that was very
prevalent during the influenza epidemic. N.W. (Huish.)
Smeech. Add :-Also Hill Deverill,
*Snake-fem. Pteris aquilina, L., Bracken. S.W. (Deverill.)
Snake's-head. Add •.— s.w. (Hill Deverill).
^Sniggling^ "A sniggling frost," a slight frost that just makes the grass
crisp. S.W. (Steeple Ashton.)
Snivett. A newt. Perhaps a sibilated form of Evet. N.W.
Snop. (2) ^^-.-s.w.
Snowballs. Add •.— s.w.
Snowl. A large piece of anything. "Gie I a good snowl o' bread, mother ! "
N. & S.W.
Snuff-rag. Add :— S.W. Also used formerly at Clyffe Pypard, N.W.
Sog. Add:— S.W.
Spance. See Waggon.
Sparked. Add :— " One of the earliest indictments on the roll of the Hilary
Sessions [Wilts], 1603-4, tells of quatuor vaccas quar1 due color sparked
et una alia coloris rubri et altera color browne." — Wilts Arch. Mag.,
xxii., 225-6.
Spear. (1) n. A stalk of reed grass (Slow). S.W.
(2) v. See Spurl.
*Split-fig. A short-weight grocer (Slow). S.W.
Sploach. To splutter. S.W.
Sprank. A sprinkling of anything. "There be a good sprank o' fruit to-
year." Also used in Somerset. N.W. (Mildeuhall).
Spreathed. Add:-$.w.
Spuddle. To make a mess. A sibilated form of puddle. S.W.
Spudgel. A wooden scoop. N. & S.W.
Spuds. Potatoes. Perhaps introduced by Irish harvesters. N. & S.W.
*8pur. See Spurl.
Spurl. Add :— Used in S. Wilts, as also Spear and Spur.
By G. E. Darin ell and the Rev. E. H. Goddard. 149
Squall. Add :— (4) Of a candle, to gutter. N. & S.W
Squailer. Add:— See History of Marllorough College, ch. ix., p. 94;
also Notes and Queries, 8th S., ii., 149 ; 197 ; 257.
Squoil. Add-.— Bird-Squoilill, killing birds with stones (Slow). S.W.
Staid. Of mature age, elderly. " A staid 'ooman." N. & S.W.
Standing, -drfrf:— Stannen (Slow). S.W.
otark. v. To dry up. "The ground is got so stark — you see the hot sun
after the raiu did stark the top on't." N.W. (Hilmarton.)
Starky. Add:— (2) Shrivelled and wasted by ill-health. N.W.
fotarve. Add : — " My old man he do starve I wi' the could at nights, 'cause
he got a crooked leg, and he do sort o' cock un up 'snaw, and the draaft do
get in under the bed-claus, and I be fairly starved wi' the could."
Strapper. Add-.-s.w.
Steart. Add : — The small iron rod, on the head of which the cappence of the
old-fashioned flail played. N.W.
Stem. Add-.—N.&s.w.
Stobball. Add: — "Illegal games .... mentioned are ....
hand-ball, foot-ball, and stave-ball or ' stobball ' ; (pilum manualem,
pedalem, sive baculinamj, 'nine-holes' and 'kittles.'" — " On the Self-
government of Small Manorial Communities, as exemplified in the
Manor of Castle Combe." Wilts Arch. Mag., iii., 156.
Stoggy. Wet and sticky ; used of ground that " stogs " you, or in which you
get " stogged." N.W.
Stomachy. Unbending (Slow). S.W.
Stone-bruise. Add : — In an American trouting-yarn in Fishing G-azefte,
17th December, 1892, p. 429, the following occurs : — " It's just the age for
' stone-bruises ' in a boy, and he must have a pair of shoes any way."
*Striddling. The right to lease fallen apples after the gathering in of the
crop. Of. Griggling.
*8trim-strum. adj. Unmusical (Slow). S.W.
*Strouter. A strut or support in the side of a waggon (Slow). S.W.
Stub. A stump of a tree. S.W.
Stubbed. A " stubbed" broom is one much worn down by use, as opposed
to a new one. S.W.
Stud. Add:—S.W.
Stun. v. To make no growth. " Grass stunned in its growth this season."
(1892.) N.W. (Clyffe Pypard, Potterne, etc.)
Succour. (1) Add : — " Goddard the elder being a copyholder of lands in
150 Contributions towards a Wiltshire Glossary.
Eylden within the Manner of Ogburne near adjoyning to His Majesties
Chace being a place that in winter time was a special and usual succour for
preserving the breed of young deer belonging to the Chace."— Extract from
Bond v. Goddard and others, 1636. See Wilts Arch. Mag., xxiii., 259.
"Its a gwain to rain, for the wind's down in the succours," i.e., hollows
and sheltered places generally. N.W. (Huish.)
Suck-blood. The Common Leech. S.W.
*Summer-ground. " A custom upon two farms .... of feeding
six oxen through the full range of all the summer ground belonging to the
hither Beversbrook .... being the Home Close, the Middle Mnrsh»
the Course Marsh, the Upper Lease, and Brewer's Lease ; through the full
range likewise of such summer grounds as belong to the yonder Beversbrook
to be put in at Mortimers Gate and to feed to Burfurlong Corner, through
all the afore mentioned grounds from the third of May to Michaelmas." —
Hilmarton Parish Terrier, 1704. See Wilts Arch. Mag., xxiv., 126.
*S\vaft. Add:— Probably from Fr. soif.— Smy the- Palmer.
Swank. To work in a slow lazy fashion, to idle. " Her bain't no good for
your place, ma'am, her do go swanking about so over her work." S.W.
(Salisbury.)
A nasalized form of sicacJc, seen in Scotch, swack, weak, feeble, hence
remiss, — Dutch, zivak, — Germ. schwach, weak, — Gothic, siukan, to be
weak. — Smy the- Palmer.
*Swanky. Weak beer. S.W.
Swash or Swosh, A rush of water, etc. "A man in answer to my
question of how the rain seemed to fall, said, ' It came down in swashes,'
and I think it may also be said that occasionally the wind came in swashes
i^r—The Great Wiltshire Storm, Wilts Arch. Mag., vi., 380. N.W.
Sweet-briar. The young succulent suckers of any rose, which are peeled
and eaten by children. N.W. (Clyffe Pypard.)
Tail. (3) ^trfrf:— Tailens. N.&s.w.
Tallet. Add.-s.w.
*Tamed. "By that time the ground will be tamed." Said in Lisle's Hus-
bandry to be a Wilts agricultural term, but not there explained.
Tan. Then is so pronounced, in such expressions as Now-an-Tan. Also see
Twitch-air-Tan.
Tazzle. n. " Her hair be aal of a tazzle," in great disorder, all tangled and
knotted and tousled. N.W.
Teg-man. A shepherd. " I am a teg-man (or shepherd) in the employ of
Mr. White."— Wilts County Mirror, 28th October, 1892, p. 8, col. 5. S.W.
(Salisbury.)
By G. E. Darlnell and the Rev. E. H. Goddard. 151
Terrify, Add : — "'Twer mostly losing of a boss as did for 'em, and most
al'ays wi' bad shoeing. They gived 'em scant measure — shoed 'em too tight,
they did, a-terrifying o' the poor beasts." — Jonathan Merle, xlviii., 520.
"Her own folks mightn't a-like so well to come and stay, if ther was
al'ays a terrifying old woman to put up with." — Ibid, liv., 596.
" Her hushand, who had been out in the fields, came home and began to
'terrify ' her."— Marlborouyh Times, 26th November, 1892.
Theave. " We have wether hogs and chilver hogs, and shear hogs, ram tegs,
and theaves, and two-tooths, and four-tooths, and six-tooths." — Wilts Arch.
Mag., xvii., 303.
Tiddle. Add :-(2) v. To tickle. S.W.
*Tiddy. adj. Weakly, delicate. KW. (Castle Eaton, etc.)
Tiller. The upper handle of a long sawyer's pit-saw. See Box. N.W.
(Clyffe Pypard.)
Tippem, Tippum. A game played by six boys, three on each side of the
tahle. The centre one '* works the piece," i.e., passes it from hand to hand
up and down under his side of the table. Then all the hands are placed on
the table, and the opposite side guesses which hand the " piece " is in,
and scores or loses a mark according as the guess is right or wrong. The
"piece" may be anything available, from a knife to a pebble or bean. N.W.
Toad's-meat. Toadstools ; fungi. S.W.
Toad-stabber. A bad blunt knife. Commonly used by boys about Clyffe
Pypard. N. & S.W.
Tommy. Food carried out into the fields. N. & S.W.
Tommy-bag. Add •.— S.W.
Tommy-hacker. The same as Hacker. S.W. (Steeple Ashton.)
Traipse, (i) Add :-s.w.
(2) Add :— S.W.
*Traveller's-ease. Ackillea Millefolium, L., Common Yarrow. S.W.
(Little Langford.)
Trendle. Add:— (2) A trough in which bakers mix their dough. N.&S.W.
Trig. " Pretty trig," in fairly good health. S.W. (Steeple Ashton.)
Truckle, (i) «. To roll.
(2) n. Anything that may be rolled.
Truckles. Add : — (2) " To play truckles," to roll anything, such as a reel,
the top of a canister, etc., from one player to another, backwards and
forwards. S.W.
Truckle-cheese. Add :-s.w.
Trumpery. Add:— "It he'd a-let us have it rent free first year ('cause
152 Contributions towards a Wiltshire Glossary.
that land wer all full o' trnmp'ry that high) we could ha' done." — Jonathan
Merle, xxxvii., 412.
Tuck. (2) Add:— S.W.
Add: — (3) To blow gustily. "The wind be so tucking to-day, i.e.,
gusty, blowing from all quarters, uncertain. N.W, (Clyffe Pypard.)
*Tufwort. "Between Crookwood and what is called 'The Folly,' they ob-
served a large cluster in one of the fir-trees .... which turned out to be a
wasps' nest. The nest, which was nearly as large as a quartern measure,
was fully matured, and is described by an expert in taking wasps' nests as
what is known as ' the tufwort' nest. It consisted of three splendid cakes
of comb, enclosed in a web." — Local Papers, July, 1893. Probably the
nest of Vespa Britannica, which in hot summers has occurred frequently
in our hedges in some parts of the county.
I Ullp-tree. Acer pseud o -pi atanus, L., Sycamore, the smell or taste of the
young shoots being supposed by children to resemble that of the tulip. S.W.
(Salisbury.)
Tump. Add:— S.W.
Tun. " To tun," or " to tun in," to pour liquid through a " tun-dish " into a
cask. N.W. (Clyffe Pypard ; Devizes ; Huish.)
Tun- dish or Tun-bowl, A kind of wooden funnel, like a small bucket
with hoops round it, and a tube at the bottom, used for pouring liquids into
a cask. N.W. (Devizes ; Clyffe Pypard ; Huish.)
*Tlirn. A spinning-wheel. N.W. (obsolete).
This word frequently occurs in the Mildenhall parish accounts, as : —
" 1793. To Box and Spokes to Torn, Is 2d. To a Standard, hoop 4 spokes
to Torn, Is. 3d. To a Hoop 3 spokes to a Torn, lid. To 4 legs and standard
a hope 5 spokes to Sal's Torn, 2s 7d. To Mending Bery's Torn, Is 6d.,
1784. Paid John Rawlins for a Turn, 3s."
In 1809-10 the word Turn gives place to Spinning-wheel in the overseers'
accounts.
*Tut-WOrk, Piece work (Slow). S.W.
Twinge. Add -.— A piece of dough moulded for making into bread. S.W.
(Deverill.)
Twitch. " At every twitch and turn " (or " tan "), now and again. N. & S.W.
T'year. ^^ :— Also To-year.
Under-Creeping, Underhanded. S.W.
Unempt. Add -.— S.W.
Unked. Add :— " Another use of uncouth— (I) unknown, (2) strange, un-
canny, lonely." — Smy the -Palmer.
Up-along. A little way up the street or road. See Down-along. N. &
s.w.
% G. E. Dartnell and the Rev. E. H. Goddard. 153
Up-sides. Add:— S.W.
Vamp. To walk about. " I zeed she a-vamping half round the town." Much
more used in Dorset. S.W.
*Velleys. (Valley P) The drain where the eaves of a cottage meet.
Vinriey. Add : — It was said at Hill Deverill of a woman feigning to be
bed-ridden, that "she would lie there abed till she were vinney."
Waggon. Add-.— See Draughts, Limbers, Shutleck, Shut-
lock, Strouter, Ridge-tie, Blades.
Wag. (2) Add:-8.W.
Want. Add :— " 1620. Itm. to William Gosse for killing of wants, xijd."—
Records of Chippenham, p. 202.
*Want-rear. A mole-hill. S.W.
Watch. If a hay-rick is so badly made that it heats, the owner is often so
ashamed of it that he attempts to set the matter right before his neighbours
find it out. If a passer-by notices him poking about the hay as if searching
for something in it, the ironical question is asked — " Have 'ee lost yer
watch thur ? " N.W. (Clyffe Pypard.)
Watchet. Add :— " You'd best come along o' me to the lower lands ....
for it be mighty wet there these marnins, and yell get watshed for certin."
— The Story of Dick, ch. xii., p. 142.
Weather-glass. Anagallis arvensis, L., Scarlet Pimpernel. See Shep-
herd's- Weather-glass. N. & s.w.
Weigh-jolt. Add :— Formerly in common use at Clyffe Pypard, N.W.
West. (Waast}. A stye in the eye. See Wish. S.W.
WhipwhileS. Meanwhile. A Somerset word. S.W.
WhlSSgig. (1) v. To lark about. N. & S.W.
(2) n. A lark, a bit of fun or tomfoolery. "Now, none o' your whissgigs
here ! " N.W.
WhlSSgiggy. adj. Frisky, larky. N.W.
* White. " Cow white "=cow in milk. " Calf white "=sucking calf. " All
the small tithes such as wool and lamb, cow white and calf etc. throughout
all parts of the parish unexpressed in the several foregoing particulars. The
usual rates at present being fourpence a cow white — six pence a calf . .
. . the sheep, lambs and calves are due at St. Mark's tide— the cow white,
and fatting cattle at Iiamni&s"—Hilmarton Pariah Terrier, 1704. See
Wilts Arch. Mag., xxiv., 126. Usually defined as above, but more
correctly written as cow-wite and calf-wite, i.e., the mulct or payment for
a cow or calf. " Tythes of Wool and Lambs and Calves, and three half-
Contributions towards a Wiltshire Glossary.
pence, which is due and payable at Lammas being Composition Money for
the Tythe White of every Cow." — Wilcot Parish Terrier, 1704— As regards
the ordinary derivation, compare white-house, a dairy, white-meat, milk,
whites, milk. " Wheatly (On the Common Prayer, ed. 1848, p. 233-4)
quotes from a letter of one G. Langbain, 1650, as follows: — ' certe quod de
Lacte vaccarum refert, illud percognitum habeo in agro Hamtoniensi (an
et alibi nescio) decimas Lacticiniorurn venire vulgo sub hoc nomine, The
Whites of Xine ; apud Leicestrenses etiam Lacticinia vulgariter dicuntur
Whitemeat" — Smy the- Palmer.
White-livered. Pale and unhealthy looking. N. & S.W.
At Clyffe Pypard the word has a yet stronger idea of disease about it. and
a " white-livered " woman is supposed to be almost as dangerous as was the
poison-nurtured Indian beauty who was sent as a present to Alexander the
Great. How the '' whiteness " of the liver is to be detected is not very clear,
but probably it is by the pallour of the face. At any rate, if you discover
that a young woman is " white-livered," do not on any account marry her,
because the whiteness of the liver is of a poisonous nature, and you assuredly
will not live long with a white-livered young woman for your wife. It is
most unhealthy, and if she does not die, you will ! The word is so used of
both sexes.
Whiver. (1) Add :— To flutter.
Wildem (i short). An apple-tree run wild in the hedges, as opposed to a true
crab-tree. N.W. (Clyffe Pypard.)
Wiltshire Weed, The. The Common Elm. See notice in Athenceum,
1873, of Jefferies' Goddard Memoir, also Wilts Arch. Mag. This is a
term frequently occurring in books and articles on Wilts, but it would not
be understood by the ordinary Wiltshire folk.
Wish, Wisp. A sty in the eye. N.W. (Clyffe Pypard, etc.)
Wooset. See Houssett.
Worsen. v. To grow worse. " You be worsened a deal since I seen 'ee laast,
I d' lot as you beant a gwain to live long." N. & S.W.
" Life worsens here, and ere it reach the worst,
Unto the Jove that may be would I speak
To help my people."— W. Morris, Seller ophon at Argos.
Wosbird. Jdd:— Husbird. N.W. (Devizes, etc.)
Woilt. A carter's order to a horse to bear off. The opposite to Coom hether.
Wrastle. Add:— "O.E. raxle, N. Eng. and Scot, rax, to stretch, extend,
reach, and so to spread ; A.S. wraxlian, whence wrestle. — Smy the- Palmer.
By G. E. Lartnell and the Rev. E. H. Goddard. 155
Yaught, Yawt. To swallow, to drink. "There's our Bill— he can y aught
down dreuk like anything," or " He can yaught a deal." A.S. geotan, to
pour. N.W. (Clyffe Pypard, Huish, etc.)
Zammy. Add :— (2) n. A simpleton, a soft-headed fellow. S.W.
" The idea common to both senses is halfness, incompleteness, from Mid.
Eug. sam, half (Lat. semi] ; e.g., sam-ded, sam-ope. So half-baked, silly,
Lousdale, hoafen, half-witted." — Smythe-P aimer.
ADDENDA.
*BaWSy. Add: — "I take Borsy to be the more correct form, standing for
bur-sy, full of burs (Fr. bourre] : cf. burrass in Murray, coarse hempen
cloth, Fr. bourras." — Smy the -Palmer.
*BoresllOre. Add •.— " This is a kind of hurdle stake which can be used in
soft ground without an iron pitching bar being required to bore the hole
first for it. Hence it is called bore-shore by shepherds." — Mr. Slow.
Caddie. (3) Add:— To bother, to worry. " Tain't no use caddling I— I
can't tell 'ee no more." — Greene Feme Farm, ch. 8.
CaSlllty. (1) Add: — l< ' Fine growing morning, you.' 'Ay, casualty
weather, though.' .... * Casualty,' used in connection with weather,.
means uncertain." — Ibid, ch. 1.
Chinsteys. n. The strings of a baby's cap. N.W. (Clyffe Pypard.)
Compare Chingstey, Devon. "Oh! Mo-ather ! Her hath chuck'd me
wi' tha chingstey [caught her by the poll and choked her with the strings
of her cap " — The Exmoor Scolding, p. 17.
*Clote. n. Verbascum Thapsus, L., Great Mullein (Aubrey's Wilts
MS.}. Obsolete.
*CoglerS. The hooks, with a cogged bar to adjust the height, by which pots
and kettles were hung over open grates in cottages. Now superseded by
H anglers. N.W., obsolete.
*Crandum. Add:— N.W. "I first heard this word near Hungerford,
where some farm hands were having a spree. There was a six-gallon jar of
beer on the table, which they were continually smacking with their hands,
whilst they sang in chorus : —
" Let it run down yer crandum,
An' jolly will we be," etc.
I have only heard it applied to the human throat, never to that of an
animal." — Mr. Slow.
156 Contributions towards a Wilts/tire Glossary.
Dawk. Add :— " This seems to be identical with A.S. dale, dole, But. and
Dan. dolk, Icel. ddlkr, Ger. dolch, all meaning a sharp piercing instrument,
skewer, dagger, etc." — Smy the -Palmer.
*Dick-and-his-teani. The Great Bear. " I know the north star; there
it is .... And the Great Bear ; the men call it Dick and His Team."
— G-reene Feme Farm, ch. 6. Compare Jack-and-his-team.
*Liggled. Add :— DiggleS is used as a noun, as:—" Let's go a black-
berryin' ; there's diggles [abundance, plenty] up Grovely."— Mr. Slow.
Drock. (3) Add: — "Where meaning a water way, it is usually spoken
of as a Drock -Way, ' drock ' alone being the passage over the ditch."—
Miss JS. Boyer-Brown. N.W, (Castle Eaton.)
*Drucked. Filled to overflowing (Slow).
*Dl'Oy. n. A thunderbolt (Aubrey's Wilts MS.). Obsolete.
*Falarie. Add :— " Used about Wilton, but not so extensively as its synonym
rumpus" — Mr. Slow.
Featish. Add :— " How's your voice ? " " Aw, featish [fairish]. I zucked
a thrush's egg to clear un." — Greene Feme Farm, ch. 1. " ' Ees, this be
featish tackle,' meaning the liquor was good." — Ibid, ch. 7. " A' be a
featish-looking girl, you." — Ibid, ch. 1.
Folly. Add: — " ' Every hill seems to have a Folly/ she said, looking round.
' I mean a clump of trees on the top.' " — Ibid, ch. 6. There is a clump of
Scotch Firs on the top of Compton Down, called " The Long Folly."
Friggle. Add :— (3) To fidget, to worry about a thing. " He freggled
[fidgetted] hisself auver thuck paason as come a bit ago." — Ibid, ch. 7.
FrOUghten. Add :— " Lor, Miss, how you did froughten I ! "—Ibid, ch. 7.
Full mare. n. In my childhood I remember being told more than once by
a servant at Morden, near Swindon, N.W., that a colt which was playing
about in a field near was " a fullmare." Could this possibly have been a
survival of the old word " Folymare, a young foal," which is given by
Halliwell and Wright as occurring in a fifteenth century MS. at Jesus
College, Oxford P I have never heard the word elsewhere. — G.E.D.
GaapUS. n. A fool, a stupid fellow. •' What be at, ye girt gaapus ! "
N.W. (Clyfte Pypard, etc.)
Goggles. Add:—'' GllggleS, the empty shells of snails — not the large
brown kind, but those of various colours." — Miss F. Boyer-Broivn. N.W.
(Castle Eaton.)
Gold. Nodules of iron pyrites in chalk. " On past the steep wall of an ancient
chalk-quarry, where the ploughboys search for pyrites, and call them thunder-
bolts and ' gold,' for when broken the radial metallic fibres glisten yellow."
— Greene Feme farm, ch. 5. Heard once near Clyfte Pypard, years
ago.—
% O. K Dartnell and the Rev. K H. Goddard. 157
H anglers. The hooks by which pots and kettles are suspended over open
fire grates. See Coglers. N.W.
Hank. Add as example : — " I won't ha' no hank wi' un," will have nothing
at all to do with him. Cf. Hand (3).
Hook. Add :— " This is another form of ILuclc or Hike, q.v."—Smythe-
P aimer.
Hudmedud. Add:— " < That nimity-pimity odd-me-dod ! ' . . . : Little
contemptible scarecrow." — Greene Feme Farm, ch. 3.
Hullocky. Add:— Also Yellocks. '"Now which way is it?' . . . .
' Yellucks,' said the boy, meaning < Look here.' "—Ibid, ch. 5. " ' This be
the vinest veast .... as ever I zeed .... Yellucks ! ' — as much
as to say, Look here, that is my dictum."— Ibid, ch. 11.
In-a-most. Almost. " It inamwoast killed our bwoy Sam."— Wilts Tales,
p. 145. N. & S.W.
*jimmy-swiver. n. A state of trembling. " ' Lor, Miss, how you did
froughten I ! I be all of a jimmy-swiver,' and she visibly trembled, which
was what she meant." — Greene Feme Farm, ch.7. Apparently connected
with whiver or swiver.
Junket. Add:— '"This be the vinest veast .... ag ever I zeed since
ould Squire Thorpe .... got up the junketting when the news come
of the battle of Waterloo, dree-score years ago.' " — Ibid, ch. 11.
*Latter Lammas. Add •.— " This is a noun. 'When a person is habitually
late and uupunctual, folks say — ' What a Latter Lammas thee beest, ta be
sure ! ' "— Mr. Slow.
Messengers. Add:--(2) n. " The ' messengers '—small detached clouds,
that precede the rest, were already passing overhead." — Greene Feme
Farm, ch. 6. Used by children in both N. & S. Wilts.
* Mucker. Add :—" Old Eng. molcerer (Old Eng. Miscellany, E. E. T. S.,
p. 214), a miser ; Scot, mochre, mokre, to hoard, O. Fr. mucer, to hide away,
O.E. to much, to hide. The last portions of curmudgeon(=coiLn-m\ic}iiug) and
hugger-mugger are related."— Smy the- Palmer. Cf. Mouch.
*Nigllt-fall. n. A disease in horses. "Witness .... told him
his animal was very bad, and asked him what was the matter with it. He
replied, ' Nothing, it is only •* night-fall," and it comes on several times
during the year.' "—Wilts County Mirror, 27th October, 1893.
Nistn't. Need not, must not. " Thee nistn't hoopy at I — I can hyar as
well as thee."— Greene Feme Farm, ch. 3.
*Perseen. ^dd as example:— "There's Jack White a comin'; I won't perseen
ta know un." — Mr. Slow.
VOL. XXVII.— NO. LXXX. M
158 Contributions towards a Wiltshire Glossary.
*Plank-stone. n. A flag-stone. " This soyle [Easton Piers] brings very
good oakes and witch hazles ; excellent planke stones."— Jackson's Aubrey,
p. 236. " In 1666, the diggers found the bones of a man [near Lacock]
under a quarrie of planke stones."— Aubrey's Nat. Hist of Wilts.
*Qliean. Add :— " When a man says of his wife that ' th' old quean ' did so
and so, he means no disrespect to her, any more than if he were speaking of
his child as * the little wench.' " — Miss E. Boyer-Brown.
Slire. 'v.' To look askance or out of the corners of your eye at anything.
" ' Why should you suspect him? ' * Aw, a' be a bad 'un ; a' can't look
'ee straight in the face ; a' sort of slyers [looks askance] at 'ee."— Greene
Feme Farm, ch. 9. N.W. (ClyfEe Pypard, etc.)
Spade. Add :— Also Spady in N. Wilts. A. S. sped, phlegm.
Tackle. Add :— Also used of food for cattle. " Thaay [the sheep] be goin'
into th' Mash to-morrow .... We be got shart o' keep ....
Thur's a main sight o' tackle in the Mash vor urn."— Greene Feme Farm,
ch. 5.
*Take. n. The sciatica (Aubreys Wilts MS.). Obsolete.
Thunderbolts. Add : — " The ploughboys search for pyrites, and call them
thunderbolts. Greene Feme Farm, ch. 5. See Gold.
Unked. Add :— " ' What be the matter with thuck dog you P How he do
howl—it sounds main unkid ! ' " — Ibid, ch. 9. Here unkid=omino\is and
uncanny.
*Vessel. "To wash up the vessel (sing., not pi.}," is to wash up plates,
dishes, etc." — Miss E. Boy er Brown. N.W. (Castle Eaton.)
Vrail. The whip part of the old-fashioned flail. N.W. (Clyffe Pypard.)
*Yoil. This word is often thrown in at the end of a sentence, sometimes as a
kind of query — "Don't you think so?" — but usually to give a strong
emphasis to some assertion. " A' be a featish-looking girl, you." — Greene
Feme Farm, ch. 1. *' Fine growing maraing, you."— Ibid, ch. 1. " That
be a better job than ourn, you." — Hodge and his Masters.
NOTE.
We must here call attention to a most interesting article by Miss
E. Boyer-Brown, entitled " On the Upper Thames" which appeared
in Leisure Hour for August last. The district which it deals
with is that in which Castle Eaton and Marston Meysey lie,
and many of the local peculiarities of dialect are ably commented
on, and traced to their respective sources. The greater part of these
Unpublished Documents relating to Sir William Sharing ton. 159
words have already been recorded by us, but we have made a few
extracts from the article in the foregoing- pages. We trust that the
authoress will continue her researches into our " Field Names/'' a
branch of Wiltshire archaeology which has hitherto been somewhat
unduly neglected.
Many Wiltshire words and expressions are also to be found in
" Lark : a Tale of the Down Country" a novel which appeared last
year, and has attracted much attention since.
We have to thank the Rev. Dr. Smythe-Palmer and Mr. Slow
for a few additional notes and corrections which came to hand too
late to be included in their proper places, and are therefore given
separately above, as well as a few others from various sources.
A Notice to Members, relative to the proposed publication of the
Glossary by the English Dialect Society, will be found on the cover
of the present number of this Magazine.
ootttmtts relating to
of <§nr Militant <§jjanttgtoit, Uatmarg, 1549.
By the Rev. W. GILCHEIST CLARK.
various occasions in earlier volumes of the Magazine, articles
have appeared which have dealt incidentally with the life
and fortunes of William Sharington, the grantee of Lacock Abbey
at its dissolution in 1539, The object of the present article is not
to give a complete life of Sharington, since for that purpose the
materials are not yet, I think, available, but to put before the readers
of the Magazine three documents, hitherto unpublished, which not
only give us further information about an individual of whose moral
character very various estimates have been made,1 but also may
1 Froude (Hist, of Eng., vol. v.) speaks very slightingly of him : Latimer, oil
the other hand, called him " an honest gentleman, and one whom God loveth."
M 2
160 Unpullisked Documents relating to the
prove of wider interest by casting- a side-light on the political in-
trigues of the time, as well as illustrating the magnificence, especially
in jewellery, which characterized the nobles of the time of Henry
VIII. and Edward VI.
The Abbey appears from a deed at Lacock,1 to have been sur-
rendered on January 21st, 1539, not on July 21st, as stated in Bowles
and Nichols' History of Lacock, p. 282. The earlier date is confirmed
by Rymer's Fcedera. The price paid was £783 13$. 10?^., paid in
four instalments, i.e., £100 on 16th July, 1540; £220 on June
24th, 1541 ; a similar sum on April 9th, 1542 ; and the balance of
£243 135. lOjrt?. on November 15th, 1544. Letters patent were
to be made out to " W. Sharyngton, Page of the King's Robes, and
Elyanor, his wife/' He was involved in the fall of the Lord High
Admiral Seymour,2 and brought to trial at the Guildhall, London,
on February 14th, 3 Edward VI. (1549), on the charge of having,
at Bristol, on the 10th July, 1 Edward VI. (1547), and at divers
times before and after, counterfeited £2000 worth of coins called
testons, without warrant and in defiance of prohibition. Sir William.
Sharington appeared, in the custody of Sir John Gage, Constable,
and Sir John Markham, Lieutenant, of the Tower, and pleaded
guilty. He was condemned to death, to be taken to the Tower, and
thence drawn through the midst of the city to the place of execution,
and there hanged ; execution to take place at the King's pleasure.
By an Act passed in the Parliament which met 4th November, 1
Edward VI., and continued till 4th November, 2 and 3 Edward VI.,
he was attainted, and forfeited all his estates.
Probably the sentence of death was little more than formal, and
Sharington was given to understand that a heavy fine, and full
confession of his complicity in the Admiral's designs, would ensure
1 " Inquisition of the Attorney-General against Henry Sharington, concerning
all his possessions."
2 Acts of Privy Council, 1547-1550, p. 239. " 1548-9. xix. Januarij. This
day more declaration of the said conspiracy cummyng forth and appering, Sir
William Sherington, Vice Thresaurer of the Mynt at Bristoll, and Mr Fowler
of the Privy Chamber, for that and other matiers, were sent to the Tower."
Sharington was still in the Tower in January, 1549-50, as on the 20th of that
month we find an order for the payment of his " dyetts," p. 371, ibid.
Arrest of Sir William Sharington, January, 1549, 161
his pardon, and that he would be allowed to re-purchase his estates.
Accordingly he furnished the Council with the evidence which
follows, printed from the original in the Record Office. (State
Papers, Domestic, vol. vi., No. 13.)
At such tyme as the Lord Admirall was made Admirall* he said unto me that
he was as glad of that office as of any office within the Realme, and that no man
shuld take thnt office from him but he shuld take his lif also, why my lord
said I there be many much better offices then that which yow maie have, what
office soever I shall haue (said he) I will not giue up the patent of the Admyrals
office whiles I line. I asked him wherefore, wherefore (said he) mary nowe I
shall haue the rule of a good sort of shippes and men. And I tell yow it is a
good thing to haue the rule of men/
2. At such tyrne as the Lord Protector toke his Tourney into Scotland,*]"
thadmyrall said to me that he inisliked that my said lord Protector had not
apointed him to haue the government of the king before so dronken a fole as Sir
Richard Page was/
3. I have knowen thadmirall alwaies muche desirous of Stewardships and to
entertain gentillinen, but to what eande I did ueuer know otherwise then to serue
the king for so he did! allwaies say/
4. I remember that at an other tyme he told me that thearle of warwike
wold haue had the Mannor of Stratford uppon aveu of him, and offred to giue
him a better thing in some other place, Mary then let him haue it said I for it is
owt of your wayes but beggerlye howses, nay said he I will not depart from it,
for yt is a pretye towne and will make a good menyj of men/
5. The lord Admirall bathe diuers tymes caused me to loke with him uppon a
Cart of England in the loking wherof he wold many times shewe me howe strong
he was, what nombres of men he was able to make, howe farre his landes and
dominions did stretche, And howe his landes lay betweine his house of Bromham
and the holte/§
6. He wold also many tyines shewe me what Shy res and places war for him,
and (noting the places in the plat) wold also say diuers tymes in this place and
in that place I am amonges the myds of my freends, and in these talks he used
also some tymes to shew me where my lord Protectors lands and my^lord of
warwikes lay unto whom I know he had no great affection/
In the begynnyng of this last wynter ridyug wl the lord Admyrall from my
lord marques Dorsets house the said Admyrall used sondry tymes to shew me as
we rodde togither the Cowutrees rounde abowt saying all those which dwell in
thes partes be my freends/
7. At this tyme talking with me of his freends he reioised moche therat
* Immediately after Edward the Sixth's accession-.
f In September, 1547.
J Meny — a company of followers. Halliwell's Dictionary of Archaic and
Provincial Words.
§ Bromham : probably not Bromham in Wilts, which belonged to the Baynton
family ; there is a Bromham near Bedford* The Holte : Holt in Denbighshire.
162 Unpublished Documents relit ////// to the
vaunting him wife and hosting l.hal, he had as groat nomhr of gentilmon that
loucd him aw any noble man had in Kngland, And further said that he thought
lie had more gentilmon that loved him then my lord protoeto' had, whereof ho
.>-d miicho to reioi-.e, sayong that he was happyo that had 1'iveuU in this
world whatsoever shall chaunco/
7. And hi-sides his fn-ends he told me that he eoulde make or bring of those
which be within his rules, and of his own Tenants and Servauntes ten thou-and
men if he shuld be; eommaunded to serve/
8. After this at an other time f whiche tyme I can not certainly remember f
thadmirall asked me, what mony I eoulde make him if nede were, J said abowt a
foure thousande pounds f English f Tushe quod thadmyrall that is hut a
lytell, but what can yow make (me) in dede P Marye, said I it wold
harde for me to make yow more sodeynly, but if yow give me a litell warnyng I
filial! he hahle to make yow as muche as I shall haue «tuf to make it of, then
thadmirall willed me to get as muche money into my hands as I could gel, And
in like sort he wold warn me and advise me many tymes sayeng it wen- good to
have allwaies a good masse of mony redye And to get into my hands as much
monye as I could and then (said he) a man may do some what withall/
9. At another tyme ridynge with the said Admirall as is afoivsaid and com-
munyng as we had before he -aid unto me, how mudie mony will find ten
thou-and men a mom-th, and uppon that aceompting awhile ul himself, he did
cast that after the rate of vjd the day for a man, x'"u or thovabouto wold
and tharnppOD further said it were good leving of buylding, an<l to h:iue alv
a good masse of monye for if a man have redy mony he maie buyld at all t;
10. At whiche tyme he said also further unto me in this soit ( i< dial her
Sharyngton if we had ten thousand pounds in redy mony that were well, could
not yow be able to make so muche monye P I trust we shuld not lack it then :
to whom I made answer that he shuld not lack if I were able to make it, and if
the mynt did stand at Uristoll I said I wold warrant him he shuld lack no monye
Whereunto he said he had no doubt but the mynt shuld continue/
11. About Christmas weke last past after my ivturne from ( 'anterhurye
suspecting that some trouble was lil ; ,mt to the lord Admir.ill
and told him tthat, andt that 1 could not iustific my doings in the mynt if they
were knowen, Nevertheles (said I) 1 have so ordred the matier that no man shall
hr liable to accuse me. And therefore where I had receivid of him the
Admirall when he \\rnl to Land--i>ey* m1' for the which I oromyscd to pay him
interest amounting in this space to ixcli. And so my principall debt w' interest
comythe to xixcli And where I had receivid of him wole for ceec1' And so my
whole debt amounted to him to mmccc1'. whereof (I told him) I had laid fort he
for his buyldings at Hromham xvcli for his buildings at SudK-yJ xi'1' lent him at
f f Erased in MS.
*Landrccy in Fland. ,| by H.^nrythe Might h'« army in ()et.,b.-r, I .1:5.
J Sudeley (-astle. The windows of the earlier Kli/abethan work, at tie
i. hie Shai'inglon's work, but are probably rather later- about the beginning
of the ivign of Mary. The Conduit I louse, however, call, -d Keiielm's W.-ll, at
Sudeley. ; I ,a \ e a 1 1 1 he cha ract i-rist ics (.f Sharingt oil's \\ ,,
and is the only building in which they are known to be matched. The comparison
o>f Si/' WiUi^>. ^ .j tun,, January, 1549. 16-3
. bini to t' and paiJ
, by
by ine t debt wins
•vaie birn
*
abuld happen
afteu*. | -rail
in u'.v. ->.e (for iii. . :i was vii
toke the bill ol rne,
I think U iu bis house at London. And at the same tyme I praied hioa
';uld happen unto me to bere me iu any
whieh thr me to do/
12. I vemernbre also tbat I have bard tbadimraU saye tbat tbe Ladye Jane
Mawjnes v'.. \vaa for bir qualities and vertvies a tit uiuviag-.-
tbe king if be abwW inary witbin tbe Kealnus and tbat be bad vatber tbe king
»buld uaary bir% tben bis brotbew tbe Lord Protect o's dongbc
member tbat xii or xitij daios before obriatmaa Last past
•ie in bis bowse told me tbat be was not contented tbat
;. in tbe pavliarnet-bonse as one of tbe kings uncles/
14. 1 vV at diuers tymes tbat be bad giueu to tbe kiuga
mau* to tbe Yalo1 of lxxxu wbiob money Fouler^ receivid of bim and did dis-
tribute tbe same according to tbe kings Ma1"* pleasure to tbe pagis and otber
Mo1 1 ivmember tbat tbe first daie ol tbia parliamet as I was going
tbitl , ke wbo toke me a side advising me freendly
tbat 1 sbnld IK h'lizabeta. I asketl bim whye but be said no
^»nu»; beveupjH.>u 1 gatlu [ovu'biug .-.ivyraU detevmyniag
tbat 1 N\i>ld »}>eake w' bim in tbis matier wben I came nere unto bim, but yeat I
tban a sevenetb, till be cam to my bouse § oue
• Kenelm's N\ . , uluit House, at page 53 of tbe
and Sudelvy, by Kmma l>ent. Tbe conjectural date
\\ date is probably 154S. Tbe Conduit House baa
vnt, and a tig u re of St. Kenelm added.
.;, in c^se Q uould not
.he Admiral in tbe matter of funds.
; daugbtfi- of tht-y, Lord Dorset, IN grand-
\ 11
% I K I, mucb employed by Seymour.
^•1, aiul u . Itousu, called " Cam-. \
v\ith tbe i/u/'ct\/* .'..( .
, 1, 3rd and 4th of 1'hilip aad Alary (loo .uington,
>ir William, ti> hi* ; :m Sharington and Agnes,
v . obaut, and formerly
•» '• .ttridge, gentle.
.Mary
\
164 Unpublished Documents relating to the
mornyng as he was going to his ship, where when he had broken his fast going
throughe my garden as I remember or els the same after none after his coming
from his ship walking in my said garden till his Supper was redye, I told him I
was warned by Smythweke that I shuld not come at my Lady Elizabeths, and
theruppon I said unto him have yow any thing to do there, I take it that I am
warned not to meddle in any such matier, and no more I will whereunto thad-
mirall answered that he had nothing to do ther, but (said he) why shuld not the
kings doughters be married within the realme, and this muche haue I said to
some of the Counsayll who were able to say litell unto yt/
16. At another tyme I asked him why he gaue him Self no better to serve*
seing that every other man dyd so willingly offer to serve, hold thy peace man
(said thadmirall) it is good abiding at home, and to make mery w* our neighbor»
in the contry, I said I thought it wold not be well taken seing it is knowen yow
can serve, well said he speake no more of that matier, let it pas/
(Sd.) W. SHABINGTON.
Endorsed:—® Willm Sharjngton.
Paper, 8 pp., 3 blank. The remaining five signed W. Sharington.
The foregoing does not, perhaps, impress us with a high idea of
Sharington's moral fibre ; 'and beyond doubt his proceedings at the
Bristol Mint constituted a grave abuse of his position. Yet we
must remember that the age in which he lived was one of duplicity
and intrigue ; one who lived about the Court could hardly escape
being tainted with the prevailing infection ; and on the whole
Sharington does not appear to have been worse than most poli-
ticians of his time, or even the great Queen Elizabeth herself, of
whom Green says : — " It was an age of political lying, but in the
profusion and recklessness of her lies Elizabeth stood without a peer
in Christendom."
Sharington's evidence produced the effect which no doubt he
expected. On February 1st, 1550, an Act was passed pardoning
him and restoring him in blood. And by letters patent of the day
following,4 his estates were restored to him.
At the time of his arrest, however, commissioners had been sent
to his various houses, to take charge of his personal effects. Lacock
was visited by John Berwick (or Barwik) and John Pert ; his house
in Tower Hill by Sir Edmond Peckham and Richard Fulmerton.
It is not specified who was sent to Bristol. Apparently these pos-
4 Original at Lacock.
Arrest of Sir William tiharingion, January, 1549. 165
sessions were not forthcoming at Sharington's restitution, and ac-
cordingly he furnished a list of what was missing, in the following
paper, endorsed " Sharington's declaration for want of things,"
now among the State Papers in the Record Office. (State Papers
(Domestic), vol. vi., No. 29. Calendar of State Papers, Domestic
Series, 1547-1580, p. 14.)
Ane estimate of all such plate Jewells money and other goods as apperteigned
to Sir Willm Sherington, Knight, and were remaineng in his several! houses the
tyme of his apprehencion in Januarie last 1549.
At my house at Lacock in Wiltesh'. All my plate there sent from thense to
London under the chardge of John Pert auditor by the appoinctmeut of John
Berwick Esquier (sole commissioner thereof) and is become I knowe not wheare,
worthe at the least one thousande markes.
Ingotts of gold of divers sorts, beside olde golde, viz. : Portegews, Angellots,*
and doble Ducates: that was remayneng in a chest there, the just valew I knowe
not but I am sure the same was worthe one thousande pounds at the least.
Naperie, hole peeces of fine Lynen cloth, cloth of golde, velvet, and uther silks,
beside tykes and hole peeces of fustian f and uther faire stuf a great chest full
and as muche more as Laded one Wayne conveighed to the said John Berwicks
house, to the Duke of Soms' use, as he saied, worthe as I esteeme it ccc1' and
better. Rings, habiliments.J and other Jewells of my wiefs besids her chaynes
and twoo of myne, all taken awaye by the said John Berwick to the vale we as I
do esteeme them of two hundreth pounds and better.
More olde gold and broken silver with some money, beside certein peeces of
relvet and silk of my wif 's store by her delivered also to the said John Berwick
worthe as I do esteeme it vij. or viij11.
Certein Jewells of my Ladie of Suffolks§ being of great valewe, and lefte with
* " Portague : a Portugese gold coin worth about £3 12s." " Angelot : a gold
coin of the value of half an angel, current when Paris was in possession of the
English."— Halliwell.
t Tykes : perhaps covers for feather beds. See S&eafs Dictionary, s. vfc
Tick. Fustian : a strong linen cloth, first manufactured in England temp. Ed.,
VI. Planche, Cyclopedia of Costume, s. v.
J Probably the same as " billementes," frequently mentioned in the " inden-
ture " given below. Halliwell gives " Billaments, ornaments," though he says^
that the derivation from " habiliments " is not probable. Yet these habiliments^
were personal ornaments, being mentioned between " Rings " and " other
jewels " ; they seem to have been jewels mounted on velvet, satin, or other
material, and capable of being sewn on to dresses.
§ " Catherine Willoughby, Duchess of Suffolk, second wife of the gallant and
accomplished Charles Brandon, the favourite and brother-in-law of Henry the
Eighth, married, after his death, Mr. Bertie, with whom, in Mary's time, she-
became a refugee."— Eraser Tytler, Reigns of Edward VI, and Mary, i., 280.
166 Unpublished Documents relating to the
me for thassurance of xj. bundreth pounds that I lent her, delivered up to the
said John Berwick, and where they be become I knowe not.
Having also put in inventarie all my Wifs apparail, and the same have
sequestred from her use remaineng there Locked up in a chest by the said John
Berwicke so as she can not come at none of it. But as for my housholde stuf
which only served the competent furniture of my house there, are also put in
inventarie and remaignenge there are by the said John Berwick committed unto
the chardge of one of my servants.*
In the Castell of Bristoll. Item there remayned there f as much golde and
silver as by the advowchinge of Thorn's Dowrishe my deputie there wolde have
made withaddicion of allaye threttene or fourtene thousande pounds. The»re
remaigned also of myne in a Chest in redie money ccli assaies of golde and silver,
all kinds of household stuf, and myne owne apparaill to what valewe I can not saye.
There remaigned also specialties to the valewe of one thousande pounds and
upwards.
There remaigned also in the hands of the company there J as muche Leade as
was of the valewe of one thousand five hundreth pounds and in redie monie five
hundreth pounds more.
And further there remaigned in the Key at Bristoll twoo Shippes with their
Ordinaunce and takle, which my Lorde Admiral! gave unto me worthe at the
least twoo hundreth pounds.
At my house at the Towre hill in London. Plate remaigneng there of myne
the cei ten valewe 1 knowe not, but as shall appeare by Sir Edmonde Peckhains§
books, who with Richard ffulmerton Comptroller to the Duke of Seiners' were
commissioners there over and beside a parcell of broken plate of Anne Sheringtons|j
my Sister to the valew of 1. or Ix. pounds.
Readie money with olde golde and silver of divers kinds and coynes remayneng
in my house there to the valewe aa I doe esteeme it, of three thousande pounds
and upwards.
My household stuf with my horses etc put in Inventorie (except a bedde and a
poore deale of stuf allowed to my wief ) all taken awaie and bestowed I kuowe
not wheare nor am not hable to judge the valewe thereof.
But as I am enformed, five Chambers hanged throughlie with tapestrie being
furnisshed with bedds of downe, quiltes of woll, with sparvises ** of divers kinds
of silke, and their quiltes to the same, were conveighed thense to the Duke of
Somersetts house.
And two faire Jewells of mine : viz a dyamonde and a white rubye worthe at
the least one hundreth pounds were by Richard ffulmerton taken awaie and
* Probably Thomas Noble (see below, note * on Indenture).
f The mint was in the Castle.
J Probably Nicholas Thome and Company, of Bristol, whose trustee, Thomas
Shapman, gave Sharington a bill for £1500 payable in four years, for 300 Fodder
of Lead (see Indenture).
§ Master of the Mint.
|| Anne Sherington is a hitherto unknown member of the family.
** Sparver : the canopy or wooden frame at the top of a bed." — Malliwell.
Arrest of Sir William Sharing ton, January, 1549. 167
delivered to my Ladle Somers' who afterwards told my wief that the same were
of no value, wheare in very dede they were no lesse worthe but rather better*
Itm a Turcase worthe x1' left in my Chambre, a diamont worth xlu and uther
Jewells to the value of I11 and upwards remaigneng in my Compting house were
conveighed I knowe not whither.
Moreover one Casket t conteigning so many specialities as I do esteme to
amount unto seven or eight thousand pounds.
Md. that 1 occupied in Flaunders,* being free of the companie there and had
a stocke of mm. pounds and upwards.
Whether the bulk of this property was restored to Sir W.
Sharington, we do not know; but among- the Lacock papers in the
Record Officef there is preserved a document relating to the receipt
by him from the Earl of Wiltshire, then Lord High Treasurer, of
the Duchess of Suffolk's jewels, and certain " Obligations, Bills and
Specialties/'' possibly some of those referred to in Sharington's
" Statement," though he there only mentions specialties at Bristol
and London, while they are stated in the following Indenture to
have been found at Lacock. It may be suspected that those things
which were taken away " to the Duke of Somerset's use " did not
find their way back into Sharington's possession. The following is
the text of the document (Record Office, Court of Wards, etc..
Deeds, Box 94, D. 3.)J
This Indenture mad the xth daye of February in the fourthe yeare of the
Raigne of our Soveraigne Lorde Edwarde the vjth by the grace of god Kinge of
England &c Betwene the right honorable Willm Erie of Wilshere and Lorde
Highe Treasorour of England on that one p'te and Sr. Will'm Sharington Knight
on thother p'te Witnesseth that the said Sr Will'm Sharington as well by vertue
of the Kinges Majesties L'res patent of Restitution nnder the greate Scale of
England to him made asalso by ordre and Comaundemente of the Lords of the
Kings most Honorable Counsaill hathe receaved of the said Lorde Treasorer all
thes p'celles of Juelles hereafter named delivered to thands of the said Lorde
Treasorer by John Barwik gent whiche were fouude at Lacocke in Wilshere in
* Sharington's family was of Norfolk, and he probably engaged in the Easfe
Anglian cloth trade with Flanders. Occupied, i^e., traded ; cf. St. Luke, xix.y
13, " Occupy till I come."
f Court of Wards, etc. Deeds, Boxes 94 A, B, C, D, E. How these deeds-
came into the possession of the Crown is not quite clear, but probably during the
minority of Sharington Talbot, the grandson of Sir Henry Sharington.
J For knowledge of these Lacock deeds and tianscripts of this and several
others, I am indebted to A. Story-Maskelyne, Esq., of H.M. Record Office.
168 Unpublished Documents relating to the
the house of Thorn's Noble * srvnte to the said Sr Will'm Sharington Whiche
p'celles were delivered to the said Thorn's Noble by the Ladye Sharington and the
same do ap'teine to the righte honorable Katherine Duches of Sufr" and whiche
the said Duches delivered to the said Sr Will'm Sharington in gage for a certaine
some of money That is to saye First one Brouche of gold enameled w1 vj pictures
and foure brode table Bal laces f Item a faier Brouche of gold enameled wl a
Towne or Castell and diverse pictures w* a faier rock Rubie in the fote of it.
Item a Crosse of Diamoundes set in golde on thone side and on thother side the
Crosse of gold black enameled and iij greate peerles hanging on the same Item
a greate Table Balace sett in a rounde Scochin of golde and a faier peerle hanginge
on thend of it. Item a crosse sett w* 1'res of Jhesus of Diamonds on thone side
and in the hier p'te thereof a foure squared Diamond and a longe Rubie under-
nethe it, and three peerles hanging on the fote of it. Item a flower of golde sett
uppon wl 1'res black enameled uppon golde wrethidd and three faier pointed dia.
monds in the same and three faier peerles hanginge on the fote thereof and ther
ap'eth too voide places in the same. Item a Tablet J of gold enameled of the
storie of Jacob lieng uppon a pillor and two Aungelles standing on a Ladder and
a greate Table Balace under his elbowe and three litle table diamounds and three
litle Rubies set abowte the bordur of that side the tablet, and on thother side
the picture of a woman white enameled and half a Lyon of golde on thone side
of hir and a sirpents hedd on thother side and two veray litle peerles on the
hedd of it and the pioture of a gentle woman livelye sett owte w4n the said
Tablet. Item a round Brouche of the Storie of the woman Samaritan set owte
w* pictures of golde and diverse litle diamounds and Rubies set veray flatte
on the hedde and foute of the same. Item a Tablet of gold braunchedd and
enameled white five faier Emerades sett on thon side therof and wlin the saide
Tablet the picture of the Kinge that deade is on thone side and the picture of
a gentlewoman on thother side livelye sett owte. Item a faier square Table
Ballace set in golde. Item a faier Brouche wl pictures of gold black enameled
w* xxiiij litle diamonds sett in sundrie places emonges the said pictures Item
a faier Brouche. wl diverse pictures sett abowte a boorde and a faier
pointed Saphire sett uppon a potte of gold on the foote thereof and
a litle Saphire uppon a litle potte on thoneside. Item a faier upper
Billemente § of fourtie eight Diamonds sett in so many Roundles of
* He lived at Bewley Court, on the opposite side of the river to Lacock.
" Imprimis Thomas Nobull holdythe by indenture not sealyd nor sygned the
gcite of the manor there called Bewlys Cowrte with thappurtenances," etc.
From the survey of the Manor of Lacock, and other manors, August 31st,
2 Ed. VI., 1548, by Stephen Cole, gentleman, surveyor and steward, under
the head of " the lands and tenements late bought by Sir Wyllyam Sharyngton
knyght of Master Dyrrell (Darell) in Bewell as folowithe."
t Balays : ruby. — Halliwell.
J Tablet : an ornament of gold. — Baret's Alvearie, 1580, here possibly some
kind of a locket.
§ See above note J on " Declaration." Billaments : the attire or ornaments
of a woman's head or necke. Baret's Alvearie.
Arrest of Sir William Sharing ton, January, 1549, 169
gold the most parte of the said diamonds being pointed and some Tabletts
Item faier peir of Beads of faier Agates wl litle Knappes of gold sett betwene
everie of the said stones and a Tassell of golde and blacke silke sett in a
Knappe of gold white enameled in the toppe thereof. Item a Girdle of gold
having xxvij litle Rubies sett in xxvij Bullions* of gold and two faier litle
peerles sett uppon golde betweene the said Bullions and ther ap'eth in one
place to lack two peerles. Item a Billemente of xxli faier litle table diamounds
sett in Bullions of gold black enameled. Item an under Billemet of xxv Rubies
sett in litle Bullions of gold black enameled. Item a neck lace or chaine of
litle Knappes of gold black enameled having in the same xxij litle Rock Rubies
and xxj faier litle peerles. Item an under Billimente of white Satten havinge
in the same xlj faier peerles set between everie of them w* litle Knappes of
golde blacke enameled Item a neck lace or Billemente of peerle of a lesser
sorte cont' iiijxxvij peerles Item vij Ropes of faier Rounde peerles of sev'all
lengthe and severall bignesse sealed together w* the printe of a mans hedd
on thoneside and a Beasts hedd on thother sidef Item a Billemente of xxtt
Rubies sett uppon xxu Bullions of gold black enameled w* peerles settogether
betweue every of the said Bullions and the same sette uppon Black Vellat
Item a Billemente of x faier diamonds and xj rock Rubies sett in xxj Bullions
of gold black enameled uppon black vellat. And the said Sr William hathe
by like ordre Receaved of the said lord Treasorer all thes obligacons Billes
and Specialties hereafter ensueing made to the Sr Willm Sharington by sundrie
psonnes founde at the house of the same Sr Willm at Lacocke aforesaid which
were delivered to thands of the said Lorde Treasorer by John Perte gent as
hereafter at lardge is couteined that is to saye First one obligation bearing
date the vjth of January anno Henr' viijvi xxxviijvo wherby it ap'eth that George
Knighte of Bristowe standeth bounde to Sr Willm Sharington, Knighte in the
some of cc1' for the pamente of cu Item one other obligacon .... the
xxijth of Septembr anno Regis Edwardi Sexti primo .... Nicholas
Poynes Knighte and Thorn's Throckmerton .... in three hundreth
markes_for .... two hundreth markes Item foure other severall
obligacons .... xijth of Septembre Edwardi Sexti primo ....
Edward Baynton J oweth unto Sr W. S. the some <3f fowre score pounds
Item one bill .... xiiij of Septembre .... primo .... Edwardi Sexti
Will'm Coke of Lacock oweth .... for wolle xvij", xvj8, whereof is alreadie paid
as ap'eth by the backe of the said Bill xiju Item one bill . _,_ . . viijth
daye of Aprell . . . . E. Sexti primo .... Thorns" Shapman of
Bristowe marchaunte and Ministre unto the heires of Nicholas Thome and
Company of the said Towne hathe receaved of Sr W. S: three hundrethe
Fodder of Leade at cs the Fodder amounting to a thowsand five hundreth
pounds to be paide in four yeares. Item one Bill .... xviij of Julye
* Bullions : buttons or studs. — Halliwell.
t Probably a clasp set with a cameo, representing one of the Janus-like com-
binations of heads not uncommon in antique gems, e.g., Plato and Socrates,
Dionysus and Aphrodite, etc.
J Edward Baynton, of Rowdon, near Chippenham.
170 Unpublished Documents relating to Sir William Sharing ton,
anno prirno Edwardi Sexti .... Henry Bronker of Melkesham . .
. . Wilteshere hath receaved of Sr Willm S. before hande one hundreth and
fourtie pounds for the price of certaine Toddes of wolle which he the saide
Sr Willm shall receave of the said Ht-nry Bronker before the Feast of Sainte
Michell tharchaungell nexte after the date of the said Bill. Item a L're of the
Lorde Adrniralles .... last of August whereby it ap'eth that the late
Lorde Admirall maketh request unto Sr. W. S. for the paimente of one
hundreth pounde to be delivered unto one Roger Barlowe Item a L're of
Sr Will'm S. bearing date the fourthe of Septembre wherby it ap'eth that
M1 Sharington hath appointed wl one Mr Cowdrington for the paim1 of the
said hundreth pounds to the said Roger Barlowe. Item one obligacon . .
. . fourth of tSeptembr' anno prinao Regis Edwardi Sexti .... Henry
Ostrige of Bristow oweth unto the late Lorde Admirall .... a hundreth
poundes. Item one Bill .... vjth of Septembre, 1547, whereby it ap'eth
that Henry Ostrige marchaunt hath receaved of Thomas Shipman by three
Bills of Exchaunge foure hundreth ducketts in (?) Hughe Tipton in Calice. Item
a Counterpayne of an Indenture of Mr Andrew Bainton * bearing date the
xxvjlh of Julye a. r. Edwardi Sexti primo mencioning for the some of foure-
score pounde the Sale of all thos his Mannours messuages landes ....
sett lieing and beinge in Wroughton and Chesilden in the Countie of Wiltes
to Sr Willm Sharington and his heires Item one Bill bearing date the xth of
Decembr' in the Seconde yeare of Kinge Bdwarde the vjth .... that
Nicholas Snell hath receaved of Sr. W. S. to thuse of Andrew Bainton the
some of a hundreth and threescore pounde in full paiment of D markes
of and for certaine Bargaines and Covennts dependenge betwixt the Lord
Seymore and the said Androwe Bainton Item a L're of the late Lorde Ad-
miralles bearing date the xxth of Novembr 1548 directed to the Ladie
Sharington for the paimente of C markes to Mr. Androwe Bainton. In
witness whereof the parties abovesaid to this p'nte Indenture entrechaungeably
have put to their seales the daye and yeare above written.
(Sd.) W. WILTESHB?
It would be interesting to know whether any of these jewels can
be traced. It is too much, perhaps, to hope that any have escaped
the melting-pot; but some might possibly be recognized by an
examination of portraits of the Duchess of Suffolk.
* Andrew Bainton, of Bromham.
171
'otcs on ait ttntosmieif jJtoiw Ckcle at Coatc,
tuar j
By A. D. PASSMOEE.
remaining stones of this circle, which have hitherto
escaped the notice of archaeologists, lie immediately in front
of Day House Farm, about a quarter of a mile from the village of
Coate and two miles from Swindon. They are now not at all
conspicuous, as they are all lying prostrate, and at first sight they
appear quite small, but on investigation with an iron bar I found
that they are much larger than they appear to be, the greater
portion of them being now buried under the turf, for though none
Sketch-plan of Circle of Stones at Day House Farm.
of them stand more than about 18in. out of the ground, and several
of them only just show above the surface, yet stone No. 6 on the
172 Notes on an undescribed Stone Circle at Coate, near Swindon.
plan I found to be some 9ft. Gin. long; Nos. 3 and 5 are over 6ft.;
and No. 1 is about 5ft. in length.
Stone No. 1, which lies beside the wall of the cow-shed on the
western side of the road, seems to be still unbroken, though prostrate
and almost buried, as are also the next three stones — 2, 3, and 4 —
which lie in the grass to the east of the roadway. The distance
(lift.) between 3 and 4, I take to have been the original distance
between the stones all round when the circle was complete — In
which case the number of stones would have been about thirty.
The circle, however/ seems to have been irregular in shape, and
varies in its diameter from north to south, and from east to west.
As will be seen from the plan, the cow-yards and rick-yards occupy
a considerable part of the site of the western side of the circle, and
here only one stone is visible — No. 9, in the rick-yard — and that
has been mutilated. Doubtless the others, being here more in the
way, have been broken up and removed. There is a patch of old
pavement of large sarsen stones and several big fragments are lying
about loose. The two stones 7 and 8, in front of the house, are the
smallest of all, and between these and 6 there is a wide gap which,
after hours of probing with an iron bar, I have hitherto failed to fill
up. I have, however, proved that other stones once existed besides
those now visible, by digging into the depression between Nos. 4
and 5, and finding in it a piece of burnt sarsen and a quantity of
white ashes — probably of straw — clearly pointing to the fact that
a stone standing here has been broken up.
The distances between the stones are : — from 1 to 2, 75ft. ; from
2 to 3, 58ft. ; from 3 to 4, lift. ; from 4 to 5, 68ft. ; from 5 to 6,
30ft. ; from 7 to 8, 17ft. ; from 8 to 9, 67ft, ; and from 9 to 1, 70ft.
In the large grass field to the south-west of the farm-house, which
4
Three Stones near Day House Farm,
borders on the reservoir, at a distance of 18 chains from the circle
By A. D. Patsmore. 173
already described are the three sarsen stones standing by themselves
in the middle of the field, of which a plan is given. Of these the
one to the eastward is a very large stone lying on its side, some 3ft.
high and 7ft. long above ground. The other two are comparatively
small stones, but have evidently been broken up. The distance
between the stones is in each case 59ft, measuring from the outside
of the stones. These stones, as they stand, have much the ap-
pearance of having formed part of a circle, but there is no sign of
any other stones, or of depressions in the turf from which other
stones may have been removed. Still, an old man informs me that
he remembers many large stones in this field being broken up in his
early life, and he rather thinks that they stood in a circle. His
evidence, however, is not sufficiently strong to build upon.
Near the stones I have found several worked flints and pottery o£
rude type.
By the side of the road which runs in front of Day House Farm
and passes through the circle first mentioned are five stones which
may possibly have formed part of an avenue. They lie in a line to
the north of the circle, which, if continued, would cut through the
circle and through the three stones beyond it, already described.
Several of these are stones of considerable size, though only just
their upper surface is now visible as they lie beside the road.
The first of these stones is near the main Swindon Road, on the
east side of the Day House Road. The other four lie on the opposite
side of the road, or in the ditch. The distance between the first and
second is 400ft.; between the second and third, 191ft. ; between
the third and fourth, 65ft. ; and the same distance between the fourth
and fifth. I cannot find any stone nearer to the circle than this
last. It has been suggested that these stones are tying beside the
road because they have been removed from the cultivated fields—-
but a stone 6ft. long is such an awkward thing to move that if the
only object was to get rid of them they would have been broken up
rather than drawn to the roadside. The equal distances, too, between
the third and fourth, and fourth and fifth stones, seem to point to
their having been intentionally placed there.
At the end of the reservoir, as you approach it from Broome Farm,
VOL. XXVII. — NO. LXXX. N
174 Notes on Arcliaology.
are a number of large sarsens, partly under water when the reservoir
is full, some on one side of the road and some on the other. An
irregular line of these seems to follow the western shore of the
reservoir for some distance, but it is impossible to make out any
plan, and probably they are really nothing but a natural drift of
sarsens.
At Broome Farm, however, which is close by, is a field which still
retains the name of Longstone Field. Here were many standing
stones, until they were broken up and carried off to Cricklade.
Stukeley mentions them thus : — " Longstones at Broome, near
Swindon, Wilts, is a great high stone and a little way off many
lesser ones in a row."
At Hodson, about one and a half miles from Day House Farm,
I have noticed a number of sarsens, which may or may not have
formed part of a circle, and from them a line of stones seems to lead
in the direction of Coate.
In conclusion, I must express my thanks to Mr. W. Handy, the
tenant of Day House Farm, for the kind way in which he has
allowed me to explore his fields.
on
A SUGGESTED USE FOR " INCENSE CUPS."
The Society's Museum possesses a varied and interesting series of the small
vessels of burnt clay, which have, in the absence of exact information, been
spoken of as " Incense Cups." I venture to suggest that they were used by the
Ancient Britons for the very homely but important purpose of containing the
material— whether dried moss, dried fungus, or other kind of tinder — used in
obtaining fire.
Notes on Archaology . 175
They have, without exception, a pair of holes bored on one side, about half-
an-inch apart.
It has been suggested that these were intended for suspension ; may they not,
more probably, have been the orifices through which a cord was passed to tie on
the cover ? An example from Lambourne, Berks, now in the British Museum,
has a lid of the same ware as the cup itself, and ornamented with a corresponding
pattern, and in both cup and cover there are two holes, the same distance apart,
through which the string was probably passed to fasten on the cover.
None of these cups in the Society's Museum have covers. It is probable that
the Lambourne cup is the only one known with this appendage preserved ; but
lids of wood may have been used, which have decayed in the progress of the
centuries.
It is evident that the cups could not be used for holding incense, or any other
similar substance, if suspended from holes on one side.
W. CUNNINGTON.
[A circumstance which seems to militate against Mr. Cunnington's theory is
the fact that in most cases the perforations in these little cups are not near the
tipper edge of the vessel, as one would fancy that they would be if the string
passing through them was to serve as a hinge for the lid, but an inch or more,
that is to say, one-third of the way down the side of the vessel. — ED.]
MEDLEVAL BELL AT KEMBLE,
A Pre-Reformation bell exists at Kemble, which is not mentioned by Mr. Lukis
In his list of the bells of Wilts. The height of the bell is 2ft., and the diameter
of the mouth 2ft. Gin. The inscription reads : —
Jhmrtr £jm-itu£ after write gratia.
The centre word is difficult to decipher, a rubbing was submitted to Dr. Cox,
Editor of the Antiquary, who reads it as above.
C. E. PONTING.
OPENING OF Two BARROWS ON LIDDINGTON WARREN FARM,
N. WILTS, 1893.
The first barrow opened is close to a green road leading from Shepherd's Rest
to Marlborough. It is a bowl-shaped barrow, and as it has been ploughed over
for many years it has spread over a considerable space, its diameter from north
to south being about 68ft., and from east to west 80ft., whilst its height is now
only about 4ft.
A trench was started on the south-east side, and at 13ft. from the centre the
N 2
176 Notes on Archaeology.
edge of a cairn of sarsens was reached, 3ft. in depth and built np on the original
surface-level. The stones were so evenly built in that it was with difficulty that
a pickaxe could be forced between them. Following these along they were found
to rise within Gin. of the surface of the tumulus. When these had been removed
to a depth of 4ft. the original chalk level was reached, when a cist was found in
the centre full of burnt bones, on the top of which was the rim of an imperfectly
burnt urn, and a small turned conical button pierced under its base in pulley
fashion with a hole for the string, apparently of Kimmeridge shale, similar in
shape to specimens now in the Stourhead Collection at Devizes.
The second barrow lies in a ploughed field near the 6th milestone from Swindon
on the Hungerford Road. It seems really to consist of two barrows joined
together. A trench was dug in the easternmost of the two, beginning on the
south-east side. At 3ft. from the centre the bottom of an " incense cup "
was discovered, and when within 1ft. of the centre the chalk on the original
surface level was found to be of a dirty brown colour and was rammed down so
hard that the pickaxe would hardly enter it. On the surface of this chalk, and
not in a cist, under the centre of the barrow was a heap of burnt bones. Nothing
else was found.
A. D. PASSMOBE,
Swindon.
SKELETONS AT KINGSTON DEVERILL.
Whilst digging a pit for the purpose of chalking some land on Kingston
Deverill Down about 1853, several skeletons were found a slight distance under
the surface — there having been previously no tumulus or any sign on the surface
of the interment below. The exact spot is the chalk pit nearest Mere Down
Farm on the right-hand side of the road going towards Kingston, about 53 yards
from the highway. The man who found them said that the skeletons were
ranged round with their feet together. A number of " loom weights " of chalk
were found with them. These passed into the hands of the Rev. D. M. Clerk,
who gave them, I believe, to the Salisbury Museum.
T. H. BAKER,
Mere Down.
FIND OF ROMAN COINS AT MERE CEMETERY IN 1856.
The following account of this discovery, which seems never to have been
noted in the Magazine, is taken from a MS. note-book belonging to the late
Rev. D. M. Clerk, Rector of Kingston Deverill, who died 1893, now in my
Notes on Archeology. 177
possession :— " On the 26th October, 1856, some workmen engaged in draining
a piece of ground, a little to the south of Mere, which is intended for a new
cemetery, came upon a vase of coarse pottery. The vase was unfortunately
broken by their tools, and though I have seen some fragments I have been
unable to make out even its shape. It contained Roman denarii to the number
of about two hundred and seventy, as near as I can ascertain. The following
memoranda contains a catalogue and description of two hundred and twenty
forwarded to the office of the Duchy of Cornwall, besides seven others that
had been offered for sale or were in the hands of persons in the neighbourhood.
Those coins which have passed through my hands are for the most part much
worn, coins of the latest date (as might be supposed) the least so ; scarcely one,
except the very latest, would be called by collectors ' very fine.' There are some
interesting reverses, but on the whole none of the coins appear to be of any great
value. The most remarkable thing concerning the hoard is that there are com-
paratively speaking very few duplicates, the reverses almost all vary even where
the type is somewhat the same. The earliest coin dates A.D. 65 ; the latest,
A.D. 166— thus covering one hundred years. The following is a summary of
them : — Nero, one ; Galba, one ; Vitellius, one ; Vespasian, seventeen ; Titus,
three ; Domitian, twenty-one ; Nerva, seven ; Trajan, fifty-six ; Hadrian, sixty ;
Sabina, eight ; JElius (Caesar), two ; M. Antoninus, twenty-eight ; Faustina,
Sen., ten ; M. Aurelius. thirteen ; Faustina, Jun., four." The catalogue which
follows contains a full and accurate description of the one hundred and seventy-
four different varieties of which the coins consisted.
T. H. BAKER,
Mere Down.
FIND OF COINS AT BRADENSTOKE.
Several Roman coins have been lately found near the abbey, amongst them
third brass coins of Gallienus (dr. 253 A.D.), Constantius II. (317—361), and
Yalentinian I. (364 A.D.). Also some of the well-known Nuremberg tokens-
one of them with the device of a man seated at a table apparently using the
tokens in counting — a purpose for which some authorities believe these tokens
were chiefly used.
E. C. TBEPPLIN.
ROMANO- BRITISH PIT AT GORTON, HILMARTON.
In January, 1880, as some labourers were cutting a deep drain from the iron
stone quarry immediately outside the rickyard of Corton Farm, they came upon
178 Notes on Arcfiaology.
several flattish sarsen stones which may have been the covers of a pit some 8 or
9ft. deep. This pit, of which there was no indication on the surface, contained a
quantity of rag stones which seemed to be partially in situ still as the lining of
the sides. A number of fragments of potter}' found amongst the stones, and a
quantity of animal bones found at the bottom of the pit, were some time ago
submitted to General Pitt- Rivers, who reported on them as follows :— " The
pottery is no doubt Romano-British. There is one fragment of Sauiian of
inferior quality but probably imported ; and fragments of Romano- British
imitation Samian. There is one fragment of basin-shaped rim with upright
ridge, which was common in all these villages (near Rushmore), and has been
found by Mr. Mansel Pleydell in the ancient kilns at Bagber, Dorset. It is
the ordinary form of vessel at Silchester.
" Most of the fragments are of the ordinary black-brown quality found in all
the Romano-British villages here, and in the kilns at Bagber, where it appears
to have been made. One small fragment resembles the quality ' E ' that was
found in both sections of Wansdyke, and which will be described in my Vol. III.
of Excavations, that is just coming out. Several fragments resemble the quality
R ' of the sections in Wansdyke, viz., red outside and in, and generally grey in
the interior of the substance. There can be no doubt, therefore, I think, that
your well is of the same period or earlier than the Wansdyke. The ordinary
pottery appears rather harder than the average from the villages : this may
perhaps be owing to the preservation of it in the deposit in the well. It is not
enough, in my opinion, to cause a distinction. Great care is necessary in
identifying the fragments of pottery. You cannot go by colour, which depends
a good deal on the baking, and the same vessel may vary in colour in different
places, so that the black -brown and red may in reality be the same pottery.
" The only measurable bones are : — 1, fragment of skull of ox ; 2, humerus of
ox ; 3, metacarpus of horse ; 4, metatarsus of horse ; 5, metatarsus of deer,
Cervus elaphus.
" The calculation of stature from the skull of the ox gives an approximate
height at the shoulder of 4ft. 3in., about the size of our modern Pembroke ox,
and considerably larger than the ordinary Romano-British ox of these parts,
which was 3ft. Sin. to 3ft. 5in., viz., about the height of our modern Kerry cow,
But as the estimate could only be made from one measurement of the skull, viz.
the maximum bi-orbital width, it is not very reliable. I should say that the
calculation from the minimum inter orbital width gives a stature of 3ft. llin.,
but this also is not very reliable.
"The humerus of ox gives a height at the shoulder of 3ft. llin., which is
about the size of our Alderney cow, and a little larger than the average Romano-
British ox. This calculation is only approximate, as the bone is a little reduced
in length, and its original length had to be judged.
"The metacarpus of horse gives a height at the shoulder of 12 hands 3in.,
and the metatarsus gives a height of 12 hands 2Un., which is about the size of
our New Forest pony, aud is also the size of the Romano-British horse of these
parts. These measurements of horse are both quite reliable.
" I have no test animals by which to calculate the height of the red deer from
the metatarsus, but it is rather a small red deer."
C. V. GODDAED.
Notes on Archaeology. 179
OLD STAINED GLASS IN CLYFPE PYPARD CHURCH.
It sf ems worth while to note the fact that several small panels of ancient glass
have lately been inserted in two of the windows of the north aisle of Clyffe
Pypard Church. The whole of this glass (except the circular panel of the Virgin
and Child) was collected by the late Mr. J. E. Nightingale, F.S.A., probably on
the Continent— and after his death was given to myself.
In the centre light of the window to the west of the north door is a panel made
up of pieces of 13th century Grisaille glass, very like the original glass of
Salisbury Cathedral. This glass is very thick and on the outside is corroded
into holes, precisely resembling those on worm-eaten wood. Below this is a
beautiful panel of probably 16th century German work, representing the donor : —
"Comatr ^r^rr pfarm |tt Htlrtjfcrnj"
kneeling before St. John, who bears in his arms the Agnus Dei, to which he
points. In the background is a lovely little landscape view of an old walled,
towered, and spired town— doubtless Conrad's home ; at the base of the panel is
a shield of arms, or, two bendlets gules.
In the western light of this, window there is a single piece of good early
glass, perhaps of the 14th century — figured with a leaf. This is very thick and
deeply corroded. Below this is a small panel of late Flemish (?) work, perhaps
1 7th century, representing Abraham bidding farewell to Hagar and Ishmael. In
the background Isaac and Ishmael are quarrelling, and Sarah is going to the
rescue of her son.
The eastern light has a very fine bit of early blue glass — thick and corroded —
perhaps of Italian make — above, and below, the crowned head of a saint with a
border made up of fragments of ancient glass put together. This head may be
of loth century work.
In the window on the eastern side of the north door the centre light has a
comparatively modern panel of the Saviour falling under the cross, above, and a
beautiful circular panel of the Crucifixion below, St. John and the Virgin beside
the cross, and four angels catching the blood from the wounds. This is probably
late 15th century Flemish work. In the eastern compartment is a similar round
panel, also of Flemish work of about 1500, with the Virgin enthroned, and the
Christ standing on her lap. The western compartment has a round panel of very
good work of perhaps twenty or thirty years later, also probably Flemish— the
subject of which is Judith and Holofernes. The camp, the city in the back-
ground, the soldiers, Judith with the head of Holofernes in her hand, and her
maid holding the bag to receive it, are depicted with great delicacy. There are
a few other quarries and fragments of 15th century glass. All the glass here
referred to has been inserted in the lower part of the windows. The fragments
of glass in the heads of these windows, as of others throughout the Church, are
remnants of the original glass of the Church — somewhat coarse early l(5th
century work.
E. H. GODDAKD.
180 Notes on Archaeology.
OAK-TREE COFFIN AT CHRISTIAN MALFORD.
The walls of the south porch of Christian Malford Church having for some
time shown signs of settlement, they have lately been- underpinned and repaired.
During this process a curious coffin made from the hollowed-out trunk of an
oak tree was found under the foundations, which were of large boulder stones,
at a depth of about 4ft. Fragments were found of thinner board, with which
the coffin appeared to have been lined [?]. The coffin, presumably of great
age, was crushed by the pressure of the walls over it, and was broken to
pieces in the digging out the new foundations. The porch is of 15th century
date.
E. C. TBEPPLIN.
RECOVERY 01 AN ANCIENT BRASS AT SALISBURY.
A small " brass," or rather copper plate, has recently been placed on the
north wall in the inside of the tower of St. Edmuud's Church, near the door
leading to the belfry, which deserves to be mentioned. It appears to have
once been inserted in stone, and was probably taken from a vault beneath St.
Edmund's Church where lie the remains of Henry Dove, formerly Mayor of
Salisbury. It had come into the possession of a person living near Andover,
who informed Dr. H. P. Blackmore, Hon. Director of the Blackmore Museum,
of it. Dr. Blackmore informed the Rector of St. Edmund's, the Rev. J. D.
Morrice, and through his liberality it was purchased and replaced in the Church.
The copper plate measures 9in. by 7in. ; it appears to have been originally
gilded, and has engraved upon it the arms of the City of New Sarum,
surmounted by a dove bearing an olive branch in its beak, and with its right
foot holding a sword, supposed to be the crest of Henry Dove. The in-
scription, which is on either side of the shield of arms, reads as follows :—
HENET DOVE DYED MAIOE
OF SALI8BVET. AN0. DO 1616.
J3TAT. 57. AVGV8T 24.
Underneath this is the outline of a large altar tombstone with a skull and
an hour-glass placed upon it on either side of the city arms, and bearing these
lines upon its front : —
" I, voyd of gall, this cities sword did sway :
As God freely confer'd the same on me ;
Soe I, (before my full prsefixed day)
Resign'd the same againe unto God free.
In Peace I liv'd, in Peace I did depart ;
Now in seternal Peace I have my part."
Notes on Archeology. 181
Henry Dove was elected Mayor in 1615, and according to Hatcher's Salisbury,
p. 697, died August 20th, 1616, during his year of office, and was succeeded
by Richard Godfrey. The Dove family was connected with Salisbury for a
considerable time, one Peter Dove, of St. Edmund's, is mentioned in a list
of the gentry of Salisbury in 1565. Others of the family, Francis, John, and
William, took an active part on the Parliamentary side in the Civil War.
John Dove was High Sheriff for Wilts in 1655.
Robert and Thomas Dove,'in all probability sons of Henry Dove, the Mayor^
graduated at Magdalen Hall, Oxford, and, having taken holy orders, were
Vicars, in succession, of Elm, in the County of Cambridge.
C. W. HOLQATE.
BOOKS AND ARTICLES ON WILTSHIRE.
Stonehenge. In the Illustrated Archaeologist for September there is an
article on Stonehenge by Mr. Edgar Barclay, in which he calls attention to a
point which he maintains has been overlooked by all writers on the subject — with
one exception — the significance of the short stone in the south side of the outer
circle. Professor Flinders Petrie is the exception. He notices this short stone,
but regards it as an evidence that the outer circle was never properly finished,
and that material became scarce before the work was completed. Mr. Barclay,
on the other hand, maintains that the difference in size of this stone from that of
all the other uprights of the outer circle was not an accident, but a part of the
original design of the building, that there must have been at this point a break
in the lintel ring — for this stone could have had no lintel on the top of it—
and that its position, due south of the southern trilithon, marked the original
entrance to the temple. In support of his contention that — contrary to the
received belief— there was an opening in the circle here, he argues that it is
very unlikely that the presence of the short stone is due to the fact that the
builders could not find one of the proper size, for the uprights on either side
of it, that on the east still standing and that on the west lying prostrate, are
both of the same size as the other stones of the circle, and in both the tenons
to hold the lintels are clearly to be seen.
Mr. Barclay further argues that the design and proportions of the structure
prove that the whole of it was erected at one time, and his final contention
is, "That Stonehenge is not of Prehistoric antiquity, but was raised immediately
after the first shock of the Roman conquest upon the downfall of Druidism,
by the Britons under the leadership of their native chieftains— and that the
temple was erected in a locality consecrated from time immemorial as a burial
ground of the race."
To Blade and White for March 25th, 1893, Mr. A. P. Sinnett contributed
an illustrated article, under the title of a " New Theory of Stonehenge." In
this he impartially pours contempt on the theory of the Post-Roman origin
of Stonehenge, as propounded by Fergusson, and on the older theory that it
was erected by the Britons before the advent of the Romans. " Where is the
Notes on Archeology.
sense," he asks, " of supposing that semi-savage Britons .... would
go to the infinite trouble of dragging huge blocks of stone all across England
to be used in a building close to quarries \_sic~] containing any quantity of
stone just as good from the builder's point of view?" He goes on to maintain
that uncivilised barbarians never could have erected the megalithic monuments
of the world — such, for instance, as the cap stone of a dolmen at Constantine,
in Cornwall, which, on the authority of Higgins, he tells us weighs 750 tons !
The very idea he says is absurd. The only rational explanation of their origin
is that they are the work of the inhabitants of the lost continent of Atlantis,
to whom also the civilization of Yucatan on the one hand and Egypt on the
other owe their existence. This, so far at least as Central America is con-
cerned, has been, Mr. Siunett tells us, put beyond doubt by the deciphering —
by an American savant, Mr. E. J. Howell— of "a certain Troano MS." in
which " the submergence of the last piece of the now lost continent is said
to have taken place 8,060 years 'before the writing of this book/ and the
population sacrificed on that occasion is estimated as having been sixty-four
millions." The thanks of all persons in want of new material for " theories •"
are certainly due to the writer of this article,
Salisbury Museum. The Antiquary for September has a well- written
article, by Mr. J. Ward, F.S.A., on the (Salisbury and South Wilts Museum,
dealing with its archa3ological contents ; this is followed in the October number
by a second article from the same pen on the Blackmore portion of the Museum,
calling attention to the excellence of its arrangement, as well as to the unique
value of the collection of stone implements housed therein.
Castle Eaton. The August number of the Leisure Sour contains a
good illustrated article, entitled "Upon the Upper Thames," by Miss E.
Boyer-Brown, dealing with Castle Eaton and its neighbourhood and the dialect
of that part of Wilts.
George Herbert and Bemerton. The sermon and lecture delivered on
the occasion of the recent celebration at Bemerton of the tercentenary of
George Herbert's birth, by Canons Kingsbury and Swayne, together with a
short account of Bemerton by the late J. E. Nightingale, a paper on St.
Andrew's Church, by C. E. Ponting, and a memoir of John Norris, Hector of
Bemerton, by the Rev. J. H. Overton, have been collected and published lately
in pamphlet form, making an interesting memorial of the tercentenary.
Truffle Hunting. The November number of the English Illustrated
Magazine has an article entitled "A Painless Hunt," descriptive of truffle
hunting on Salisbury Plain.
Marlborough College is described in the September and October numbers
of the Ludgate Monthly Magazine, by W. C. Sargent, and the articles are
excellently illustrated with views of the college buildings, portraits of the
masters, and other subjects connected with the college.
183
on |fatmkal flistorg.
MALFORMATION OF PEA- FLOWERS,
Early in July, 1893, some specimens of pea-flowers, grown in the Broad Town
allotments, were shown to me in which the whole inflorescence was altered.
There were no coloured petals, the parts, though small and shrivelled, being of a
healthy green. I sent a specimen to Kew, and it was decided there that the
malformation was due to a microscopic mite of the genus Phytoptus. On
reference to Miss Ormerod's standard work I find that this mite has heen noted
upon birch trees in Savernake Forest, and also upon black currants and nuts,
causing abortive growth of the leaf-buds, but there is no mention of its occur-
ence on the pea.
G. J. HILL,
Wootton Bassett.
ELECTRICAL PHENOMENA.
In the Western Gazette, Friday, July 8th, 1881, a curious incident of the
severe storm of Tuesday, the 5th, is related : — "At Wincanton, about 2 o'clock,
Mr. Galpin, of Horwood, was in a hay field with a pitching fork, which he was
holding with the prongs upwards, when he observed the interesting phenomenon-
known as St. Elmo's fire. A steady light, like the flame of a tiny candle, was-
seen on each point of the prong, and a cramping sensation, like that experienced
on the reception of the electric current from an electrifying machine was felt in1
the hand which held the stem of the fork."
A somewhat similar phenomenon was observed by my brother, Ernest Baker,,
in 1869, and was described by him in Notes and Queries (February 6th, 186J>,
4th Series, III.), as follows, asking for some satisfactory explanation of it,
which he never received : — "On Friday, Dec. 18th, at about 6.45, p.m., I was
riding over the downs to Mere, when there suddenly appeared on my horse's
head five lights, one on each ear larger than the rest, about the size of the flame
of a small taper, of a bluish colour ; two on the left eyebrow, and one on the
right ; these were like glow-worms, or as if you had rubbed the parts with
phosphorus. It was pitch dark, with a steady rain falling ; yet, while the lights
lasted (which was while I rode upwards of a quarter of a mile), I could see the
buckles on the bridle. There had been thunder and lightning in the afternoon.
184 Notes on Natural Hi&tory.
I rode steadily, trying to make out what it could be ; when it disappeared as
suddenly as it came. The horse was taken from the stable, and had only travelled
half a mile ; it did not perspire in the least."
T. H. BAKEB,
Mere Down.
OCCURRENCE OF WHITE MICE.
With reference to this, the Vicar of Broad Town writes : — "Several years ago
my son brought from school a pair of white mice which he kept in his bedroom.
To my joy they escaped. Some two or three years afterwards Mr. William Price
was threshing a rick in his yard, at no great distance from the vicarage, and
destroyed a large number of mice, amongst others a quantity of white ones. We
always thought these were the descendants of my son's pair."
OCCURRENCE OP THE GADWALL AT STOCKTON.
With reference to the gad wall (Anas strepera), which many Members of the
Society saw at Stockton House, Mr. Ashley Dodd writes :— " I shot the gadwall
which you saw in the Justice Room at Stockton House, on the 7th January, 1893,
within a quarter of a mile of the house. The bird was one of three, and one of
the others was certainly an ordinary mallard, for I got him with the second
barrel. The man who picked up the birds said I had got a duck and a drake,
and it was not until I returned home that I knew that I had got a prize.
Having shot several in Egypt of course I recognised it at once."
G. ASHLEY DODD.
[Mr. Smith, in his Birds of Wilts, only mentions one specimen of this duck
as having occurred in Wilts. This was shot at Amesbury in 1871.— ED.]
STORMY PETREL AT RUSHALL.
In the Devizes Gazette for November 30th Mr. J. M. Harris reports that a
specimen of the Stormy Petrel (Thalassidroma pelagica) was shot on Bushall
Down on November 27th.
Mr. Smith records four previous occurrences of this bird in Wilts— generally
after stormy weather.
Additions to the Museum and Library. 185
FLOCK OF PUFFINS (Fratercula arctica) AT CODFORD.
On November 20th, 1893, six or seven " strange birds " were seen flying about
<a field of swedes about =6ft. from the ground on Mr. Charles Notley's farm at
Codford St. Mary. In the course of the same day a puffin was picked up by a
beater in the course of a hare drive. It had apparently been shot by somebody
(or had it flown against a barbed wire?), but was still alive. Of course a puffin
is a common enough bird at the right time of year in the right place, but it
seems odd to find, not merely a chance bird, but a small flock, on November 20th —
in the extreme south-west corner of Salisbury Plain — at the end of a three
days' gale, mostly from the N.N.E., but varying to N.W., when one remembers
that the birds are due to leave our shores in August.
G. ASHLEY DODD.
COAL MINING IN THE OXFORD CLAY.
*' Under these strata [the coral rag] we have one called Chinch clay ....
with their laminae of coal [fossil wood]. The appearence of ' coal ' in this bed
has given rise to numerous trials, encouraged by ignorance or fraud. Among
these, I remember one at the expense of Sir Edward Bayntun and the Marquis
of Lansdowne, to the south-east of Tetherton. A much more rash adventure has,
I understand, been set on foot near Horsham, in Sussex, in the same bed, at the
expense of thirty thousand pounds."— The " Character of Moses," by the Rev,
Jos. Townsend, M.A., Kector of Pewsey, 1813, p. 127.
" Sir Edward Bayntun was amused and flattered with the hope of an extensive
colliery ; and from time to time the workmen showed him infallible signs of
coal, till the subscription funds and his patience were exhausted, and then they
reluctantly departed."— Ibid, p. 427.
to
3une 1st— Nobemfar 1st, 1893.
THE MUSEUM.
Presented anonymously : — Seventeenth Century Wilts tokens :
Freshford. John Curie Sen1.
Malmesbury. Edward Browne.
Wilton. Francis Wace.
186
Addition* to the Museum and Library.
Presented by THE BARONESS BRTJININGK : — Polish and Russian coins.
Presented by Mr. J. W. BROOKE : — Marlborough Token, W. Crabbe.
Presented by the Rev. J. Ft. CAREEW : — Part of the skull of an animal, from
Trow bridge.
Presented by Mr. W. COWARD :— Fine specimen of Ammonites Peramplus, from
Roundway.
Presented by Mr. B. H. CUNNINGTON: — Spindle- Whorl, found in Bishops
Cannings Churchyard.
Presented by Miss CUNNINGTON : — Fragments of ancient Cloth, found in a bar-
row at Upton Lovel.
Presented by the Rev.E, H. GODDARD;— Spindle-Whorl, found in Clyffe Pypard
Churchyard,
Presented by Mr, H. N. GODDARD :— Holed Stone (Spindle- Whorl P), found in
an interment at Clyffe Pypard.
Presented by Mr. W. J. KINGSTON!, by consent of the Trustees of Somerset
Hospital :— Four Romano -British Urns, from Bromsgrove Farm, Pewsey.
Presented by Mr. G. H. MEAD : — School-Children's Medals, Devizes ; struck to
commemorate the Duke of York's Marriage.
Presented by Mr, PORTER, Trowbridge : — Trowbridge Token (later series) J. B«
& H. Gorham.
Presented by Rev. C. SOAMES :— Seventeenth Century Wilts Tokens, new to the
Museum : —
No. in
Williamson.
90
135
140
No. in
Boyne.
62
EDMVND . HIDE . IN . HIWORTH =
Bear with chain . ^ .
RICH . LEADER . IN . HIWORTH = A
greyhound . ^ .
(Heart-shaped.)
IOHN . HAMMOND . OF = A clasped book.
MARLEBOROVGH . 66 = I . K . H
SIMON . PIKE . OF = Grocers' arms.
MARLEBOROVGH .1667=S.A.P
j Number of
Specimens in
the Society's
Museum.
Presented by Miss TANNER, Yatesbury :— A Pillion.
Presented by Miss PENRUDDOCKE :— Gold Touch Piece of Queen Anne, com-
memmorative of the touching by the Sovereign for the " King's Evil."
Small Oval gold Medal or Pendant, the obverse bearing the head of King
Charles I., the reverse the Royal Arms with the Garter round them.
Additions to the Museum and Library. 187
Purchased : —
Salisbury Token. W.G.M. Man in a tie wig.
W. Sheppard's Somersetshire, Wiltshire and Gloucestershire Silver Token,
value 12 pence (two specimens).
THE LIBEAEY.
Presented by Mr. A. E. BABNETT, Devizes :— Original Rules of Society for Relief
of Widows and Orphans of Poor Clergymen in the County of Wilts, 1764.
Presented by Miss BRADFORD :— Illustrated account of Maiiborough College — •
from Ludgate Monthly Mag., September and October, 1893.
Presented by Mr. A. COLEMAN : — MS. List of Wiltshire non-Parochial Registers
in the custody of the Registrar General.
Presented by Mr. WILLIAM CUNNINGTON : —
Plans and Descriptions of Stonehenge, Sir H. James, Ord. Surv., 1867.
Books :—
The Book of the Company of Mercers, "Burg, de Devizes," and Accounts,
1615 to 1736. MSS.
Survey of the Manor of Cannings Canonicorum, 1660, and Court Rolls from
1672. MSS.
Deed by Ralph Withers, of Bishops Cannings. 166 L
Bound together in fol. volume : —
Copies of Inquisitions of Borough of Devizes. 1254.
Ditto (fish-pond at Castle). 1274.
Lease of Seymour de Sudeley, of possessions at Devizes. 1650.
Ditto. 1650.
Ditto. 1560.
Translation of Document. MS. 1562.
Lease of Queen Catharine to Borough of Devizes. MS. 1511.
Petition of Sir John Danvers. MS. 1608.
Extracts from Records in Tower of London relating to Tolls of Borough of
Devizes. MS. 1186 to 1625.
Rental of Overseers of St. Mary's, Devizes. MS. 1736.
First Devizes Improvement Act. 1781.
Muster Roll of Devizes Volunteers. 1804.
Handbill proclaiming Thos. Dickenson a deserter. 1800.
Report of Kennet and Avon Canal. 1813.
Case, Tilby v. Corporation of Devizes. MS. 1825.
Second Improvement Act of Devizes. 1825.
Devizes Charities. MS. 1833.
Petition re Great Western Railway. MS. 18—.
The Barrow Diggers : a Dialogue; and Notes. 1839.
Proceedings, Minutes of Council, and Accounts of Wilts Topographical
Society. 1839—50. MS.
Cuttings and Plans and Original Letters relating to the Water Supply,
Devizes. Mounted 4to. 1873.
Oolitic District of Bath and Wilts, by W. Lonsdale. Trans, of Geological
Society. 1832.
188 Additions to the Museum and Library.
On Belemnites of "North Wilts, Prof. Owen and Dr. Mantel!. Autograph
Letters on subject from Prof. Owen, Dr. S. P. Woodward, S. P. Pratt,
Dr. Mantell. From Philosophical Transactions. 1848—50.
Monograph of Greensand Crustaceans (many from Wiltshire), Prof. T.
Bell. 1862.
The Spinster at Home, in the Close, Salisbury, by Miss Child. A poem. 1844.
Wiltshire from Rev. T. Cox, Magna Britannia. 1720.
History of Malmesbury. Cuttings from North Wilts Herald, 1867.
Richard Jefferies. 1867.
Memoir of Henry Hunt, 3 vols. 1820.
Addresses by Henry Hunt, 2 vols.
Descripton of Curiosities at Wilton House, by James Kennedy,and description
of Stowe. 1758.
Bidcombe Hill : a Poem ; Rev. F. Skurray. 1824.
Beauties of British Antiquity, J. Collinson of Bromham, Stonehenge, Abury,
Silbury, Malmesbury Abbey, &c. 1779.
Topographical Survey of Hants, Wilts, Dorset, Somerset, Devon, and Corn-
wall. W. Tunnicliff, Salisbury. 1791.
Observations on the Modern Clergy. Rev. C. Lucas. 1840.
Bath Road. Robertson. 2 vols. 1792.
Papers read, at Meeting of Society, Wilton, by J. E. Nightingale, W. C. Lukis,
L. Gidley, and others. 1870.
Guide to Salisbury Meeting, and Notes : — Kemm, Amesbury Church and
Abbey; Edwards, Amesbury Gleanings ; Stevens, Jottings on Stonehenge
and Moot Excursions; Maskelyne, Abstract of Stonehenge Petrology. 1876.
Druidical Temples of Wilts. Rev. E. Duke ; and Review. 1846.
Stonehenge. Rev. L. Gidley. 1873.
Tour in quest of Genealogy. H. Jones and R. Fenton. 1811.
Wiltshire, from Description of England and Wales. 1770 .
Description of Stonehenge. J. Easton, 1802.
History of Nonconformity in Warminster. Rev. H. Gunn. And account
of Horningsham Chapel. 1853.
Highwaymen of Wiltshire. J. Waylen. 1857.
Poems by Rev. W. L. Bowles. Vol. iv. 1809.
Pamphlets, fyc. : —
Caer Pensauelcoit. Thomas Kerslake. 1882.
Liberty of Independent Research. T. Kerslake. 1885.
Primeval British Metropolis (Pen Pits). T. Kerslake. 1877.
Reports, Wilts County Asylum, 1857, 1858, 1859, 1864, 1865, 1869.
Proceedings of Salisbury Meeting of Society. 1865.
Self-condemned Quaker and Beaven's Addresses. 1707.
" A Tender Visitation." Charles Marshall, Quaker. And MS. note by Canon
Jackson. 1684.
Five Minutes' Consideration on Making Roads. T. Smith, Devizes. 1799-
Report of Trial, Tilby v. Corporation of Devizes. 1827.
Baldud and the Mistletoe. E. T. Stevens. 1875.
Wiltshire Antiquities : from Antiq. Top. Cabinet. Rev. E. Duke. 1809.
" The Mad Gallop." Kennet and Avon Canal. MS. copy. 1793.
Additions to the Museum and Library. 189
Cretaceous Eocks, Beer Head and Warminster, &c. C. J. A. Meyer. 1874
Coaching Days— Bath Road. English Illustrated Mag. 1887.
Memoir of Eev. W. Jay, of Tisbury.
A Wiltshire Centenarian. 1872.
Rules and Tables, Wilts Friendly Society (first). 1855.
Restoration, Salisbury Cathedral ; report of Meeting. (Circular.) 1864.
Funeral Sermon, late G. E. Sloper. R. Dawson. 1866.
History of Salisbury Cathedral. W. Mitchell, Westbury. 1866.
Historical Associations, Longleat. W. Mitchell.
Stonehenge. W. Mitchell.
Shepherd of Salisbury Plain. Mrs. H. More.
Family of James Johnson, Bishop of Gloucester and Worcester (partly
Wilts). Walter Money.
Benefits of Sanitary Reform, Salisbury. A. B. Middleton. 1864.
Martin's History of Wiltshire. 1763.
Memoir of Thomas E. Black well, C.E. 1864.
Description of Parish of Cheverell Magna. 1871.
Canaling : a Poem (Kennet and Avon). 1793.
Voyage from London to Salisbury. John Taylor. 1630.
Samuel Prout, Catalogue of Drawings. Ruskin. 1879.
Report of Marlborough College Natural History Society. 1866.
Catalogue, illustrated, Salisbury and South Wilts Museum. 1864.
Coloured Litho— A Wiltshire Girl, after Sir T. Lawrence.
Presented by Mr. G. E. DABTNELL : —
Pamphlets, fyc. : —
Salisbury Election Addresses, &c., 1885, 1892.
Salisbury Cuttings and Scraps.
Collections for Parochial History of Wilts. W. C. Lukis.
Sermon, Marlborough Coll. Chapel. E. C. Wickham. 1866.
Marlborough College " Prolusiones," 1867, 68, 69, 91.
Prints : —
Heytesbury Church, south side. Anast. by M. Gee.
Tottenham Park House. Small cut.
Presented by the Rev. E. H. GODDARD : —
Wilts Friendly Society Reports. 1877, 1879-1881, 1886, 1890, 1891 .
Juvenile Branch of do., Rules. 1882.
G.W.R. Swindon Sick Fund Society, Rules. 1876.
Clyffe Pypard Friendly Society, Rules. 1868.
Guide to Tesselated Pavement, Box. 1888.
Four Visitation Addresses by Bishop Wordsworth. 1888.
Address on Education in Wilts. By R. J. Curry. 1890.
Wilts Clergy Charity, Reports. 1879, 1883—1885, 1888—1891.
Service for Consecration of St. Paul's Church, New Swindon. 1881.
Salisbury and South Wilts Museum, Report. 1891-2.
Chippenham -printed Tracts (three).
Newspaper Cuttings, &c.
Catalogue of Maces, Swords of State,&c., exhibited at the Mansion House,1893.
VOL. XXVII. — NO. LXXX. O
190 Additions to the Museum and Library.
Prints : —
Lord Methuen. Vanity Fair Cartoon. 1893.
Proposed Music School at Marlborough College. Ink Photo. 1893.
Presented by Mr. H. N. GODDABD :— Illustrated Sale Catalogue of Cowbridge
House Estate. 1893.
Presented by THE AUTHOB, Mr. N. A. List, of Omaha, U.S.A. :—
American Charts. Vols. I. and II. (Stonehenge, &c.).
Cabala of the Bible.
Presented by THE AUTHOR :— Lydiard Manor, its History. By the Rev. W.
H. E. McKnight, 1992.
Presented by Mr. H. E. MEDLICOTT :— Sale Catalogues of Farleigh Wick,
Ogbourne Maisey, Rodbourne Cheney, and Fairwood Estates.
Presented by THE AUTHOR : —
King John's House, Tollard Royal, by General Pitt-Rivers.
Primitive Locks and Keys, by General Pitt-Rivers.
Presented by Mr. G. NOTES :— Poll Book of Election of 1818.
Presented by Rev. C. SOAMES : —
Pamphlets : —
Deed relating to East Harnham Hospital, &c., vesting £8000 in Trustees.
1796.
Report of Public Meeting, 1845, to promote communication from Manchester
and the North with Salisbury and Southampton.
Remarks on Office of Deputy Recorder of Salisbury. By R. Benson, Deputy
Recorder. 1831.
Proceedings in Charles Brooke v. Henry Guy, of Chippenham, for libel. 1802.
Answer to Address from Charles Brooke to Electors of Chippenham, by
H. Guy. 1802.
Copies of General Meetings of Co. of Wilts, and Proceedings and Correspon-
dence of Committee appointed January 26th, 1780.
Address to Electors of Borough of Chippenham. By John Maitland. 1818.
Letter to Archdeacon of Sarum on Ruri- Decanal Chapters. By W. Dansey.
1840.
Part of Pedigree of Dore Family, of Longcot.
Report from the Select Committee on Petition of Calthorpe and Beckford,
respecting undue Election for Borough of Hindon. 1775.
Act for Repairing and Widening Road, Bowden Hill to Kingsdown. 172|.
Act for Enclosure of Tilshead. 1811.
Act to grant Bowood Park to Sir Orlando Bridgeman, Bart.
Dialogus Physicus de Natura Aeris. By Hobbes, of Malmesbury. 1661.
Hare's Sermon, preached at Swindon — Archdeacon's Visitation. 1797.
Sherlock's Sermon, preached at Sarum — on Rebellion in Scotland. 1745.
Assize Sermon, preached at Devizes, by F. W. Fowle. 1838.
Sermon, preached at Sarum, by F. W. Fowle, at Visitation of Archdeacon
of Sarum. 1837.
Remarks on two late Sermons preached at Cathedral, Sarum. 1711.
Farewell Sermon, preached at Tilshead, by Rev. H. Gauntlett Collins,
Salisbury. No date.
(Any Member whose name or address is incorrectly printed in this List
is requested to communicate with the Financial Secretary.)
WILTSHIRE
tstotg
1893.
Patron :
THE MOST HONOUBABLE THE MABQUIS OF LANSDOWNE.
President :
SIB HENBY B. MEUX, BABT.
Vice- Presidents :
The Most Hou. the Marquis of Bath
William Cunnington, Esq., F.G.S.
Sir Gabriel Goldney, Bart.
Sir Heury A. Hoare, Bart.
Sir John Lubbock, Bart., M.P.
The Right Hon. Earl Nelson
Rev. H. A. Olivier
Lt.-General Pitt-Rivers, D.C.L.,
F.R.S.. F.S.A.
Charles Penruddocke, Esq.
The Right Rev. the Lord Bishop of
Salisbury
Rev. A. C. Smith
C. H. Talbot, Esq.
Trustees :
Sir Edmund Antrobus, Bart.
The Most Hon. the Marquis of Bath
William Cunnington, Esq.
G. T. J. Sotheron Estcourt, Esq.
G. P. Fuller, Esq., M.P.
Sir Gabriel Goldney, Bart.
The Most Hon. the Marquis of
Lansdowne
Sir John Lubbock, Bart., M.P.
The Right Hon. Earl Nelson
Charles Penruddocke, Esq.
The Committee consists of the following G-entlemen and Honorary Officers
of the Society : —
T. B. Anstie, Esq., Devizes
J. I. Bowes, Esq., Devizes
Henry Brown, Esq., BlacJclands
Park, Calne
C. F. Hart, Esq., Devizes
Rev. C. W. Hony, Bishops Cannings
Joseph Jackson, Esq., Devizes
Rev. A. B. Thynne, Seend
Honorary G-eneral Secretaries :
H. E. Medlicott, Esq., Sandfield, Potterne, Devizes
Rev. E. H. Goddard, Clyffe Pypard Vicarage, Wootton Bassett
Honorary G-eneral Curators ;
A. B. Fisher, Esq., Potterne
B. H. Cunnington, Esq., Devizes
Honorary Librarian :
W. Heward Bell, Esq., Seend Cleeve, Melksham,
Honorary Local Secretaries :
J. W. Brooke, Esq., Marlborough
W. Forrester, Esq., Malmesbury
C. W. Holgate, Esq., Salisbury
H. Kinneir, Esq., Swindon
Alex. Mackay, Esq., Trowbridge
W. F. Morgan, Esq., Warminster
Kev. J. Penrose, West Ashton,
Trowbridge
C. E. Ponting, Esq., F.S.A.,
LocTceridge, Marlborough
J. Farley Butter, Esq., Mere [sham
Arthur Schomberg,Esq.,$eew££,.MeZ&-
J. K. Shopland, Esq., Purton
Mulville Thomson, Esq., M.D.,
Bradford-on-Avon
Henry Wilkins, Esq., Calne
Honorary Treasurer :
C. B. H. A. Colston, Esq., M.P., Roundway Park, Devizes
Honorary Auditors:
G. S. A. Waylen, Esq., Devizes
John Wilshin, Esq., Devizes
Financial Secretary :
Mr. David Owen, 31, Long Street, Devizes.
LIST OP SOCIETIES, &C., IN UNION WITH THE
iai iwb gatunl Pfetorg
For interchange of Publications, fyc.
Society of Antiquaries of London
Royal Archaeological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland
Society of Antiquaries of Scotland
Koyal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland
Kent Archaeological Society
Somersetshire Archaeological Society
Oxford Architectural and Historical Society
Belfast Naturalists' Field Club.
Essex Archaeological Society
Professor L. Jewitt
Bath Antiquarian and Natural History Field Club
United States Geological Survey
Herts Natural History Society
Powysland Club
Bristol Natural History Society
Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society
Essex Field Club
Berks Archaeological and Architectural Society
Bureau of Ethnology, Washington, B.C., United States
Clifton Antiquarian Club
Hampshire Field Club.
of Members.
Life
Awdry, Charles, 2, Hyde Park Street,
London, W.
Bruce, Lord Charles, Wilton House,
Eaton Square, London, S.W.
Duke, Rev. Edward, Lake House,
Salisbury
Ellis, Rev. J. H., 29, Collingham
Gardens, South Kensington, Lon-
don, S.W.
Fitzmaurice, Lord E., Leigh House,
Bradford-on-Avon
Grove, Sir Thomas Fraser, Bart.,
Feme, Salisbury
Hawkesbury, Baron, 2, Carlton House
Terrace, Pall Mall, London, S.W.
Hoare, Sir Henry A., Bart., Stour-
head, Bath [Salisbury
Holgate, Clifford W., The Palace,
Lansdowne, Most Hon. Marquis of,
Bowood, Calne [penham
Lowndes, E. C., Castle Combe, Chip-
Members :
Lubbock, Sir J. W., Bart., M.P., 15,
Lombard Street, London, E.G.
Lushington, Sir Godfrey, 16, Great
t Queen Street, Westminster, London,
S.W.
Meux, Sir Henry B., Bart., Dauntsey
House, Chippenham
Mullings, John, Cirencester
Neeld, Sir A., Bart., Grittleton,
Chippenham
Penruddocke, C., Compton Park,
Salisbury
Penruddocke, C., Jun., Bratton St.
Maur, Wincanton, Bath
Prior, Dr. R. C. A., 48, York Terrace,
Regent's Park, London, N.W.
Salisbury, the Rt. Rev. the Lord
Bishop of, the Palace, Salisbury
Selfe, H., Marten, Great Bedwyn
Wyndham, the Hon. Percy, 44,
Belgrave Square, London, S.W.
Annual Subscribers.
Adderley Library, Librarian of,
Marlboro ugh College
Anstie, E. L., Devizes
Anstie, G. E., 31, Market, Place,
Devizes ,
Anstie, T. B., Devizes
Archer, Col. D., Fairford House,
Gloucestershire
Armstrong, F. A. W. T., 42, St.
Michael's Hill, Bristol
Arundel of Wardour, Rt. Hon. Lord,
Wardour Castle, Tisbury, Salisbury
Awdry, Rev. E. C., Kington St.
Michael, Chippenham
Awdry, Justly W., The Paddocks,
Chippenham
Awdry, Rev. W. H., Ludgershall,
Andover
Baker, T. H., Mere, Bath
Barnwell, Rev. C. E. B., Southbroom,
Devizes
Bath, the Most Hon. the Marquis of,
Longleat, Warminster
Batten, John, Aldon, Yeovil
a'Beckett, W. A. C., Penleigh House,
Westbury
Beddoe, Dr., The Chantry, Bradford-
on-Avon
Bell, Rev. Canon G. C., The Lodge,
Marlborough College
Bell, W. Reward, F.G.S., Cleeve
House, Seend [Shrewton
Bennett, Rev. Canon F., Maddington,
Bennett, T. J., M.D., Steventon
House, Steventon, Berks
Bennett, W. S., Overcombe, The
Shrubbery, Weston-Super-Mare
Bethell, S., Oak Lea, Calue
Bingham, Rev. W. P. S., Kenton
Vicarage, Exeter
Blackmore, Dr. H. P., Salisbury
Blake, Henry, Elmhurst, Trowbridge
Blaker, Rev. W. I., Easterton
Vicarage, Devizes
Bond, Rev. Canon John, Steeple
Ashton Vicarage, Trowbridge
Booker, Rev. A. W., Sutton Venej
Rectory, Warminster
IV
LIST OP MEMBERS.
Bosher, C. W.,
Bourne, Rev. G. H., D.C.L., St.
Edmund's College, Salisbury
Bouverie, Rev. Hon. B. P., Pewsey
Rectory
Bouverie, E. 0. P., 93, Park Street,
London, W. [Devizes
•Bowes, J. I., Wilts County Asylum,
Bradford, J. E. G., 16, Marlborough
Buildings, Bath [sham
Brakspear, Harold, The Priory, Cor-
Bristol Museum and Library, Hon.
Sec., Queen's Road, Bristol
Britton, Mrs. Helen, 39, Croydon
Grove, West Croydon, Surrey
Brodrib.b, Rev. W. J., Wootton
Rivers, Marlborough [borough
Brooke, J. W., The Green, Marl-
Browne, H., Blacklands Park, Calne
Brown, Henry, Salisbury
Brown, James, South "View, London
Road, Salisbury
Brown, Rev. R. G., Little Somerford
Rectory, Chippenham
Brown, W., Devizes
Brown, Sir W. R., Highfield, Trow-
bridge
Bruce, Rt. Hon. Lord Henry B., 34,
Eaton Place, London, S.W.
Buchanan, Ven. Archdeacon,Poulshot
Buckley, Alfred, New Hall, Boden-
ham, Salisbury
Buckley, Rev. Canon Felix J., Stanton
St.Quintin, Chippenham [Swindon
Buller, Mrs. Tremayne, Chiseldon,
Bullock, William H., Pewsey
Burgess, F. W., 22, Market Place,
Trowbridge [Bristol
Bush, J., 10, St. Augustine's Parade,
Bush, J. J., Hilperton Grange,
Trowbridge [Bath
Bush, Robert C., Winifred's Dale,
Butt, Rev. W. A., Minety Vicarage,
Malmesbury
Bythesea, Lt.-Gen., 22, Wilton
Crescent, London, S.W.
Butterworth, G. M., Swindon
Caillard, His Honour Judge, Wing-
field, Trowbridge
Caird, R. H., Southbroom, Devizes
Galley, Rev. J.H., Chiseldon Vicarage,
Swindon
Carey, Rev. T., Ebbesborne-Wake,
Salisbury
Carless, Dr., Devizes [Salisbury
Carpenter, Joseph, Burcombe Manner,
Gary, J., Steeple Ashton, Trowbridge
Chamberlain e, Rev. E., Blagden
House, Keevil
Chamberlaine, Rev. W. H., Keevil
Chandler, Thomas, Devizes
Chandler, T. H., Rowde, Devizes
Chandler, W., Aldbourne, Hungerford
Cholmeley, Rev. Canon C. H., The
Rectory, Beaconsfield (R.S.O.),
Bucks
Clark, Major T., Trowbridge
Clarke, Miss M., Prospect House,
Devizes
Crespi, Dr. A. J. H., Wimborne
Cleather, Rev. G. E., The Vicarage,
Brixton Deverill, Warminster
Colborne, Miss, Venetian House,
Clevedon
Coleman, A., Wootton Bassett
Colston, C. E. H. A., M.P., Roundway
Park, Devizes
Colwell, J., Devizes
Cook,Edward,Walden Lodge, Devizes
Cooper, Rev. W. H. H., Tockenham
Rectory, Wootton Bassett
Corke, Rev. H. A., Bradenstoke
Vicarage, Chippenham
Cunnington, B. H., Devizes
Cunnington,Mrs.S.,Southgate House,
Devizes
Cunnington, William, F.G.S., 58,
Acre Lane, Brixton, London, S.W.
Curtis, C. W., 74, Lombard Street,
London, S.W.
Daniell, Rev. J. J., Langley Burrell,
Chippenham
Dartnell, G. E., Abbottsfield House,
Stratford Road, Salisbury
Dear, George, Codford St. Peter, Bath
Devenish, Matthew H. W.,Westleigh,
Salisbury
Dixon, H. P., Southcott, Pewsey
Dixon, S. B., Pewsey
Dodd, G. Ashley, Stockton House,
Codford St. Mary, Bath
Dowding,Rev.W.,Idmiston,Salisbury
Dowding, W. Drummond, 2,
Clements Inn, London, W.C.
Du Boulay, Rev. F. H., Heddington,
Calne [bury
Dugdale, Rev. S., Motcombe, Shaftes-
Dunlap, Rev. J. D., Vicarage,
Corsham
LIST OP MEMBERS.
Eddrupp, Rev. Canon E. P., Bremhill,
Calne
Edgell, Rev. E. B., Bromham, Chip-
penham
Errington, Sir George, Bart., Rath-
cline, Hampton Court, Surrey
Estcourt, G. T. J. Sotherou, Estsourt,
Tetbury [Malmesbury
Estridge, H. W., Minety House,
Everett, Rev. E., Manningford Ab-
bots, Pewsey [Salisbury
Everingham, Rev. W., The Palace,
Ewart, Miss M. A., Coney hurst,
Ewhurst, Guildford
Ewart, Miss M., Broadleas, Devizes
Eyre, G. E. Briscoe, Warrens, Lynd-
hurst, Hants
Eyres, Edwin, Lacock, Chippenham
Eyres, Henry C., St. Alban's House,
Highgate Rise, London, N.W.
Finlay, Rev. E. B., The Lodge,
Avebury, Calne
Fisher, A. B., Court Hill, Potterne
Forrester, William, Malmesbury
Fox, C. F., The Bank, Saudown, Isle
of Wight
Fox, F. F., Yate House, Chipping
Sodbury, Gloucestershire
Fuller, G. P., M.P., Neston Park,
Corsham
Gabriel, C. W., Yale Lodge, Weston,
Bath
Gillrnan, C., Tresco Villa, Devizes
Gladstone, John E., Bowden Park,
Chippenham
Goddard, Ambrose L., Swindon
Goddard, Rev. C. V., Chideock
Vicarage, Bridport
Goddard, Rev. E. H., Clyffe Pypard,
Wootton Bassett
Goddard, H. Nelson, ClyfEe Pypard
Manor, Wootton Bassett
Goddard, W. C. !G., Brentwood,
Wyndham Road, Salisbury
Godwin, J. G., 15, St. George's Row,
Pimlico, London, S.W.
Goldney, F. H., Prior Place, Frimley,
Farnborough
Goldney, Sir Gabriel, Bart., Beech-
field, Corsham
Gouldsmith, W. A., The Bungalow,
Shanklin, Isle of Wight
Gower, GranviDe Leveson, F.S.A.,
Titsey Place, Limpsfield
Gray, A. Murray, Devizes
Grose, Samuel, M.D., Melksham
Grove, G. Troyte Chafyn, North
Coker House, Yeovil
Gwatkin,R.G., Manor House,Potterne
Gwillim, E. LI., Maiiborough
G.W.R. Mechanics' Institute, Secre-
tary of, New Swindon
Haden, J. P., Hill View, Trowbridge
Hadow, Rev. G. R., Calstone Rectory,
Calne
Hall, Capt. Marshall, Easterton
Lodge, near Parkstone (R.S.O.),
Dorset
Halliday, J. Edmund, Warminster
Harding, John, 51, Canal, Salisbury
Harmer, G. H., Apsley Villa, Ciren-
cester [Calne
Harris, Henry W., The Woodlands,
Harris, Thomas, South Place, Calne
Hart, C. F., Devizes
Hayward.Rev. S. C., Pilsley Vicarage,
Clay Cross, Derbyshire
Hay ward, William, c\o Messrs.
Cunnington, Devizes
Haywood, T. B., Woodhatch Lodge,
Reigate
Heytesbury, The Rt. Hon. Lord,
Heytesbury
Hill, Rev. A. Du Boulay, Downton
Vicarage, Salisbury
Hill, Rev. Geoffrey, Harnham Vicar-
age, Salisbury
Hill, G. J., Clematis Villa, Wootton
Bassett
Hill, James L., Bulford Manor,
Amesbury
Hillier, H. W., 21, High Street,
Marlborough
Hobhouse, C. E., M.P., The Ridge,
Corsham
Hobhouse, Sir C. P., Bart., Monkton
Farleigh, Bradford-on-Avon
Hodgson, Rev. Canon J. D., The
Rectory, Collingbourne Ducis,
Mavlborough
Hoiiy, Rev. C. W., Bishops Cannings
Hulse, Sir Edward, Bart., Breamore-,
Hants
VI
LIST OF MEMBERS.
Hurry, J. S., Devizes
Hussey, Mrs. H., The Close, Salisbury
Hutchinson, Rev. T. N., Broad Chalke
Vicarage, Salisbury
Hatchings, Rev. Canon R. S., Alder-
bury, Salisbury
Inman, Rev. Canon E., Potterne
Vicarage, Devizes
Jackson, Joseph, Devizes
Jacob, J. H., The Close, Salisbury
Jennings, J. C. S., Abbey House,
Malmesbury
Johnson, Rev. J. A., Biddestone
Rectory, Chippenham
Johnson, J. G., Concrete House, New
Swindon
Jones, H. P., Portway House, War-
minster
Jones, W. H. Hammond, Tigbourne,
Witley, Surrey
Jones, W. S.,Milbourne, Malmesbury
Kelland, J., Canal, Salisbury
Kemble, Rev. A., Vicarage, Berwick
St. John, Salisbury
Kemm, Mrs., Amesbury, Salisbury
Kemm, Thomas, Avebury, Calne
Kenrick, Mrs., Keevil, Trowbridge
King, Rev. Bryan, Avebury, Calne
Kingdon, The Rt. Rev. Bishop H.
T., Fredericton, New Brunswick
King, Walter E., Donhead Lodge,
Salisbury
Kinneir, H., Redville, Swindon
Kirwan, J. S., 1, Richmond Gardens,
Bournemouth
Lambert, Rev. R. TL, Christchurch
Vicarage, Bradford-on-Avon
Lansdown, G., Trowbridge
Laverton, W. EL, Leighton, Westbury
Lawrence, W.F., Cowesfield, Salisbury
Lea, J.Henry,Cedarhurst, Fairhaven,
Mass., U.S.A.
Leslie, Thomas, Laurel Villa,
Wootton Basselt
Lewis, Harold, B.A., Mercury Office,
Bristol
Literary and Philosophic Club — A. B.
Prowse, Esq.,M.D., Hon.Librarian,
28, Berkeley Square, Bristol
Llangattock, The Rt. Hon. Lord, The
Hendre, Monmouth
Long,Frederick W., Courtfield House,
Trowbridge
Long, W. H., M.P., Rood Ashton,
Trowbridge
Long, Col. William, Woodlands,
Congresbury (R.S.O.), Somerset
Lowe, Charles H., Rowde, Devizes
Luckman, Rev. W. G., Castle Eaton
Rectory, Fairford
Mackay, Alex., Holt Manor, Trow-
bridge
Mackay, Dr. Henry John, Devizes
Mackay, James, Trowbridge
Mackay, William, Trowbridge
Maclean, J., C., M.D., Swindon
Magrath, Col., Ban-aboo, Co. Wex-
ford, Ireland
Manley, Rev. F. H., Somerford
Magna Rectory, Chippenham
Mann, William J., Trowbridge
Marlborough College Natural History
Society— President of, The College,
Marlborough
Marshall, J. T., Park Dale, Devizes
Maskelyne, E. Story, Hatt House,
Box, Wilts
Maskelyne, N. Story, F.R.S., Bassett
Down, Swindon, Wilts
Master, Rev. G. S., Bonrton Grange,
Flax Bourton, Bristol
Matcham, William E., New House,
Salisbury
Mayne, Rev.Canon,Christian Malford
Vicarage, Chippenham
Mayo, John H., India Office, Lon-
don, S.W.
McNiven, C. F., Perrysfield, Oxted,
Surrey
Mead, G. H., Devizes
Meade, Rev. the Hon. S., Frankleigh
House, Bradford-on-Avon
Medlicott, H. E., Sandfield, Potterne
Meek, A. Grant, Hillworth House,
Devizes
Meek, H. Edgar, Devizes
Mere wether, Rev. W. A. S., North
Bradley Vicarage, Trowbridge
LIST OP MEMBERS.
Vll
Merriman, E. B., Marlborough
Merriman, R. W., Marlborough
Merriman, T. Mark, 25,Austin Friars,
London, E.G. [Court
Methuen, Major Gen. Lord, Corsham
Milford, Rev. R. N., East Knoyle
Rectory, Salisbury
Milling, Rev. M. J. T., Vicarage,
Ashton Keynes, Cricklade
Mitchell, Arthur C., Cottles House,
Melksham
Morgan, W. F., Warminster
Morrice, Rev. Canon W. D., Holy
Trinity Vicarage, Weymouth
Mullings, Richard B., Woodville,
Devizes
Nelson, Rt. Hon. Earl, Trafalgar,
Salisbury [Salisbury
Nelson, Rt. Hon. Countess, Trafalgar,
Nightingale,Miss,The Mount, Wilton
Normanton, the Rt. Hon. Earl of, 7,
Prince's Garden, Prince's Gate,
London, S.W.
Noyes, George, 11, Bassett Road,
Netting Hill, London, W.
Oliver, Andrew, 7, Bedford Row,
London, W.C.
Oliver, Capt, S. P., F.S.A.. F.R.G.S.,
Anglesey, Gosport [Salisbury
Olivier, Rev. Canon Dacres, Wilton,
Olivier, Rev. H. A., West Green
House, Winchfield
Owen, D., 31, Long Street, Devizes
Palmer, George LI., Trowbridge
Parsons, W. F,, Hunt's Mill, Wootton
Bassett
Pass, Alfred C., The Holmes, Stoke
Bishop, Bristol
Passmore, A. D., Swindon
Paul, A. H., The Close, Tetbury
Pembroke and Montgomery, Rt. Hon.
Earl, Wilton House, Salisbury
Penrose, Rev. J., West Ashton
Vicarage, Trowbridge
Penruddocke, Rev. J. H., South
Newton Vicarage, Wilton
Philipps, Rev. Canon Sir J. E., Bart.,
The Vicarage, Warminster
Pinder, R. H., Hernhurst, Florence
Road, Boscombe, Bournemouth
Piper, H. D., Bath Road, Swindon
Pinniger, Henry W., Westbury
Pitt-Rivers, Lt -Gen. Lane Fox,
F.R.S.,F.S.A.,Rushmore,Salisbury
Plenderleath, Rev. W. C., Mamhead
Rectory, Exeter [Marlborough
Ponting, C. E., F.S.A., Lockeridge,
Poore, Major R., Old Lodge, Newton
Toney, Salisbury [sett
Price, W., Broad Town, Wootton Bas-
Prower, John Elton, 110, Elm Park
Gardens, S.W.
Powell, JohnU.jBoreham, Warminster
Poynder, Sir J. Dickson, Bart., M.P.,
Hartham Park, Corsham
Radcliffe, C. H., Salisbury
Radcliffe, F. R. Y., 1, Mitre Court
Buildings, Temple, London, E.G.
Radnor, Right Hon. Earl, Longford
Castle, Salisbury
Radnor, Right Hon. Countess of,
Longford Castle, Salisbury
Randell, J. A., Devizes
Ravenhill, W. W., 10, King's Bench
Walk, Temple, London, E.G.
Redman, T. E., Castle Fields, Calne
Rich,SirC.H.S.,Bart.,F.S.A.,Devizes
Castle [ough
Richardson, H., Littlefield, Marlbor-
Richmond, George, R.A., 20, York
Street, Portman Square, London
Rodway, E. B., Adcroft House, Trow-
bridge [Salisbury
Roe, J. Reed, Wilts County Mirror,
Rose, G. W., 14, Church Street,
Trowbridge
Ross, Rev. A. G. Gordon, 11, Park
Lane, New Swindon
Rudge, Col., The Highlands, Calne
Rumboll, Charles A., 15, Orange
Grove, Bath
Rumsey, D. G. Wilson, Devizes
Rutter, J. F., Mere, Bath
Salisbury, The Very Rev. the Dean,
The Deanery, Salisbury
Saunders, T. Bush, The Priory,
Bradford-on-Avon
Schomberg, Arthur, Seend,Melksham
Schomberg, E. C., Seend, Melksham
Seymour, Rev.C. F., Stratford House,
West Hill, Putney
Short, Rev. W. F., The Rectory,
Donhead St. Mary, Salisbury
Vlll
LIST OF MEMBERS.
Shopland, James R., Purton, Swiudon
Shum, P., 17, Norfolk Crescent, Bath
Sibbald, J. G. E., Admiralty, White-
hall, London, S.W. [vizes
Simpson, G., Jun., Market Place, De-
Ski-ine, H.D., Claverton Manor, Bath
Sloper, Edwin, Lombard House,
George Yard, Lombard Street,
London, E.G. [High worth
Sloper, George O.» Westrop House,
Slow, Edward, Wilton
Smith, Rev. A. C., Old Park, Devizes
Smith, H. Herbert, Buckhill, Calne
Smith, J. A., Market Place, Devizes
Soames, Rev. C., Mildenhall, Marl-
borough [Chippenham
Spicer, Capt. John E. P., Spye Park,
Squarey, Elias P., The Moot, Downton
Stancomb, J. Perkins, The Prospect,
Trowbridge
Stancomb, W., Blounts' Court, Pot-
terne
Staples, T. H., Belmont, Salisbury
Stevens, Joseph, Hurstbourne, Alex-
andra Road, Reading
Still, Rev. J., Halstock Vicarage,
Yeovil [ham
Stokes, D. J., Rowden Hill, Chippen-
Stokes, Robert, Burroughs Hill,
Laverstock, Salisbury
Stratton, William, Kingston Deverill,
Wai-minster
Strong, Rev. A., St. Paul's Rectory,
Chippenham [Chippenham
Strong, Rev. W., St. Paul's Rectory,
Swinhoe, Dr., Park House, New
Swindon
Tait, E. S., M.D., 48, Highbury Park,
London, N. [penham
Talbot, C. H., Lacock Abbey, Chip-
Tatum , Ed ward J . , Solicitor , Salisbury
Tayler, G. C., M.D., Lovemead
House, Trowbridge [Devizes
Taylor, S. Watson, Erlestoke Park,
Thomas, Mrs., Blunsden Abbey,
High worth
Thomson, Mulville, M.D., Manvers
House, Bradford-on-Avon
Thynne, Rev. A. B., Seend,Melksham
Toppin, Rev. G. Pilgrim, Broad Town
Vicarage, Wootton Bassett [minster
Torrance, Mrs., Norton House, War-
Trepplin, E. C., F.S.A,, Vasterne
Manor House, Woottou Bassett
Trotter, Rev. Canon H., The Rectory,
Trowbridge [Malmesbury
Tucker, Rev.G. Windsor, Ingleburne,
Tucker, Silas, Spencer House, Lark-
hall Rise, Clapham, London, S.W.
Tudor,H.Owen,Wilcot Manor,Pewsey
Usher, Ephraim, Ethandune, Hil-
perton Road, Trowbridge
Wadworth, H. A., Breinton Court,
Hereford [Salisbury
Waitt, Rev. T. Brace, The Palace,
Wakeman, Herbert J., Warminster
Walker, Rev. R. Z., Boyton Rectory,
Bath [Trowbridge
Walker, William, Longfield House,
Walters, Rev. J. V., Cherhill Rectory,
Calne [Bavaria
Ward, Col. M. F., Partenkirchen,
Waldron, James, Marridge Hill,
Ramsbury, Wilts
Warre, Rev. Canon F., Vicarage,
Bemerton, Salisbury
Waylen, G. S. A., Devizes
Waylen, J., 64, Lillie Road, Fulham,
London. S.W.
Waylen, R. P., Devizes
Wayte, Rev. W., 6, Onslow Square,
London, S.W.
Webb, C. W. H., Trowbridge
Welsh, Rev. J. H., St. Boniface
College-, Warminster
Whinfield, E. H., The Hollies, Gipsy
Road, West Nor wood, London, S.E.
Whytehead, Rev. H. R., St. Peter's
Vicarage, Marlborough
Wilkins, Henry, High Street, Calne
Willis, F.M., Steeple Ashton, Trow-
bridge
Wilshin, John, Capital and Counties
Bank, Devizes
Wilson, J., M.A., Lancaster House,
Balham, London, S.W.
Winterscale, Col. J. F. M., Buckleigh,
Westward Ho
Wood, Rev. S. Theodore, Hilperton
Rectory, Trowbridge
Wyld, Rev. C. N., St. Martin's Rec-
tory, Salisbury [Melksham
Wyld, Rev. Edwin G., Vicarage,
Yates, Pardoe, Glencairn, Wilton
Yeo, D. J., The Banks, Lyneham,
Chippenham
Additions to the Museum and Library. 191
Wiltshire Feast, Sermon, preached at St. Mary le Bow. E. Felling, Rector.
1682.
First Fruits of Gentiles, three Sermons preached at Cathedral, by B. Parsons,
of Collingbourne Kingston. 1618.
Cain and Abel — Sermon, preached at St. Thomas's, Sarum, by H. Glover.
January 30th, 1664.
Sermon, preached at Sarum, to a Congregation of Protestant Dissenters, by
Samuel Roberts. 1745.
On Death of Rev. John Still— Sermon preached by F. C. Harbin. 1839.
Presented by Rev. G. P. TOPPIN :—
Sermon in Memoriam Rev. H. A. L. Grindle, Vicar of St. Peter's, Devizes.
By Rev. W. P. S. Bingham. 1885.
Purtou Cottage Hospital, Rules and Annual Reports from its opening in
1877 to its closing in 1892 (complete).
Presented by the Rev. Canon WAERB : — A Collection of Papers relating to the
Parish of Bemerton. In Memoriam George Herbert. 1893.
Purchased : —
Books : —
J. Easton, Antiquities of Old Sarum, &c. 1818.
Authentic Account of Old and New Sarum. Boyter. 1795.
Clapperton's Stonehenge Handbook. 1858.
Memoir of Maria Gundry, of Calne. 1851.
Antiquitates Sarisburienses, &c. 1771.
Historical and Descriptive Account of Old and New Sarum. 1834.
Historia Translationis Veteris ecclesise Beatae Mariae Sarum ad Novam.
Horse Sarisburienses. By the Pupils of the kte Dr. Radcliffe. 1829.
Mountain, Anne, Old and New Sarum, &c. From Wiltshire Ballads. 1862.
Herbert (Hon. A.), Cyclops Christianus, Stonehenge, &c. 1849.
Bowles (Rev. W. L.), Annals of Lacock Abbey, &c. 1835.
Maton (G.), Nat. Hist, of part of Wilts. 1843.
Moody (H.), Notes and Essays relating to Hants and Wilts. 1851.
Morris (W.), Swindon Fifty Years Ago. Reminiscences, Notes, &c.
Hulme (F. E.), Town, College and Neighbourhood of Marlborough. 1881.
Pocock (Mrs. R. R.), Longleat Views. 185—.
Stephen Duck, the Wiltshire Bard, Works of, with some account of his
Life and Writings. 1753.
Edwards (W.S.), Biographical Records of Joseph Rawling, of Bearfield,
Bradford. 1866.
Scudder (H., of Collingbourne Ducis), The Christian's Daily Walk. 1690.
Pamphlets : —
More (Hannah), The Shepherd of Salisbury Plain.
Salisbury Cathedral Restoration, Report on, &c. 1874.
Newton (C.), Notes on Sculpture at Wilton House. 1849.
Bishop Hamilton and Bishop Denison— Letters on Cathedral Reform. 1855.
Quarterly Review, article on Wilts. Review of Hoare, &c. 1858.
Jones (Canon W. H.), Canon or Prebendary.
Ditto Sermons. 1846, 1849.
192 Additions to the Museum and Library.
Articles of Association of Salisbury Diocesan Board of Finance.
Philipps (Sir J. E.), Sermon, Warmiuster. 1864.
Acquired by Exchange : —
Belfast Naturalist Field Club, Report, 1892-3.
Hertfordshire Natural History Society, Transactions^ vol. vii., Parts 5
and 6.
Clifton Antiquarian Club, Proceedings, vol. ii., part 3.
Bristol Naturalists' Society, Proceedings, vol. vii., part 2.
Surrey Archaeological Society, Collections, vol. ii., part 2.
Cardiff Naturalist Society, Report, vol. xxv., part 1.
Society of Antiquaries of London, Proceedings, vol. xiv., No. 3.
British Archaeological Association, Journal, vol. xlix., Part 2.
Bath Natural History and Antiquarian Field Club, Proceedings,
vol. vii., No. 4.
American. Report U.S. National Museum, 1890.
Proceedings U.S. National Museum, vol. xiv., 1891.
Bulletin U.S. National Museum, No. 40.
Instructions for Collecting MollusTcs. W. H. Dall.
Directions for Collecting Insects. G. V. Ridley.
Notes on the Preparation of Rough Skeletons. F. A. Lucas.
Directions for Collecting Birds' Eggs and Nests. C. Bendire.
„ „ Reptiles, 8fc. L. Stejnegar.
„ „ Recent and Fossil Plants. F. H
Knowlton,
„ „ Birds. R. Eidgway.
Prairie Ground Squirrels of the Mississippi Valley. V.
Bailey.
-ZV. American Fauna. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
HURRY & PEARSON, Printers and Publishers, Devi/es.
THE
WILTSHIRE MAGAZINE.
"MULTOEUM MANIBUS GRANDE LEVATUE ONUS." — Ovid.
THE FORTIETH GENERAL MEETING
OF THE
BHtttsfjiw Archaeological anfc Natural JUtstorg Societg,
HELD AT WARMINSTER,
July 26M, 27^, and 28^, 1893,
THE PRESIDENT OP THE SOCIETY,
LT.-GEN. PITT-RIVERS, D.C.L., F.R.S., F.S.A., &c.,
In the Chair.1
Society had not met at Wai-minster since 1877, and it
was accordingly selected as the place of meeting for 1893.
A Local Committee had worked most assiduously beforehand to make
it a success, and collected a sum of nearly £80 in the locality to-
wards defraying the expenses, out of which luncheon on the two
days' Excursions, and light refreshments at the evening Conver-
saziones were provided. Indeed, all the arrangements for the
comfort of those attending the Meeting were made on a lavish and
liberal scale, and at the conclusion a considerable balance made an
extremely welcome addition to the Society's general funds.
The proceedings began on the 26th with the GENERAL
MEETING, which was held at the Town Hall at 4 o'clock, about
fifty persons being present. GENERAL PITT-RIVERS gave an account
of his latest excavation at RUSHMORE— that of the South Lodge
Camp— illustrated, as his papers always are, by numerous diagrams,
and by two models of the camp — one of the ground as it was
before excavation, the other as it appeared when the trench had been
1 The Editor desires to acknowledge the assistance he has received in preparing
this report from the pages of the Swindon Advertiser and the Warminstcr and
Westbury Journal.
VOL- xvvn — N(X LXXXI. P
194; The Fortieth General Meeting.
fully cleared out. A number of photos of the excavations, and the
principal objects found in them, were also exhibited.
After a vote of thanks had been moved by Mr. C. N. P. PHIPPS,
and seconded by Mr. H. E. MEDLICOTT, the President briefly replied,
and referring1 to his museum at Farnham, said that he had given
special attention to the construction of models of excavations —
showing the exact position in which the various articles had been
discovered. This was really the most important thing to note,
because it was the only evidence by which the age of earthworks
could be established. If the objects found in excavating a camp
or a barrow were all mixed together without any record of the exact
relative positions in which they were found, they might be interesting
in themselves, but they probably proved little or nothing as to the
age of the work excavated. For instance, the finding of Roman
coins or pottery in an earthwork might prove either nothing at all,
or everything, as to its date, according as they were found on the
surface of the work or deep down under the bank on the level of
the original soil. All excavators, therefore, should bear in mind
that the really important thing in excavations is to make a careful
and accurate record of the •exact position and depth at which each
object is found, by which alone the age of any work can be de-
termined.
Mr. MEDLICOTT then read the
ANNUAL REPORT.
"THE KEPOBT OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WILTSHIEE ARCHAEOLOGICAL
AND NATUEAL HISTOEY SOCIETY FOE 1892-3.
" The Committee has the pleasure of reporting that the Society continues to
prosper. As time goes on the interest in its proceedings and in its publications
does not appear to wane. On the 1st instant we had on the books twenty-five
life Members, three hundred and fifty annual Members, and twenty exchange
Members, or a total of three hundred and ninety-three, as against three hundred
and ninety-eight on the same date last year. During the year ending 30th June
last twenty-eight new Members were elected, and since that date nine names
have been added to the list. There have been eight losses by death during the
same period, amongst which the Society has specially to deplore the deaths of
the Rev. Canon Goddard, an original Member; of the Rev. W. C. Lukis, also an
original Member, and one of the Society's first Secretaries, of whom an obituary
notice appears in the last number of the Magazine ; and of Mr. West Awdry.
Annual Report. 195
There have been no less than seventeen resignations, for the most part without
cause assigned, and amongst Members of but recent standing.
" A copy of the audited accounts for 1892 is printed with the last number of
the Magazine. The receipts for the year are considerably above the average, as
is also the sale of the Society's Magazines and other publications, while on the
other hand the expenses at the Museum and some other items of account having
slightly decreased, the balance carried forward is larger than for some years past.
The published accounts do not include the special subscription for a memorial to
the Eev. Canon Jackson. The amount promised is not yet sufficient to justify
the Committee in carrying out the scheme for the enlargement of the Society's
Museum. The project has not been lost sight of, and it is hoped it may in time
be realised. The list of donations to the Museum and Library, which will be
found at the end of each number of the Magazine, show that our treasures are
being constantly added to, but this very increase brings the Committee face to
face, whenever it meets, with the impossibilty of displaying to any advantage
the many objects of interest entrusted to the Society. We know as a fact that,
had we space, further collections of interest and importance would soon find their
way into our hands. The Society has to thank Mr. Willis, of Steeple Ashton,
for arranging the ' Wiltshire Trade Tokens,' at the same time adding largely to
the collection and preparing a careful and accurate catalogue of them, which is
published with the last Magazine. The work of cataloguing the contents of the
Library is still in hand.
"Our collection of English coins is a long way from being complete, but
we have recently received a very considerable addition to their number from Mr.
H. N. Goddard, to whom the thanks of the Society are due.
" The Committee appeal to all Members of the Society to assist in making the
Society's Library a real library of reference for all Wiltshire matters by presenting
to it books, pamphlets, newspaper cuttings, sale catalogues, drawings or
engravings— whether of ancient or modern date— on all subjects connected in
any way with Wiltshire or written by Wiltshire men. Things which would
otherwise go into the waste-paper basket will prove valuable material for history
if thus preserved.
" It is hoped that a full and complete catalogue of the Stourhead Collection
may be undertaken before another year passes. The great value and importance
of this collection is little known except among experts. The Committee regard
it as a duty, even at some considerable expense, to have a catalogue worthy of the
collection prepared and printed.
" Numbers 78 and 79 of the Magazine have been issued since our last Meeting,
the former completing the 26th volume. The Committee ventures to offer its
opinion that the interest, value, and importance of the Society's Journal is fully
maintained. Whilst recognising the support of the former contributors of
papers, the Society welcomes new workers.
" Attention is called to the report at the end of No. 79 on the ' Transcription
and Publication of Parish Registers,' which contains valuable suggestions to all
who are anxious to assist in the preservation and transcription of such documents.
It will be remembered that among the notices to Members a resolution of the
Committee has long been recorded desiring that every encouragement should be
given towards obtaining second copies of Wiltshire parish registers.
p 2
196 The Fortieth General Heeling.
"An effort is being made, under the auspices of the Lord Bishop of the Diocese,
to compile a ' Catalogue of Portraits/ in the possession of private owners in the
county. The Committee commends this to its Members as a means of throwing
light on county history. As in the case of the Stourhead Collection, the assistance
and direction of experts with time and money at command, is required to bring
this project to a successful issue.
" Following the precedent of our last report, we may call attention to some
notable works of preservation of ancient buildings during the past year. Chiseldon
Church presents a model of what so-called restoration should consist in. Happily
the mural monuments have been allowed to remain undisturbed on the walls of
the nave and chancel. The old ledger-stones forming the floor have not been
displaced by encaustic tiles, and there has been no scraping at all of the surface
of the old stone-work.
" It was a source of much gratification to the Committee that General Pitt-
Eivers consented to hold the office of President for one year longer. The Society
has gained distinction by having had for its President for four years one so
deservedly regarded as a leading authority on all archaeological matters, and who
has devoted time and money, health and energy to the pursuit of antiquarian
research, especially in connection with the great prehistoric earthworks in which
Wiltshire abounds. The Committee will recommend that General Pitt-Rivers
shall be added to the list of Vice-Presidents, with a view to a more permanent
connection with so valued a Member of the Society.
" Having travelled last year outside the boundary of the far northern portion
of the county, the Committee selected Warminster as the place for its General
Meeting in 1893. Meetings were held in this town in 1856 and 1877. The
welcome extended to the Society on both these occasions by the Marquis of Bath
as President, and by a large committee of the inhabitants of the town and
neighbourhood, encouraged the hope of a like reception in 1893. The officials of
the Society have been so well received that they feel confident that such hope
will be realised."
THE PRESIDENT then moved that Sir H. B. Meux, Bt., be elected
President of the Society for the ensuing three years, which was
seconded by the Rev. E. H. GODDARD, and carried unanimously.
Mr. H. J. WAKEMAN proposed that General Pitt-Rivers be ap-
pointed a Vice-President of the Society for life, and that the Officers
of the Society be re-appointed.
The Meeting then concluded, and the Members inspected the
various exhibits arranged in an adjoining room — the most notable
being two fine series of really valuable coins exhibited by Mr. T. H.
Baker, of Mere Down, and Mr. J. E. Halliday, of Warminster ;
together with a case containing twenty-eight of the famous Breme-
ridge Nobles (cf. vol. xxi., p. 121), lent by Mr. Phipps. Mr. Baker
also showed a large volume in which he has most carefully transcribed
The Dinner. 197
the whole of the very early churchwardens' accounts of Mere. It is
much to be hoped that some considerable portion of these accounts
may be printed by the Society at no distant date. Amongst other
interesting exhibits was a box of clippings from silver coins of
Elizabeth's reign, found in an old house near Frome, and certain
relics found quite recently with a skeleton at Southgrove Farm,
Collingbourne. These had been submitted to Mr. Read, of the
British Museum, who pronounced them to be of Roman or Romano -
British date. They consisted of the bone handle of a dagger or
knife, part of a pair of tweezers, and several ornamented pieces of
bone, together with iron objects, which Mr. Read thought might
have been portions of the cross-bow, of which the bone catch, or
trigger, was in fairly good preservation. There are two or three of
these cross-bow catches in the British Museum, but they are in-
teresting and not commonly found. This cross-bow was evidently
buried with its owner.
At 5 o'clock the Rev. SIR JAMES and LADY PHILIPPS received
the party at tea at the Vicarage, and afterwards conducted them
over the Parish Church, lately re-built on an enlarged scale by Sir
A. Blomfield, containing good new glass, and altogether forming a
fine modern Church — the one interesting example of old work being
a very small and plain eleventh century window in what was the
east wall of the Norman south transept. This was found built up
in the wall during the re-building, and has been carefully preserved .
The Chapel of St. Lawrence was also inspected, but contains
nothing of interest except its picturesque tower.
The DINNER, at which fifty-one sat down, was held in the
Town Hall, at 7 o'clock. After the usual toasts, the Rev. SIR J. E.
PHILIPPS proposed " Success to the Society " and GEN. PITT-RIVERS,
in replying, said that he thought the Society was doing really good
work and keeping up the interest in archaiological matters in the
county well. Of course the county was not a scientific division,
and perhaps the action of the Society last year when it united with
the Gloucestershire Society mio-ht point to the direction in which
local societies like our own might possibly develope in the future.
From many points of view a strong South- Western Society, formed
198 The Fortieth General Meeting.
by the union of the present Wiltshire, Gloucestershire, Dorsetshire,
and Somersetshire Societies, would be likely to be of more permanent
and scientific value than the present local societies. At the same
time he recognised that there would in such a union be a loss of
esprit de corps, as well as a weakening of the social side of the local
societies' operations, and in any case the time was not ripe for such
an amalgamation, and if it ever came it must come naturally, and
could not be forced.
THE PRESIDENT then proposed the health of Mr. W. F. Morgan
and the Rev. J. F. Welch, the Local Secretaries, to whom the
Society was so much indebted for the success of the Meeting. Those
gentlemen having responded, the health of the General Honorary
Secretaries was proposed aud responded to.
The company then adjourned to the Conversazione in the upper
room, which had been nicely decorated with foliage plants for the
occasion — tea and coffee being provided by the kindness of the
Local Committee.
Mr. C. H. TALBOT read his paper, entitled " A Plea for the
Further Investigation of the Architectural History of Longleat," to
a large audience. This was followed by a paper, written by the
late Rev. DB. DIXON and read by Mr. S. B. DIXON, on " Notes on
a Sun- Dial from the Monastery of Ivy Church" — the dial itself
being exhibited in illustration of the paper; and, lastly, came a
paper on the " History of Hill Deverill," by Mr. J. U. POWELL.
This last, it is hoped, may in the future be printed in a more extended
form. The other papers will be found in the present number of the
Magazine.
The intervals between the papers were enlivened with vocal and
instrumental music by the Rev. R. POWLEY, the Rev. J. F. WELSB,
and Mr. Jackson.
THURSDAY, JULY 27ra.
The previous evening had been rainy, and the morning opened
with a shower or two, but as the day wore on and the party started
in breaks at 9.15 from the Town Hall, the weather cleared and
nothing could have been more delightful than the drive through
Thursday, July Nth. - 199
the woods and park of LONGLEAT. The sun shone brightly and
made the lights and shades on the wonderful woodland scenery
such as they only can be after rain, while at the same time it was
not too hot to enjoy the walk to Heaven's Gate and across the park
thoroughly.1
The inspection of the house by so large a party occupied a con-
siderable time, as only thirty persons were allowed to be shown
round at once; and in consequence the many objects of interest —
the decorations of the rooms themselves — the many portraits and
other pictures — the china and the fine specimens of furniture could
only be seen a good deal more hurriedly than many would have
wished to see them. The visit to the roof was especially interesting
as showing what Mr. Talbot in his paper had dwelt upon, viz., the
gables of the older building on the inside replaced on the outside by
the horizontal parapet.
The next move was to WOODHOUSE FARM, a walk of some
half a mile from the point where the breaks stopped, where a ruined
circular chamber with very thick walls, which seem of comparatively
modern date, appear to constitute the sole remains of Woodhouse
1 By the kindness of Mr. H. P. Jones the following interesting particulars,
taken from accurate measurements made in 1877, of some of the largest trees in
Longleat, are available : —
The six Silver Firs in the " High Wood " vary from 100 to 135 feet in height,
and contain from 300 to 500 feet of timber; whilst others in ' The Grove " are
estimated to be 140 feet high and to contain from 280 to 550 feet of timber.
Of Oak trees, five in the " Pheasantry Piece " are 95 feet in height and contain
respectively 320, 400, 484, 651, and 700 feet of timber ; whilst nine others in
"The Grove" vary from 60 to 100 feet in height, and from 500 to 1100 cubic
feet in contents.
There is a Spanish Che,snut in " The Grove " 100 feet high and containing
400 feet of timber ; whilst the largest Elms vary from 105 to 115 feet in height,
and from 600 to 650 feet in contents.
There are five Lime trees 110 to 125 feet high, and containing from 500 to
540 feet of timber.
The largest Abele Poplar in " The Grove " measured 60 feet from the ground
to the first branch, 110 feet to the top, and contained 467 feet of timber with
the bark.
Of exotic trees a Taxodium sempervirens planted in 1852 had attained a
height of 83 feet in 1877 ; a Salisburia adiantifolla was 65 feet high ; a
Wellingtonia planted in 1861 was 68 feet high, and an Abies Douylassii
planted in 1866 was 74 feet.
200 The 'Fortieth General Meeting.
Castle — the scene of some sharp fighting during the Civil War.
The Rev. J. F. WELSH here gave an interesting account of what is
known of the historical events connected with the spot. After this
the party proceeded through Horningsham to SHEARWATER,
where an excellent lunch, provided by the liberality of the Local
Committee, awaited them. After the thanks of the Society to
Lord and Lady Bath had been expressed by Mr. C. A. BLEECK, a
few minutes were allowed for the enjoyment of the scenery of the
beautiful sheet of water before the carriages were ready to take the
party on to LONGBRIDGE DEVERILL, where the Church — described
by Mr. PONTING — and the seventeenth century almshouses which
group so well with it as seen from the road, were visited. In the
latter the original oak staircases to the upper rooms., and the
panelling, though plain, are of some interest.
A short drive further brought the Members to HILL DEVERILL,
where the exceedingly unpromising-looking Church was visited
for the sake of the fine Ludlow altar-tomb and the curious
wooden tablets of the Cokers. Close by is the interesting old
manor-house of the Ludlows, now a farm — the front of the house
being good work of about 1700, whilst the back is of olderElizabetban
work, and the immense barn against which it is built is of the
fifteenth century — the earliest work of all being a low range of
buildings circa 1420, now forming the stables, on the opposite side
of the yard, which still retains a fine doorway with interesting
details, and its original roof. This probably formed the entrance to
the original house. The fullest liberty to inspect these interesting
buildings was kindly allowed the party by the owner, Mr. Stratton.
A further drive and a stiffish climb on foot brought the party to
the ramparts of BATTLESBURY CAMP, where a grand view, and
— what perhaps for the moment was even more appreciated by
the majority — an excellent cup of tea, provided by the forethought
of the Local Committee, awaited them.
Probably few who had not visited this camp before were prepared
to find it, as it certainly was, one of the greatest treats of this
year's Meeting, the double line of earthworks it presents round its
entire circumference of a mile having a most striking effect, and
Thursday, July Nth. 201
giving1 one the impression that it must have been in its day a position of
very great strength. The Rev. J. F. WELSH, in a few words, stated
the opinion of some authorities, founded apparently on the find of
some Roman coins in the north-west angle in 1773, that the camp
was of Roman origin — but GENERAL PiTT-RiVEps, whilst declaring
that nothing but the spade used scientifically could settle the date
of this or any other camp, said that it was almost certainly not
Roman. The Romans might have occupied it doubtless, but it was
almost certainly formed by a people who depended much upon
missile weapons for defence, which the Romans themselves did not.
Moreover, it was not the habit of the Roman commanders to form
hill-forts, such as this, nor did they throw up great earthworks of
this kind — they did not respect their enemies sufficiently to take
the trouble to do so. On the contrary, Roman camps were generally
found on comparatively low ground, and the earthworks surrounding
them were by no means of such magnitude as those of the British
camps. Whilst walking round the ramparts the General pointed
out how the inner rampart, originally probably 5 or 6 feet higher
than at present, would have commanded the steep escarpment of the
down to a much greater extent than it does now, and also how—-
where the ground is comparatively level at the two ends of the camp
— a third line of rampart is constructed to form an additional defence.
He also pointed out that the entrances to the camp were probably
not direct openings in the embankments, but narrow ways running
for some distance parallel with the banks, and then turning at
right-angles through them, being overlapped by the outer rampart.
GENERAL PITT-RIVERS considered that, so far as appearances went,
it was probable that the barrow, which stands in the lines of the
fortification, was constructed later than the camp — but here again
he said nothing could be proved except by the scientific excavation
of the barrow itself and the rampart adjoining it. The mere opening
of the barrow in such a case was useless for purposes of evidence.
The great object was to find the original undisturbed surface under
the earthwork, and then if you could find coins, fragments of pottery,
or other objects capable of being dated, on that original surface,
you would know that they were there before the earthwork was
202 The Fortieth General Meeting.
thrown up, and so would have ascertained the earliest possible date
of the work itself.
At the Conversazione in the evening a paper on the Corporation-
Plate and Insignia of Wiltshire was read by the Rev. E. H,
GODDARD : the paper being illustrated by full- sized drawings of all
the Wiltshire maces. This was followed by an account by Mr. B.
H. CUNNINGTON of an important find of urns and of the kilns in
which they were baked, in the neighbourhood of Pewsey, in 1H93.
Both these papers will be found at a future page of the Magazine.
FRIDAY, JULY 28
On Friday morning a start was made from the Town Hall, in
breaks, at 9.15. The first stoppage was at BUTTON VENEY. Here
the really grand new Church, by Mr. Pearson, was first visited, and
then, by the kindness of the Rector, the Rev. A. W. BOOKER, the
party proceeded to the Rectory, where the fine fourteenth century
roof of the hall of what was formerly the manor-house — now cut
up into attics — was inspected, as well as much good furniture in
different parts of the house. The remains of the old Church, of
which only the chancel is preserved intact — the nave being roofless
and in ruins, were next visited ; and here Mr. TALBOT read a few-
notes on the architecture, pointing out the Norman doorway on
the north of the nave, and the interesting Early English mouldings
of the caps of the crossing piers.
Entering the breaks again the party drove past the little Chapel
of Tytherington, which had nothing to detain them, to UPTON"
LOVELL, where the Rector, the Rev. H. F. CROCKETT, gave an
account of the Church — which has just been admirably restored by
Mr. C. E. Ponting — and also some interesting details of the
history of the parish.1 This Church, although without any very
1 Among other things the Vicar told the following interesting story, as related
to him in 1874 by the oldest man in the parish : — The castie being besieged (date
of the occurrence not precisely specified), before it was taken Lord and Lady
Lovel escaped, she with her infant son to the woods round Boytou, from which
she eventually made her way to the North of England — he to the river Wylye,
where he took refuge under a bridge by which the road from Upton Lovell to
Boyton crosses the river. The castle having been taken the soldiers hunted
.Friday, July 2M, 203
remarkable architectural features, is now a charming example of a
little village Church.
BOYTON CHURCH, the next item on the programme, has, on
the other hand, a number of architectural features of very great
interest, but the general effect of the building inside has been very
much injured by the injudicious "restoration" perpetrated some
years ago — when even the fine effigy of Sir Alexander Gifford had
its face entirely " restored " and the whole surface of its armour
carefully scraped away and destroyed, rendering the figure as it now
exists quite misleading as to details of costume — a flagrant example
of the irreparable mischief often done in the process of smartening-
up Churches and everything in them during the progress of work
of restoration. Here Mr. PONTING called attention to the many
points of interest in the building, and then the party proceeded to
the adjoining MANOR-HOUSE, over which they were most kindly
allowed to ramble by Mr. J. H. MARTIN, who also provided
light refreshments for those who felt the need of them. Many
would have been glad to linger longer over this fine old house, which
remains almost unaltered in its exterior from Elizabethan times, and
its picturesque garden — but the Secretary's trumpet warned them
that time was pressing, and the breaks started for STOCKTON*
Here the first thing to be done was to sit down, to a sumptuous
lunch in a tent in the park — provided, as on the previous day, by
the generosity of the Local Committee — the only drawback being
the presence of a large contingent of wasps, who attended without
invitation. After votes of thanks to the Local Committee, and
more especially to Messrs. Morgan, Welsh, and Bleeck, had been*
most cordially passed, the party proceeded to the lawn, where Bishop
HUYSHE YEATMAN, of Southwark, brother of the owner of Stockton>
Col, Yeatman Biggs, gave a most interesting account of the house>
everywhere for Lord Lovel without success, until one of them suggested that hi*
favourite dog, who exhibited great distress at the loss of his master, should be-
let loose and followed. The dog led them to the bridge, on which he stood
whining and refused to go any further. The soldiers promptly looked underneath,
discovered the unhappy fugitive, dragged him out, and put him to death, in,
remembrance whereof the bridge goes by the name of " Sufferer's Bridge " to-
this day.
The Fortieth General Meeting.
of its successive owners, and of the chief incidents in its history
(cf. vol. xii , pp. 105 and 185). The house itself was then thrown
open from top to bottom by Mr. and Mrs. Ashley Dodd, who in the
kindest possible way took the party into every room and pointed
out the objects of interest with which the house is literally filled.
Upstairs and downstairs alike there is a wealth of fine old furniture
such as is rarely seen — much of it collected by Colonel Yeatman
Biggs, who also restored the house in the most admirable way,
In the bedrooms are splendid oak beds ; one of them from Fother-
inghay Castle, said to have been slept in by Mary Queen of Scots,
stands now in the room once occupied by Queen Elizabeth. China
and pottery, a valuable collection of birds formed by Mr. Ashley
Dodd in Egypt, curiosities and objects of art of all kinds — not the
least notable among them being a wonderful toilet set in rock crystal,
set in mounts with elaborate translucent enamel and gold enrich-
ments— made the time seem all too short which could be allowed
for their inspection.
But, after all, the great charm of the house lies in the rooms
themselves, with their oak panelling, carved stone mantelpieces,
and fine Elizabethan plaster ceilings, -which have been preserved
throughout in a wonderfully perfect condition. The drawing-room
especially remains absolutely intact as it was when it was first
decorated in Elizabeth's reign. The beautiful panelling surmounted
by its richly-carved frieze has never even been painted over. The
elaborate ceiling, except that it has been raised most skilfully where
it had sunk, has not been touched, and the gem of the whole, the
inner porch or entrance in the corner of the room, retains its original
carving — some of it of extraordinary richness and depth of under-
cutting ; altogether a room which it would be hard to find the equal
of. Here, too, seen by some of the party, is a barn filled with the
panelling and finely carved stalls of seventeenth century woodwork
ruthlessly torn from the walls of Winchester College Chapel by
Mr. Butterfield some twenty years ago, leaving the Chapel in the
bare and unsightly condition in which it at present exists, to the
grief of all old Wykehamists. The gardens are worthy of the
house ; and taken as a whole Stockton House will probably live in
S-I
\) ^r^^-J7^ & ^ ^
:ENTRAL PANEL OF CHIMNEY PIECE IN BEDROOM AT STOCKTON HOU:
From Skttch by S. J. Elyard.
Friday, July 28^. 205
the memory of Members of the Society as perhaps the most charming
of the many charming country residences which they have been
privileged to visit within the borders of the County of Wilts.
The Church, which is well restored and cared for, is as full of
interest in its way as the house. The very singular wall dividing
nave and chancel, the Norman arcades, the fine tombs and monu-
ments of the Topps and others, the good modern glass, are all worthy
of more attention than the time at disposal allowed of. The Rector,
CANON CODD, here pointed out the chief objects of interest, and
Mr. PONTING followed with an account of the architecture.
CODFOED S. MARY Church was the next place to be visited,
the chief points being the very interesting Norman and Early
English chancel arch and the remnants of Norman carving found
during the restoration and preserved in the porch. Mr. PONTING,
as before, acted as architectural guide.
At this point some of the party left in order to catch the 5.17
train at Codford Station, whilst the remainder proceeded on their
way to CODFORD ST. PETER Church. Here the Rector, the
Rev. D. MACLEANE, gave an account of the Church, and also read
Mr. Ponting's notes on the architecture — the latter having been
obliged to leave by train. The principal points of interest here
were the font and the curious Saxon sculptured stone illustrated in
vol. xx., p. 138. Thence the carriages drove to HEYTESBURY
HOUSE, where LORD and LADY HEYTESBURY kindly received the
party, tea being laid out under the trees on the lawn — LORD
HEYTESBURY himself afterwards taking the Members round the rich
collection of pictures. The house itself, though of very modern
appearance externally, is on the site of a very old one which pre-
ceded it. The tea and the fruit were so much appreciated by the
ladies that it was half-past six before the fine, but much-restored,
Church was reached. The Vicar, the Rev. W. J. S WAYNE, kindly
read a paper on the history of the Church, but this was uncere-
moniously cut short by a series of blasts from the Secretary's
trumpet outside, peremptorily demanded by those who had to catch
trains at Warminster. The congregation accordingly broke up
somewhat hurriedly, and with but scant thanks to Mr. Swayne, and
206 Excavation of the South Lodge Camp, Eushmore Park.
the breaks made the best of their way to Warminster. And so
ended the Annual Meeting for 1898, a Meeting marked by the
great interest taken in the Society's proceedings by the inhabi-
tants of Warminster and the neighbourhood, by the large numbers
attending the meetings and excursions, and by the great activity
and liberality of the Local Committee in providing for the comfort
and entertainment of those attending — the thanks of the Society
being especially due to Messrs. Morgan and Bleeck, and to the
Rev. J. P. Welsh, who, as Local Secretaries, spared neither time
nor trouble to make the Meeting the success it undoubtedly was.
of % jJotttjj Jo^e Camp,
Sn (Entrencljmtttt of rtje Bronje
By LI-GENERAL PITT-RIVEES, D.C.L., F.R.S., F.S.A.1
at the Warminster Meeting of the Society, July 26th, 1893.]
WAS prevented by illness from excavating in the summer
of 1892, but in April, 1893, I returned to the work.
Rushmore, owing to the quantity of undisturbed down and wood-
land, is so full of ancient earthworks that it will probably take
several years before they can be examined with the necessary
thoroughness. Although the area is limited, the remains include
vestiges of all ages, from the Neolithic to the Roman Age, and the
transition from one period to another in a small area, can be better
studied than in a larger one, by means of the silting of ditches and
the denudation of earthworks.
I commenced the digging of the year with what I have now
1 The Society is indebted to Gen. Pitt-Rivers for the generous gift of the plates
illustrating this paper.
SCALE OF FEET.
10 0 10 2O SO
PLAN OF
sou
AVERAGE SECTION OF RAP
OF EVERY FRA<
Plate H.
RAMPART 507 FEE-
TABLE OF F
FOUND IN RAMPART,
RAMPART.
( ABOVE 2FZ...
DITCH-< ABOVE 3 FT. _.
BELOW 3 FT...
INTERIOR
BRITISH POTTERY.
N<> I. •
COARSE
BRITISH.
797
IB
69
144
430
1+40
NP2.0
SOFT
BRITISH.
54
5
8
7
5
74
NO 3. X
DRINKING
VESSEL
TYPE.
8
'6 FT
RELICS
* NOT INCLUDED IN THE TOT A
THE FRAGMENTS OF POTTERY AND RELICS FOU/
CAMP ARE PROJECTED INTO THESE SECTIONS. _
CLASSIFIED INDEPENDENTLY OF DEPTH, AND AS
THE SECTION AFTERWARDS.
SCALE O
By Lt.- General Pitt-Rivers, D.C.L , F.R.S., F.ti.A. 207
termed the South Lodge Camp in the Park. Its position is figured
in Plate Ixxx., Vol. II. of my " Excavations in Cranborne Chase,"
and it is also marked on the map of the Park, Plate I., Vol. I. of
the same work. The five tumuli, therein figured, were examined
in 1S80 and 1884, and proved to be barrows of the Bronze Age-
not that any bronze implements were actually found in them, but
the urn, the pottery, and the interments by cremation, were such
as are recogniced as belonging to that period. In No. 3 barrow,
two central interments and eight secondary ones by cremation were
found, in small basins cut out of the chalk floor, each containing,
besides the burnt bones, fragments of coarse British pottery placed
to mark the spot (quality No. 1, Plate II. of the accompanying
table), and one by inhumation, crouched up, in the side of a
causeway over the little ditch surrounding the barrow, and on the
south side. The finding of a secondary interment by inhumation,
crouched up, was singular, and might, in some places, have been
supposed to argue a very early date, but, as it has subsequently been
proved by excavations in the Romano- British villages of this
neighbourhood, that the crouched-up position, for burial, was used
into Roman times, it is probable that this inhumation interment was
of that date, rather than earlier, and it seems possible, therefore, that
these Bronze Age tumuli were used for secondary interments, even
up to Roman times.1 An urn (quality No. 1 of table, Plate II.)
was found in barrow No. 4 ; and in the silting of the diteh of No. 3
fragments of Roman pottery, including Samian, were found ; none
but British having been found in the barrow itself. These tumuli,
as shown by the map, Vol. II., PL Ixxx. "Excavations," were
only 350ft. distant from the South Lodge Camp, and its proximity
to them led to the conjecture that the camp might also be found
to be of the Bronze Age, but of course no certainty can be argued
from proximity in the case of such earthworks.
The earthwork, Plate I., is of squarish, or rather lozenge-shaped
form, and the sides are irregular and not in straight lines, as a
1 The crouched position was used in the Bronze Age, in this neighbourhood,
as well as in Romano-British times. Two skeletons so placed, with drinking
vessels at their feet, have been found near here without any tumuli over them.
208 Excavation of the South Lodge Camp, Rushmore Park.
Roman camp would probably have them. It was of very low relief,
and the ditch almost entirely filled up by silting ; and although one
corner of it touched the carriage road, it had been but little observed
by passers, owing to its having been thickly covered with nut-wood.
The first measure was to cut down the nut-wood, and grub up
the roots, and it is remarkable that nothing — not even a single
fragment of pottery — was found during this process, showing that
surlace mould must have accumulated to a certain depth, sufficient
to cover over all the relics beneath. The camp was then surveyed, and
the features of the ground recorded in contours of 4 inches vertical
height (not shown on this plan, model exhibited). Six sections, 10ft.
wide, were then dug, across the ditch and rampart, in different parts
of the camp, and it is worthy of observation that in the first three
sections little or nothing was found, which shows what very false
conceptions are liable to be formed by merely digging one or two
sections in a camp. In the fourth section, on the east side, part of
a large British urn was found at the bottom of the silting of the
ditch, which was 6ft. deep here, A., Pis. I. II., and III. The urn
was lying on its side, evidently thrown in as rubbish, and it had
on the inside of the bottom, an ornament of eight raised spokes
like a wheel, z, PI. III., somewhat similar to one that Sir Richard
Hoare found in a barrow near Woodyates.1 Similar ornaments
on the same part of urns have been found in Ireland and elsewhere.
The question has often been discussed, as to whether the urns
found in barrows of this period were mortuary urns made especially
for this purpose, or vessels for ordinary use, employed to contain
the ashes of the dead. The present discovery favours the supposition
that they were in common use, as it is more probable that an object
of this kind should have found its way into the ditch of a camp if
it were in common use, than if it were constructed for ceremonial
purposes only ; and the large quantities of pottery of the same
quality, Column I., Plate II., afterwards found in different parts of
the camp, confirms this opinion, as it could not all have been used
for funeral urns. The urn was of coarse quality, having large grains
1 Hoare's "Ancient Wiltshire," vol. i., p. 243.
Plate III.
BRONZE, BONE AND EARTHENWARE OBJECTS,
FOUND IN THE SOUTH LODGE CAMP, RUSHMORE PARK.
By Lt.-Gen. Pitt-Rivers, D.C.L., F.R.S., F.8.A. 209
of flint in its composition, similar to that of the first column of the
accompanying table, and similar in all respects to that of the urn
found in barrow No. 4>, and the fragments found with the cremated
interments in barrow No. 3. This was therefore, the first find
which showed the camp to be of the Bronze Age, for it was evident
that the ditch must have been dug before the urn was thrown into it.
The other two sections produced nothing of value, beyond frag-
ments of pottery, which will be considered further on ; and, as the
evidence obtained from the sections appeared to be insufficient, I
determined to dig the camp all over, down to the undisturbed chalk,
ditch, rampart, and interior space. This was accordingly done,
and, in speaking of the finds in the ditch and rampart, I shall
therefore in future refer to the whole ditch and rampart all round
the camp, and collect the objects discovered together in one average
general section. Plate II.
The ditch was of an average width of 9' 5ft. at top, and the depth
about 6* 6ft., and it was o£ nearly uniform dimensions all round.
The lower 3ft. of the silting consisted entirely of chalk rubble,
above which the mould began, and got thicker towards the top. It
is probable the ditch may have been kept open for some time after
it was constructed, and the smooth flat bottom, about 1ft. wide all
round, sufficient to enable a person to walk along it, implies that
this was the case. But the sides of the ditch, "escarp" and
" counterscarp'3 were unusually abrupt, being at an angle of 60°,
whereas in most camps I have found them at 45° with the horizon.
No doubt, owing to this, it would fill up rapidly when left to itself,
and the lower 3ft. of the silting would consequently consist entirely
of chalk rubble ; after which mould would begin to be found, and
would thicken gradually, with time, up to the surface. The ditch
may, therefore be conveniently divided for the position of the objects
found in it, into two halves, above, and below, the 3ft. line. See
Section, PI. II, Some persons have supposed that, on account of
the quantities of made earth, often found above the chalk bottom,
these ditches must have been filled up intentionally; but when —
as in this case— the chalk rubble is found entirely at the bottom
and the mould only at the top, it must be due to atmospheric causes,,
VOL. XXVII. — NO. LXXXI. Q
210 Excavation of the South Lodge Camp, Rushmore Park.
frost and rain, which would be amply sufficient to account for the
silting up, considering the great length of time the ditches have
been exposed to these influences.
The objects discovered in the ditch, exclusive of pottery, were as
follows : — at the south-west angle, a bronze chisel at the bottom of
the ditch, D., Pis. I., II., and III. This has a flat edge at one
end, and must be regarded as a chisel, though narrower than most
objects of the kind. Nothing exactly like it is figured in the works
of Sir William Wilde or Sir John Evans, but some bronze chisels
equally narrow, from the Swiss Lakes, are figured by Keller. Two
implements of the form known as razors, one at the bottom of the
ditch at the north-east angle, E., Pis. I., II., and III. This and
the chisel must have been deposited at the same time as the urn,
when the ditch was open, soon after its construction. The other
razor, F,, Pis. I., II., and III., which was a better formed one, with
a notch at the top end, and a tang at the bottom, was found 3ft.
deep on the east side, just below the mould and above the chalk
rubble. The ditch must therefore have been filled, or silted up,
3ft. before this object was dropped into it, Section, PI. II.
Bronze razors of this description are well-known objects of the
Bronze Age, and are so called because some of them are found with
an edge as sharp as a pen-knife. Sir John Evans records the finding
of one in the Thames at Wallingford with a socketted knife, but
he does not state how this connection was established in a river-bed.
One formerly in the Stourhead Collection, but now in the Museum
at Devizes, also resembles this one, but does not appear to have the
notch at the tip. One was found with a hoard of bronze implements
in the Heathery Burn Cave, They have been found in Ireland,
and Sir W. Wilde figures one and describes two others. They have
also been found in Scotland and Wales, but Canon Greenwell does
not mention them in "British Barrows." Somewhat, though not
precisely similar razors of bronze, evidently connected with these
in point of form, have been found abroad, and Ca3sar mentions that
the Britons shaved.
Near the razor, and at the same level, viz., 3ft. beneath the
surface of the silting of the ditch, was found the greater part of a
By Lt.-Gen. Pitt-Rivers, L.C.L., F.R.S., F.S.A. 211
bronze bracelet, G., Pis. I., II., and III., with fluted ornamentation
on the outside. Though not an ordinary type, the fluted ornamen-
tation is distinctly characteristic of the Bronze Age. Sir John
Evans, in his work on the Bronze Age, figures one from Cornwall ;
Chantre gives an illustration of one in the Museum at Lyons ; two
are figured by Madsen ; and one was found in a tomb by the Baron
de Bonstetten.
At the same level, viz., 3ft., and on the same side of the camp,
a bunch of bronze wire, H., Pis. I., II., and III., and a bone
awl, B., Pis, I., II., and III., were discovered, the latter having
two perforations in it, as if to attach it to a rod of some thick-
ness.1 Two bone awls were also found in the rampart on the
other side of the camp, L. and K,, Pis. I., II., and III. Bronze
awls are of common occurrence in tumuli of the Bronze Age, and
for soft substances an awl of bone would suffice. Bone awls are
frequently found with bronze implements in the Swiss Lakes, and
are figured by Keller.
The last implement to be mentioned is a bronze spear-head with
two loops, found in the silting of the ditch at a depth of only 0'9ft.
on the south side, C., Pis. I., II., and III. It is of a well-known
Bronze Age type. One from Wilsford, Wilts, is figured by Dr.
Thurnam in his " Ancient British Barrows." Evans says that hardly
any examples of looped spear-heads from other countries can be cited,
whilst in Britain — and more especially in Ireland — they are very
abundant. He assigns the socketted spear-head to a late period in
the Bronze Age, and none have been found in barrows in Britain, so
that in all probability they are subsequent to the Barrow Period, and
—-like the socketted celt — of late production. The sides of the socket
in this specimen are extremely thin, and the skill involved in pro-
ducing- sockets so truly bored could only have been acquired after long
practice in casting. Mr. Franks has drawn my attention to a plate
1 Upon further consideration, I think it more probable that this object served
the purpose of a button. It is rather long for such a purpose, but the pointed
end may have been intended to pass it through the button-hole or a loop. The
two holes are similar to those of a bone button found by Mr. Goddard in a
tumulus on Cold Kitchen Hill, and illustrated in this number of the Magazine.
212 Excavation of the South Lodge Camp, Eushmore Park.
in an early volume of the " Archceologia" l in which a looped spear-
head, like this one, is represented as having been found in a hole at
the bottom of an oblong pit, together with relics of the late Celtic
Period, in 1803, but the account of them is so very concise, and the
writer evidently not well acquainted with the nature of the objects,
that I doubt whether much reliance can be placed on his description,
as attributing this class of weapon to any period later than the Bronze
Age. It is, however, worth notice, that this spear-head wae found
in the silting of the ditch at a higher level than any of the other
bronze objects, being only 0'9ft. from the surface, C., Section, PI.
II., and consequently in a position that might be taken to imply
that it was deposited later than the other objects, and after the
ditch had silted up to that level. This may, however, perhaps be
accounted for in another way. It was noticed before excavation that
the rampart had been levelled at this spot, so that an entrance
was expected to be found there.2 This, however, was not the case,
and it was evident that the rampart had been filled in to the ditch
here at some subsequent period to the construction of the camp ; so
that the spear-head may possibly have been buried in the rampart,
and may have been thrown into the ditch at the time of this filling
in, which would account for its being found at such a high level.
On the south-west side, several well-formed flint scrapers were found
together in the rampart, M., PI. I. ; these evidently had never
been used, and, from the sharpness of their edges, must have been
covered up soon after they were made. Flint scrapers are recognised
as having been commonly used in the Bronze Age.
All these objects, then, are relics of the Bronze Age, and from
their position in the ditch afford sufficient evidence of the camp
being of that period ; but the most reliable evidence upon this
point is derived from the position of the fragments of pottery of
different kinds found throughout the camp. A fragment of pottery
when thrown upon the ground is washed down with the earth on
1 " Archaeologia," vol. 16, p. 348.
2 This will be better shown in the contoured plan of the camp, which will
appear in the fourth vol. of iny " Excavations in Cranborne Chase."
By Lt.-Gen. Pitt-Rivers, D.C.L., F.R.S., F.8.A. 213
which it falls, and, unlike a bronze implement, or any object of use
or value, receives no further attention from mankind, so that its
" gisement" is dependant solely on natural causes, such as rain or
frost, and, like any stone in the soil, it lies in the stratified layer
into which it may have been washed, according to the period of its
deposition. As a ditch became gradually silted up in the course of
ages, new kinds of pottery, as they were introduced, would be found
at higher levels; so that, if we know the periods to which the
several kinds of pottery belong, we have no difficulty in assigning
a date, or at any rate a place in sequence, to the successive strata
that have been deposited. The position of every fragment of pottery
and the depth below the surface was, as usual in my diggings,
measured, and noted on the plan kept on the ground. See Table,
PL II.
The pottery found in the ditch and rampart is of six kinds ; their
position is recorded in the upper Section on PL II. — three British
and pre-Roman, and three of the Roman Age. Dividing the
ditch into two halves by a horizontal 3ft. line, more pottery was
found below than above that line, but every fragment below that
line, all round the camp, was British and pre-Roman, whilst of
the one hundred and thirty-two fragments found above that line,
fifty-two — or nearly half — were of the Roman Age. Then, again,
of the total number of eight hundred and fifty-three fragments
found in the rampart, only one— and that perhaps a doubtful
specimen of Romano-British pottery1 — was of the Roman Age ; all
the rest were British. All this pottery in the rampart, must have
1 This fragment was very small — only one inch across. It has been examined
frequently, and must, I think, be classified as Romano- British, but it has a
few small grains of quartz sand in its composition, and it might possibly belong
to the fourth quality of British, of which no other fragment was found in
this camp, though it was found in a pit adjoining. But, assuming it to be
.Romano-British, nothing can be argued from the rinding of one fragment out
of the eight hundred and fifty-three fragments, exclusively British, found in
the rampart. It was at a depth of 2'4 feet only, and might therefore have
got down to that depth through some stake-hole or other disturbance of the
rampart in Roman times. It is possible also that this fragment may have
dropped from the top, although the workmen denied it.
Excavation of the South Lodge Camp, Rushmore Park.
been deposited there at the time the rampart was formed ; so that the
" guemenl " of the pottery corroborates entirely the evidence afforded
by the position of the bronze and other relics, and shows that the
first construction of the camp was in the Bronze Age, and that a
time arrived, after the ditch had silted up to about 3ft., with
material consisting entirely of chalk rubble, when mould began to
be deposited, and then pottery of the Roman Age began to appear,
and increased in quantity until the ditch had been completely filled
up. We have, in this, a complete exposition of the value of the
evidence afforded by pottery when the position of every fragment
is carefully recorded, Of the sixty-nine fragments of pottery of
the Roman Age found throughout the camp, only a small proportion,
amounting to ten fragments, was actually of Roman construction,
and of the kind known to have been fabricated in the New Forest,
including also a few fragments of red Samian. The rest was of a
quality which I have determined in my investigations in Romano-
British villages to be Romano-British, of a kind probably fabricated
in the kilns at Bagber. Its " guement" in this camp, proves the
correctness of my classification, made in the other villages. It is
of a quality that is quite distinct from any of the true British kinds,
and my assistants and myself found no difficulty in recognising each
piece of it as soon as it was found and washed. Whether the sixty-
nine fragments of pottery of the Roman Age, out of the total
number of one thousand five hundred and ninety-one found in all the
camp, is sufficient to denote Roman occupation of the camp, is
questionable. This neighbourhood was so thickly inhabited in Roman
times, as proved by my previous excavations, that a camp formed by
their immediate predecessors must frequently have been visited, even
if it were not occupied, by the Romanised Britons, and thus pottery
may have been broken in the place without their actually occupying
it as a residence, but this does not in any way affect my argument
as to the period of such fragments as were found in the camp, for
pottery could only be found in places to which it had access at the
time it was broken and thrown down. Roman pottery could not
possibly be found in the bottom of the ditch with the British pottery,
unless the silting had been disturbed. The pottery found in surface
By Lt.-Gen. Pitt-Rivers, D.C.L., F.R.8., F.S.A. 215
trenching in the interior, was of all the six kinds found in the ditch,
and rampart, with the addition of a few fragments of thin grey, not
found elsewhere in. the camp, though well-known in the Roman
deposits of this neighbourhood. This quality is, therefore, not
included in the average section of the ditch and rampart.
I may here refer to a recent paper on " Quelques Encientes
Anciennes des Departments de la Somme, &c.," by M. M. Vauville,
which has been kindly sent to me by the Societe des Antiquaires
de France. It relates to the examination of several camps on the
sides of the Somme Valley, viz., those of Tirancourt, I/Etoile,
Liercourt, and others. I am acquainted with these camps, having
examined them superficially twice. The passenger by railway to
Paris may see some of them, if he looks for them, near Abbeville
and Amiens. M. Vauville received a grant from the French
Government for the purpose, and his conclusions are based almost
entirely on the quality of the pottery found in his excavations. I
think we may welcome this communication as a first recognition of
the value of the evidence afforded by fragments of pottery in camp
digging, and as a first commencement of the scientific study of the
French camps, from which, like ours, so much information relating
to prehistoric times is likely to be derived in future. His conclusions
are no doubt correct in the main. He attributes these camps to the
later part of the Neolithic Period, but shows that they were also
occupied in later times. I am bound, however, to say, that I think
the information given in the paper is a little unsatisfactory in point
of detail. Although assisted by a grant from Government, his
means have evidently been insufficient, and, as he himself admits ^
it will require further evidence to substantiate some of the con-
clusions. For instance, he speaks repeatedly of " une poterie
gauloise," " deux poteries gauloises," &c., but one would require
more precise information to satisfy one upon this point, as there were
several varieties of Gaulish pottery, as well as of British. Then again,
it is evident from the diagrams, and is also admitted by M. Vauville,
that, on account no doubt of the expense, the sections were not
carried on to the main ramparts, and without that, the origin of a
camp cannot possibly be determined. He speaks of Neolithic
216 Excavation of the South Lodge Camp, Rushmore Park.
pottery, from which he concludes that they were originally con-
structed in late Neolithic times. I confess that I am myself very
ignorant of Neolithic pottery in connection with camps, and I
cannot help suspecting that some of the pottery supposed to be
Neolithic may turn out to be of the Bronze Age ; but it is, never-
theless, a paper that is full of interest, in connection with the future
study of camps, and it is to be hoped that it will be followed by
similar excavations in our own country. This, and the exploration
of the Pfahlgraben by the German Government are examples not
to be lost sight of by our own archa?ologists ; not that I believe in
anything of this sort done by Government, but it shows that those
countries are able to squeeze out of their Governments some juices
that are free from the bitterness of political strife, whereas it is
impossible to approach our Government in any way, without being
bitten by political bugs and fleas.
We have seen that the evidence derived from the fragments of
pottery, tallies with the evidence of the Bronze Age implements
discovered in the ditch, in proving this camp to have been originally
constructed in the Bronze Age, and to have been followed, either by
Roman occupation, or by a time in which the more numerous
population of the Roman period frequented the place. Can we
form any estimate of the proximity of these two periods to one
another ? I am much averse to generalizing upon insufficient data,
and fully admit that the examination of a single camp, or indeed
several camps, is not enough to warrant any definite opinion upon
so large a subject. One large piece of a Roman mortarium, studded
with large grains of quartz and other hard substances on the inner
side for the trituration of vegetables, of a kind universally recognised
as Roman, was found at a depth of 3ft. on the top of the chalk
rubble beneath the mould, in the ditch. Two pieces of pottery of a
quality recognised at a glance as being Roman hard New Forest ware,
with fluted sides, were found at the same depth. Above, Samian
ware was found, both on the surface and 1ft. in the silting of the
ditch. At the same level, viz., 3ft., we have seen that a bronze
razor, a bronze bracelet, a bunch of bronze wire, and a bone awl,
were found, whilst still higher, if we are to assume that it was in
By LI. -Gen. Pitt-Rirers, D.C.L., F.R.S., F.S.A. 217
its original position, a looped socketted spear-head was found, not
more than a foot from the surface. Nothing of iron was found in
the camp, except a spur and one or two cow's shoes, obviously
modern or mediaeval, quite on the surface. The presence of Bronze
Age pottery in the lower parts of the ditch, with a gradual accumu-
lation of Roman and Romano- British pottery higher up, appears to
be established. May not these bronze implements, on the 3ft. level,
have been dropped into the ditch, together with these fragments of
Roman pottery, at about the same time, viz., when the ditch had
only half silted up, the bronze implements having perhaps become
valueless on account of the recent introduction of iron ?
We know how strenuously the older antiquaries, of whom Mr.
Thomas Wright was the representative, resisted the growing
evidence of a Bronze Age, and persisted in asserting that the bronze
implements were Roman. We know now sufficiently well that their
views were erroneous, but might not the facts on which they based
what we may perhaps term their obstinacy, now be accepted as
evidence, not of contemporaneity, but of the juxta-position of the
two periods of the arts, in certain places, and more particularly in
the remote south-west of England, where the culture coming from
the south and east, penetrated slowly. In the presence of large
forests and few roads, certain poor districts — and this was un-
doubtedly a poor district — must have been very isolated. The
vicinity of the copper and tin mines of the south-west, by facilitating
the fabrication of bronze weapons, may have led to their continuance
longer than elsewhere. In the tumuli close by, which were probably
the burial-places of the chiefs who inhabited this camp, Roman
pottery was found in the silting of their ditches, though not in the
body of the tumuli. In the midst of the Romano- British village
of Rotherley, not far off, described in Vol. II. "Excavations/" PI.
xcii., a Bronze Age interment, associated with a Bronze Age
drinking- vessel, of the same quality, and having the same ornamen-
tation as some of the fragments found in this camp, was discovered
in the centre of the village, in the midst of Roman remains. I
attributed it to an earlier period, but how much earlier? — time and
further researches may probably show. At any rate, we must take
218 Excavation of the South Lodge Camp, Rushmore Park.
the evidence derived from each separate spot as we find it, and put
them together piece by piece.
There can be little doubt that, in many places in England, an
Iron Age — including what has been termed a late Celtic Period —
intervened between the Bronze Age and the arrival of the Romans,
but it does not follow that the use of bronze implements may not
have survived in some places, even up to Roman times. Even stone
implements, such as celts, and flint flakes, and scrapers, may have
been used by the poorer inhabitants. There are many objects
appertaining to late Celtic times in the east of England, that are
ill-represented here. The ornamented Celtic pottery found in
Sussex and the ribbed pottery, of which Mr. Arthur Evans lately
found a quantity at Aylesford, is rarely found here, although the
latter is found occasionally. No . coins of any kind were found in
this camp, but the British gold and silver coins of this neighbourhood
are of an uninscribed, barbarous kind, and appear to have survived
quite into Roman times. I cannot conceive any district in which
the survival of bronze implements, up to a late date, is more likely
to have occurred. More detailed plans, sections, and drawings of
the relics discovered in this camp will be found in the first part
of my fourth volume of Excavations, now in course of preparation.
Near the surface, in the camp, two grain-rubbers, represented in
the accompanying woodcuts, were found at J. and N., Plate I.
They are of a kind frequently found amongst Bronze Age relics,
and of a form that preceded the quern for grinding corn.
Grain-rubbers found in South Lodge Camp, Rushmore Park.
By Lt.-Gen. Pitt-Rivers, D.C.L., F.R.S., F.S.A. 219
The animal remains consisted of ox, deer, and sheep. No entire
bone was discovered, so that it was impossible to compute the
stature at the shoulder, by means of the test animals that I have
prepared for the purpose > but by comparing the heads of some of
the bones, by the eye, it appears that the ox was of small size — not
larger than that of the Roman Age — and a horn core, found near
the bottom of the ditch, shows that it was a " Bos longifrons"
with horns pointing forwards, like our modern shorthorn, and about
the size of our Kerry Cow. Nothing savouring of the large " Bos
Primigenius " was discovered. The sheep was a small animal, with
slender bones, like that of the Roman age found in the neighbouring
villages, and like those from St. Kilda, of which examples may be
seen in Rushmore Park. No trace of pig was found ; or of horse,
so that we may presume the latter was not eaten, and judging by
our modern standard, the Bronze Age folk may have been in this
respect better feeders that the Roman Britons. Deer was more
abundant than in the Roman villages, and bones of a small kind of
dog were found, which shows that they were hunters, whilst the
Roman Britons in the same locality were sedentary, and lived almost
entirely on domesticated animals. Only the bones found in the
rubble, at or near the bottom of the ditch, could be taken as repre-
senting the animals of the period.
The camp slopes down towards the west, which [is remarkable, as
level ground might have been obtained within a short distance : but
this brought them nearer to the bottom of the adjoining Combe, in
which probably a spring may have existed in those times. The
slope may also have helped to drain the interior of the camp. There
were no pits in this camp, such as were common in all the residences
of the Romanized Britons. A hole, P., PI. L, evenly cut, 2ft. in
diameter and 2ft. Gin. deep, was found, but nothing except fine
mixed earth and two pieces of decayed wood were found in it.
Numerous soft places in the chalk — which are the bete noire of the
excavator in a chalk soil — had to be conscientiously cleared out, but
without finding anything that appeared to be artificial, except the
small hole above-mentioned and a pit 10'Sft. long, and 5 -3ft. wide,
Q., PL I., which might have been a grave, but had no bones in it.
220 Excavation of the South Lodge Camp, Rushmore Park.
A very slight rise, in the centre of the camp, O., PI. I., produced as
many as two hundred and one fragments of coarse British pottery,
quality No. 1. It may have been a tumulus, but no bones — either
burnt or unburnt — were discovered in it, and it is difficult to say
whether it was of the period of the camp, or earlier. My impression
is that the place was occupied before the camp was constructed, on
account of the large number of fragments of coarse British pottery
found in the rampart. Most of these must have been on the ground
before the ditch was cut, and must have been thrown up with the
earth : but probably the same pottery continued to be used in the
camp afterwards. An area to the south and west, outside the camp,
R.R., PI. I., was trenched, to see whether pottery could be found
outside the camp also, but only three fragments of coarse British
pottery were discovered, and these on the side nearest the camp.
As to the small lozenge-shaped form of the camp ; in endeavouring
to compare it with others, I am not aware of any other camp having
been dug over so completely as to prove it to be of the Bronze Age,
The only other camp of squarish form that I ever examined, was
that of Highdown, in Sussex, in which I found a bronze socketted
knife, as recorded in " Archaologia" vol. xlii., p. 27-76, but it was
not thoroughly explored, and Saxon remains have since been found
there. There are several small camps near Rushmore, a model of
one of which was exhibited, which will be explored hereafter. We
shall then see whether the square form of camp can be further
associated with the Britons of the Bronze Age in this locality. As
yet, notwithstanding the number of Bronze Age tumuli which have
been opened by Sir Richard Hoare, Dr. Thurnam, and others, no
residence of the bronze people, except this one, has been examined
in this neighbourhood.
I have since had the South Lodge Camp completely restored, by
throwing the silting, excavated from the ditch, into the rampart,
and planting it with mahonia, ivy, and other shrubs to preserve it,
so that it probably very much resembles what it was at the time it
was in use.
Since this paper was read two other ditches in this locality, of the
Bronze Age, have been explored in the same manner and with similar
By Lt.-Gen. Pitt-Rivers, V.C.L., F.R.S., F.8.A. 221
results, the Roman pottery having been found only at the top of
the silting-, and in one of them, bronze implements and pottery below.
So that there are grounds for hope that, by a similar method of
exploration, evidence may ultimately be obtained which will throw
light on the interval, if any, which existed in this neighbourhood
between the Bronze and Roman Ages.
[This paper was illustrated by two models of the camp, one done
before excavation — showing the features of the ground, before it
was entirely destroyed by being excavated — and the other after
excavation, showing the ditch, with pins marking the exact position
of the relics found. These models have been made for my Museum
at Farnham, in which there are one hundred and eight models of
prehistoric monuments and earthworks of different kinds. Photo-
graphs were also exhibited, showing the condition of the excavations
at the time each object was discovered, with diagrams, tables, and
a map of the position.]
THE FOLLOWING IS A DESCRIPTION OF THE VARIOUS
KINDS OF POTTERY REFERRED TO IN THIS PAPER.
BRITISH POTTERY.
No. 1. — COARSE BRITISH. This contains large fragments of flint,
shell, or chalk in its composition, but no sand. Most of the cinerary
urns are made of this quality. It is generally badly baked and
hand-made ; frequently ornamented.
No. 2. — SOFT BRITISH. This much resembles No. 1, but has no
grains in its composition. It is badly baked, and frequently red on
the outside and black on the inside, or in the interior of the substance.
It cannot always be distinguished from No. 1, as parts of the vessels
of No.l quality have fewer grains than others. It is always hand-made.
No. 3. — FINE BRITISH. This is generally thinner than the
preceding qualities ; red, and without large grains of flint or quartz
or sand. It is often ornamented with incised lines, and is the quality
of which the so-called drinking vessels, found with the crouched
interments of the Bronze Age are composed. It is hand-made.
No. 4.— HARD BRITISH. This is generally thicker than the last,
222 Excavation of the SoutJi Lodge Camp, Rushmore Park.
and of a brownish colour, and contains no large grains of quartz,
flint, or chalk, but the clay is mixed with coarse sand of quartz and
other materials, Only one possible fragment of this quality was
found in the South Lodge Camp, and it is not included in the table/
Plate II., but this quality was found in an adjoining pit, and has
frequently been found elsewhere in association with relics of the
Bronze Age. It is sometimes difficult to distinguish from the
Romano-British pottery. It is hand-made.
ROMAN AND ROMANO-BRITISH POTTERY.
ROMANO-BRITISH. — This is generally black or brown in colour,
thin, and generally without much sand, though it has occasionally
grains of quartz sand in its composition, but never large grains of
quartz or flint, or chalk. It is mostly lathe-turned, and often tooled
over on the outside. It is sometimes difficult to distinguish from
the fourth quality of British, but never has the same amount of
sand. This quality appears probably to have been fabricated in the
kilns at Bagber.
THIN GREY. — This is both thick and thin, hard and well baked ;
lathe- turned, and of grey colour. It has no sand in its composition,
and never large grains of any kind.
OTHER ROMAN POTTERY. — This is of several kinds. The hard
New Forest ware is a kind of thin stone ware, generally of dark
brown colour, and has fluted sides. It has no sand or grains in its
composition, and is well baked ; quite a superior quality of pottery
to the Romano- British. Other fragments are softer, cream-coloured,
and sometimes painted red or black. It was fabricated in the New
Forest, where the kilns have been found.
RED SAMIAN. — This is the well-known glazed red pottery, that
was introduced from abroad and not fabricated in England. The
older quality of it is the finer, and of a deeper red colour. Imita-
tions of it were fabricated in England, but they are coarser and
thicker and of a lighter red. Imitation Samian passes into a kind of
red pottery, of which, however, no fragments were found in this camp.
The several qualities vary in different parts of the country, and
the same table will not, therefore suffice for all localities.
1 See note, p. 213.
for % Jwtjw Instigation of
Pistorg of ^o
Bj C. H. TALBOT.
[Read before the Society at Warminster, July 2Gtk, 1893.1]
T must be understood that what I have undertaken to read
|>j to-night is not a paper on the architectural history of
Longleat, but simply a plea for the further investigation of that
subject.
I shall have continually, in the course of it, to mention a name
that is still very fresh in our memories and which has come to be
intimately associated with Longleat, that of the late Canon Jackson,
to whose labours this Society owes so much, from whose writings I
have continually drawn information, and whose personal friendship
I shall always feel it a very great privilege to have enjoyed.
I have long intended to make some necessary corrections of the
architectural notes on Longleat, which I published in the Society's
Magazine, in March , 187 8. 2 The present occasion of the Meeting
of the Society, at Warminster, seems to be a suitable opportunity
for doing so.
It is necessary first to explain how I came to be led into statements
which I afterwards found to be only partly tenable. Before I ever
saw Longleat, I had read Canon Jackson's first paper on the subject,
published in the Society's Magazine in 1857,3 containing views,
1 The paper is printed, as read, with the omission of one passage containing a
suggestion which did not appear to be tenable. On visiting Longleat, next day,
a few Members of the Society examined the building critically, and were, I
think, satisfied that there is earlier and later work of the sixteenth century, which
is the main point for which I contended.
2 Vol. xvii., p. 358.
3 Vol. iii., p. 281.
224- A Plea for the Further Investigation of
however, out of which he had probably already grown, when I first
read it, though I was not aware of the fact, and which he ultimately
altogether abandoned. That paper appears to be biassed by what
Horace Walpole had said, in his Anecdotes of Painting, first pub-
lished in 1761. Walpole collected a great deal of curious and
interesting matter, but I think also a good many erroneous im-
pressions owe their origin to him, from the tendency of later writers
to treat his statements as of undoubted authority. How far he
could go wrong, may be seen from a passage, in which he says : —
" I am persuaded that what we call Gothic architecture was confined
solely to religious buildings, and never entered into the decoration
of private houses," which is, of course, the direct reverse of the truth.
I cannot proceed far, with my subject, without alluding to that
somewhat unfortunate individual, known as John of Padua, whose
misfortune it has been to have been, at one time, praised as a very
great Renaissance architect, and, at another time, represented as
hardly an architect at all, but mainly a musician. I will, however,
clear the ground, at once, by saying that there is no evidence of his
having had anything to do with Longleat. The popular notion,
that he designed the house, which still continues to be repeated,
though it ought to be known to be unfounded, seems to be derived
from Walpole, though Walpole does not exactly say so. Speaking
of the change of style in architecture, in the time of Henry the
Eighth, he says : — " Henry had actually an Italian architect in his
service, to whom I should without scruple assign the introduction
of regular architecture, if it was clear that he arrived here near so
early as Holbein. He was called John of Padua, and his very office
seems to intimate something noble in his practice. He was termed
' Devizor of his majesty's buildings/ " I am inclined to think that
Walpole was mistaken in supposing that this designation was
something very exceptional, but it does, at any rate, show that he
designed buildings.
Then he goes on to say : — " In one of the office books which I
have quoted, there is a payment to him of £36 10s. Qd. In the
same place is the payment of the same sum to Laurence Bradshaw,
surveyor, with a fee of two shillings per diem. To the clerk of the
The Architectural History of Longleat. 225
latter, £9 2s>. (W. ; for riding expenses, £53 6*. Gd. ; and for boat
hire, £13 6s. Sd. John de Padua is mentioned again in Rymer's
Fcedera, on the grant of a fee of 2,?. per diem/-' Walpole then prints
the patent, from Rymer's Foedera, dated 1544. This patent specifies
payment for services in architecture and music, architecture being
put first. It was to endure during the King's pleasure and is
retrospective, payment commencing from Easter, 1542. The patent
was renewed in 1549, for life, and payment was continued till the
reign of Philip and Mary.
The office book, referred to by Walpole, does not appear to be
now forthcoming, but perhaps search may not have been made for
it, in the right place.
Speaking of the reign of Edward the Sixth, Walpole says :—
" Architecture preserved in this reign the footing it had acquired
under the last King. Somerset House is a compound of Grecian
and Gothic. It was built on the site of Chester inn, where the
ancient poet Occleve formerly lived. As the pension to John of
Padua was renewed in the third of this King, one may suppose that
he owed it to the Protector, and was the architect of this J palace.
In the same style, and dating its origin from the same power, as
Somerset House, is Longleat, though not begun till 1567. It was
built by Sir John Thynne, a principal officer to the Protector."
It will thus be seen that it is simply a conjecture, on Walpole's
part, that John o£ Padua was employed on old Somerset House, but
it is a very probable conjecture. What he says about Longleat is
rather vague, but he seems to have considered Longleat to be in the
same style as the old work at Somerset House. I think it quite
possible, however, that he may have made the comparison with
work there that was really not quite so early as the lifetime of the
Protector Somerset.
Canon Jackson, in a very interesting paper, published in the
Society's Magazine, in 1886,2 attempted to identify John of Padua
1 Anecdotes of Painting, edition of 1762, reads " his.'
2 Vol. xxiii., p. 14
VOL. XXVII. — NO. LXXXI.
226 A Plea JOT the Further Investigation of
and suggested, with great probability, that his family name may
have been Padovan, or dei Padovani, and only, when latinised, "de
Padua."" Among the persons, he names, however, the identification
cannot, at present, be made with certainty.
When I first read Canon Jackson's original paper on Longleat, I
was already familiar with early Renaissance work, remaining at
Lacock Abbey, which has since been ascertained to have been
executed in the period 1540 to 1553, which curiously enough nearly
coincides with the period during which John of Padua received a
salary from the Crown, though I do not mean to say that that is
more than a coincidence. I may perhaps, be permitted to repeat
what I said, in 18 78,1 on the subject, and am able to adhere to
entirely. It was this : — " I happen to be familiar, in my own
home, with a type of work which is such as, I believe, we should
have found in old Somerset House, had any part of that building
remained to the present time " — by which, I meant, any part of the
original building. " This is the work executed for Sir William
Sharington, when he converted the buildings of the dissolved
monastery of Lacock into a manor-house. Throughout this work,
an Italian element may be traced, combined with the English
architectural forms in a very remarkable manner. In the case of
two tables of carved stone, the design is so entirely Italian and the
execution so excellent, as to lead decidedly to the conclusion that
an Italian architect or sculptor was employed."
I have brought with me photographs2 of these tables, in order
that you may see that I was not romancing. We now know that
the sculptor was probably an Englishman of the name of Chapman,
who also worked at Longleat, but there is, I think, no evidence of
any of his work remaining there now. The design of these tables
is such as might, very well, be found in Italy, but the material is
Bath stone, with the exception of the slabs, which are of a kind of
grey marble. One of the tables is authenticated, by cyphers and
crests, as having been made for Sir Wrilliam Sharington, and cannot
1 Wilts Arch. Mag., vol. xvii., p. 3&S.
2 Reduced photographs of these tables accompany the text.
STONE TABLES AT LACOCK ABBEY.
The Architectural History o/ Lone/leal. 227
therefore be later than 1553, the year of his death, and they are
obviously both of the same date. These photographs have no direct
connection with Longleat, but are shown as typical examples of
Renaissance work, of the time of Edward the Sixth. The connection
of Sharington with considerable building operations is certain. His
own buildings, at Lacock, of excellent workmanship and showing a
strong Italian influence, were in progress in 1548, just about the
time of the building of Somerset House, and he was also concerned
in building operations, for Lord Seymour of Sudeley, the brother of
the Protector Somerset, about the same time.1
I naturally expected, after reading Canon Jackson's first paper,
to find, at Longleat, work very similar to the work at Lacock.
I am not referring, however, so much, to these tables, as to
other architectural features, particularly the windows. In that ex-
pectation I was disappointed. What I saw, on my first visit,
appeared to be distinctly later, but I did not see more than the
general exterior of the house and the interior of the hall. On the
occasion of the Society's visit, in 1877, however, I went over the
bouse, and I then found, particularly in the walls of the inner courts,
evidences of what I thought then and still think earlier work, some
of it, not improbably, of the time of Edward the Sixth. I was
met then, by Canon Jackson, with the objection, that the house was
known to have been begun in the reign of Elizabeth, 1568.
Shortly after the publication of my notes, I was very kindly
permitted by the Marquis of Bath, to examine the whole house, in
the company of my friends, Canon Jackson and H. P. Jones, Esqi
We were shown over the building by the clerk of the works.
I saw, at once, that I had made some mistakes 3 in what I had
published, after a hurried visit, and that the resemblance of what 1
consider the earlier work at Longleat to Sharington's work, at
Lacock, was not so close as I had supposed, but still there was a
marked approximation, so that my opinion, that there was a good
1 Wilts Arch. Mag., vol. xxvii., p. 162.
2 Particularly in supposing that there were several doors with cornices.
R 2
A Plea for the Further Investigation of
deal of work older than had been supposed, still remaining at
Longleat, was, on the whole, confirmed.
Shortly afterwards, Canon Jackson found documentary evidence
that building had been done, at Longleat, at an earlier date than he
had supposed, and that Sir John Thynne had begun, by converting
the buildings of the priory into a dwelling-house, in the time of
Edward the Sixth. This was generally confirmatory of my opinion,
that the house was not all of one date, and that the oldest portions
were to be found in the walls of the courts. I may mention that
those walls are, to a great extent, concealed behind passages, that
have been added in modern times, but the original walls and windows
could be seen, in places, and bore some apparent traces of fire.
I was rather surprised, however, to find that Canon Jackson ulti-
mately took this ground, that no part of Sir John Thynne's earlier
buildings remained, but that the front and back walls of the present
house, though dissimilar in treatment, were all put up at the same
time. Now it is an unlikely thing that an architect would deliber-
ately design the front and back of a building, in different styles, and an
examination of an old building will generally enable one to determine
the relative dates of different parts of it. What evidence is there,
then, of a complete re-building, in this case, strong enough to over-
ride the apparent testimony of the house itself? It is true that Sir
John Thynrie is said to have built Longleat, with his own stone and
timber and the materials of the former house which was burnt, but
persons are often described as having built, when they simply re-
modelled, or partly re-built, existing buildings.
One would like to know whether the plan of the present house
was determined, at all, by the plan of the priory, which formerly
existed at Longleat, and whether any portion of the monastic
building still remains. If there is any, it must be very incon-
spicuous, but I am, by no means, certain that some small portion
does not remain. I remember noticing, in a cellar, in 1878, an
arched doorway which I thought might be monastic, but I could
not be sure. I may here quote a passage from Canon Jackson's
first paper. He says : — " That the Priory stood upon this identical
spot is proved by the discovery, a few years ago, during some
TJie Architectural History of Longleat. 229
alterations in the interior of this house, of an old wall that had
formed part of it, and that had been worked up into the frame of
the present house."
You will observe that this is not consistent with his later theory,
that the place had been entirely re-built,
He continues : — " At the same time, several coffins of rude work-
manship, containing skeletons, were found under the floor, near the
foot of the grand staircase. These were removed into Horningsham
churchyard/'
Canon Jackson's paper, on John of Padua, also contains further
Dotes on the history of the building of Longleat, in which he has
given us glimpses of matters of great interest, but glimpses only.
He hardly seems to have realired the importance of publishing, as
far as possible, the original documents in full. He says, in one
place, speaking apparently of the year 1559, that " the names of
persons employed in the work are given " in the original documents..
Unfortunately, he has not given them to us. The names of the*
same persons might be found, sooner or later, elsewhere; and any-
how it would be better to have them.1 He does, however, notice
an original contract, with William Spicer, of Nunney, in 1559. It
occurs to me that this may perhaps be the same William Spicer,
who was surveyor of the works, at Upnor Castle, Kent, for Queen
Elizabeth, in 1559 and 1560; was appointed, by the Earl of
Leicester, to succeed Rowland Johnson as surveyor of the works
and fortifications at Berwick, in 1584- ; had a grant of the office of
1 As an illustration of this — in Parker's Domestic Architecture (vol. iii., p.
295), is given the plasterer's contract, between Sir Thomas Kytson, of Hengrave
Hall, Suffolk, and Robert Watson, "ruler of his building in H engrave," and
Thomas Neker of Great Fransham, Norfolk, dated January 20th, 29th of Henry
VIII. (1538).
The Record Office furnishes (Court of Wards Deeds, Bag 94, D.) evidence of
the following bonds or debts, owing to Sir William Sharington, in 1548, viz. : —
Ap. 24. 2 E. vj Robert Watson & Alex Chapman of Norwiche £20.
Ap. 24. 2 E. vi Robert Watson & John Howell £20.
It is probable that this is the same Robert Watson and that there is a reference
to building transactions. Alexander Chapman may have been a relative of the
Lacock and Longleat carver, whose Christian name Canon Jackson has given as
John, but without fully quoting his authority.
230 A Plea for the Further Investigation of
surveyor of the Queen's works, in 1597, with the usual fee of two
shillings a day, and is apparently mentioned, for the last time, in
1599, in connection with the fortifications of Carisbrook. Of course,
they may possibly be different men, but the Christian and surname
being identical, I think it is worth enquiring whether they are not
the same.
The most important fact, published by Canon Jackson, in its
bearing on the prevalent opinions about Longleat, is probably the
documentary evidence of the employment of Robert Smithson, on
the building. It appears that he was recommended to Sir John
Thynne, in 1568, as having "been employed by Mr. Vice Cham-
berlain as principal freemason." Sir Thomas Heneage appears to
have been Vice Chamberlain to Queen Elizabeth, and, if he filled
the office at that date, Copt Hall, which is described as " at that
time the noblest house in Essex," would probably be where Smithson
was employed, before he went to Longleat. The date assigned to
Copt Hall, from 1564 to 1567, would agree, very well, with this
supposition. Unfortunately, Copt Hall, is, I believe, entirely
destroyed, so that we cannot compare it with Longleat, but, at a
later date, 1580, Smithson was employed, by Sir Francis Willoughby,
at Wollaton, in Nottinghamshire, and here we can institute a com-
parison. I have not seen Wollaton, but I have studied some
architectural drawings of that house which appeared in the Builder^
in 1889. The first thing that strikes one, in any view of Wollaton,
is that, whereas the house, in the main, is an elaborate Elizabethan
building, there is a great towering erection in the centre, so dis-
similar to the rest that it can hardly be the design of the same
architect. With that central part I am not, at first, concerned.
The outer building appears to be undoubtedly Robert Smithson's
work, with the exception, perhaps, of a few features that may have
been added later. The resemblance of the design to Longleat is
very striking, particularly in the proportions of the windows, but,
as it is rather later, so is it rather more ornate and, I think, rather
less satisfactory. Ornamental pilasters are introduced, throughout
the work, whereas, at Longleat, they are confined to the projecting
bays. The date of this part of Wollatou is given by an inscription,
The Architectural History of Longleat. 231
on the building, which records that it was begun in 1580 and finished
in 1588.
I will here give an extract from Britton's Architectural Antiquities,
published in 1809. Speaking of Wollaton, John Britton says :—
" since writing the preceding pages, I have obtained the following
copy of an inscription from the church at Wollaton : and as this
brings forward the name of an Architect, hitherto unknown, or
scarcely noticed, and invalidates the claims of John Thorpe, to the
honour of having designed Wollaton- Hall, I presume it will be
deemed a curious document, by the Architectural Antiquary. ' Here
lieth ye body of Mr. Robert Smithson, Gentn Architector and
Survayor unto the most worthy House of Wollaion with diverse others
of great account. He lived in ye Fayth of Christ 79 yeares, and
then departed this life the xvth of October an'o d'ni 1614.' " From
this inscription, it appears that Smithson must have been born about
1535, and would be about 33 when he went to Longleat. Another
writer (in the Building News, 1870) states that the original drawings
of Wollaton are preserved and are signed by Smithson.
I now come to the tower-like building, in the centre, at Wollaton.
It has, I understand, been suggested that this was an old tower
originally. If so, it was converted in the time of Elizabeth or
James the First. Yet it is in no keeping with the Elizabethan
work which surrounds it. It exhibits a reversion, in the windows,
towards a quasi-Gothic type, that is, they have a kind of tracery,
of circles only, and the building has turrets, corbelled out at the
angles, something like those which were common in Scotland.
Combined with this, there are some Elizabethan features, similar to
those in the rest of the house, and the balustrade, at the top, seems to
have been originally the same, though since altered to a Gothic type.
It is well-known that there is, in Sir John Soane's Museum, in
London, a book of plans and drawings by John Thorpe, an architect
of the time of Elizabeth and James the First, to which attention
appears to have been first called by Horace Walpole, in whose time
it was in the possession of the Earl of Warwick. It is obvious that
Thorpe was not the originator of all the designs which he represents.
There is a plan of Copt Hail, but no elevation, and the plan does
£32 A Plea for the Further Investigation of
not help us. There is an elevation of Wollaton, which shows
Smithson's building and also shows the tower, with its quasi- Gothic
windows and original balustrade, and a very remarkable stack of
chimneys, on the top, which has now disappeared, but which is
shown in an old engraving, in Thoroton's Nottinghamshire, 1677.
These chimneys appear to have been of a spiral Gothic type, but the
whole stack to have been surmounted by a kind of pediment. I
really think the explanation of the design of these extraordinary
chimneys must be this : — the Elizabethan architects were fond of
making chimneys like columns, and, in this case, the architect seems
to have gone the length of a complete portico, on a small scale,
running the flues through the pediment, and afterwards apparently
to have Gothicised the shafts. The drawings, which represent these
chimneys, are, however, not very distinct. I noticed, in Thorpe's
drawing of Wollaton, that two pilasters, one above the other, are
shown on the face of the tower, as if they were the suggestion of a
scheme of decoration, never carried out. They are drawn in ink.
This suggested to me the idea that, if Thorpe, as well as Smithson,
executed work at Wollaton, Thorpe was probably the later of the
two, and the design of the central tower may be his. This derives
some support from the fact that to one of the smaller Elizabethan
designs, in his book, is appended an additional upper story, sketched
in in pencil and showing similar quasi-Gothic windows, which do
not occur in the original drawing. This, however, requires further
investigation. All that appears to me clear is that Robert Smithson
is not likely to have designed the central tower at Wollaton.
I must now revert to a point, which I suggested above, whether,
in comparing Longleat with Somerset House, Walpole was not
instituting a comparison with work at Somerset House, which was
not really of the time of the Protector.
A plan of the outer court of old Somerset House, with an elevation
of \hQfacade next the Strand, is found in Thorpe's book of drawings,
and happens to be one of those drawings which are not named. It
was, however, recognised by Walpole, who must have been familiar
with what remained of the building, in his own time. It is noticeable
that, at the time when he made the comparison between Longleat
The Architectural History of Longleat. 233
and Somerset House, be does not seem to have known anything of
John Thorpe or his book of drawings. There is no mention of them
in the first edition of Walpole's work, and the notice was introduced,
as a " Supplement," in some later edition.
I have carefully examined Thorpe's drawing and plan. The
building was of two stories only, above ground, with a sunk story
containing kitchen and cellars. The front, next the Strand, had a
gateway in the centre, ornamented with the three orders super-
imposed, but, inasmuch as the building was of two stories only, the
Corinthian order occurs on two pavilions, carried up above the leads,
on each side of the gate, and on a light construction connecting
them. In a later engraving, however, by John Kip, about 1720,
in Strype's edition of Stow, this upper part is not shown, so that
it would appear to have been, by that time, demolished, or possibly
to have been never carried out.
At some distance from the gatewa}7, on each side, were two square
bay windows, ornamented with the two orders superimposed, and
not carried up to the parapet of the building but finished with a
pediment or low gable. The occurrence of the orders, on these bay
windows and on those at Longleat, appears to be the principal point
of resemblance between the two buildings. The rest of the front,
as also the lower part of the bays, was of rusticated masonry, and
was pierced, at regular intervals, with two-light mullioned and
transomed windows, surmounted by pediments. I was struck, at
once, by the apparent resemblance of the bay windows to those at
Corsham Court, and, I think, the proportions will be found to agree,
pretty closely, in all the windows, but the two-lights, at Corsham,
are not pedimented. The date of the work, at Corsham, appears,
from an inscription on the building, to be 15S2.
Thorpe's drawing does not give the plan of this front part of
Somerset House, for the reason that the elevation is drawn upon
that portion of the paper where the plan would be, according to a
not unfrequent old practice. Kip's engraving, however, shows that
there were no bay windows in that part, next the court, and that
the gateway, on the inside, was more of the traditional English type
with flanking turrets. This view and Thorpe's plan show that, on
234 A Plea for the Further Investigation of
the sides of the court, the bay windows occurred again, the windows
and balustrade being the same as in the front, except that the
windows ran up to the balustrade. The roof was a leaded flat.
On the opposite side of the court was a sort of cloister, common
in Elizabethan houses, with a doorway in the centre leading to the
hall, on the left, and a terrace above the cloister. A passage, in the
corner, next the hall, led to the Great Chamber, the Presence Chamber,
and a gallery which returned and formed another square court.
To revert again to the elevation of the front, the chimneys are
remarkable. They have rather a columnar appearance, but ornament,
on the shafts, of a late Gothic character, with the exception of one
which is left plain, and that looks to me very much as if Thorpe
was not simply drawing existing work, but designing, in the matter.
These chimneys were actually executed, as they appear in a later
view, which shows the front in an altered and dilapidated state.
The conclusion that I come to is this : — that there is no reason
why the whole of this court may not have been Thorpe's own design
and as late as 1560, or later.
If so, the question may be asked : — where was the work executed
for the Protector Somerset? I would venture to suggest, as a
possible explanation, that Somerset's work may have consisted, as
in other cases, not so much in actual re-building as in the conversion
of existing buildings, and that, this failing to satisfy the taste of
those who succeeded him, the outer court was entirely re-faced, not
improbably by Thorpe. Stow does, however, no doubt, say that
the Protector, in 1549, pulled the old buildings down and made level
ground. At any rate, he must have left his own buildings incomplete.
Somerset House became the residence of Anne o£ Denmark, the
Queen of James the First, and Strype says: — " This House was
much repaired and beautified and improved by new buildings and
enlargements by this Queen.1"
This may, perhaps, be the work in question. If we supposed it
to be executed very shortly after the accession of James, it would
not be beyond Thorpe's range. Kip's engraving, to which I have
several times referred, is a bird's-eye view, from the river side, and
shows the two courts clearly and also the additions by Inigo
The Architectural History of Longleat, 235
Jones, who does not appear to have worked there before 1623.
I have thus endeavoured to show that Walpole's opinion, that the
outer court of Somerset House was built in the time of the Protector,
for I think it amounts to that, and that the facades of Longleat are
in the same style, is not to be considered as necessarily conclusive.
To return to Longleat; — taking the architectural evidence and
the documentary evidence together, it appears almost certain that
Robert Smithson must have been the man who built, for Sir John
Thynne, those portions of Longleat of which the design has been
commonly but erroneously associated with the name of John of
Padua, and it also appears that Sir John Thynne not only had a
very long experience in building, but also took a strong and direct
personal interest in the work. What I believe to have happened is
this— that, when Smithson was called in, it was considered advisable
to re-build the front entirely, but it was considered practicable to
repair the back. I presume that, previous to the fire of 1567, the
house must have had gables to the front, as well as towards the
courts. This gabled arrangement has been retained, at the back,
but, as the gables were probably too much damaged by the fire to
stand, they appear to have been re-built. The opportunity must
have been taken of treating the front in a manner that was becoming
more fashionable, with a continuous horizontal parapet, but I under-
stand that the same construction of roof is continued through, from
the gables, at the back, to the front walls, passing under the leads,
like gables, with the upper part removed.
On the gables, at the back, only one solitary carved stone animal
now remains. Those inner parts of the house have, unfortunately,
suffered much from alterations, and appear to have been considered
as not of much account, but it is precisely, in that part, that I think
there are architectural problems to be solved. The front part is
more easily understood.
lii conclusion, I may be criticised, as having said but little about
Longleat, and more about other places, but I have done the best I
could, with the materials to which I have had access, and, after all,
my object has been mainly to stimulate enquiry, on the part of
other persons.
236
on a j&mujt&l from % Ufottasterg of
, twav
By the late Rev. EGBERT DIXON, LL.D.
[Read at the Warminster Meeting of the Society, July 26tk, 1893.] l
N taking down the remains of the Monastery of Ivy Church,
in the parish of Alderbury, near Salisbury, there was found,
built into one of the walls, a cubical stone, which, on examination,
was found to be the remains of a sun-dial. It measured 5| inches
in length, by the same in breadth and 6| inches in height; 1 inch,
however, of the height had been inserted into a pillar, so that we
may speak of it as a perfect cube of 5| inches, with five faces
available for sun shadows. By cutting off triangular pyramids from
the angles eight other faces have been made, and in consequence the
five-sided faces turned into octagons. Two other cubical stone-dials
of about the same size and apparently the same age, as this one, are
known to me. One, found at Wigborough, near Yeovil, is now in
the Taunton Museum. The other was found on the site of the
disused Church of St. Martins le Grand, Dover, and is now in the
Dover Museum. It has been carefully described and sketched in
The Archaeological Journal, vol. xxi.
The one now before us has suffered much damage from time and
wear, and it is surprising that a more durable stone was not used
for a purpose where sharpness in the sides of the excavations was
most essential for the distinct marking of the shadow boundaries.
The Dover dial has also suffered much, but the Taunton dial hardly
at all, having been constructed of the hard freestone from one of
the Inferior Oolite quarries south of the Mendip Hills, which has
lasted so well in Glastonbury Abbey and Wells Cathedral.
1 The drawings of the dial given in the accompanying plate were kindly made
by the Rev, the Hon. B. P. Bouverie, of Pewsey Rectory, where the dial now is.
CO
c
z
e
Notes on a Sun-Dial from Ivy Church, near Salisbury. 237
The hour-lines on the east and west faces are inclined to the
horizon at an angle of about 50f degrees — this was, therefore, the
latitude for which the dial was constructed.1 Living myself in
this latitude I have had a good opportunity in an unusually sunny
spring of noting the movements of the shadows on the various faces.
The upper face has teen used for a horizontal dial. The metallic
sub-stile (2 inches in length) is still visible, and many of the Roman
numerals indicating the hours, as well as the incisions marking the
hour angles, which are fairly accurate for the latitude. The sub-
stile is the remains of a triangular gnomon which stood 2*4 inches
high with the same inclination to the horizon (5 Of degrees) as the
lines in the east and west faces. In the Dover sun-dial the metallic
remains have been regarded (I think erroneously) not as a sub-stile
but as the dowels of a cross. Small dials like this would be placed
on low pedestals, and the utility of a horizontal dial, as the only one
indicating the time from sunrise to sunset, could not be overlooked.
The south face has an excavated heart with eleven lines in it
diverging downwards from above the cusp. This was clearly meant
for a south vertical dial, indieating the time from 6, a.m., to 6, p.m.
But where was the shadow thrown ? Certainly not from the sides,
for the boundaries of these shadows would be curvilinear, nor yet
from the cusp, for even assuming that this was ever sharp and pointed
enough for this purpose, shadow lines would not have been needed,
reaching to the bottom. I believe the explanation is to be found
in the small slit at the top, the orifice of which points in the direction
of the celestial equator. A stilus inserted at right angles in a plug
placed in this slit will be inclined 39J degrees to the face, this being
the complement of the latitude, and is the proper indication for the
gnomon of a south vertical dial. I must acknowledge, however,
that I cannot make the shadows quite tally with the hour-lines,
1 The sun's apparent daily course is a circle, approximately parallel to the
celestial equator. The earth's axis and lines parallel to it are perpendicular to
the equatorial and parallel planes. Shadows, therefore, from obstructions parallel
to the earth's axis and so pointing to the celestial pole, are unaltered in lateral
direction. A simple geometrical construction shows that the angular height of
the polestar is equal to the latitude.
238 Notes on a Sun-Dial from the Monastery of
except, of course at noon, and I am of opinion that the stilus must
have been in some way bout round the cusp. The excavation
answers two purposes, it tends to equalise the hour angles, and its
illumination marks 6, a.m., at its beginning and 6, p.m., at its
ending.
The east face had a short stilus inserted in the central hole. The
resemblance of the double plane to an open book standing on the
plane of the celestial equator and its side edges and central line,
therefore, pointing to the celestial pole, is so generally noticed, that
I think it must be intentional. The top of the stilus marks the
hours from sunrise to noon, its shadow being on the central polar
line at 6, a.m. But it does more than this. Two small metallic
marks may be seen at the central point of the outside polar exca-
vations. The shadow of the stilus moves at the equinoxes along a
line joining these metallic marks, but above it from the autumnal
to the vernal equinox, and below it from the vernal to the autumnal ;
the maximum divergence being reached at the solstices. One other
thing is noticeable : — at 11, a.m., the shadow of the upper plane
begins to be thrown on the lower plane — there is, of course, com-
plete obscuration over this face at noon.
The west face has three excavations. A rectangular one with a
plane base ; a semi-lenticular one (if I may be allowed this expression
to denote the figure obtained by bisecting a thick double-convex
lens) ; and a rectangular one with a curved base. The advantage
of curved bases in equalising the hour-spaces may be seen by com"
paring the first and third of these excavations. In the former (the
first) the shadow limit at 1, p.m., is 3 inches from the lower edge :
at 2, p.m., it has advanced 7 inches ; and it occupies four hours in
passing over the 8 inches which complete the base ; whereas in the
latter (the third) the hour lines appear to proceed by regular intervals
from 1, p.m., to 8, p.m. (?). This, however, cannot be verified,
owing to the damage sustained by the upper or shadow-casting
edge. The semi-lenticular excavation was fitted in the centre with
a small stilus, indicating the afternoon hours, as the stilus on the
east side did the forenoon hours, as well as the period of the year
by the line of its movement. Indications of this latter use are
Tvy Church, near Salisbury \ 239
still visible in the faint curves drawn at intervals parallel to the
equatorial line that passes through the centre hole. At the equinox
the shadow of the stilus passes along this equatorial line. It appears
possible that the damage done to the lower excavation is partly
attributable to some ill-judged attempts to extend the reading of
the shadow. The small metallic mark over the lower excavation I
cannot explain.
Of the eight triangular dials at the angles the four upper ones
are in a sadly damaged condition. Each had a small stilus and
excavation apparently in a shape of a reversed heart (?). The
vertical direction of the shadows of the stili would indicate respec-
tively 3, a.m., 9, a.m., 3, p.m., and 9, p.m. The first and last of
these, however, would be unattainable in this latitude. The two
southern lower dials show excavated triangles, with stili indicating
respectively 9, a.m., and 3, p.m., when their shadows fell vertically.1
By far the best preserved of these triangular dials is the one in the
lower north-west angle. Here a quarter sphere has been hollowed
out, the diameter of the sphere being an edge of the west octagonal
face ; the polar inclination is the cause of the irregularity of the
octagon. A well-defined shadow is here thrown from 4, p.m., to
sunset, travelling inwards. The shape of the corresponding hollow
in the lower north-east angle can be inferred from this ; here the
shadow would travel outwards from sunrise to 8, a.m.
There remains the north face. A dial with this aspect is obviously
of little use in these latitudes, as it would be wholly obscured from
6, a.m., to 6, p.m. In the Dover dial this face is blank. In the
Taunton dial there is an excavated hemi-spherical groove below the
polar face, partly serving the same purpose as our two lower north
triangular dials, but indicating the morning hours from sunrise to
6, a.m., only, and the evening hours from 6, p.m., only to sunset.
1 It must be to a construction of this kind, emphasing, that is, special hours,
that Durandus refers when he says (Nat. Divin. Offic.), writing in the 13th
century, " The horologe by means of which the hours are read, teacheth the
diligence that should be in priests, to observe at the proper time, the canonical
hours, as he saith, ' seven times a day do I praise Thee.' "
240 Notes on a Sun-Dial from the Monastery of
Here we have a large sharply -cut crescent recumbent on the convex
side; if this was used at all for indicating the hours (which I much
doubt) it could only be by showing the junction on the concave side
of the shadows thrown from the top and bottom.
The age of this dial must remain a matter of conjecture, but we
may attempt to bring it within definite limits. The early Saxon
dials are of a very different character, being based on a rude division
of the hours of sunlight. The GraBco-Latin method, originating
with the Egyptians, of dividing day and night into twenty-four
hours, was not introduced into England until after the eleventh
century, and then made its way but slowly. The excavated dial is
a specially Greek construction, and was adopted from them by the
Arabs. Abul Hassan, in the thirteenth century, gave an impetus
to the science of gnomonics by constructing dials on various kinds
of curvilinear surfaces ; and it is, I believe, to Saracenic influences,
which permeated Spain and Southern France during the middle
ages, and still linger in place names, that we must attribute the
introduction of the excavated dial into England.1 We should not,
I think, be far wrong in placing this dial at about the middle of
the fourteenth century. Clocks on foreign buildings had for some
time been introduced from abroad, but the foreign invention was
not eagerly adopted. Monastic conservatism no doubt held out
long against the innovation. It was incredible that the sun should
have evidently culminated and the gnomons be indicating noon
while the abbey clock gave the time as a quarter to, or a quarter
past twelve. The natural inference was that the clock was wrong,
and the clock-maker an impostor.3 Surely the real sun, irregular as
it might be asserted to be, was a better guide for the chapel, the
scriptorium, and the refectory, than a mean sun which was
1 As an argument in favour of this view I may mention that the Dover dial
was constructed for a latitude of 47°.
2 Over and above the difficulty of the equation of time, there was some real
ground in the monastic objections if we can depend on the statement in Haydn's
Dictionary of Dates, s. v. clocks, " that the clock set up at Hampton Court in
1540 was the first in England that told accurate time."
Plate 1
N?2.
ENCAUSTIC TILES FROM HEYTESBURY HOUSE.
Notes on Encaustic Tiles at Reyiesbury Home. 241
confessedly the figment of an astronomer's mind. But in the
contest of clocks against sun-dials the latter were always hampered
by the imperative condition, that the sun should shine ; a condition
never fulfilled in the night-time, and in England too rarely in the
day-time.1 So the clocks ultimately won the victory, and the sun*
dials, whose silent voices had so long preached " time's thievish
progress," fell into disuse and neglect, except when maintained or
renovated to adorn a terrace or a wall, or reconstructed according
to the fancy of some enthusiast in sciography.
Whether or not the excavations in the dial now before us were
meant to be symbolical, or the whole arrangement to convey aa
allegory, I will leave others to determine.
ott feattsttc Ci(e# at Jegteslmrg
By HAEOLD BBAKSPEAB, A.R.I.B.A.
?,HE accompanying plates illustrate the encaustic tiles, now
preserved at Heytesbury House, which were exhibited
in the dining-room during the Society's visit to that place in 1893.
Lord Heytesbury can give nothing further of their history than that
they were taken up from the floor of the boot-hole (of the house) by
order of his grandfather. A further number were also found, but,
being broken, were unfortunately thrown away.
It will be seen that the armorial devices are mostly of the
1 The average daily duration of sunshine in England is only three and a quarter
hours. Arago tells us of an ingenious device in the twelfth century in the
Abbey of Cluny to reckon the canonical times for nocturns and lauds. The time
of the recital of certain psalms was calculated in the day by the sun-dial, and
the repetition of these at night by relays of wakeful monks furnished a measure
of time.
"VOL. XXVII. — NO. LXXXI. S
£42 Notes on Encaustic Tiles at tleytesbury House.
Hungerford family. The late Canon Jackson 1 states, that Walter,
Lord Hungerford, the High Treasurer, seems to have been the first
of his family to use as a badge the garb between two sickles ; on
the seal of one of his earlier deeds is a talbot's head as badge,
similar to the crest on the monument of his father, Sir Thomas, in
the chapel of Farleigh Castle.
According to Sir R. C. Hoare,2 the Dean's register contains a
notice of the foundation of a small chantry in the Church at
Heytesbury, by Walter, Lord Hungerford, who presented a chaplain
to it on May loth, 1421. Later references are made to two chantries
said, to be on the south side of the Church, one belonging to the
Hungerfords at the altar of St. Mary ; the other founded by William
Mounte at the altar of St. Katharine, supposed to have been in the
south transept.
In 1438 an inquisition was held at the instance o£ Walter, Lord
Hungerford, respecting the chantry of St. Mary, when it was found
that the right of patronage was in the said Lord Hungerford.
There was a house, seven acres of arable, three acres of mead and
corn, and pasture for one hundred sheep; the whole yearly value
being 40$. The Bishop,3 in 1442 gave license for uniting to the
said chantry the chantries of St. Edmund in Calne Church,4 and
Upton Scudamore, also the Free Chapel of Gorton, in Hilmarton.6
Across the north arch of the tower is a fine fifteenth century
stone screen bearing devices of the Hungerfords, and within the
north transept are some remains of an altar-tomb to one of that
family of late Gothic work, about the time of Henry VIII. Other
parts of the same monument that were found here, were removed
when the Church was restored, to Farleigh Castle, and are pre-
served in the chapel there.
There is every reason to suppose the tiles were from the flooring
1 Farleigh Guide, p. 21, note.
2 Modern Wilts, Heytesbury Hundred.
3 William Ayscough, Bishop of Salisbury 1438—50.
4 Founded by Sir Robert Hungerford, 1336. See Jackson's Aubrey t page
32, note.
5 Jackson's Aubrey, page 168, note.
Plate II
3.
4.
6.
7. 8. 9
ENCAUSTIC TILES FROM HEYTESBURY HOUSE.
By Harold Brakspear, AM.I.B.A. 243
of some one of these Hungerford Chapels, most probably from the
north transept, and were removed from thence in the last century,
when it was converted into a mortuary vault for the A'Court family
by building up the arch into the tower and aisle. These walls were
happily removed at the late restoration, when the previously-destroyed
aisles of the choir were re-built.
The large tile on Plate II. No. 8, bears the arms of Robert
Wyvill, who was Bishop of Salisbury from 1329 to 1375, and which
are described by Papworth (Dictionary of Arms, page 668) as Gules
a cross argent fretty azure y between four pierced six-pointed mullets or.
It is in character with this earlier date and is more carelessly executed
than the rest.
The lower pattern on Plate I. is the most refined and best executed
of all. It will be seen that the four centre tiles have no connection
in pattern with those of the border, so that any four-tile pattern
may have been introduced for variety.
The centre tiles have the well-known arms of Heytesbury im-
paling Hungerford, the usual coat of this family: in the pattern
above the shield is a piece of ornament noticeable as being Renaiss-
ance in character.
The upper pattern on the same plate is of rough design and
execution, most apparent in the intertwining band being reversed
on one tile ; this, like the last design, may have had any four-tile
pattern in the centre. There is at Lacock AbJ>ey a fragment of an
angle tile which is identical with this pattern.
On Plate II., No. 6 has been, when perfect, a good design ; un-
fortunately one angle tile only now remains, which is so much worn
as to make it impossible to trace the design of the continuation of
the bird in the corner, neither can any tile be found to fit the centre.
The leaf ornamentation on the circular band is early in character for
this time.
No. 5 is one of a sixteen-tile pattern bearing the motto &£0
gtariag round the circle four times repeated. No angle tile remains,
and the next adjoining in pattern is too worn to be reproduced.
The crest on No. 3 has not yet been identified, but was at one
time most probably used by the Hungerfords.
244 Notes on Encaustic Tiles at Heytesbury House.
No. 4 is a very general device of this family ; unlike the other
tiles here the field is of white clay. It should also be noticed that
the sickles are represented with saw-tooth edges; this is interesting,
as being an example of the original form of that implement, which
only gave place to the now generally used reaping hook about sixty
years ago.
No. 7 is a supporter of the Hungerfords, and represents a raven
volant collared and chained.
No. 9. The garl between two sickles, the most general crest of
the Hungerfords, was — as previously stated — introduced by Lord
Walter, the High Treasurer ; so it fixes the date of the tiles as not
earlier than his time.
There are a few other patterns so worn as to be almost untraceable.
The following is a list of the numbers of each pattern now re-
maining : —
No. 1. — Two angle tiles, seven side and one centre.
No. 2.— Sixteen angles, forty-eight side and twenty-one Hunger -
ford arms, as in the centre.
No. 3.— Fifteen.
No. 4. — Fourteen.
No. 5.— Two.
No. 6. — One angle and six sides.
No. 7. — Eleven.
No. 8. — Two (one broken) .
No. 9. — Twenty-five.
*#* The plates, as will be seen, have inadvertently been reproduced from the
full-sized drawings to two different scales, but all the tiles are about the same
size, namely 4|in. square; except that with the Wyvill arms, which is 6in.
square.
245
'oiw on CJjttwjjw in % HJUigpomijoofr of
latmittster.
By C. E. PoNTiNGh, F.S.A.
BOYTON. S. MARY THE VIRGIN.
(HIS Church has been so fully described by Mr. Fane,1 and
its heraldry by Dr. Baron,2 in addition to Sir R. C. HoareV
account in his " Hundred of Heytesbury," that it seems almost
presumptuous for me to say anything further about it, and it is only
on the special request of the Rector and others that I venture to do
so. I am encouraged by the distance of time at which Mr. Fane
wrote, and the works which have since been done in the Church, to
hope that new light may be thrown on some of its features : and I
am much assisted in this by information which has been supplied to
me by the Rector.
The plan of this Church is very peculiar, and although there are .
side projections it can hardly be called cruciform, as the length and
the ridge of the south projection are parallel to the nave. It con-
sists of chancel without side adjuncts, nave with transept on the
north and chapel on the south, tower on the north westwards of the
transept and forming the porch, and a lean-to vestry against the
west wall of the latter.
The oldest part of the building as it now stands is the chancel,
which, although it has been much altered,, is mainly the work of
about the middle of the thirteenth century. Of the original work
we have (1) the south wall with its three-bay sedilia, piscina, two
lancet windows and priests'" door, almost intact (the arch of the
latter has, however, been renewed) ; (2) the east wall with the ex-
ception of the window ; and (3) the three lancet windows on the
1 Wilts Arch. Mag., vol. i., p. 233.
2 Ibid, vol xx., p. 145-.
246 Notes on ike CJmrcJies m tJie Neighbourhood of Warmi lister.
north. The lancets have inner arches — the mouldings on which
have been so made up with plaster that they are unreliable — the
sedilia are of three bays stepped up towards the east although the
arches over the whole are level — these arches are of trefoil form
supported on shafts with moulded caps and bases, and with moulded
labels over ; further eastward is a coeval piscina of the same type,
the bowl has been cut away. The chancel originally had no but-
tresses, and those on the north and south, and the diagonal ones at
the angles, appear to have been added in the fourteenth century,
when so much other work was done about the Church. The north
wall was re-built (the old windows having apparently been re-fixed
in their old positions with the easternmost one kept higher) and the
east window inserted at the restoration in 1860. The previous east
window was a Perpendicular insertion — this has been removed to
the west end of the nave ; the sills of the original triple lancets can
be traced below that of the modern window. The arms still pre-
served in the old glass in one of the lancets are those of Thomas
Plantagenet, Earl of Lancaster, son of Henry III., who married a
Longespee, and, in his wife's right, became Earl of Salisbury.
Of the rest of the Church built during the Early English period
we have no part left standing as first erected (with the exception of
part of the porch), but there is no lack of evidence from the beautiful
features of that period which are preserved that there was built at
that time at least a porch — and probably also a nave, unless the
Norman one remained.1 One of the two lancet windows in the
north transept and the magnificent outer doorway of the tower are
coeval with the chancel work, but have obviously been re-built, and
it is doubtful whether they are in their original positions. If we
examine the doorway carefully we shall see that the dog-tooth
ornament of the outside member could not have been cut in situ (as
was the invariable mode of working it), but many of the stones
have been shortened since they were worked by cutting off parts of
the ornaments — this is particularly the case on the east side and at
1 Mr. Fane states that the Norman pilaster buttresses existed here in 1853 and
belonged to the original Church restored in Early English times.
By C. K Pouting, F.S.A. 247
the apex. The outer order of the arch, too, springs at a higher
level than the moulded parts, and the " centre " from which the latter
are described is below the springing. This arch has certainly been
taken down from its original position and re-built here ; then, if we
look at the east and west walls of the lower stage of the tower we
shall see indications of there having been a low lean-to roofed porch,
and I think there is little doubt that all this part of the Church —
the north transept and the lower stage of the tower — were built at
just before the middle of the fourteenth century; that the vestry was
then erected and the chancel arch inserted, also the arch into the
transept with its cusped piscina in the east jamb, showing this to have
been founded for a chantry ; and that the fine doorway was removed
from the south wall of the nave to its present position. The lancet
in the east wall of the transept — which is the original Early English
one — is the outer part of the window with a plain splay, like those
of the chancel ; but it will be seen that the other has a cavetto
mould and I consider this to be a fourteenth century window, made
to match in outline the old one re-built here at that time but with
later detail, and that the inner moulded arches of both were then
added. The fine Flowing Decorated window in the north gable is
also of this date, but the gable over, and the parapet, have been
since re-built. The deep plinth-mould carried continuously round
transept, tower, and vestry, is very remarkable, and the absence of
any break in the line, or any buttress, points to the probability that
it was not contemplated to build a tower when this part was erected,
as the tower does not seem to start from the ground, but from the
top of the fourteenth century work, although the same excellent
flint- work is employed in both ; and, in spite of the weight thus
added — thanks to the chalk subsoil — the whole has stood without a
crack.
The ogee cusped single-light window of the vestry, with sunk
patterns and with inside curtain arch, is a typical fourteenth century
feature. Inside the vestry will be seen the corbels of its original
roof, which must have been at a lower level than the present one,
as the low position of the side window also indicates. The aumbry
and fireplace are ancient features.
248 Notes on the Churches In tlie Neighbourhood of Warmi niter.
To revert for a moment to the details of the fine thirteenth
century doorway forming the main entrance to the Church. The
arch is of two orders, both with deep roll mouldings, and the inner
order and the outside of the outer order are enriched with dog-tooth
members finely cut; this arch springs from clustered shafts (which
have been recently renewed) with moulded caps and bases.
The tower has a weathered set-off at the top of the lower stage,
and above this rises the belfry stage erected at the end of the
fourteenth century, entirely without buttresses but with two-light
windows in three faces, embattled parapet with round outlets in the
cornice and without the usual gargoyles. Before leaving this part
of the Church I would call attention to the very uncommon position
of the vestry or sacristy, so far removed from any altar. The inner
doorway of the porch is coeval with the fourteenth century re-
modelling of the north side ; it is of two orders of large splays with
bold stops : a later stoup has been cut in the splay on the east jamb.
The west wall of the nave was re-built in 1860, and the old
three-light window from the east wall of the chancel was then
inserted here and the later square- head doorway reinstated in its
former position — in the spandrils of this doorway are carved a lion
passant (? the arms of the Giffard family). In the south wall of
the nave formerly existed an old doorway, but this was transformed
into a window at the restoration, at the cost of the present Vicar of
Warminster ; one of the door jambs having an old sun-dial cut on
it is built into the window, but placed upside-down. Remains of a
thirteenth century coffin- slab are built into the wall here.
Mr. Fane, writing in 1853, refers to the remains of a rood-loft
staircase and passage, with staples yet remaining in the wall, but
these are no longer to be seen.
On the south of the nave is one of the most complete specimens
in existence of a chapel of the transitional period from the " Early
English " to the " Decorated " styles — this chapel is supposed to
have been founded either by Walter Giffard, Archbishop of York,
who died lord of the manor of Boyton, 1279 ; or by his brother,
Godfrey, Bishop of Worcester, who died lord of the manor in 1301 ;
or by them jointly, for the resting-place of their brother, Sir
By C. E. Pouting, F.S.A. 249
Alexander Giffard, the Crusader, who followed Longespee to the
Holy Land as equerry, and died in 1250. This supposition would
accord fully with the type of work, which I should assign to the
third quarter of the 13th century. Mr. Fane l and Dr. Baron 2 give
exhaustive accounts of this family of Giffard, who held the manor of
Boyton for many generations from shortly after the Conquest, and
I need not further refer to it here. The effigy of a cross-legged
knight under the easternmost arch, which was evidently constructed
to receive it, is no doubt that of Sir Alexander Giffard, whose arms
are borne on his triangular shield ; he wears a long straight sword,
and his feet rest on an otter. This figure has been much scraped
and defaced, the coat of mail and helmet were doubtless of chain
armour, like those on the effigy of his chief, the Earl of Salisbury,
in our Cathedral. It is noteworthy that the legs of this effigy are
crossed, while those of the one at Salisbury are not.
The architecture of this chapel is most interesting and instructive,
The arcade of two bays opening into the nave consists of segmental
pointed arches of two orders, the outer with chamfer carried to the
floor and the inner deeply moulded, springing from clustered shafts
with very striking moulded caps and bases, the former having a
most unusually exaggerated " bell " member. The windows, al-
though of one date, are of various types and design, and form a
striking instance of lancets contemporary with tracery. In the
south wall are three uncusped lancets with cavetto mould and tre-
foiled inner arches (which have been ruthlessly cut into for the
insertion of corbels to receive the modern roof) and with outside
labels, which have been given modern terminals. The east window
is a three-light one with Early Geometrical tracery without cusping,
very richly and deeply moulded, and with label moulds inside and
outside of the same section. In the west wall is a large wheel
window, 12ft. in diameter to the outside of the label, the circle
being divided by tracery into three segmental triangles, within each
of which is described a circle with quatrefoil cusping ; in each of the
1 Wilts ArcJi. Mag., vol. i., p. 233.
3 Ibid, vol. xx., p. 145.
250 Notes on the Churches in the Neighbourhood of ffarminster.
three spandrils is a smaller circle containing- a triangle — the whole
contained within the label mould. (Although this is an early
developement of tracery in a small parish Church, the well-known
wheel window in Lincoln Cathedral (1200) is an earlier example
still.) In the south wall is a group of three recessed sedilia and
piscina — the former with seats stepped up towards the east; these
recesses have trefoil arches springing at the same level, and curious
label-canopies over; the arch moulds are carried down the mullions
and the sedilia jamb and stop on moulded bases ; on the east side of
the piscina they are stopped by a carved head. The bowl of the
piscina has been cut away.
On the outside the work of this chapel is very rich, well-designed,
and good, the buttresses are gabled with moulded weatherings and
a double splayed base with a roll member above it ; the upper splay
is carried round the walls and drops at the buttresses to admit of
the roll member.
In the centre of the chapel stands an altar-tomb of rich design in
Tisbury stone ; this has seven panels on each side, two at the west
end, and a larger one at the east end, each of which has a pedestal
with dowel-hole for a figure, and there are traces of figures having
been fixed here, but all are now missing. These figures may have
been of marble or alabaster, so as to be richer than the body of the
tomb, and they, as well as the ground of the panels, were coloured.
Mr. Fane records that this tomb is hollowed out to receive a coffin
4ft. 11 in. long — probably that of a female or child. The tomb is
said to have contained the body of the last of the Giffard family —
Lady Margaret — who died in the reign of Edward III., and at
whose death the whole of the estates passed to the Crown, but it is
somewhat earlier in style.
In the floor of the chapel is a Purbeck slab 10ft. by 4ft., with
the matrix of a magnificent brass with a single figure, the head
resting on a cushion and surmounted by a canopy ; at the sides were
shields and the whole was surrounded by a border. Both Sir R. C.
Hoare and Mr. Fane speak of this as being in the north transept;
the latter relates that on removing this stone in 1853 a stone coffin
was found containing a nearly perfect skeleton with the skull placed
By C. E. Pouting, F.S.A. 251
on one side, and he conjectures this to be the last male Giffard (John
Giffard the Rich) who joined Thomas, Earl of Lancaster's rebellion
in the reign of Edward III., and was beheaded at Gloucester. Mr.
Fane's surmise that the north transept chapel was erected for the
interment of this body is hard!)' borne out by the date at which I
have put the architecture. Moreover the matrix shews the effigy
to have been that of a lady. On the floor are interesting inscribed
stones to Edmund Lambert, 1739, Sarah, his wife, 1736, and Edmund
Lambert, 1751. On the wall is a tablet commemorating Annie
Lambert, wife of Edmund Lambert, of Boyton, who bore him five
sons and nine daughters and died 1609. (Edmund Lambert probably
re-built Boy ton House, 1618.) Amongst the other monuments
here is one of special interest — the hatchment of Prince Leopold,
afterwards Duke of Albany, who for several years resided at Boyton
House.
The roofs throughout the Church are new.
It would ill become me to judge of the new work in this Church,
but it is much to be regretted that so much injury was done in the
restoration — even the thirteenth century effigy has been scraped.
The Church is one of exceeding interest, and it is gratifying to see
it so well appointed and cared for. It is remarkable for having so
much work of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries rather than
the more usual Perpendicular work.
In the churchyard, in good condition, is the bowl of a thirteenth
century font with the iron fastenings for the cover : it is much to
be desired that this should be brought back into the Church.
STOCKTON. S. JOHN BAPTIST.
This Church consists of chancel, clerestoried nave with north and
south aisles, western tower, and north porch. "
The nave arcade on each side consists of two bays of pointed
arches of two orders of chamfers springing from central cylindrical
columns and the half columns of the responds, with square caps and
bases, all of late Norman work. Eastward of this on each side is a
lower and narrower arch of one order — that on the north being
252 Notes on the Churches in the Neighbourhood of Warminster.
chamfered and the south one moulded. It would appear that the
nave was lengthened by this short bay in the fourteenth century,
when the south aisle was erected and probably founded as a chantry
— the arch between the aisle and the nave does not start from the
floor but there is a solid wall for some 3ft. in height, apparently
intended to receive a recumbent effigy : the corresponding arch on
the north side might have been cut through to match this, or to
serve as a squint, at a later date. This lengthening of the nave
was done at the expense of the chancel, and it is obvious that the
entire Church was not then lengthened, as there is earlier work both
on the east and west of this bay. I have gone out of the order of
date in order to complete my description of the nave arcades. Next
in order after the Norman bays of the arcades comes the western
tower, which possesses several remarkable features. It consists of
three stages in height of Early English work, surmounted by
a fourteenth century cornice and embattled parapet with good
gargoyles. In the centre of each side is a buttress carried up the
lower stage only — the one on the north is of the early flat pilaster-
like form — there are also traces of a similar early buttress at the
north-west angle. The lower stage has an archway opening into
the nave of two orders of chamfers supported by massive shafts
with a roll-cap and base ; this stage would seem to have been erected
many years before the next was proceeded with. Over the archway
is a lancet window also opening into the nave — the reason for a
window in such a position is not very obvious. We met with a
similar instance of about the same date last year at Oaksey. The
west window of this stage is modern. The middle stage of the
tower has a double lancet window in the west face, and the upper,
or belfry, stage has a similar window on the west, a single lancet on
the south and a square-headed one on the north. The western part
of the north aisle is Early English work, including the small lancet
window in the end ; the remainder of this aisle and the porch were
re-built in 1842. The Rev. T. Miles records in the Magazine1 that
the east part of this aisle was once vaulted in stone, which fell in 1840.
1 Vol. xii.; p. 117.
~By C. E. Pouting, F.ti.A. 253
The south wall of the chancel is also thirteenth century work
and contains two lancet windows of that period placed at different
levels, the westernmost being kept low, apparently, for the use of a
hand-bell, and there are marks as if for a shutter. (The north and
east walls were re-built in 1840, when the east window was con-
structed, as the date below it indicates, the springers to the gable
copings with curious double-head corbels being re-used.)
The proportions of the chancel are very uncommon, it is only
16ft. IGin. long by 18ft. 6in. wide : this shortness is doubtless due
to the encroachment upon it in the fourteenth century by the founder
of the south chantry, who appears to have lengthened the nave at
the same time. The south aisle (although much of it has probably
been re-built) is an interesting feature, and the features are entirely
of one date— about the middle of the century, the same plinth and
parapet are carried round, there are two two-light square-headed
windows besides a doorway in the south wall and one at each end,
diagonal buttresses at the angles and two square ones on the south
side. Under the westernmost window in the south wall is a recessed
tomb containing the mutilated figure of a female lying on her left
side. The Rev. T. Miles l states (in 1869) that it was formerly
situated near the centre of this wall but removed to make room for
the tablet dated 1708, and Dr. Baron,8 writing in 1881, says "The
peculiarity [of this effigy] is that the lady is represented recumbent
on the left side, and in the attitude of prayer, apparently respecting
the altar in the same south aisle. Tradition says it formerly oc-
cupied a position about the middle of the south wall . . . under
a recess which was destroyed to make way for a glaring monument,
and that being found out of place in the restoration of 1840 a new
recess was made for it where it now lies : " — these two statements
agree that the monument was once further east. It is coeval with
the aisle and probably that of the foundress, and the piscina (which
has been restored) shows that this aisle was erected as a chantry.
In the fifteenth century a clerestory with three two-light windows
1 Wilts Arch. Mag., vol. xii., p. 111.
3 Ibid, vol xx., p. 121.
254 Notes on the Churches in the Neighbourhood of \Var minster.
on each side appears to have been added to the nave, when probably
the ancient pitch of the roof was flattened to admit of it. The old
fifteenth century roof remains, but it has probably undergone some
alteration, for on one of the beams is cut the following- inscription :
" Framed by Mr. Fleming in June, in the year of Our Lord 175 7."
We now come to the feature which above everything else dis-
tinguishes this Church. I refer to the wall dividing the nave from
the chancel. So far as there is any evidence to show — viz., that of
the openings in it — this wall was erected in the fifteenth century.
Instead of the usual chancel arch this wall has a flat four-centred
doorway only 4ft. wide and 8ft. 2in. high to the apex,
chamfered on the east edge and evidently provided for a door,
and on each side of it a smaller opening about 2ft. 5in. wide and
2ft. llin. high, the sills being 2ft. 7in. from the floor, with pointed
arches chamfered on the side towards the nave. These squints (or
hagioscopes) converge towards the altar, of which they were
doubtless intended to admit a view from the nave. In the article in
the Wills Mag., before quoted, Mr. Miles refers to two corbels as
existing on the west face, and Dr. Baron to one on the north side of
the doorway only, but he also states that the one on the north side
of the north squint is remembered, but was inadvertently removed
during a recent restoration : there is no doubt there were four corbels
here, their object being to support a rood-loft. Dr. Baron considers
that this example " illustrates, when compared with other examples
in England, and with Greek and Latin Churches, the whole history
of chancels, choirs and chancel screens, and shows the influence of
Greek ritual and tradition in the far west at a very early date."
He apparently gives an undue antiquity to these features, but this
does not lessen the force of his arguments as to their use, and the
analogy he draws from the Greek Church of S. Theodore, at Athens,
and the early Latin Church of San Clemente, at Rome, is very in-
structive as showing " how the Greek idea of a Church was developed
and adapted to Italian circumstances and requirements " — the high
screen with three openings which shut off the " bema," or sanctuary
of the earlier Church, becoming removed farther westward so as to
fence off a space from the nave (the c/wros) for clergy and singers
By C. E. Pouting, F.S.A. 255
by a low screen, and provision for the seclusion and dignity of the
sacred mystery being made by the baldachino and curtains over the
altar : the latter arrangement being in course of time improved
upon by making room for the choir within the structural chancel
and separating it from the nave by a screen more or less open. A
good view of the interior of Stockton Church accompanies Dr.
Baron's paper; instead of the wooden doors shown in Dr. Baron's
view there are now good modern iron gates.
I conclude that this wall, erected in the fifteenth century when
screens were becoming more general, was probably intended to take
the place of the more usual kind of stone or wood screen, and a loft
(whether for reading the gospel from, or, as would seem more
probable in small Churches, merely to give access to the rood)
erected against the blank wall over, supported by corbels and ap-
proached by wooden steps.
The window of three lights with semi-circular heads in the east
end of the north aisle is an Elizabethan one and was doubtless
inserted when this part was re-modelled to receive the still existing
monument of that period to the founder of Stockton House, his
wife and six children. The roof of the south aisle is a Jacobean
one; that over the nave bears the date 1757. The roof of the north
aisle is of cedar,1 presented in 1880 by Bishop Moberly.
J The history of this cedar, as it was told to the Members of the Society when
they visited the Church, July 28th, 1893, by Bishop Huyshe Yeatrnan, of
Southwark, is worth recording. Samuel Wilberforce, before he became Bishop,
was Rector of Brightstone, in the Isle of Wight. During a severe storm a ship
came on shore there, and the rector, after assisting in rescuing the sailors, had
them taken up to the rectory and cared for. The crew, desiring to make him
some acknowledgment of their gratitude, could find nothing to give him but a
log or logs of cedar wood which had formed part of the cargo of their vessel.
This he put away and determined to devote to some sacred purpose. Time passed
on, however, and he left Brightstone to become Bishop of Oxford without using
the cedar — which remained as a legacy to his successor, George Moberly. He,
too, in turn, left Brightstone to become Bishop of Salisbury, and took the cedar
with him. The Rev. Huyshe Yeatman — brother of Col. Yeatman Biggs, the
owner of Stockton, who restored the north aisle of the Church in memory of the
Topp family, the original owners of the property— happened to be the Bishop's
chaplain, and to him the Bishop offered the cedar if he would use it in Stockton
Church. The offer was accepted and the wood was used in the panelling- of the
roof of the north aisle.
256 Notes on the Churches in the Neighbourhood of Warmimler.
The font is coeval with the earlier parts of the nave arcade.
The pulpit is a Jacobean one.
There are several sun-dials cut on the wall of the south aisle (two
on one stone of a buttress, being inverted, show that this part has
been re-built), and one on the sill of one of the lancet windows of
the chancel. There are old inscribed stones built into the aisle wall
bearing dates 1622, 1663, and 1669. The inside has many interesting
monuments, but none apparently older than 1625.
Mr. Miles records that there were formerly traces of painting in
oil on the chancel walls.
I would, in conclusion, express my opinion that all lovers of
antiquity owe a debt of gratitude to the restorers of this Church
for preserving to us the unique features between the nave and
chancel. It may probably be considered by some to be inconvenient,
but I hope it may never on that account be altered. I would ask
those worshippers who object to it, so long as they can hear the
service at the altar, to be satisfied to see with the eye of faith. The
Saxon canon quoted by Dr. Baron, which says, in reference to the
consecration of the elements, " Look who will/' seems to show that
seeing was not regarded as a religious obligation upon all, but only
imperative in the case of some who find it a help to their devotion,
and the three openings afford the necessary means for their doing so .
UPTON LOVEL. S. PETER.
This simple little Church possesses features of interest in two
periods widely distant. In plan it consists of chancel, nave with
porch on the north and a vestry on the south, and a western tower.
The chancel was erected at about the end of the twelfth or the be-
ginning of the thirteenth century, and the corbel table under the
eaves, the pilaster buttresses, the lancet window in the north wall,
the caps and bases of the inner shafts of the east window, the chancel
arch, and the piscina are typical specimens of the work of that period.
The east window had been destroyed and the bases of the shafts
were only opened out during the recent works of restoration : these,
with pieces of the caps preserved at the rectory, afforded the necessary
By C. K Ponting, F.S.A. 257
elue for the reinstatement of the inner parts of the window — the
exterior parts are purely conjectural : the aumbry and piscina were
also discovered in the execution of these works. The aumbry is a
later insertion in the early wall, and a piece of the earlier work
forms the head. In the fifteenth century a two-light window was
inserted, doubtless in place of a lancet, as giving more light, in the
south wall of the choir. The upper part of the east wall of the
chancel and large portions of the north and south walls near the
east end were re-built when the late eighteenth century window and
roof, now removed, were constructed.
There is no indication of what the remainder of the Church was
at that time, but in 1633 the nave with north porch and vestry were
re-built, and this date occurs on both porch and vestry (in the former
case accompanied by the appropriate text " This is the House of
Prayer ") and on a tie-beam of the nave. It is significant of the
reaction which marked the reign of Charles I., that, instead of
following the prevailing forms of debased Renaissance, the re-
builders of this Church adopted a pre- Reformation type for some of
the features — their success is much less conspicuous in the masonry
than in the beautiful oak roof : here they have so closely adhered to
the fifteenth century type that it is only by closely examining the
details of the carvings and mouldings that the late date of its
construction can be detected.
The tower is of two stages in lieight with west door, angle
buttresses and pinnacles, and pointed archway opening into the nave.
The windows and doors have semicircular heads, but the buttresses,
pinnacles, and arch of the tower follow the Gothic lines.
In the restoration of this Church which I was privileged to carry
out for the present Rector a few years ago I regarded the building
as a very valuable example of ecclesiastical work carried out when
little of the kind was done and when more attention was paid to
domestic architecture ; and I felt strongly that the preservation of
this special characteristic should be the first consideration, and that
on no account should any attempt be made to alter or " improve
upon " this work in any way so as to reduce it to the level of modern
Gothic, which may or may not be more beautiful, but which would
VOL. XXVII. — NO. LXXXI. T
258 Notes on the Churches in Ike Neighbourhood of Warminster.
certainly be less interesting-, and so blot out a valuable chapter in
the history of the parish. Our efforts were mainly directed towards
remedying the damp and dismal condition into which the whole
Church had fallen ; removing the mean and incongruous deal pews
and gallery, the flat ceiling which concealed the nave roof, and the
entire roof and east window of the chancel, and replacing them with
something more in keeping with the old work — and it will be seen
that a seventeenth century type has been followed for the fittings,
as being the best period of English wood-work, as well as being in
harmony with the 1633 portions of the structure. The old thirteenth
century font bowl has been rescued from its position as a flower- vase
in the rectory garden and restored to use.
< In the floor of the sanctuary is a small brass which has lost its
slab. It represents a priest (probably a rector of the parish) wearing
eucharistic vestments. Mr. Kite1 puts the date at circa 1430.
On the south side is a recumbent effigy, supposed to be that of
Lord Lovel, the last of the family who held the manor.
SHEERINGTON. Sr MICHAEL.
This is a very remarkable Church, and its architectural history
looks, at first sight, somewhat involved ; but on further investigation
it will be seen that the whole Church was re-built in 1624, when
the following old features were reinstated : — the three-light reticu-
lated west window ; the three-light east window with carved label
terminals, one representing a bishop ; the priests' door and two two-
light square-headed windows in the north wall of the chancel ; two
similar windows on the south of the chancel ; the arch of the outer
porch doorway, springing from 1624 jambs; the outer arch of the
inner doorway — the inner arch being of 1624 date; the chancel
arch, having 1624 impost; the font, an octagonal bowl (having an
eighteenth century oak cover) . All the foregoing are Late Decorated
work, excepting perhaps the font, which looks rather earlier.
There can be no doubt as to the remainder of the Church, the
1 Monumental Brasses of Wilts, p. 32.
By C. E. Pouting, F.S.A. 259
inscription T.L. H.G. 1624 on a stone in the north wall of the
chancel, the one with arms and 1624; as well as a panel with S.C.
in the gable of the porch and that with 1624 H.G. in the east wall
of the chancel, doubtless record the exact date; but there is
abundant further evidence that the walls were re-built at about that
time. The moulding of the plinth is a Jacobean one, it is returned
down on each side of the priests' door, the lower stones of which
were either re-worked or renewed. The four two-light debased
windows in the side walls of the nave, the small circular window to
light the pulpit, and the elliptic inner arches throughout, the impost
of the chancel arch, and the manner in which the mouldings are
here returned, the weathering of the buttresses, the waggon-head
roof with oak plates and ribs and plaster panels, the altar rail and
its bold turned balusters and the fine oak benches throughout
(somewhat spoilt in effect by the modern terminals), are typical
features of the work of this period as applied to Church-building.
The arch of the west window and the heads of the south windows
of the chancel evidently once had labels over them, but these have
been omitted in the re-building. It is interesting to find that the
old glass was replaced in the south chancel windows in carrying
out this work, and the whole Church is a valuable specimen of
ecclesiastical work of the time of James I. The pulpit, prayer-desk,
and lectern are made up of later carved work.
HEYTESBURY. SS. PETER AND PAUL.
This Church is of the orthodox cruciform plan fully developed.
It consists of a nave of four bays with north and south aisles and
south porch ; a chancel of three bays with north and south aisles
and a tower at the crossing ; both the nave and the chancel are
clerestoried. This is the usual Norman plan, and there is little
doubt that the present building stands on the foundations of a
Church of that period equal in size — the narrowness of the aisles
points to an earlier origin than the date of the walls. This Church
became collegiate about 1165, and was probably re-built soon after.
The only portions of the Norman Church which remain are the
T 2
260 Notes on the Churches in the Neighbourhood of Warminster.
north and south arcades of the chancel, and these are quite late,
verging on the Early English, say about 1180-1200; the east
responds and the two easternmost columns have clustered shafts of
freestone and slate alternately (the slate is new, and probably takes
the place of Purbeck marble), the two westernmost columns are
cylindrical — the one on the north having a scalloped capital and
that on the south moulded only. The west respond on the south is
like the column, and coeval, but the one on the north was re-built
with the tower — the former is conclusive as to there having been a
Norman central tower. The arches of these arcades are pointed,
and consist of four orders of chamfers. I do not consider that these
are of later date than the piers, except the westernmost one on the
north side, which appears to have been re-built with its respond,
the rest are probably coeval with the piers (the modern labels over
the arches are misleading). Before the restoration in 1867 by Mr.
Butterfield these arches were blocked up, and the present chancel
aisles were added at that time.
In the thirteenth century the lower stage of the central tower,
the eastern part of the chancel, the two transepts, the arcades, the
west end of the nave and the aisles were re-built and the clerestory
to the chancel added. The east wall of the chancel is arcaded in two
stages divided by a string-course ; the arches of the lower stage
return on the responds of the side arcades ; the upper stage consists
of three bays of moulded arches free of the wall, with detached
shafts of Purbeck marble — the shafts have central bands or annulets;
a large lancet window (the inner part of which is modern) occupies
the central bay, and the one on each side is solid. In the south
return of the lower stage is a coeval piscina of circular form under
a square-headed recess — the low position of this shows that there
was formerly no step at the east end and that the existing level is a
modern " improvement." It may be noticed that the three clerestory
windows on each side are placed between the arches (and not over
them, as is more usual), as in the case of the early examples of
Bishop's Cannings and Battle ; in order to carry out this one has
been placed over each west respond. The east, north, and south
arches of the tower are as re-built in the thirteenth century, but the
By 0. E. Pouting, F.S.A. 261
west arch was re-built and widened when the Church was restored.
Although the transepts have been much altered since, there is
abundant evidence that they were re-built with the tower in the
thirteenth century ; the walls and buttress of the north transept
and much of the east wall and plinth of the south transept remain
of this work. The south transept has a coeval doorway opening1
into the chancel aisle, and a string-course which is cut off square by
this door is carried along the east wall ;• there are also remains of a
lancet window on the outside.
The nave arcades look somewhat later than the chancel and tower
work, but they are not later than temp. Edward I. ; they have tall
octagonal columns on high moulded bases supporting pointed arches
of three orders of chamfers with moulded labels. The arcades have
been partly re-built, the bases renewed, and the surface of the old
work has been badly scraped. The two east responds on the south
and the west one on the north side have clustered shafts carrying
the inner order of the arch, the remaining one is octagonal.
The two massive buttresses which flank the west end of the nave
are of about the same period as the arcades, although their different
heights seem to indicate that they were not carried up at one time,
and a coeval string-course runs across the west ends of the aisles
and part of the nave, but is broken into here by the insertion of the
later doorway.
The south transept appears to have been altered in the fourteenth
century when the south wall above the plinth with its tall buttresses
having five set-offs, and the adjacent parts of the east wall, were
re-built. There is a coeval corbel in the east wall, probably inserted
to receive a figure by the altar ; also a square aumbry in the south
wall. Towards the end of this century the low upper stage of the
tower was added, having a two-light window in each face.
Towards the middle of the fifteenth century the clerestory of the
nave was added, and the weather-mould on the west face of the tower
marks the high pitch of the earlier roof. The clerestory has three
two-light square-headed windows on each side, placed over the piers,
as in the case of the earlier example of the chancel. The waggon-
head roof over the nave with its carved wall-plates is coeval witk
262 Notes on Uic Churches in Ike Neigliliourliood of Warminster.
the clerestory, as is also the door and the five-light window over it
at the west end.
Both transepts were re-modelled in the fifteenth century. The
one on the north contains a chantry chapel of the Hungerfords
(whose badge, three sickles, appears on the screen and the remains
of the late Perpendicular monument). This chapel is supposed hy
Canon Jackson to have been founded in 1421 by Walter, Lord
Hungerford, K.G. (who was also owner of a chantry dedicated to
S. Mary founded in 1300 in the south part of this Church and the
founder of the chapel in the nave of Salisbury Cathedral in which
he was buried in 1449), and it was probably at this time that it
was separated from the rest of the Church by the beautiful stone
screen which remains under the tower arch. This screen has good
fan-vaulting, also a small aumbry on the inside for use at the chantry
altar. The cresting of the screen has been lost. The transept had
a stone vaulted ceiling added as part of this re-modelling, but this
has also been lost with the exception of the two corbels bearing the
symbols of S. Matthew and S. Mark. This vaulting was probably
destroyed in 1644 when the roof was lowered, as indicated by the
stone in the wall outside. The east window of this transept is a
good three-light Perpendicular one (the new one in the north gable
is described by Mr. Talbot l as " a cross between Early English and
Perpendicular/' and was probably thus designed by the architect to
avoid misleading future antiquaries) , and the interesting archway
in the east wall is reported to have been taken from the west wall
when the new arch was inserted there. The window in the gable
of the south transept is a three-light Perpendicular one with two
transoms, but the tracery has probably been cut away.
Early in the sixteenth century the upper part of the north aisle
walls and all the buttresses there with one exception were re-built,
and the four debased three-light windows constructed (the latter
have had their mullions and the inner parts of the arches renewed).
The western part of the south aisle with the similar window in the
south wall was dealt with in the same way (this window has been
1 Vol, xvii., p. 363,
By 0. E. Panting, F.S.A. 263
.copied in the part of the aisle eastward of the porch re-built at the
restoration) , and the roof of this aisle is coeval.
The two windows in the west ends of the aisles are very re-
markable, and at first sight might from the appearance of the labels
be taken for fourteenth century work, but on closer examination J
think they will be found to be some three hundred years later.
They are at present filled with quatrefoil tracery inserted by Mr.
Butterfield, but before that they appear to have been plain circular
openings, and they probably had an iron framework to receive the
glass.
The roofs of the chancel and north and south transepts are modern,
as are also the porch and the font. The chancel aisles were erected
in the restoration of 1867, and there is no doubt that care was taken,
.to construct them on the foundations of the Norman aisles which
preceded them, and the old weather- mould indicates the position of
the ancient roof, but a curious point in connection with this arises
on the north side, where the aisle cuts into the fifteenth century
window of the transept ; from this it would appear that the old
aisle was pulled down before this window was inserted. A modern
parapet has been added to the chancel, and copings and cross to the
east gable.
Mr. Lukis l describes the six bells in the tower. No. 4 is dated
,1616; No. 2, 1668; No. 1, 1739; No. 3,1753; No. 5, 1843.
The tenor bell is a medieval one, bearing two coats of arms, one of
the family of Knollys, the other probably that of the Fowells. It
also bears the inscription : — " INTONAT E CELIS vox CAMPANE
MICHAELIS." — " The voice of the Bell of S. Michael's resounds from
the sky."
L eland speaks of this Church as " Heitredesbury — a Collegiate
Church impropriate to the deanery of Sarum has the gift of four
prebends."" And Canon Jackson,2 referring to this, says " Heytes-
bury Church was made collegiate about A.D. 1165, chiefly through
the agency of Roger, Archdeacon of Wilts or Ramsbury. The
1 Vol. ii., p. 335.
2 Vol. i., p, 174.
264 Notes on the Churches in the Neighbourhood of Warminster.
four prebends are — 1. Tytherington, given by the Empress Maud :
2. Horningsham : 3. Hill Deverill : and 4. Swallowcliffe. The
Archdeacon was at first head of this Collegiate Church, but it was
afterwards annexed to the deanery of Sarum. The Dean now acts
as Ordinary within it, and has the patronage of the four prebends/7
In the belfry are two kneeling figures in white marble of Thomas
Moore and Rachel, his wife, died 1623.
.•
SUTTON VENT. THE OLD CHURCH OF S. LEONARD.
Since the fine new Church of S. John's was erected from Mr.
Pearson's designs in 1868, the old Church has been allowed to fall
into ruins, with the exception of the chancel, which was then en*
closed and used as a mortuary chapel ; and as the old work is fast
disappearing, it seems desirable to place on record some description
of it as it exists in 1893.
The Church was cruciform, consisting of nave and chancel with
arches at the " crossing/' and north and south transepts.
In the north wall of the nave is a good Norman doorway with
semicircular arch with label and a flat lintel under which the jambs
are corbelled out. The shafts on the jambs are missing, but the
caps remain — these are carved and have square abacus moulds. No
other parts of the Norman Church remain, as the earliest walling
is of thirteenth century date, when the entire structure appears to
have been re-built (the Norman doorway remaining in situ). The
walls of this period remain in the nave and chancel (with the
alterations referred to below) and part of the transepts — they are
constructed of rubble and appear to have begun to subside and incline
outwards at a very early period of their existence, for the fourteenth
century part of the south transept was built against an already
leaning arch.
The four arches at the crossing are distinctly Early English (circa
1200), three orders of chamfers carried down the jambs, intersected
only by an impost moulding, and having interesting stops which
show the jambs and arches to be coeval ; the bases are splayed.
By C. K Pouting, F.S.A. 265
There is no evidence as to whether a tower was carried up over these
arches. On the north side of the nave are the splays of two lancet
windows, and a trace of one on the south, the chancel retains its
three small lancets with labels over on the north, also a flat buttress
at the north-east angle returning on the east face, and a coeval
doorway on the south, now blocked up. The rubble walling at the
east end of the chancel and the thirteenth century string (now
intersected by a modern window) show the east window to have
been at an unusual height. A chamfered string runs along under
the windows on the south side, but there is no plinth to the side
walls, this being confined to the quoins.
Very little of the transepts remains, but they were probably
largely re-built late in the fourteenth century. A doorway of this
date inserted in the thirteenth century south wall of the nave and
intersecting the string-course, still remains, with a fifteenth century
niche over it.
The alterations here during the Perpendicular period are less than
usual, and do not include any extension of plan. At the west end
of the nave a door with three-light window over was inserted circa
1500, and a buttress was carried out from the north-west angle—-
this work is in coursed masonry, and the junction with the Early
English rubble wall portions of its plinth is clearly traceable. Two
buttresses were added to support the north wall of the nave, which
had already become leaning. A three-light square-headed window
(now blocked up) was put in the south wall of the chancel when
the greater part of this wall was re-built, but the earlier priests'
door was not disturbed.
There is an old sun-dial on the south-west quoin of the nave.
In more recent times two buttresses have been erected against
the south wall of the nave to serve the same purpose here as the
fifteenth century ones added to the north wall ; a miserable roof,
hipped at the east end, has been put on the chancel, and the chancel
arch built up, with a doorway facing the entrance. The west wall
of the nave has been pulled down above the top of the buttresses,
and much of the side walls, the wrought stonework of the windows
on the north side appears to have been taken away.
Notes on the Churches in the Neigkbourfwod of Warminster.
NORTON BAVANT. ALL SAINTS.
This Church consists of chancel with vestry on south and organ
chamber on north, nave with chapel projecting from the middle of
the south side, western tower and a north porch near the west end
of the nave. With the exception of the tower the entire Church
was re-built in 1840 in the poorest style of that period, when every
structural feature was renewed with the exception of the archway
into the chapel, which was either retained or reinstated ; the good
seventeenth century iron gates were also retained. This archway is
of fourteenth century date. The chapel is known as the Benet
Chapel, and " is supposed to have been built by John Benet, buried
in the middle of it in 1461" (Canon Jackson, Wilts Arch. Mag.y
x., 298), but this date is too late for the construction of the arch.
The brass of " Johnes Benet and Agnes his wife " still remains in
the centre of the pavement, and another on the west wall of Thomas
Benet, of Westbury, and Margaret, his wife. (There is also a brass
to the latter in the north chapel of Westbury Church, giving the
date of his death as 1605.1)
The tower is divided into three stages internally, although the
lower two are undivided by any string-course on the outside. These
two stages, with the stair-turret to the same level, are the work of
late in the fourteenth century, and were constructed without but-
tresses.
The archway opening into the nave is constructed of chalk. It is
of two orders of chamfers continued down the jambs and terminating
in a long stop of very unusual form at the lower ends. The middle
stage of the tower was (like that of Langley Burrell, where there
exists an aumbry) constructed for and apparently used as a priests'
chamber : it is provided with a fireplace having an opening 3ft. 4in.
wide and 2ft. 9in. high, with mouldings carried round and a lintel
1ft. 5in. deep enriched with three sunk and carved quatre foils. The
fact that the flue terminates abruptly at the commencement of the
upper stage indicates either that the tower was only two stages high
when left in the fourteenth century, or that the upper stage was
Kite's Brasses of Wilts, p. 78.
By C. E. Pouting, F.S.A.
re-built (probably owing1 to settlements) : bowever tbis may be, tbe
present upper stage was erected about a century later, circa 1500.
Tbe fourteenth century work is constructed of Chilmark coursed
masonry of a rough description. The middle chamber has a two-light
square-headed window with deeply moulded jambs in the west face.
There was doubtless a west window of the same period in the
lower staere, but when the tower was raised this was removed and a
O '
Perpendicular three-light window (the tracery of which has since
been removed) with a doorway beneath it (now built up) inserted ;
at the same time diagonal buttresses were added at the north-west
and south-west angles, the bonding stones of which do not range
with the masonry of the main walls into which they were inserted.
It is somewhat remarkable that the plinths of these buttresses were
made to carry on the design of the earlier mouldings. The upper
stage has a two-light window in each side with shallow moulding
and the mullions flush with the outside face of the wall — the masonry
of this part is also coursed, but composed of smaller stones. This
stage was not built parallel to the substructure, the orientation
varying about 2jin. in its width on the north face. It is surmounted
by a good cornice with boldly-carved angle gargoyles and a battle-
mented parapet. The stair turret is a striking feature placed at the
eastern end of the south side, the east face of it being fair with
that of the main part of the tower, as at Imber. It is carried up
above the rest, has its own parapet and gargoyles, and is surmounted
by a small spire placed within it. This feature doubtless led to the
tower being described in Kelly's Directory as (t an embattled
western tower, with one pinnacle " \ The turret has the angles
canted off for the full height and -the other two angles — making an
octagon — at the top. There are no traces of pinnacles having
existed on the angles of the tower — the angle filling which at first
appears intended to support them, is doubtless for strength.
The tower contains four bells, the first and fourth are dated 1656,
the third 1711; the second is a mediaeval bell, and bears the in-
scription : — " >J< SANCTE : TOME : OKA : PHO : NOBIS." l These are
1 Lukis, Wilts Arch. Mag., ii., 336.
268 Notes on the Churches in the Neighbourhood of Warminsler.
said to have been brought from Bishopstrow, and it is clear that the
frame was not made for this tower, but was adapted to fit it.1
BISHOPSTROW.
This Church is dedicated to S. Aldhelm, who is believed to have
visited this place.
It is certain that a very early Church existed here, and Sir
Richard Colt Hoare2 gives a ground- plan of it, showing a semi-
circular apse without an east window (as at Manningford Bruce),
the chancel being lighted by windows placed north-east and south-
east.
There is no trace of this early work visible in the present structure,
the earliest part of which is the tower and spire, probably added to
the Saxon Church circa 1430. The proportions of the tower are
much injured by a raising of the ground outside and the floor inside
to the extent of about 2^ft. — the base being thus hidden — but
it is a charming bit of work. It has diagonal buttresses, small
two-light windows in each side of the belfry stage, and a most
graceful spire rising from within an embattled parapet, and having
a traceried and embattled band around at mid-height ; as well as a
fillet carried up the angles. The west doorway is quite modern,
and it is doubtful whether one existed here originally.
The remainder of the Church was re-built in 1757, and a stone
tablet in the south wall is inscribed : —
D. O. M.
Ecclesia de Bishopstrow.
A. B. iinis fundamentals restaurata est
A. R. S. H. MDCCLVII.
It is noteworthy that in work of this period a string-course of a
good Gothic type should have been used.
The windows, copings, &c., have been since again re- modelled.
There is now only one bell, but tradition says that the three at
Norton Bavant were removed from this Church.
1 This tower, which had become badly dilapidated, is now (June, 1894) under-
going restoration, owing to the liberality of Mrs. Torrance, of Norton House.
2 Modern Wilts— War minster, p. 74.
By C. E. Pouting, F.S.A. 269
IiONGBRIDGE DEVKRILL. SS. PETER AND PAUL.
This Church appears to have received much attention at the hands
of the restorer, and to have been added to considerably in recent
times. Its present plan consists of nave with north and south
aisles, chancel with an aisle on the north known as the Bath Chapel,
and an organ chamber and vestry on the south, a western tower and
a south porch.
The earliest work is the north arcade of the nave — three bays of
semicircular arches of one order with flat soffit chamfered at the
edges, springing from massive square piers with the angles chamfered
off like the arches, and without stops, and with a plain chamfered
abacus at the springing. This work bears a striking resemblance
to the arcades at Enford, and is probably of about the same date,
viz., circa 1130—1150; the lower part of the bowl and the base of
the font may be set down at about the same period.
Next in order come the south arcade and the tower. The former
is of three bays, the piers probably standing on the foundations of
Norman ones corresponding to those on the north side ; and it is
interesting to note that both arcades are built of chalk, so that
probably the old material was worked up again when the arcade was
re-built at near the end of the fourteenth century. The arches are
of two orders of chamfers carried up the piers from the floor and
round the arches, without caps or bases. The tower was built at
about the same time. It is of three stages in height, with buttresses
standing square at the angles, and the staircase on the north carried
up for the full height — this was (as was almost invariably the case)
approached from the inside originally, but a doorway has been
formed to give access from the outside to meet a supposed modern
convenience. Note the peculiar carving to the caps of the archway
between tower and nave, The parapet is new.
The north aisle was re-built at the time of the decline of the
Perpendicular, probably early in the sixteenth century, and two
windows of two lights with square heads and peculiar square label-
terminations on the outside (the inner roll mould turned up and
stopping against it) are of that period, although the cusps to the
heads have all been renewed and made pointed. The roof is also
270 Notes on the Churches in the Neighbourhood of Warminster.
coeval with the walls and windows, as are also the arches into the
Bath Chapel and organ chamber on the north and south of the
chancel, so that there were probably older chapels on the same site :
further evidence of this is seen in the south chapel (or organ
chamber), the roof of which is an old one re-used. The chancel,
north and south chapels of nave, the vestry on the east of the latter
(which contains a good fourteenth century piscina with ogee arch),
and the clerestory of the nave, are all new work, executed about
thirty years ago. In the Bath Chapel is the monument of Sir John
Thynne, the builder of Longleat, who died in 1580, also portions of
armour, consisting of three helmets, a sword, a pair of gauntlets,
and two collars : these are suffering injury from rust and should
receive attention.
The old altar-slab has been restored to its original use, although
somewhat re-worked and altered in size.
THE ALMS HOUSES.
The picturesque block of eight almshouses (for six men and two
women) was founded in 1665 by Sir James Thynne. The three
window gables on the front and three chimney gables at the back
are the original construction, but the turret and clock are modern :
there is a good oak staircase with moulded steps, and some of the
partitions are panelled in oak. These, with the village schools and
the Church beyond, in its well-kept churchyard, form a charmingr
group. In the churchyard stands a magnificent yew tree.
HILL DEVERILL.
The old Church has entirely disappeared, and the present one,
built in 1843, is a poor structure dedicated to the Assumption of
the Blessed Virgin Mary. It contains a late fourteenth century
altar-tomb of the Ludlow family, who were then owners of the
manor. There is also an interesting Jacobean tablet on the north
wall, and, although the design is quite stone-like, it is made of wood
and painted. A chantry for four chaplains was founded here by
Robert le Bor in 1324 and endowed with lands (Modern Wilts,
Heytesbury, p. 10).
By C. E. Pouting, F.S.A. 271
The Manor House near was the seat of the Ludlows, and was
apparently built by them at about the middle of the Elizabethan
period and re-modelled in the south front and west end at about
1700 (after the manor had passed into the hands of the Cokers), to
which period (pace the local tradition that it was constructed for
cannon /) I assign the oval window over the porch and the four-light
mullioned windows with elliptic heads. The date 1781 on the gate
piers refers doubtless to their erection.
Adjoining the house on the east is a barn fifteen bays in length,
of early sixteenth century date : the superstructure had fallen over
westward before the erection of the house, which was, perhaps, built
to support it.
In the farmyard south of the house are some interesting remains
of buildings of the end of the fifteenth century, and it seems not
improbable that this was the original site of the manor house.1 The
parts existing seem to have been the gateway or porter's lodge, for
the thickness of the walls (about 2ft.) would exclude their being
considered part of the main building. What looks like the porch,
with a doorway about 5ft. 9in. wide, having the typical four-centred
arch under a square head, with a coeval niche over it (now occupied
by a shield), remains; also much of the walls and roof of the
building against which it was erected, and one window; but the
plan is by no means easy to be traced, owing to the alterations
which have been made in incorporating it with the modern farm
buildings.
BRIXTON DEVERILL. S. MICHAEL.
. This Church consists of chancel and nave with western tower.
The lower part of the -tower is thirteenth century work; the
archway opening into the nave has two orders of chamfers, stopping
on square imposts, with square jambs below ; the belfry stage was
re-built in the fifteenth century, when the lancet window on the
south side was replaced. A new doorway has been inserted in the
1 For the drawing from which the accompanying plate is taken the Society is
indebted to the kindness of Mr. Harold Brakspear,
272 Notes on the Churches in the Neighbourhood of Warminster.
tower, also a new west window with the old crocketted label re-used.
The spire and parapet are also modern — the latter bearing the in-
scription : — " Of that which God gave this spire was erected and
the tower adorned by the Rector A.D. 1852."
The chancel arch is a very fine specimen of early thirteenth
century work with deeply-cut mouldings — the central member being
the " dog-tooth " — springing from clustered jamb shafts.
The remainder of the Church has been re-built — the nave probably
temp. Queen Anne, as judged by the ceiling and font : the chancel
is stated to have been lengthened 14ft. in 1862.
There is a medieval bell, bearing the inscription : — " >ji
The old house close by has a fifteenth century inner doorway.
KINGSTON DEVERILL. S. MARY.
This Church consists of chancel, nave with a chapel on the south,
and central tower. The arcade of two bays between nave and chapel
is of fourteenth century date, and consists of two orders of the
" wave-mould." The tower is of late fourteenth century date and
has plain parapets and good gargoyles : the staircase, square on
plan, is carried above the parapet — the doorway giving access to it
has been placed outside in recent times.
The remainder of the Church was re-built in 1847.
In the chancel is a recumbent effigy of the early Decorated period,
which has been extensively renewed. There is also a thirteenth
century coffin-slab, with inscribed cross. The pulpit has old
traceried panels of " Flowing " type — probably Flemish work. The
west window contains some Flemish glass of sixteenth century date.
An oak chair bearing date 1682 is in the sanctuary.
Sir R. C. Hoare (Mere, p. 138) gives an extract from Bishop
Osmund's Register, 1099, showing that a chapel of S. Andrew
existed in this parish and belonged to Mere Church. Canon
Jackson concludes that it stood in that part of the parish formerly
belonging to the Canons of Lisieux in Normandy (Wilts Arch.
Mag., vol. x., p. 275).
By C. E. Ponting, F.S.A. 273
CODFORD ST. MART.
I have been able to glean some interesting information of the
state of this Church before its restoration from " Memorials of the
Parish of Codford St. Mary/' written by Dr. Ingram (author of
"Memorials of Oxford" and President of Trinity College), and
published by Parker in 1844. This book has been kindly lent to
me by the present Rector, and as it contains an illustration of the
old Church it is valuable. Its plan consisted of nave with a porch
on the south near the west end, chancel, and western tower, and all
which is shown in the sketch of the exterior is Late Decorated and
Perpendicular work.
In 1843 a portion of the south wall of the nave near the east
end fell down " in consequence of its being hollowed out in the
inside, first to receive the rood-loft and then the pulpit." On this
Mr. Wyatt took in hand the restoration and enlargement of the
Church, and " ifc was deemed necessary to take down the greater
part of the old structure to the foundation, with the exception of
the tower and a part of the chancel." A south aisle of three bays
was added to the nave and an organ chamber on the south of the
chancel : Mr. Wyatt's octagonal piers have subsequently been
converted into circular ones. Fortunately the re-building did not
extend to the unique chancel arch, which I will presently describe ;
but all traces of the rood-loft have disappeared, and the Elizabethan
monument which previously stood on the south of the sanctuary,
the wall projecting on the outside behind it, was removed to the
new organ chamber. This projection Dr. Ingram considers was
originally built for sedilia, which were removed to make way for
the monument, but as the plan shows the two buttresses on the
south to have been thinner than those on the north it seems more
likely that it was erected to receive the monument. On the removal
of the whitewash over the chancel arch it was found that it had
been " sprinkled in fresco with a darkish red colour," and partially
enriched with a kind of running scroll-work of the same material,
and traces of this still exist. Dr. Ingram goes on to say " evidences
of the prevalent taste of succeeding periods were observable in.
different parts of the edifice : the hagioscope, the confessional, the
VOL. XXVII. — NO. LXXXI. TJ
274 Notes on the Churches in the Neighbourhood of Warminster.
rood-loft, the aumbry, and more than one piscina," but these are no
longer to be found, unless, perhaps, some of the more obscure
fragments preserved in the porch represent some of them. One
would rather like to see what the " confessional " was like. The
head of a fourteenth century window is re-used in the new aisle.
Although the Church has lost much of its former interest, there
remains sufficient in the chancel arch to make this most worthy of
our attention.
This arch consists of two distinct archways of different periods,
placed one behind the other. The older archway is on the east side,
and exhibits features of the commencement of the Norman period ;
the jambs have attached columns or angle shafts cylindrical in section,
Gin. in diameter, with a very early form of base-mould not unlike
those found in Saxon work (e.g., in the doorway of Corhampton,
Hants), the capital on the south has a square moulded abacus and
an early type of volute ornament, that on the north is carved with
a leaf and grape ornament. The arch itself of this older portion
consists of one order with square edge and without label; it is
slightly pointed and it might have been re-built when the later arch
was added, but if so the old stones were re-used. The later archway
consists of an outer western order and an inner, or central order,
both of shaft and arch, and it bears the Transitional-Norman stamp
of the last quarter of the twelfth century. The angle shafts and
the central shafts are both attached like the older one, but instead
of being a plain cylinder in section they have a pointed fillet running
from cap to base and carried through the band and neck-moulds.
They are divided by a moulded band or annulus, which is principally
found in Early English work and never in the pure Norman. (This
band has been renewed in three out of the four cases, but the old
stones taken out are preserved and should be reinstated) . The base
and neck-mouldings are much further developed than in the outer
arch, the caps still retain the square abacus and volute, but with
later mouldings, and the carvings are quite distinct — the ends of the
volutes having the trefoil leaf seen in thirteenth century work. On
the south side the abacus of the later cap has the stop of the earlier
one worked on it (the later abacus on the north has been renewed).
By C. E. Pouting, F.S.A. 275
Both the outer and inner arches are pointed and made to follow the
line of the old, unless (as previously suggested) the old was altered
to follow the new. On the west face the outer ring has a Transitional
type of scroll ornament running round, but there is no label. As
there are two kinds of stone used in the archway it is probable that
a careful removal of the colour wash which still covers it might
reveal further evidence as to how far the older parts have been
altered or renewed.
The circular bowl and part of the shaft of the font are of about
the same date as the later portions of this arch — circa 1180.
On a shelf in the porch are preserved some very valuable old
fragments found in the walls during the restoration of the Church.
This method of dealing with them is an excellent one, and worthy
of more general adoption.
They are : —
(1) Two bands of the later western shafts of the chancel arch
removed [? why] during the restoration.
(2) A cap, apparently, of one of the early western shafts of
the chancel arch — a beak head with an interlaced, almost
pre-Norman looking, ornament passing through it ; this
stone corresponds in height with the old cap on the east
side and has the same neck-mould.
(3) A cap of the type of the later chancel arch work and of
the same depth as those in situ, and belonging to a shaft
of the same size, but the neck-mould is larger.
(4) A piece of chevron mould, the voussoir of an arch.
(5) An interesting stone of the Early Norman period, carved
with a lion couchant, its tail carried between its legs and
over its back, and below this, geometrical ornaments, an
interlaced cross, a fleur-de-lys within a circle, &c.
(6 and 7) Two masks of late Norman work, representing the
heads of beasts very like the label terminals at Malmes-
bury Abbey.
(8) The coeval part of a king's head, with part of the crown.
(9 and 10) Parts of the trunk and arm of an effigy wearing a
dagger, apparently thirteenth century work.
276 Notes on the Churches in the Neighbourhood of War minster.
(11) The head and shoulders of a female figure of the Eliza-
bethan period, probably taken from the Mompesson tomb
in the organ chamber, which formerly stood on the
south side of the chancel ; the front part of the monument,
only, is now preserved — this is in excellent condition and
is of late Elizabethan character.
Sir R. C. Hoare ascribes the monument to John Mompesson,
Rector 1612 — 1645,1 but, as he did not die until 1645, it is too
early in style, and it is, as Dr. Ingram suggests, more probably
that of Sir Richard Mompesson, Knight, the owner of the manor,
and particularly so if the mutilated effigy formed part of it. The
arms, in duplicate, on the monument, are : " Mompesson, a lion
rampant, charged on the shoulder with a martlet or pinzon, impaling
the following coat : 1.0 fesse between three .... heads
erased; 2. Jive lozenges in fesse ; 3. three lions passant in pale ; 4.
as the first. The colours not known." [Sir R. C. Hoare.]
In the gable of the chancel are stones inscribed ^z and -,^07?
the former probably commemorates a re-building of the wall by
John Mompesson, Rector at that time.
The tower is of three stages with embattled parapet and diagonal
buttresses; the type of work is debased Perpendicular, the belfry
windows are without cusping, the arch opening into the nave spans
the whole width of the tower, and the mouldings are not continued
down the jambs.
The altar has a curious and interesting history, as to which I
quote fully from Mr. Ingram's book : —
" The interior of S. Mary's Church in Oxford being found in a disgraceful
state after the termination of the reign of the Puritans, Dr. Ralph Bathurst,
President of Trinity College and Dean of Wells, who was Vice-Chancellor soon
after the Restoration, gave £300 towards fitting it up in a decent manner for
University sermons. Sir Christopher Wren superintended the work. Among
other articles of oak carving was a pulpit which, in consequence of the alterations
lately made in the interior of that Church, by the kindness of a Fellow of Merton
College came into the possession of the Author, who has availed himself of the
suggestion of the Rev. T. Miles, of Stockton, by converting it into a communion
table."
1 The last manorial rector — the advowson was given to S. John's College by
Sir Giles Mompesson in 1639, and Dr. Ingram quotes a letter from Archbishop
Laud to the college dated 20th June of that year recording it.
% C. E. Pontinff, F.S.A. 277
The pulpit is a good piece of late Jacobean work.
CODFORD S. PETER.
This Church consists of chancel, nave and south porch, and
western tower, with modern north aisle and vestry.
The building was very bountifully " restored" in 1864, when the
north aisle, the porch, and the greater part of the nave and chancel
were re-built and the vestry added. The lower part of the east wall
of the chancel up to the set-off, with the buttress in the centre under
the east window, is thirteenth century work in w<*>but it is obvious
from the various stones bearing Norman carved ornament which
occur in the Early English work as well as in the re-built parts,
that a Church existed here anterior to this. Of these carvings in
the outer walls I may mention a bit of diaper work in the east end
of the chancel, a good piece of the fish-scale pattern in the north
aisle, and a chevron ornament in the south wall of the nave by the
porch. An old lancet window with a new head has been built into
the vestry. In the south wall of the chancel are triple sedilia of
late thirteenth century date with trefoil arches and gablets over,
singularly like those in the Lambert Chapel at Boyton, and probably
by the same hand. The seats are stepped up towards the east.
The diagonal buttresses were added to the chancel in the fourteenth
century, and the mullions of the east window appear to be coeval —
the head is modern. The tower and the old parts of the porch,
consisting of the mouldett plinth, diagonal buttresses, cornice, with
good gargoyles, embattled parapet, and the outer doorway with the
sickles — the Hungerford badge — in its label terminals, are ad-
mirable specimens of late fourteenth century work. The tower is of
two stages with well-pronounced square stair-turret on the north,
west window of two lights (the tracery renewed) with label terminals
carved to represent a bishop and a king ; it is crowned by a good
cornice with gargoyles and embattled parapet — the pinnacles are
new. The tower arch is of two orders of mouldings.
The two two-light windows and two buttresses of the north aisle
are old features from the nave walls, made up and built in here.
278 Notes on the Churches in the Neighbourhood of Warminster.
The parapet and three windows on the south of the nave are doubtless
made up of old stones. An old drawing, dated 1843, shows only
a two-light window eastward and westward of the porch, besides a
small later window under the last-named ; it also shows a two-light
square-headed window and a priests' door in the south wall of the
chancel, since re-built.
The nave roof, arcades, and chancel arch are new features j the
porch was, as the inscription inside states, re-built by Maria
Waldron, in memory of a friend who died in 1863. The vaulted
roof and inner doorway are part of this work.
The ancient colouring on many of the stones outside the north
wall of the chancel and vestry indicate their former use in the
interior.
In the chancel stands a remarkable stone discovered during the
works of 1864 used as a building stone in the wall on the north side
of the chancel arch. It has been fully described and illustrated by
Dr. Baron,1 who says : —
" The subject has never been satisfactorily explained, and is still open to in-
• vestigation. Probably, if its date could be approximately fixed, it might by a
comparison of contemporary documents be found to be a conventional way of
representing some religious incident, e.g., Noah as the builder of the ark and as
a husbandman, or the return of the spies from the promised land. In the front
elevation is seen the figure of a man holding in his right hand, over his head, a
branch of an apple or other fruit tree, and looking up at it in a very awkward
manner; in his left hand he holds a mallet, or it may be a wallet. His short
emock and his slipper-shaped shoes agree with Anglo-Saxon costume. The
bamboo-formed moulding or leaning pillars with which the figure is enclosed
appear also to belong to the same period, i.e., the tenth or eleventh century, say
about A.D. 1000."
Dr. Baron's sketch does not show the pin which secures the robe
at the neck in front. I would only add that I consider it to be the
tapered shaft of a Saxon cross of the tenth century — the finishing
off at the top is modern and in cement. The key ornament running
round the upper part is worthy of note.
The font is a magnificent specimen of early Norman work coeval
with the carved stones before noticed as built into the walls. It has
a rectangular bowl, 2ft. 6in. by 2ft. 2in., on a circular shaft and
1 Wilts Arch. Mag., vol. xx., p. 138.
Notes on the Opening of a Tumulus on 279
base. On the sides are two rows of ornament — the lower a diaper
pattern carried round and the upper varying- on the four sides. It
retains the original axe marks well preserved.
Outside the chancel is the matrix of a brass — a single male figure,
and another of a kneeling figure with motto, in the aisle floor. It
is interesting to see a good specimen of a black-letter Bible, dated
1617, still in use on the lectern. The altar is the gift of Bishop
Hamilton in 1863.
The candelabrum in the chancel is a good modern copy of an old
design.
The list of rectors goes back to 1302.
The Royal arms over the tower arch are those of George I. — 1716.
on % %enittj§ of a Ctimttltts on Colly
1893.
By the Rev. E. H. GODDAED.
jN the summit of the hill connecting Bidcombe with Cold
Kitchen, some 889ft. above sea-level, and commanding
most extensive views in every direction, in the parish of Brixton
Deverill, but within about six chains of the borders of the parishes
of Kingston and Hill Deverill, is a mound marked " Tumulus" on
the new 6-inch Ordnance Map, and very visible against the sky-line
from some miles off on the Warminster Road.
It is apparently to this spot that reference is made in Hoare's
Ancient Wilts, vol. I., p. 40, as follows : —
" In the year 1803 Mr. Cunnington made some researches with the spade on
this elevated summit, and on that part which intervenes between Bidcombe and
Cold Kitchen where there are several of those irregularities and verdant patches
280 Notes on the Opening of a Tumulus on
noticed in my introduction as never failing proofs of ancient population. There
he found three Eoman coins (small brass Constantino, Gratian, and one illegible),
fragments of stuccoed walls painted crimson and green, and a great deal of
pottery of various sorts, with an ivory pin ; the adjoining barrow had been
opened before as he found pieces of an urn, burnt bones, and a pin or bodkin of
bone, mixed indiscriminately with the soil."
After these apparently unprofitable excavations of Mr. Cunning-
ton's, further researches were left to a colony of rabbits, who had
occupied the mound in force, and for many years had been engaged
in diligently excavating it, with the result that so many objects of
one sort and another were thrown out of their burrows from time
to time that in 1892 Mr. William Stratton, of Kingston Deverill —
in whose occupation the land is — determined to open the mound
again. This was accordingly done, and a trench was cut through
it from south-west to north-east down to the level of the original
chalk. A good deal of broken pottery, a quantity of animal bones,
and several bone implements, as well as the spoon and the bit of
coral, were found at this time, but the whole contents of the mound
seemed to be disturbed and mixed up together.
In September, 1893, Mr. Stratton asked me to come to Kingston
Deverill and assist at further diggings in the mound to see whether
anything more could be discovered. Accordingly a party of labourers
were set to work to cut a trench at right angles to the one dug in
1892 — that is, roughly, from south-east to north-west.
The tumulus itself is a low spreading shapeless mound covering
a large space of ground, its greatest height in the centre being 5ft.
to the level of the chalk ; its diameter from south-west to north-east
about 27yds., and that from south-east to north-west 38yds.
Doubtless the continual burrowing of the rabbits, and the digging
of the men who ferret them, as well as the previous openings, had
done much to increase this shapeless spreading of the mound.
All round, for 50yds. or more in every direction, there are de-
pressions in the ground, some of them circular, but the majority of
them of irregular shape. These are evidently the sites of ancient
habitations. I could not, however, find any traces on the surface,
of surrounding ditches or works of defence. One or two of these
depressions were dug into. In one seventy-four paces to the west
Cold Kitchen Hill, 1893. 281
of the mound a large deposit of oyster-shells was found about Gin.
under the turf. In another, forty-one paces south-west of the
mound, we dug down 4ft. Gin. through rich Hack mould — evidently
the result of ancient habitation, for such black mould could never
be produced by merely natural causes at the summit of a high chalk
down, on which, moreover, the natural soil above the chalk is a
thin layer of reddish clay with flints — before the chalk bottom was
reached. We, however, found but little in these depressions, only
an iron fibula, a bronze pin, some bones and broken pottery, and we
saw no signs of stone foundations or of the painted plaster spoken
of by Mr. Cunnington in 1803.
The great majority of the bones, the fragments of pottery, and
the other articles illustrated in the accompanying plates came from
the two trenches cut through the mound.
Both these were carried down to the level of the original chalk,
but no sign of an interment below the tumulus was found. The
mound itself was composed of made earth, with a few pieces of stone
from the greensand which crops out at the foot of the hill near
Maiden Bradley and Horningsham, and throughout the whole mass
small veins and single bits of charcoal, quantities of animal bones,
and broken pieces of pottery were found scattered apparently at
random. Indeed, as the rabbit-burrows went down in places nearly
to the original level, and as the whole tumulus was honeycombed
with them, it was impossible to say of most of the things found
whether they were in their original positions or not. So that no
certain evidence could be gained as to the age of the mound — for
the small articles found 3ft. or 4ft. deep might very well have fallen
down rabbit-holes from near the surface, whilst, on the other hand,
the rabbits had no doubt dug out many articles originally buried
deep below the surface. The only things which could not well have
moved from the spot where they were originally placed were the
skeletons — or rather portions of skeletons, for the skulls and upper
parts could not be found — which were discovered about 2ft. under the
surface, slightly to the south-east of the centre of the mound, with
the feet in one case pointing roughly to the east. A couple of large
chalk flints, about a foot square, were found just above the skeletons.
282 Notes on the Opening of a Tumulus on
I did not at the time realise that the bones belonged to more than
one individual, until Gen. Pitt-Rivers pointed out that there were
four os calces and four astragali, and that therefore there must have
been two skeletons.
Of the animal bones I collected all the complete examples that
were unearthed and submitted them, together with specimens of the
pottery, to Gen. Pitt-Rivers, who has most kindly identified them
and given me the following notes upon them. He writes : — " I
have not attempted to identify the broken bones or those in which
the epiphyses were wanting, which are all young, and from the
number of these I imagine that — as has sometimes been found here
— young animals were a good deal eaten. The tibia of the man-
assuming it to be male — gives a stature of about 5ft. O'Sin., and
therefore of the same small size that we have so frequently
here (near Rushmore) in connection with Romano- British remains.
" The bones of ox show that they were small animals about the
size of our Kerry Cow, and less than the Alderney, in which respect
they tally with those found here in both Romano- British and Bronze
Age remains ; and as the size of the bones in excavations is generally
very persistent I think we may assume that that was the prevailing
size of the ox both here and there.
"The sheep, judging chiefly by the metacarpi, but also by the
lower jaws and all the other remains, were of the small thin-legged
breed that has been found in excavations here, and which are com-
parable only with the St. Kilda breed of our own time. An idea
may be formed of the slenderness of the bones by the fact that the
least circumference of the metatarsi is only 36mm, whereas that of an
ordinary Dorset ram is 55mm.
" The remains of pig are of small size, but I think they are all
young.
" The dog is of the size of a terrier.1"
As I have said above the contents of the mound had been so mixed
up that there was no certainty that anything was in its original
place. All the coins were found in the mound, that of Carausius on
the surface, that of Valens about 1ft. Gin. under the surface, that
of Constautine in the earth thrown out from the trench. The
Cold Kitchen Hill, 1893. 283
sling-stone and the square bone counter came from near the old
surface line. The spoon was found in the first trench cut in 1892,
about 2ft. from the surface, but in much-disturbed soil. The coral
was picked up in the soil thrown out of the trench, as also was the
bronze ring, whilst the roe deer's horn came from a depth of about
2ft. in the mound.
As to the age of the mound, the majority of the objects found
are certainly Romano-British ; and as the many references I have
given to Gen. Pitt-Rivers' volumes show, are of the same age and
character as those found in the Romano-British villages round
Rushmore. Indeed, it is evident that this was a similar settlement.
The presence of the worked flints proves nothing — it is possible that
they may have been on the ground already and have been thrown
up into the mound with the soil ; or, as is more probable perhaps,
they may have been used by the Romano-British people, for it is
being recognised that there is no hard and fast line to be drawn as
to the date at which flint implements ceased to be used, for they
may have continued in use for some purposes — certainly as " strike-a-
lights " — amongst the people, more especially in isolated localities,
long after the time when even iron had come into general use.
On the other hand, the presence of so much " British " pottery,
scattered, together with the animal bones, throughout the whole
mass of the mound — for the fragments of coarse hand- made pottery
recognised as " late Celtic " or " British " were more numerous than
those of the more advanced Romano -British or Roman — goes to
prove either that the site of the settlement was occupied in pre- Roman
times, and continued to be occupied through the Roman period, or
that the origin of the tumulus itself, and of the urns and pottery it
contained, was pre-Roman, and that the Roman and Romano- British
articles found in it now made their way into it in later times when
it was surrounded by a Romano- British settlement.
It would probably be possible to settle this question by a careful
and systematic excavation of the whole site of the settlement, which
it can hardly be doubted would yield very interesting results if done
with the necessary thoroughness and care. Unfortunately Cold
Kitchen Hill is not within the range of Gen. Pitt-Rivers'
284 Notes on the Opening of a Tumulus on
archaeological activity, and the work would require both more
money and more experience on the part of the excavators than
seems likely to be forthcoming- just now.
The whole of the objects found, together with representative
specimens of the animal bones and also of all the different kinds of
pottery, carefully labelled so as to be available for reference, have,
by the kindness of Mr. Stratton, been placed in the Museum ; as
has also a bronze socketed looped celt, with three lines in relief on
the blade, which was picked up by himself on the surface of one of
the old common fields of the parish of Kingston Deverill, towards
Bradley, after an unusually deep ploughing by steam about the
year 1871. It weighs 5oz., and measures 3jin. in length, and If in.
across the broadest part of the blade.
Bronze Celt from Kingston Deverill. (Two-thirds actual size.)
LIST OF OBJECTS FOUND.
Coins,
3rd brass of Valens, A.D. 364—378. Very common.
Inscription obliterated.
1 Billon coin of Carausius, A.D. 287—293. The head on
this coin is clear, but the inscription is defaced. Mr.
J. W. Brooke, of Marlborough, reads it : IMP. CARAVSIVS
AVG. The rev. has a figure holding cornucopia and
scales, but the inscription is illegible. Mr. Brooke
states that this coin is a rare one.
3rd brass coin of Constantine, struck at Alexandria, the
obv. reading CONSTAN - TINOPOLIS. It is a common type.
1 This coin is now in the collection of Mr. T. H. Baker, of Mere Down.
7.
ARTICLES FOUND ON COLD KITCHEN HILL, 1893.
Scale 77 , Iciunl Sl&
Cold Kitchen Hill, 1893. 285
Iron Objects.
No. 1. A hinge? 4jin.
„ 2. Part of fibula or safety pin, 3Jin.
„ 3. Fibula or safety pin, 2|in.
„ 4. Arrow-head, 3Jin. Blade flat, Jin. thick.
„ 5. Knife, curved, 4jin. long, Jin. wide at broadest
part of blade.
„ 6. Piece of iron bent into oval form, lin. x fin.
,,15. A ring Ijin. in diameter, on which hang loosely
four pendants, lin. to Ijin. in length, of thin
flat iron cut off square at the bottom. An
additional pendant is detached. The whole
has somewhat the appearance of a chatelaine,
but the pendants have evidently never been
anything more than they are now. It seems
to be an ornament of some kind. I cannot
find any figure or description of a similar article.
In addition to these, five other pieces of iron were found — one a
sharply-pointed article, 3f in. long, may be a broken stylus, and two
smaller pieces are possibly sandal cleats.
Bronze Objects.
No. 7. King of solid polished bronze, very slightly cor-
roded, diameter liin., straight on one side —
apparently the ring of a buckle or strap.
„ 8. Circular brooch, with hinge pin, diameter, lin.,
the pin lost. The upper surface has been
covered with some substance now so much
corroded that no trace of pattern can be seen
except a very small portion of a kind of egg
and tongue moulding round the edge. A
precisely similar brooch from Woodyates is
figured by Gen. Pitt- Rivers in Excavations,
vol. III., PI. clxxxii.
„ 9. Handle of spoon, 4|in. long.
286 Notes on the Opening of a Tumulus on
„ 10. Pin, perhaps of a fibula, 3 Jin.
,,18. Bracelet of two strands of twisted wire, with
hook fastening, l|in. diameter. This could
only have fitted the wrist of a small child. A
similar one is figured by Gen. Pitt-Rivers,
from Bokerly Dyke. Excavation*, vol. III.,
PI. clxxv.
In addition a piece of very thin sheet bronze, 6|in. long, perfectly
plain, was found, roughly squeezed or rolled together.
.
Bone Objects.
No. 13. Bone, bored hollow (metatarsus of sheep ?), cut
off at both ends, 2£in. long. Gen. Pitt-Rivers
figures a similar article from the Romano-
British village at Rotherley in Excavations,
vol. II., PI. cxvii. He suggests that it may
have been used as a bobbin in a shuttle, as
such bones are used still in the Hebrides.
„ 19. Button? 2 Jin. x fin., of thin bone, worked flat
on both sides, pointed at the ends, the edges
sharpened, with two holes Jin. apart drilled
through the centre.
„ 14. Square article, lin. across, edges rounded, roughly
flattened on inside — the outside has the slight
natural curve of the bone. May be a counter
for some game. Two circular disks found at
Rotherley are figured by Gen. Pitt-Rivers in
Excavations, vol. III., PI. clxxiv. Four small
square counters found in barrow No. 20 on
Lake Down are figured in Ancient Wilts, vol.
I., PI. xxxi.
„ 20. Six gouges ? or parts of ditto, formed by slicing
off to a point the metatarsal bone of a sheep ;
the knuckle end of three of them being
pierced with a hole for convenience of
14-
1 6.
15-
'7-
18
21.
ARTICLES FOUND ON COLD KITCHEN HILL, 1893.
SCALE TWO-THIRDS ACTUAL SIZE.
Various. •
Cold Kitchen Rill, 1893. 287
suspension. Two similar gouges from
Wilsford Down are in the Museum.
An awl, the point broken off, 3Jin.
A flat rib-bone worked to a point at one end,
and a second flat piece, also worked.
,,11. Roughly worked piece of hard chalk, fin. in
diameter, Jin. thick, circular depression in
centre on each side. A counter for a game?
„ 12. Part of well-turned bracelet of oval section 2f in.
long, apparently of Kimmeridge shale. A
similar portion of another, of the same ma-
terial, 2 fin. long, thicker, and with a sharp
edge on one side, is not figured.
Half an earthenware bead, or spindle whorl,
diameter lin.
,,17. A sling-stone of earthenware, If in. length x
lin. in diameter, egg-shaped and pointed at
both ends. Five similar sling-stones of
earthenware, found in a Romano- British
dwelling-pit at Beckhampton Down, in 1884,
are in the Devizes Museum — with a stone one
in modern use in New Caledonia of the same
form for comparison. Others are figured by
Gen. Pitt- Rivers in his Excavations, vol. III.,
PI. ccxii., No. 7, and in Archaologia, vol. xlvi.,
p. 46' 7, the latter from pits in Mount Cabum
camp, near Lewes. Others found in pits at
Highfield are in the Salisbury Museum.
,,16. A branch of red coral, worked with two lines
round the bottom and one line round the
end of the projection. A bracelet of fourteen
beads of pink coral is figured by Gen. Pitt-
Rivers, Excavations, vol. I., PI. xliv., from
the Romano-British village of Woodcuts ; and
288 Notes on the Opening of a Tumulus on
a necklace of beads of the same material from
Padstow, Cornwall, found with Roman re-
mains., is figured in Arehaological Journal,
xvii., 315. This material is rarely found.
„ 21. Spoon of white metal, in perfect preservation,
quite uncorroded, of late Roman type, the
handle joined to the bowl by the usual curved
attachment. The bowl IJin long x IJin. in
breadth. The handle 4jin. long, octagonal in
section, straight and pointed. The bowl shows
considerable signs of use by a right-handed
person.
Two precisely similar spoons are figured in
Hoare's Ancient Wilts. Another, with a spiral
handle, found at Bokerly, is figured in Ex-
cavations, vol. III., PI. clxxv., of which Gen.
Pitt-R/ivers remarks : — <c Similar spoons have
been frequently found among Roman remains,
and were used for eating eggs. The point at
the end of the shank was used for picking
snails out of their shells, these being a com-
mon article of food among the Romans/'
Flint Objects.
Only three worked flints were found. A finger-shaped
" strike-a-light " of brown cherty flint, 3|in. in length,
bruised by use at the end, and two very roughly-made
" scrapers " of black flint, only slightly worked on one
edge.
A good many flints which had been burnt were found-
possibly they may have been used as pot boilers.
Stone Objects.
An irregular-shaped piece of hard sandy chert? 7in. x
7iin., rubbed smooth on one edge, and showing hollowed
marks of rubbing on its upper surface.
Cold Kitchen Hill, 1893. 289
A broken flat rubber S^in. x 4fin. and Ijin. thick, rubbed
very smooth on one side, and partially so on the other.
Fine-grained sandstone. ? Sarsen.
A small portion of a similar rubber, IJin. thick, rubbed
smooth on both sides.
The Pottery,
The fragments of pottery were also submitted to Gen.
Pitt-Rivers, who has carefully noted and described the
different kinds.
British. Many fragments of British " No. 1 Quality/*
having large grains of flint, chalk, or shell in its com-
position. This quality is generally found with British
remains, but it is also found occasionally with remains
of the Roman period. In this case there is a hardness
about most of it which leads to the inference that it
might be of the Roman period, but it is hand-made.
Many fragments of British " No. 2 Quality, " having few
if any large grains in its composition. This is the
quality of which British urns are generally composed,
It is hand-made, not lathe-turned. A portion of the
bottom of a vessel apparently of this quality has three
holes drilled in it. Gen. Pitt-Rivers has found many
such perforated vessels in his excavations.
Romano-British. Two or three fragments of a red brown
ware, hand-made, tooled on the outside, with a high
polish, with plain unbeaded rim, unlike anything found
at Rotherley or Woodcuts, but identical with the material
of the " food vessels " in the Museum, from a pit on
Oldbury Hill. Probably Romano- British.
Fragment of red brick-coloured pottery, without sand in,
it — late British, or Romano- British.
Fragments of Romano- British pots with bead rims, similar
to fragments abundant at Rotherley and Woodcuts.
Fragments of blackish pottery, probably Romano- British,
VOL. XXVII. — NO. LXXXI. X
290 Notes on ike Opening of a Tmnulus.
no sand in its composition, and hand-made, similar to
pottery at Kotberley and Woodcuts.
One fragment of brownish red, hand-made, much tooled
inside, no sand, burnt very hard, unlike anything found
at villages near Rushmore.
One fragment of thin, well-burnt ware, grey in centre,
with brown glaze or polish on outside,, tooled inside,
unlike anything found at villages near llushmore.
Roman. Five very small fragments of red Samian, best
quality, one having the ordinary festoon pattern.
One fragment of imitation Samian ?
One fragment of hard lathe-turned " New Forest Ware,"
reddish black outside, grey inside, fluted.
Several fragments of grey lathe-turned pottery called by
Gen. Pitt-Rivers " Thin Grey, hard quality."
Several fragments of lathe-turned rims, Roman, or Romano-
British grey ware.
Two small fragments of red colour in the largeness of the grains
resemble " British, No. 1," but the polish is peculiar. Unlike any-
thing found about Rushmore. Probably late British or Romano-
British.
The following is a list of the bones identified by Gen. Pitt- Rivers :
Ox. One tibia of small young ox.
One metatarsus of very small ox — rather smaller than Kerry Cow.
One metatarsus of small ox— a little larger than Kerry Cow, and smaller
than the Alderuey Cow.
Seven teeth. One horn of small ox cut off.
Three digits of small ox— size of Kerry Cow.
Pig. Three teeth, and eight fragments of upper and lower jaws of small pigs.
Dog. One tooth, and one fragment of lower jaw — size of terrier.
Sheep. Two teeth. One fragment of horn.
One lower jaw of small sheep— a little larger than St. Kilda.
Two lower jaws of small sheep — size of St. Kilda.
Eight fragments of lower jaws of small sheep.
Two metatarsi of young sheep,
Two nietacarpiof sheep— size of St, Kilda ram, height, 1ft. ll|in.
Notes on Food-Vessels from Oldbury Hill. 291
Three metacarpi of sheep a little larger than St. Kilda ram.
Two metacarpi of young sheep (small).
Two metacarpi of young sheep— larger and stouter animal than St. Kilda.
One radius of small sheep.
One fragment of tibia of small sheep.
Goat. Two horns.
Koe Deer. Horn.
Red Deer ? Fragment of tine.
The Human bones included tibia, pelvis, fibula, radius, clavicle, four os
calces, and four astragali. Only the left tibia could be measured ; its
length was 360 millimetres.
mi $99b*Wtm\8 from (SIbktg
By W. CUNNINGTON, F.G.S.
June, 1890, the Rev. W. C. Plenderleath was informed
that the flint-diggers on Oldbury Hill had found some
ancient British remains. On reaching the spot he was fortunate in
securing a perfect food- vessel, with its contents; and, by dint of much
searching, he obtained a quantity of fragments of two other similar
vessels. These, with three " loom-weights " (described below) and
a considerable quantity of bones of sheep, deer, ox, and hog (but
no human bones) were found in a pit some 6ft. below the surface,
just within the ramparts of Oldbury Camp, and about 100yds. south
of the monument. The surface of the turf at this spot was quite
smooth, with nothing to show that a pit-dwelling existed below, but
the finding of the articles just mentioned, in a pit of such a depth,
sufficiently proves that it was one of the ancient habitations which
abound within the camp — some of which have been opened and
x 2
292 Nates on Food-Vessels from Oldlury Hill.
described in Wilts Mag.) vol. xxiii.1 The perfect food or cooking-
vessel was exhibited by Mr. Plenderleath at the Annual Meeting
of the Society, at Devizes, in 1890 (Wills Mag., xxv. p. 248). The
undisturbed condition of its contents raised expectations that some
interesting relics might be found in it. This, however, proved to
be an antiquaries' disappointment. On removing the chalky soil
from the top of the vessel it was found to be three-parts full of a
very fine sandy earth, resembling in appearance ordinary Portland
cement. This has been analysed by Mr. Powell, of Denmark Hill,
and found to consist of fine siliceous sand, some carbonate of lime
and alumina, with a small quantity of iron. It may possibly be
silt from some brook or river. Mixed throughout this fine earth
were many small fragments of bone which had been more or less
burnt. Professor C. Stuart, of the Royal College of Surgeons, has
kindly examined these remains, and reports that " none of the
fragments are of human bone, and the small rounded one is the
internal sesamoid of some ungulate — probably red-deer."
There are three holes, carefully, though not symmetrically, bored
in the bottom of this vessel. They are counter-sunk on both sides.
When found these holes were covered over with little thin plates of
burnt clay, two of which are preserved. The holes themselves were
filled with the ordinary chalky earth.
Vessels with similar perforations in the bottom have been found
by Gen. Pitt- Rivers in some numbers in the Romano- British villages
of Rotherley and Woodcuts (see " Excavations ") and a fragment
with three holes in it from Cold Kitchen Hill (see above, p. 289) is in
the Museum. Such vessels are supposed to have been used for
1 The number of these pit-dwellings within the area of the camp proves that
this stronghold must have been much used in troublous times, by the ancient
population.
The detached entrenched camps which occupy the tops of many of our highest
hills were probably not originally intended as parts of a system of defence for
the county generally. The inhabitants (who, doubtless, in times of peace oc-
cupied the valleys, where food and water were abundant.) would avail themselves
of the temporary security afforded by the strong entrenchment, when the neigh-
bouring district was overrun or threatened by invading hordes. This view of
the subject entirely coincides with the opinions expressed by Gen. Pitt-Rivers,
in his work on the Hill Forts of Sussex (Arckceologia, xl., 11).
Notes on Food- Fessels from Qldbury Hill. 293
draining the moisture from various articles of food, or possibly
draining honey from the comb.
From the fragments of pottery we were able successfully to restore
one vessel and half of another. The three are of the same size-
about 4in. in height and 5 Jin. in width, of simple bowl shape, two
of them with almost straight sides, and square rims, the other
slightly wider at the top than at the base, without ornamentation
or handles, resembling in general appearance and size, the example
found in a dwelling-hole within the same camp by the late Mr. H.
Cunnington (see Wilts Mag., xxiii., 217). They are hand-made of
very fine well-burnt clay, probably of Romano-British date, and it
is only by close examination that it can be seen that they were not
turned on the wheel. Two of them are of a reddish brown colour,
carefully tooled and polished on the outside, the pottery of which
they are composed being identical with fragments found on Cold
Kitchen Hill, 1893, now in the Museum (see p. 289), but unlike
anything known to Gen. Pitt- Rivers from the villages near Rushmore.
Of the three " loom-weights " before mentioned, two are formed
of hard chalk and one of a stone resembling the calcareous concretions
found in the Oxford Clay. They are precisely like those from
Westbury, already in the Society's Museum — rudely formed,
flattened on two sides and tapering to one end, where a hole is bored
for suspension.1
Oldbury Hill abounds with remains of the ancient inhabitants,
and many interesting relics would reward the further researches of
the antiquary. The depression mentioned by the Rev. A. C. Smith,
Antiq. North Wills, p. 96, should be examined, and the whole area
of the camp trenched throughout.
[The illustration of the two most perfect of the vessels is from a photograph by
the Rev. B. W. Bradford.]
1 A set of about twenty of * these weights was found in the excavations at
Westbury Iron Works. They were unfortunately exposed to the frost, and
with .the exception of those which are now in the Museum were shivered to pieces.
294
otes on % §i$£ofmvg of
ottetg at Ijjroomsgvo&e, JJliltoit,
By B. H. CUNNINGTON, F.S.A. Scot.
[Bead at the War minster Meeting of the Society, 1893.]
iOWARDS the end of March, 1893, a man digging for road-
material on Broomsgrove Farm, near Milton, Pewsey, in
the occupation of Mr. William Kingston, found, at the depth of
about 16in. from the surface of the ground, a quantity of black
earth, that had apparently been burnt; digging a little further
down, this black earth was found to be mixed with many fragments
of broken pottery, and he shortly discovered a large urn in an in-
verted position but unfortunately much broken. He brought the
matter to the notice of his master, Mr. Kingston, who, knowing
the interest taken in such discoveries by our Society, communicated
with me on the subject at once.
On reaching the spot we made a careful examination of the place
and its surroundings, and ultimately came to the conclusion that
this had not been used as a burial-place, as we did not find any
remains of animal matter with the exception of two small bones
that have been identified as those of a sheep and had been broken
longitudinally, presumably for extraction of the marrow. Besides
these two pieces there was nothing but fragments of pottery mixed
with sooty matter — charcoal, wood ashes, &c. ; the urn itself being
tightly filled with the black earth only.1
Although the urn was very much broken we were able to find a
great many of the pieces, which later on I put together, making
the vessel fairly complete.
The digger still continued his course of work, and three days
1 1 may add that, whilst digging out the sandstone rock for the road repairs,
many specimens of fossil sponges were found.
Two FOOD-VESSELS FROM OLDBURY HILL.
PAGE 291.
Two URNS FOUND AT BROOMSGROVE FARM, NEAR MILTON, PEWSEY.
PAGE 294.
Notes on the Discovert/ of Romano- British Kilns and Pottery. 295
afterwards, whilst excavating laterally and in a southerly direction,
he found, 6yds. from the spot where he discovered the first urn, more
black earth, and partially uncovered another urn, which was inverted
like the one first discovered, and about 12in. below the surface of
the ground. It was very much broken up — probably some farm
implement had struck it in past years. It was left in situ, till I
had an opportunity of visiting the spot. After removing more
of the earth we found that the urn was encased in a hole lined with
clay, which had evidently been burnt. In this hole were a large
number of pieces of pottery. The hole was globular in shape.
Near the surface, or upper part, the cavity measured 2ft. Gin.
across, and its diameter was 3ft. Gin. in the widest part — near
the centre. The depth was 2ft. Gin. The burnt clay lining
averaged 2Jin. in thickness. The appearances indicated that the
clay had been fixed in position in the cavity whilst soft, and that
afterwards a fire had been lighted and kept alight for a considerable
time, as the clay was baked quite through, and had burnt to a decided
red brick colour.1
This kihr, as it may be called, was filled to the top with black
burnt earth and innumerable bits of pottery surrounding the urn.
In clearing out this stuff a flint knife, or scraper, was found, and ono
or two small fragments of Samian pottery, together with several
small sharp-pointed fragments of flint like small drills.
Having cleared this kiln out completely it was found to be con-
nected with a small channel, or flue, about 1ft. wide and lift, deep,
about half-way up the north wall of the cavity, and pursuing this
some little distance another kiln was discovered, and in its centre
another urn, similar in shape to the first found though much smaller.
This also was inverted and surrounded with pieces of pottery, burnt
wood, &c.
This kiln was much the same in shape as the other one, though
the thickness of the earth above it was only about 9iu. At its
widest part its diameter was 32in., the depth was 27in., and the
thickness of the clay lining at the bottom 2 Jin. In some places
1 Specimens of this clay lining, now in the Museum j show the marks of- the
sticks, fern leaves, &c., impressed upou it when the clay was wet.
296 Notes on the Discovery of Romano- British Kilns and Pottery
the clay lining measured t3in., and in others under 2in., showing
great inequality.
The urn had apparently been imperfectly baked, and fell to pieces
when it was removed. I have since been able to restore it, and it
is by far the best example, as it is quite complete except a small
piece of the rim.1
These kilns were apparently in a row and connected with each other
by flues, or narrow channels. Pursuing the last kiln northwards it was
found to get narrower as the excavation proceeded ; 4ft. from the en-
trance, or rather, the side which I first came upon it, it measured
32in. across, and two feet further on 25in., and further on still it ulti-
mately contracted to 14in. It therefore was not so globular as the
previous kiln, but shaped more like an egg set lengthways. I did
not excavate further, as it appeared that at this point we had reached
the end of the series of kilns in that direction. I, however, made
another excavation 19ft. in a direct line from this kiln, and found a
small flue or channel which seemed to be a continuation of the small
passage leading from the kiln. It was filled with black earth and
bits of pottery, and was about 16in. below the surface. A similar
excavation 10ft. further northward produced similar results. An
excavation at another 10ft. to the north led to no results. The
growing crops prevented an extensive system of trenches.
In addition to the urns and numerous pieces of pottery, masses of
a fine clayey mixture, turf fibres, and pieces of burnt clay were
found.
The upper greensand stratum at Broomsgrove contains horizontal
bands of sandstone and cherty rock, probably corresponding to the
" Potterne Rock " in the neighbourhood of Devizes and elsewhere,
as described by Mr. Jukes-Brown in Wilts Mag., vol. xxv., p. 322.
These horizontal layers would greatly facilitate the construction of
the globular-shaped kilns, as they would to a considerable extent
prevent the falling in of the looser sand.
Taking into consideration the discovery as a whole, together with
its situation, we may safely draw the following conclusions : — the
1 This is the smaller of the two urns in the accompanying illustration.
at Broomsffrove, Milton, Pewsey. 297
urns found and since put together are what are known as culinary
or domestic urns, intended to be used for carrying1 or storing water,
corn, &c., or any other of the domestic purposes to which vessels of
such construction and capacity might be put. The smallness of the
mouths of the urns compared with their size and capacity, and the
almost entire absence of any animal remains, points to the conclusion
that this was not a place of interment, but a place used for the
manufacture of domestic articles of pottery.
The urns appear to have been made on a potter's wheel, though
some of the pieces are so very roughly treated that it leaves room
for doubt as to their having been thus worked. Some of the smaller
and more delicate pieces of pottery look as if they formed parts of
small vessels such as cups, dishes, &c., for domestic uses.
Two of the urns have each two lines running round them, which
look as if they had been produced by the pressure of a stick, whilst
on the wheel. These lines are themselves irregular, and have between
them certain irregular lines and strokes which may have been in-
tended for ornamentation. They are, however, not at all conspicuous.
The last of the urns discovered has two lines running most of the
way round it, with an interval of one-sixteenth of an inch between
them. These two lines first run into each other and then disappear
entirely before completing the circuit of the urn.
The largest urn — the first found — measures in height 19jin.,
with a diameter of 10|in. across the rim, in the widest part, Com-
pared with its size the base of this urn is remarkably small, being
only about 6in. across. It is so beautifully and symmetrically shaped,
however, and stands so firmly, that there is little or no risk of its
toppling over.1
All the urns are very much altered in shape through pressure,
both lateral and vertical, caused probably by variations of the
seasons. Not being very deep below the surface they were no doubt
affected by frosts, and being only partially burnt were in a somewhat
soft state when first exposed to the air.
The largest urn is burnt somewhat red round the rim and shoulder,
1 This is the larger of the two urns in the accompanying illustration.
298 Notes on the Discovery of Romano- British Kilns and Pottery
but lower down the hardening* process appears to have had less effect.
In thickness this urn varies very much, in some places it is fin.
thick and in others not Jin. The bottom — which one would naturally
suppose to be the thickest part, measures about lin.
The other urns are — like the largest one — only partially burnt
and in an irregular degree over the whole surface, but their rims
appear to have been subjected to the greatest heat.
The urns appear to have been made of a fine clay or clay-puddle
mixed with grit, and the greater part o£ the surface when baked is
grey or black.
Large urns for storing corn and other products, some much ex-
ceeding in size those we have found, are still made in Morocco and
other parts of Africa and in South America. At Tetuan huge jars
are still made and fired in rude furnaces, which, judging from the
description given in a short paper in a recent publication, must
resemble in a great degree the Wiltshire kilns of which I have
spoken.
Archdeacon Farrar, in conversation with one of the Members of
our Society, informed him that the method of digging an oven in
the earth and connecting it with a channel to serve as a flue had
been commonly adopted by the Jews when camping- round Jerusalem,
before the Passover ; and I would draw attention to the fact that
the same method of making an oven is used in the British army
to-day when engaged in a campaign.
In October, 1893, I again visited Broomsgrove and unearthed
half of the top stone of a large quern, measuring 2^ft. across and
about 6in. in depth. It has an oblong groove cut from the central
hole to the depth of about lin., 2^in. long, and lin. wide. The
inner surface of this quern is very much worn and scored, and it
appears to me possible that it was used for grinding and mixing
the clay from which the urns were made.
A short time before a beautifully shaped vase of red ware was
unearthed about 5in. below the surface and a few yards from where
the kilns were discovered. This little vase had originally been
glazed, but most of the glazing had shaled off. It stands 4|in.
at Broomsgrove, "Milton, Pewsey. 299
high, and is about IJin. across the mouth, 2|in. across the body in
the widest part, and lin. across the base. About IJiti. from the
mouth there is a small raised band or ridge running round the vase,
and from this band downwards there are twelve rows of twelve
indentations each, irregular in their distance from one another,
though the rows are equidistant from one another. There is just a
vestige of a rim round the mouth, but it is very slight.
A small vase almost exactly like it in size and construction was
found in the Pans Lane Potteries, Devizes, many years ago, and is
now in our Museum at Devizes.
On March 16th, 1894, further excavations produced an urn
measuring 5|in. high and T^in. across the shoulder. It has a very
wide mouth, and a narrow thin upright rim about Jin. in depth.
It was not quite perfect, and had been crushed somewhat, probably
by agricultural implements ; I managed, however, to repair it, and
it is now fairly complete,
At the same time I found several distinct types of pottery, which
I sent to General Pitt- Rivers for identification. He has been kind
enough to send me the following particulars and descriptions :—
" The grey pottery is very interesting as it exactly resembles the
quality of ware found in the interior of the ramparts of Wansdyke
and is thus described in the relic table of Excavations, vol. III. :—
f Grey, without quartz sand, but with occasional grains of quartz
and large grains of stone and other materials, apparently cinders ;
of various thicknesses and apparently without ornamentation.'' "
This pottery is also mentioned in Excavations, vol. III., p. 32, where
Gen. Pitt-Rivers speaks of the desirability of ascertaining the locality
of the kilns in which it is fabricated. The passage, which I am
permitted to quote, is as follows :•—
** The other qualities [in addition to Saurian] of C. R. B. and G. are new, and
peculiar to Wansdyke, and although they are the same in both sections and the
entrenchment at Brown's Barn, they differ entirely from the common kinds of
pottery of Woodcuts, Rotherley, and Woodyates.
" It appears probable that all these common kinds were made in local kilns,
and, until the kilns are discovered, their sources must remain unknown."
300 Notes on the Discovert/ of Romano- British Kilns and Pottery
It may be interesting to state here that the Broomsgrove kilns
are situated at about a mile and three-quarters due south of the
nearest point of Wansdyke, and about seven and a half miles east
of Brown's Barn and the entrenchment there.
Continuing the description of the pottery sent, Gen. Pitt-Rivers
says : — " Most of the pottery seems to be Romano-British, and one
fragment of a flat convex bottomed saucer is Roman, but I have
found nothing at Rushmore exactly like it."
Gen. Pitt-Rivers further adds, that, in connection with possible
future excavations, " It would be interesting if in working out these
kilns you can by any possibility identify the pottery with coins of
any kind found in the kilns. It would afford a date for this pottery
and for that found in Wansdyke. The peculiarity of the pottery is
the black grains in it, apparently of cinder, which peculiarity I have
not found in any of the qualities of pottery found about Rushmore."
In his preface to Excavations in Bokerley awl Ifansdyke, vol. III.,
Gen. Pitt- Rivers says : —
" The grains of stone, quartz, sand, flint, shell, and other substances, mixed
up in considerable quantities in pottery'of a commoner kind to prevent its cracking
in the fire may be traced to their original beds, and will probably afford, when
properly studied, a clue to the district ill which the vessels were fabricated, and
when the kilns are discovered the distribution of their products will be the means
of tracing the trade routes that were frequented at the time.
" A good knowledge of local kilns will, therefore, add greatly to our knowledge
of earthworks, but investigations into the sites of ancient potteries can hardly
be said as yet to have become so serious a study as the subject demands. . . .
No more useful study could be undertaken by anyone anxious to contribute to
the groundwork upon which the investigation of British camps and earthworks
will have to be based."
The large urn first discovered, the other illustrated with it, and
portions of two other urns, as well as specimens of the burnt clay
lining of the kilns, and of the clay found with the vessels and ap-
parently used in their manufacture, have been placed in the Society's
Museum.
The quern stone, the small red vase, and the urn found in March,
1894, remain in the hands of Mr. Kingston.
In Memoriam James Waylen. 301
In conclusion, I should like to express my personal thanks, and
those of our Society, to Mr. William Kingston, for his kindness in
permitting us to follow these works as far as we have gone, and for
the great care he personally took in keeping these interesting remains
for our Society ; and, further, I would express our thanks to the
Trustees of the Somerset College — the owners of the land — for
allowing us to take possession of many of the articles for the
Museum.
ames
HHitft Bibliographical Notes of Ijfe
January 22nd, 1894, James Waylen died at 64, Lillie
Road, Fulham, at the age of 83, having been bora at 3,
Northgate Street, Devizes, on April 19th, 1810. His father — Mr.
Robert Waylen — was the last cloth manufacturer of the town, and
is said at one time to have employed over a thousand hands in his
business. James, his sixth son, began his schooling at Bratton,
continuing it at Mill Hill Grammar School, after which he became
a pupil of Thomas Telford, the well-known engineer, and under him
was engaged in the construction of the remarkable Dean Bridge,
at Edinburgh. He soon, however, gave up engineering, and took
to painting, going to Italy in 1834, after spending some time in a
London studio. In 1842 he married Mary Sophia Grimes, of Devizes,
and settled down at Etchilhampton. Here he wrote his " History
of Devizes " and " History of Marlborough" Mrs. Waylen dying
*#* The Editor desires to acknowledge the assistance he has derived in the
preparation of this notice from information supplied by Mr. W. Cunnington,
F.G.S., and from the obituary notices of Mr. Waylen which appeared in the
Devizes Gazette and the Devizes Advertiser*
302 In Memorlam J~awes Wayten.
in 1859 he married, secondly, in 1862, Sarah Tompkins, daughter
of Mr. G. W. Anstie, of Park Dale, Devizes, by whom he leaves a
son. The latter part of his life was spent in London, where for
some years he lived at No. 6, Cheyne Row, next door to Thomas
Carlyle, who found in him a kindred spirit imbued with the same
admiration of " The Great Protector " — and to whom he dedicated
his " House of Cromwell and ihe Story of Dunkirk," published in
1880. This, with the two already mentioned, are the three works
by which he will be chiefly remembered ; but he was an industrious
and constant writer, and was the author of a number of contributions
from time to time in the ' ' Devizes Miscellany," " Gillman's Devizes
Register" the " Wiltshire Independent" and the " Devizes Advertiser.33
In our own Magazine, too, for the first four years of its existence —
1854 to 1857 — he appears as a frequent contributor, though after
1859 he appears to have written nothing for the Society for nearly
thirty years, until in 1887 his " Wiltshire Compounders" appeared.
In 1892 another important paper, on the " Falstone Day Book" was
printed, and a shorter paper in the last number of the Magazine.
Indeed he continued writing up to the lime of his death.
As to his writings, the same characteristics run through them all
—whether he is writing the history of Marlborough or of the
Quakers — whatever his subject may be he treats it whenever it is
possible to do so from a biographical and anecdotal point of view.
He is far more of a biographer than a historian. In his writings
we do not find wide views of history, but we do get pleasant peeps
at the lives of the men who in the seventeenth, eighteenth, and early
nineteenth centuries took prominent parts in the events of the time
so far as they affected our own county of Wilts. To tell the truth,
the seventeenth century, especially the Civil War and the period of
the Commonwealth, was to Mr. Waylen almost the beginning of
history. He took no account of archeology, historic or prehistoric.
The middle ages he was obliged to look into more or less for his
histories of Devizes and Marlborough, but they possessed no attraction
for him, and he hurried on to the struggles of the seventeenth century
and the Commonwealth period as the time on which he really loved
to dwell. It was, perhaps, natural that to him, a strong Liberal and
In Memoriam James Waylen. 303
Nonconformist, the temporary triumph of Puritanism under Crom-
well and the subsequent history of Nonconformity should be the
most interesting subject which the whole field of history could offer,
and it is small blame to him that he writes, though by no means
in a bitter spirit, yet always with a certain bias to his own side,
when treating of events, which, although so distant now, still excite
keen party spirit, and have never yet been described impartially by
any historian, with the exception of Ranke and Gardiner. A more
serious blot in Mr. Waylen's work is his too frequent neglect to
give the authorities for his statements, with the result that the
reader is sometimes left in doubt as to whether he has before him
the actual words or extracts of documentary evidence, or Mr.
Waylen's inferences from them. But for all that Wiltshire has
much cause to thank him for his pleasant gossiping sketches of
men and things in the county for the last two hundred and fifty
years. They are never dry, and never dull, and a vast amount of
interesting matter, biographical and genealogical, is preserved in
his pages, which would otherwise have been certainly lost and
forgotten.
His skill as an artist was better shown in his oil portraits — of
which our Museum possesses a really good one of the old Lord
Lansdowne, painted apparently from memory and a photograph,
and of which others exist in Devizes — than in the illustrations which
he designed for his books.
The writer of this notice had not the privilege of his personal
.acquaintance ; with those who bad that privilege his memory lives
as that of a man of retiring modesty and great kindliness of dis-
position, who was always ready generously to assist others from the
large stores of knowledge he had himself acquired in a long life of
study.
A BIBLIOGRAPHICAL LIST OP MR. WAYLEN'S PRINCIPAL WORKS.
The Chronicles of the Devizes, being a History of the Castle, Parks,
and Borough of that name, with notices Statistical, Parliamentary,
Ecclesiastic, and Biographical, by James Waylen. London;
804 In Memoriam James Waylen.
printed for the Author, and sold by Longman & Co., Paternoster
Row, and T. B. Smith, Devizes. 1839." Is an 8vo volume of 362
pages, published in cloth at 14s. It is illustrated with a frontispiece and
other woodcuts. This was re-published anonymously in an enlarged form in
1859, as
" A History, Military and Municipal, of the Ancient Borough of
The Devizes, and subordinately of the entire Hundred of Potterne
and Cannings, in which it is included. London : Longman,
Brown, & Co., Paternoster Row; Devizes: Henry Bull, Saint
John Street. 1859. " 8vo, pp. 602. It is illustrated with woodcuts and
steel engravings, as well as by several historical scenes from Mr. Waylen's
drawings. The principal contents are :— pages 1 — 22, origin of the town ;
23—66, Bishop Roger's Castle ; 66—97, the story of Hubert de Burgh ; 97
— 101, state of the Town during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries ; 101—
113, the Reformation ; 113—134, Queen Elizabeth, &c. ; 134—160, the Civil
War ; 161—168, the siege ; 169—295, the Battle of Roundway, War and
Commonwealth ; 295 — 362, Nonconformity, Biographical Notices of prominent
Nonconformists, the Quakers, Elections, and varia ^ 363— 596, events later
than the seventeenth century. Index at end.
t{ A History, Military and Municipal, of the Town (otherwise called
the City) of Marlborough, and more generally of the entire
Hundred of Selkley, by James Waylen. London, John Russell
Smith, 36, Soho Square, MDCCCLIV." The introduction fills v pages,
the work itself 570. 8vo cloth. Pages 1 — 21, the pre-Norman period ; 22 —
79, the Norman period ; 80—84, the Reformation ; 85—137, Municipal
History ; 137—251, Stuart rule, events to Death of Charles I. ; 251—330,
events subsequent to death of the King, the Restoration ; 330 — 397, Municipal
History after the Restoration, the Charters, &e. ; 397—496, later Miscellanea,
496—565, Local Biography. Index.
A review of this work, by G. Powlett Scrope, appeared in vol. i. of the
Wilts Arch. Mag., pp. 116—131.
" The House of Cromwell and the Story of Dunkirk. London :
Chapman & Hall, Limited, 193, Piccadilly, 1880." "Dedicated by
permission, to Thomas Carlyle, Esq., whose * elucidations ' of Oliver Cromwell's
Letters and Speeches have elevated our admiration of the Protector into
love." It is a royal 8vo volume of vii and 389 pages, with 2 pages of index
additional at the end. In the first 172 pages the Author " traces down to
our own day the families descended from Oliver Cromwell, carrying on the
work begun by Mark Noble in 1787." Pages 173 — 272 are taken up with
In Memoriam James Waylen. 305
Sir William Lockhart and the campaign in Flanders, as connected with
Dunkirk ; and pages 273 — 383 contain nearly one hundred letters and papers
of the Protector's, unnoticed in Carlyle's work, and a number of interesting
anecdotes connected with him. The book is illustrated by several woodcuts
,of historical scenes, by Mr. Wayleu himself, and plans and maps — together
with a portrait of Sir William Lockhart, and one of Cromwell as a child.
A second issue of the remaining sheets of this edition, with a new title-page,
was published by Elliot Stock in 1893. Koyal 8vo, cloth, 10s. 6d, (8*. to
subscribers.)
A new edition is now (1894) being prepared for the press by the same
publishers, which will contain much new and additional matter, collected by
Mr. Waylen before his death.
" Wiltshire during the Civil Wars." Published in the Wiltshire Inde-
pendent, apparently in seventy-eight parts, beginning May 28th, 1840 (as
mounted in a small folio volume it extends to some 85 pages of small print,
in double column). As set forth in the prefacing statement, it is "a series of
papers designed to illustrate the history of this county during the period of
the Civil Wars " — " embraces the whole county " — and is " intended to present
in chronological order the several events."
A notice in Wilts Arch. Mag., vol. ii., p. 397, repeated vol. iii., p. 126,
states that " J. Waylen proposes to re-publish a Political, Military, and
Domestic History of this County during the Contests of the 17th century, to
be illustrated with engravings designed by himself — to be published by sub-
scription in the form of a thick imperial 8vo, price not to exceed a guinea."
" The work will contain an account of the estates of all the Koyalists in the
county, as well as lists of the Parliament's friends." It was to cover the
period from 1640 to 1745. This design of re-publishing was never carried
out. The seventy-eighth contribution to the " Independent " has the notice
" to be continued " at the end of it, but no more was printed,
" The Highwaymen of Wiltshire." Published in the Wiltshire Inde.
pendent of February 14th, 1856, and subsequent numbers, in fourteen parts,
containing an account of the careers of the more notorious highway robbers of
the county :— Thomas Boulter, James Caldwell, Mary Sandall, William Peare,
William Davis, James Whitney, Jervis Matcham and the Dead Drummer,
and others.
These papers were afterwards re-published in the form of a 16mo book of
108 pages, entitled " The Highwaymen of Wiltshire, or, a Narrative
of the Adventurous Career and Untimely End of divers Free-
booters and Smugglers in this and the adjoining Counties.
Devizes: N. B. Handle, Market Place." It was published anony.
VOL. XXVII. — NO. LXXXI. Y
306 In Memoriam James Waylen.
mously. The frontispiece of Boulter and Caldwell's night attack on a post-
chaise is from a drawing of Mr. Waylen's.
A second edition was published by Brampton, of Devizes.
The papers in the Wiltshire Independent contain some information not
reprinted in the book — but the book, on the other hand, has accounts of some
additional highwaymen not mentioned in the paper.
" The History of the Quakers of Wiltshire." A series of papers pub-
lished in the Devizes Advertiser in the years 1864 — 66, dealing with the
most notable Quaker preachers who suffered persecution or preached in the
county from 1656 to 1852. Amongst others of whose life and work sketches
are given are, W. Penn, Barbara Blagden, Thomas Lawrence, William
Hitchcock, John Roberts, William Stovey, William Moxon, and Samuel
Capper. Cut from the newspaper and mounted these papers fill sixteen pages
of small print in double column, 4to.
f( Mornings at Bowood." Consists of four chapters, published in The
Wiltshire Independent, about 1866 or 1867, dealing with Bowood, Sir Orlando
Bridgman, Calne Politics, the Title of Lansdowne, and the House of Petty —
filling, as mounted, nine 4to pages.
" The Cavaliers of North Wilts." A series of papers extending to five
pages small folio, double column, were printed in the Devizes Advertiser,
beginning May, 1867, but first appeared in The Monthly Packet for August,
1866.
" Nonconformity in Devizes " was published in the Devizes Advertiser in
twenty-five chapters between May 3rd and December 8th, 1877. This was
the work of Edward Waylen, but after his death, October 23rd, 1877, the
last four chapters and an appendix were written by his brother James. These
papers, filling thirty- seven 4to pages (mounted in double column), contain an
immense quantity of interesting matter concerning the most prominent
Nonconformists of the town, as well as the more notable Anglican clergy for
the last two centuries.
Papers in the Wilts Archaeological Magazine :—
1854. Vol. i., pp. 210 — 211. Note on a Petition for appointment to a corrody
in Malmesbury Abbey.
„ „ pp. 217—232. The Hertford Correspondence, consisting of
letters and documents passing between the Earl of Hertford,
his Deputy-Lieutenants, and other distinguished persons, on
various matters connected with the County of Wilts, temp.
James I., with preliminary remarks.
1855. Vol. ii., pp. 131—132. Notes on The Sheriff of Wilts Imprisoned at
In Memoriam James Waylen. 307
Devizes, 1741. — Lamps on Beckhampton Down, 1743. —
Tisbury a market town.
„ „ pp. 257—260. Notes on Henry, Earl of Danby.— Chalfield
House. — Curious tenure at Hakeneston, 1322.
„ „ p. 398. Grant of Clarendon Park to the Duke of Albemarle.
1856. Vol. iit, pp. 115—119. Christopher Wren, of East Knoyle, D.D.
„ „ pp. 119—124. Who destroyed the Images at the West End of
Salisbury Cathedral ?
„ „ p. 125. Mr. Darley at Charlton Park.
„ „ pp. 245—249. The Despencers' Estates in Wilts.
1857. „ pp. 367—376. Mysterious Death of a Lord-Lieutenant of Wilts,
or the Story of the Marlborough Pin-Maker.
„ „ pp. 376— 379. Notes on Accident to Charles Dryden at Charlton.
—Cloth-Making, time of Henry Till.— Birthplace of Pitt.
1859. Vol. vi., pp. 215—223. The Dead Drummer, a Legend of Salisbury
Plain.
1887-89. Vol. xxiii., pp. 314—346 ; vol. xxiv., pp. 58—103, and 308—344, The
Wiltshire Cornpounders.
1890. Vol, xxv., pp. 112—118. Wiltshire's Contribution to the Piedmontese
Fund.
1892. Vol. xxvi., pp. 343—391. The Falstone Day-Book (Diary of Parlia-
mentary Committee for Wilts).
1893. Vol. xxvii., pp. 113—120. The Wilts County Court— Devizes versus
Wilton. (A great part of this was re-printed from G-illman's
Devizes Almanack and Directory for 1892.)
" Wiltshire Worthies." A series of papers in the Devizes Advertiser : —
1865 — 67. " Historico-Religious Sketches — viewed from the Nonconformist
standpoint."
Lucy St. John, the Cinderella of Wiltshire.
John Cennick, the Evangelist of North Wilts.
The Story of the two Confessors of Marlborough, or a race between a
Protestant Sheriff and a Catholic Inquisitor.
A Comedian burnt at Salisbury.
Burning of two Baptists.
John Ayliffe of Tockenham.
"The Home Circle at Longleat 160 years ago." Devizes Miscellany,
vol. ii., May 1, 1852, pp. 57-61.
" Heale House." Remarkable instance of the provisions of an unjust will
being defeated. Notes and Queries, 2nd Series, vi., 134.
Y 2
308 NoteS) Arch&ological and Historical.
" Letter on the Authorship of Origines Divisiante." Devizes Adver-
tiser, 1877.
" Sir Francis Burdett, late M.P. for North Wilts." 7 pp. Gillmarfs
Devizes Public Register, 1868.
" Bishop Barrington, Bishop Burgess, Lord Sidmouth, Hannah
More, The Shepherd of Salisbury Plain, W, L. Bowles, Lady
Lansdowne, Tom Moore, a Devizes Farce. 7 pp. Ibid, 1870.
" (S. T.) Coleridge and (R. H.) Brabant, M.D., as connected with Calne
and Devizes. 6 pp. Ibid, 1872.
" The Rev. Ed. Wilton, M.A. pp. 3. Ibid, 1872.
E. H. GODDARD.
^wjmologtcal anfr
FONT IN HILPERTON CHURCH
There has been recently set up in this Church an old font which was dug up in
the churchyard of the adjacent parish of Whaddon many years ago (the present
font at Whaddon is quite modern and is said to have been preceded by a wooden
font). The bowl only of the old font was recovered. This is of twelfth century
work, circular in form, 1ft. 7in. in height, 2ft. 7in. diameter at the top, and
slightly tapered. Around it is worked an arcade of thirteen bays of semicircular
arches with flat fluted shafts and stepped bases, all in low relief j two of the arches
Notes, Archaeological and Historical. 309
are enriched with saw-tooth ornament, and it is probable that the remainder were
intended for this, but it was never carried out. A similar ornament is carried
round the lower edge of the bowl. Above the arcade are spandrel carvings of
conventionalised leaves with their stems terminating in scrolls over them.
Around the top is carried a border of conventionalised leaf ornament. One
side o£ the font has the indications of fire (? was Whaddon Church ever
burnt)*. The font now stands on a new stone base and shaft, set on a step of
Pennant stone. The font which this has» displaced was a modern one, put
inx at the restoration of the Church in 1854. It has now been removed to
the Mission Church at Hilpexton Marsh.
G. E. POSTING.
LEAD DOWELLBD CHIMNEYS AT LACOCK.
At the beginning of last year the chimneys in the back, yard of Lacock
Abbey having become insecure, it was decided to have them carefully repaired.
This has been done under my professional superintendence.
In taking down the two large chimneys the top capping course was found
to be cramped with iron in the usual way; but when we came to the next
course we found that, instead of iron, lead had been used, and each stone
was dowelled to its neighbour by a dovetailed dowel 3fin. long, by fin. deep.
These continued throughout the two chimneys. The other chimney taken
in hand was smaller and had every indication of having been re-built at some
more recent date. It was found to be cramped with iron as far down as the
plinth, where lead commenced again. The whole of the work containing these
dowells has by all appearances been untouched since it was built by Sir
William Sharington, between the years 1540 and 1553.
H. BBAKSPEAB.
WILTS SEVENTEENTH CENTURY TOKEN.
We have lately added to our collection a token hitherto unpublished : —
O. Unstruck.
B. IN . WAR.MINSTER . 59=W.B
The carelessness of the striker is to be regretted, but possibly some day a
more perfect specimen may turn up.
P. M. WILLIS.
ANCIENT LEADEN COFFIN — FOUND NEAR DEVIZES.
In the spring of 1852 some workmen employed in draining a field on the
left-hand side of the road from Devizes to Maryborough (nearly opposite the
site of the present Barracks) met with a leaden cist or coffin, lying about 3ft.
>elow the surface. Expecting to find treasure in it, they broke it up, but
were .disappointed. With the exception of a deposit of a white substance,
310 Notes, Archaeological and Rlsiorical.
resembling lime, which covered the floor of the coffin to the depth of £in.
it was absolutely empty. This white material— as was proved by analysis by
Mr. E. Clark— contained 9'49 per cent, of bone earth, traces probably of the
skeleton, the remainder being fine sand, with some carbonate of lead. The
coffin was formed of one sheet of lead bent up into a rectangular shape, and
the four corners were held together by metal (lead — not solder) run into the
folds by a process resembling what is known in the present day as autogenous
soldering. The length of the coffin was 5ft. Sin. ; the breadth, 1ft. Sin. ;
depth, 1ft. 2in. Tho weight, in its partially decayed condition, was 140lbs.
There were no coins or trinkets to show the date of the interment, but from
the fact that the coffin was placed nearly north and south, the north end
about 12° towards the east, we may conclude that it was of very remote date
— probably Roman and ante-Christian.
[From notes made at the time by the late Mr. Richard Falkner, of Devizes^
one of the originators of the Wilts Arch, and Nat. Hist. Society.]
P.S.— Is it not remarkable that this interment should occur in such a
solitary spot? No other remains, so far as the writer knows, have been found
in the immediate neighbourhood — though Roman antiquities are abundant on
the south side of Devizes. The person here buried must have been of some
social standing, as is shown by the costly coffin, for lead must have been ex-
pensive in those days. It is remarkable that the skeleton, in spite of the
care bestowed in providing a leaden coffin, was in this case so entirely de-
composed ; whilst within a mile of the same spot — on the edge of Roundway
Hill— a skeleton buried in the chalk was found with every bone perfect, though
the interment must have been older by at least a thousand years. And this
is the usual condition of bones found in the chalk. It is possible that the
somewhat sandy soil in which the coffin was found may have had a direct
action in promoting the decomposition of the animal remains. It is considered
that such soils are of a " hungry " nature, as the good effects of manures are
speedily dissipated. Information on this point would be very acceptable.
W.
THE MALMESBURY STANDARD YARD.
" WILTS COUNTY COUNCIL.
" Weights and Measures Office, Swindon,
" May 29th, 1893.
"Mr. Mayor and Gentlemen. — Through your kindness I have been allowed
to examine and compare with the modern standard yard of the County of
Wilts, the interesting and ancient standard of length of the Borough of
Malmesbury. I have taken the liberty of enclosing the standard in a
mahogany case, which may assist in protecting from damage so interesting
and valuable a relic of ancient times, and I beg to bring to your notice the
following particulars, which may be of interest : — The standard yard and ell
of the borough of Malmesbury is dated 1654, being the time of the pro-
tectorate of Oliver Cromwell. The original and official verification which
appears to have been made of this standard was made in the City of
Notes, Archaeological and Historical. 311
London. The standard has been very carefully compared with the standard
yard No. 2174, verified by the Board of Trade Standards Department,
February llth, 1891, for the use of the County of Wilts, and the length
of the Malmesbury yard, which is between the two shorter pillars, is, not-
withstanding its extreme antiquity and the amount of usage it has under-
gone, now at the present day within 'OOSin., or one two-hundredth part of
an inch of the said standard 2174. By order in Council made the 4th day
of February, 1879, the amount of error allowed on a standard yard was one
hundredth part of an inch. The Malmesbury standard, with its two
hundred and thirty-nine years' service, shows now only half the amount of
error in excess which is allowed. The sub-divisions of the standard are not
authentic, but have been marked on roughly with a coarse file by some too
enterprising custodian, and must not be taken as in any way representing
measure of length. The round brass rod yard in the lid of the case is an
exact yard, and by placing it between the pillars on the Malmesbury
standard no appreciable difference can be observed between the length of the
two. The length between the two end pillars of the Malmesbury standard
is forty-five inches or five-quarters of a yard, being the old English or cloth
ell of the period, a measure which is now obsolete, and of which there is
now no legal standard measure of length. As a curiosity, and as a means
of showing how inappreciable is the difference of length in the standard
yards of 1654 and 1893 the standard of the Borough of Malmesbury is un-
doubtedly an instrument of value, and too much care cannot be taken in
preserving it.
"1 am, Mr. Mayor and gentlemen, yours respectfully,
"JAMES WARD,"
"County Inspector of Weights and Measures."
(Re-printed from local paper.)
" THE CHRISTMAS BOYS/' OR " MUMMERS/'
As used and spoken at Potterne between the years 1875 and 1890.
(Enter FATHEB CHEISTMAS.)
" Here comes I, old Father Christmas,
Christmas or Christmas not
I hope old Father Christmas will never be forgot.
Roast beef, plum pudding, and minced pies,
Who do like that better'n thee and I ? [sing ;
A jug of your Christmas ale will make us merry, whistle, dance and
Money in our pockets is a very fine thing.
Koom ! Room ! ladies and gentlemen, let King George come in !
(Enter KING GEOBGE.)
Here comes I, King George,
King George, the man of courage bold,
With my sword and spear in my hand I won three crowns of gold.
312 Notes, Archaeological and Historical.
'Twere I slew the dragon
And brought him to the slaughter,
And- I hope I shall maintain the King of Egypt's daughter.*
And now let old Turkey snipe clear the way.
(Enter TURKISH KNIGHT.)
Here comes I, old Turkey snipe,
Come from the holy Turkey land to fight.
I challenge thee, King George, the man of courage bold ;
If thy blood's hot I soon will make it cold.
(They fight, TURKISH KNIGHT falls.)
(KiNG GEORGE) Is there a doctor to be found
To cure this man lying blooding on the ground?
(Enter SPANISH DOCTOR. >
Yes, I'm a doctor newly come from Spain,
I have a bottle by my side
The fame of which spreads far and wide j
It cures the sick of every pain,
And raises the dead to life again.
(KiNG GEORGE) Pray, Doctor, what is thy fee?
(Sp. DR.) Fifteen guineas is my fee,
But ten pound I will take of thee.
(KiNG GEORGE gives him the money.)
(Sr. DR.) Here comes I, the Spanish Doctor, [again*
I'll cure thee the biggest bellied man that ever rose from dead to life
(He holds bottle to TURKISH KNIGHT'S mouth.)
Rise, Turkish snipe (he rises).
(All join hands and sing.)
Once we was wounded and now we're brought to life ;
We sent for the doctor who brought us all to life ;
So we'll all shake hands and we'll never fight no more,
But we'll live like brothers and sisters the same as we was before.
Before before before my boys before, for
We'll live like brothers and sisters the same as we was before.
(KiNG GEORGE) If you don't believe in what I say
Let old Almanick clear the wa}r.
(Enter OLD ALMANACK!)
• An old man (81) tells me that the right line is, •' And for that fair deed I do maintain the great
King William's daughter " ; but the «' King of Egypt's " is historically right, I believe. But this
reading is much the best and oldest.
* I suspect that Almanack ought to change speeches (not place) with Little Man Jack. Then I
think that the eleven children of Almanack ought to refer to the months (up to December) and Little
Man John (who is really the devil) then comes and fetches away the " girt blackguard." But this
is only conjecture.
Notes, Archaeological and Historical. 313
Here comes I, old Almanick,
With my girt head and little wit.
Though my wit is but small
Yet I'm the best man 'mongst ye all.
My knuckle bones are very hard,
Pray Doctor, come and feel (DocTOB feels).
(DocTOE) Yes, thy bones are very hard,
I think thou be'est a girt blackguard.
Room! Room! Let the valiant soldier clear the way.
(Enter VALIANT SOLDIEB.)
Here comes I, the Valiant Soldier,
Cuterman Slashermau * is my name :
All through these cold wars I lately came.
I and seven more stood the battle of 'leven score.
What man stands there wi' his sword in his hand ?
I'll actually cut him and slash him as small as dust,
And send him to the pastrycook's shop to make minced pie-crust.
(FATHER CHRISTMAS and VALIANT SOLDIEB fight, FATHER CHRISTMAS falls).
(KiNG GEORGE) Is there a doctor to be found
To cure this man lying blooding on the ground?
(VALIANT SOLDIER) Yes, I'm a doctor pure and good ;
A little o' my physic '11 do he good.
(He hits FATHER CHRISTMAS three thumps on the back f with the fiat of
his sword, saying) Rise, Father Christmas.
(All join hands across and sing, as before).
Once we was wounded, &c.
(VAL. SOL.) If you don't believe in what I .say
Let Little Man Jack clear the way.
(Enter LITTLE MAN JACK) J
Here comes I, Little Man Jack,
Wi' all my family at my back.
Out o' 'leven I got but seven,
Half of they be gone to heaven;
Out of seven I got but five,
Half of they be starved alive.§
Out of five I got but three
Half of they be gone to sea.
• Corruption of " Cut them and slash them."
+ Father Christmas wears a cushion on his back as a hump.
J Little Man Jack wears a row of dolls strung on his back.
Query — does " starved alive " meau " frozen to death." I have been told it does.
314 Notes, Archaeological and Historical.
Out of three I got but two,
And where they'm gone to I can't tell you.
If you don't believe in what I say
Let Little Man John clear the way.
(JEnter LITTLE MAN JOHN.)
Here comes I, Little Man>John^
If any man'll fend I let'n come on."
WALTER BUCHANAN.
SMALL Pox IN DEVIZES IN 1761.
In view of the present insane agitation in some places against the enforce-
ment of vaccination, the following note on the fly-leaf of a little MS. volume of
sermons in the Museum, is instructive as reminding us of what seems to be
entirely forgotten — the frightful nature of the scourge of small pox before
vaccination was introduced.
" The small pox which began in Devizes in January, 1761 to the end of April
following : —
Total No. of Inhabitants. Total No . that have had ye Small Pox. Died.
St. John's Parish. 1354 429 22
St. Mary's „ 1767 837 58 "
The number of those " inoculated " was 344, of whom 8 died.
E. H. GODDABD.
THE COST OF AN ELECTION AT WOOTTON BASSETT.
" 3 April, 1796. My Lord I have at your Lordship's request sent the
underneath account, stating as near as I possibly can, the expense of the
probable cost of an election at Wotton Basset, the voters being gratified at the
last election with £30 each, with the extras as below. I am your Lordship's
faithful obedient servant.
237 Voters at £30 each 7110
12 Burgesses at £40 each 480
1 The Mayor 60
Expenses previous to the Election and at the
time, supposed will amount to 340
7990
The half 3995
(From a note by the late J. Waylen. The names are lost.)
HATCHMENT IN SALISBURY CATHEDRAL.
A very interesting seventeenth century hatchment has recently been
restored to its original position in Salisbury Cathedral. It had apparently
Notes, ArcJuzologioal and Historical. 315
been removed during the great restoration of 1863-79, placed in the
triforium for safety, and forgotten. There it was accidentally dis-
covered a few months ago, and with the concurrence of the Dean it was
replaced above the little tablet to the memory of Mary Barnston, on the
dwarf wall to the east of Bishop Giles de Bridport's monument in the south
choir aisle.
The Barnston tablet is a typical piece of early Jacobean work, of stone-
elaborately carved and painted. It bears the following quaint inscription : —
Mariae Barnston
good fuit propter
situm maritus
amans dolens
debeus hoc posuit
in memoriam
obiit 6 Julii
1625
Below, apparently cut later, are the lines—
Altera ps obijt 30mo Maij
1645
Abijt, no obijt & reverti
debet
In each corner of the tablet, the dimensions of which are 3ft. by 2ft. 7in.,
a tiny coat of arms is painted — in the first and fourth corners, Azure, afess
dancetty ermine, between 3 crosses crosslet fitchy or* (Barnston) ; and in
the second and third corners, Gules, a cross patonce, between 4 trefoils
slipped or (Manning). Above the tablet was carved a crest ; but of this
portion of the original design little more than the wreath now remains. It
was roughly knocked away to allow for the placing of the hatchment, which
rests on the tablet and reaches to the top of the dwarf wall mentioned
above. There a stout nail, seemingly contemporary with the hatchment
driven into the masonry, catches a large staple fastened to the frame, and
holds it in its place.
The hatchment is rectangular, and not of the modern lozenge shape. It
consists of two substantial boards, each 9|in. wide by 2ft. lin. high, within
a very heavily moulded frame, all of oak painted black. The frame is
4in. wide by 3|in. deep, and measures 2ft. 9in. by 2ft. 3in. The blackness
of the moulding is relieved by two lines of gold.
The field of the hatchment is almost entirely occupied by a large shield
of very plain and severe form, charged with Barnston quartering Manning
(the arms which appear in the corners of the tablet) differenced by a crescent
argent. There is no other device of any kind, except the date 1645 above
the shield, and xvi° Maij in the spaces at the base of it, in golden
characters.
The tinctures of the arms, especially the blue, have faded somewhat in
two hundred and fifty years, but they are still quite plainly visible.
The domestic idyll which these things perpetuate is easy to read. When
* Papworth and Morant give the tincture of the crosses crosslet as argent.
316 Wiltshire Books, Pamphlets, and Articles.
Mrs. Barnston died in 1625 her " maritus, amans dolens, debens " raised
the beautiful tablet to her memory. At his decease in 1645 the stately
hatchment, charged with his quartered coat and the date of his death, was
placed over it, and the tender little note, " altera pars obiit," was added to
the tablet of his wife. " Altera pars " was John Barnston, who came of a
Cheshire family, of Brasenose College, Oxford, D. D., Rector of Everley, 1598,
and of Winterslow, 1635, Prebendary of Bishopstone, 1600, and Canon
Kesidentiary, 1634. He was buried in the Cathedral. As Residentiary he.
occupied the Canonry House in the Close, immediately to the north of the
Choristers' School.
E, E. DOELING.
Sir Robert N. Fowler, Bart., M.P. A Memoir by John Stephen
Flynn, M.A., Rector of St. Mewan. London: Hodder & Stonghton,
1893. Post 8vo, pp. 358. With etched portrait by Manesse. The author of
this biography — Sir Robert's son-in-law — had no light task. " Thirty-eight
large volumes of diary, several hampers of letters, and a mass of newspaper
cuttings collected during twenty-six years " had to be carefully read through
and selected from. He has, however, performed his task well and has given us
an interesting memoir at not too great length of a man who in many ways
was a remarkable character, and one of whom Wiltshire may well be proud.
The first of the Fowlers connected with Wilts was Thomas Fowler, who
settled at Melksham in 1692, and Gastard was bought by Robert Fowler
towards the end of the eighteenth century. The family had always been
Quakers ; and though Sir Robert Fowler joined and became a devoted
member of the Church of England, he retained to the last many of the
best of the Quaker characteristics. From his earliest years he regularly
kept a voluminous diary, in which he entered the events of each day and
his own thoughts and comments thereon— and in this diary we find constant
evidence of the deep and unaffected piety which was the foundation of his
character through life. A staunch Conservative, who nevertheless put his
principles before his party ; widely travelled, full of information, and pos-
sessing a most retentive memory ; so transparently honest and straightforward
as to win the respect of everyone ; actuated in all things by the strongest
sense of duty ; popular in Wiltshire as a genial country gentleman and a
Wiltshire Books, Pamphlets, and Articles. 317
prominent member of the Beaufort Hunt ; better known and still more
popular in London as a banker, as a leader in every philanthropic enterprise,
as a member of the council of University College, on the committee of
the Bible Society, the Anti-Slavery Society, the Aborigines Protection
Society, the London City Mission, and a host of other religious .and charitable
agencies; M.P. for the City of London; and for two consecutive years
Lord Mayor. Few men have served their generation better, and even
amidst the torrent of modern lives and memoirs the Life of Sir Kobert
Fowler is welcome to Wiltshiremen.
The book has been reviewed in the Guardian, January 31st, 1894 ; the
Standard, and other papers.
The Life of George Herbert, of Bemerton, S.P.C.K., ^London, 1893,
is a well got up and well printed post 8vo volume of 328 pages. It is
an open secret that the author — whose name is not given — is the rector
of a North Wilts parish. The contents of the book are as follows : — a
short historical sketch of the Herbert family, and of Montgomery Castle,
G. Herbert's own home circle — his life at Westminster School and at
Trinity College, Cambridge — his early work, " Epigrammata Apologetica "
— his restoration of Leigh ton Church — his mother's life at Chelsea as the
wife of Sir John Danvers, her death and burial, and his " Parentalia "
written in her memory — his friend, Dr. John Donne — his residence in Sir
Henry Herbert's home at Woodford— his marriage to Jane Danvers and
her home at Baynton— his stay at Dauntsey — his institution to Fugglestone
and Bemerton and his connection with Wilton House— the building of
Bemerton Kectory and his life and ministry there — his death, will and
portraits — Nicholas Ferrar, the Little Gidding community and the publication
of "The Temple" — his brothers and sisters — Izaac Walton, Bishop Ken,
and Barnabas Olney — the chained books at Cherbury — the MS. volume of
his poems in the Williams Library and its contents — a list of the Kectors
of Fugglestone and Bemerton and index. The book is written in a spirit
of intense veneration for its subject as a poet and a man. It is scholarly
and interesting, and bestows considerable attention on the surroundings of
George Herbert's life, his different homes, his friends and relatives.
Favourable reviews have appeared in The Athenaeum, March 10th, 1894 ;
The Salisbury Diocesan Gazette, February, 1894 ; Salisbury Journal,
May 26th, 1894 ; and Devizes Gazette, February 15th, 1894.
Some old Wiltshire Homes, illustrated by S. John Elyard, with
short notices on their Architecture, History, and Associations.
London : Charles J. Clark, 4, Lincolns Inn Fields, W.C., 1894. Imp. 4to,
pp. xi. and 88. Price 25*. (15*. to subscribers). This is the most notable
318 Wiltshire Books, Pamphlets, and Articles.
book on Wiltshire that has appeared for many years. Its value consists
chiefly in the beautiful full-page illustrations from the author's pen-and-
ink sketches, of which there are twenty-six in the volume, in addition to
several smaller sketches and the cuts of armorial bearings. These sketches
are excellently reproduced ; indeed, the whole get-up of the book is very
good. The letterpress is short and — as the author states in the preface —
is for the most part taken from various published sources of topographical
information, and therefore does not contain very much that is original.
This could hardly have been otherwise under the circumstances, as in the
case of many of the houses illustrated here there is extremely little in the
way of history available in print.
Mr. Elyard is at heart an artist rather than an architect. He prefers
always to draw his subject from the most picturesque point of view. He
studies the grouping of his picture more than the details of the work he
is drawing — and in the volume before us he has given us a series of really
charming views of our old Wiltshire houses, but he has not given us any
of those details which are very often to the real student of domestic archi-
tecture of equal if not greater interest than the general appearance of the
building. The fireplaces, the staircases, the ceilings, the wood-work of
many an old house are often the most interesting parts about it, and the
ground-plan in the more important and perfect houses at least is most
desirable for the understanding of the history of the building. But it is
scarcely fair to quarrel with Mr. Elyard when he has given us so much
that is excellent, because he has not given us more. We may hope that
in any further series of drawings — and it is greatly to be wished that the
author may not rest satisfied with his present achievement, but may in
due time give us another instalment of " Wiltshire Houses " — the interiors
and details will receive rather more attention. As an earnest of this we
are indebted to him for the two sketches of the interior of Stockton House
which illustrate the report of the Warminster Meeting in this number of
the Magazine.
The houses chosen for illustration— though a few of the well-known
buildings, such as the Duke's House at Bradford, the Porch House at
Potterne, South Wraxall and Great Chalfield appear— are for the most part
examples of beautiful and interesting old buildings which having sunk to
the condition of farm-houses, often in remote situations, are but little if
at all known out of their own immediate neighbourhood. Sheldons,
Tockenham, Restrop, Cadenham, Edington, Can Court, and the others of
this class are the more welcome because they are comparatively unknown.
Mr. Elyard has exercised a wise discretion in giving them to us, and those
who were sensible enough to subscribe to his work may congratulate them-
selves on having acquired so fine a volume at such a very moderate price.
Wiltshire Books, Pamphlets, and Articles. 319
Reviews of the book have appeared in Wiltshire Notes and Queries,
March, 1894 ; The .Devizes Gazette, March 15th and 22nd, 1894 ; The
Antiquary, June, 1894 ; The Illustrated Archaologist, June, 1894 ;
The Salisbury Journal, March 31st, 1894; and the Bristol Times and
Mirror.
Richard Jefferies, a Study/by H. S. Salt. Lond. : 1894. This book,
in its large paper 8vo edition rejoices in excellent type, and hand-made
paper with wide margins ; it has a photographic portrait of R. Jefferies
as a frontispiece, and as illustrations four wash drawings of Coate and the
neighbourhood, reproduced by some process analogous to photogravure with
singularly soft and pleasing results. In five chapters the author deals with
his subject as man, naturalist, poet-naturalist, thinker, and writer, and the
book concludes with a bibliographical appendix of his works.
Mr. Salt holds a very high opinion of Jefferies' power and value as a
writer. " He is one of the small number, the very small number, of great
prose writers of his generation " — but he grounds that opinion not on the
excellence of those studies of wild and rural life by which he is so widely
known, but on his later mystical writings, and more especially on his
" autobiography " — The Story of My Heart. " Whereas Jefferies' real
and ultimate fame as a writer is based on his later and more imaginative
essays, his present commercial-literary reputation is based on an antecedent
transitional and distinctly subordinate phase of workmanship. He survives
in booksellers' catalogues as the author of the Gamekeeper at Home, that
he may be known to future ages as the author of The Story of My Heart.11
" Jefferies in the finest efforts of his genius is necessarily for the few,"
the few superior beings who can enter into his mystic " ectasies," and
sympathise with him in those moments of " exaltation " which he shared
we are told with the " adepts " of the East. To rise to this height of
appreciation it is apparently necessary to be in religion a Pantheist, and
in politics a Communist — a state of mind to which perhaps the average
Wiltshireman can hardly hope to attain. He will, nevertheless, find Mr.
Salt's essay very readable.
The small paper edition, price 2s. Qd., forms one of the " Dilettante
Library " issued by Messrs. Swan, Sonnenschein, & Co.
The book has been widely noticed in the Times, December 28th, 1893 ;
Saturday Review, March 3rd, 1894; Daily Chronicle, January 25th,
1894 ; and twenty-one other London and provincial and twelve American
papers.
" Richard Jefferies, the Man and his Work" is the title of a lecture
delivered at the Salisbury Museum, on February 8th, 1894, by Mr. J. L.
320 Wiltshire Books, Pamphlets, and Articles.
Veitch, and reprinted from the Salisbury Journal in small pamphlet
form. Mr. Veitch gives an interesting survey *of Jefferies' writings, and
seems to take a juster view of his works on the whole than some other
recent critics have done who have been more effusive in their praise.
<* Richard Jefferies and his Home in Wiltshire/'' hy Bertha Neweome,
is an article of seven pages in Sylvia's Journal for March, 1894, illustrated
with eight process reproductions of drawings by the authoress, of the house
at Coate, the gamekeeper's cottage, scenes on the downs, &c.
The authoress follows Mr. Salt in her estimate of the comparative value
of his earlier and later writings, especially holding up for our admiration
those passages in which he inveighs most bitterly against the iniquity of
all things as they are.
Wiltshire Words, a Glossary of Words used in the County of
Wiltshire, by George Edward Dartnell and the Rev. Edward
Hungerford Goddard, M.A. 8vo, London, 1893. Pp. xix. and 235.
Price, 15*. net. This is a re-publication by the English Dialect Society of
the three papers of " Contributions towards a Wiltshire Glossary" which have
appeared in the Wilts Arch. Mag., in connected form, with a considerable
number of additions and corrections, prefaced by a short grammatical intro-
duction, and containing twelve pages of specimens of Wiltshire talk, partly
original, and partly taken from Akerman's Tales. There are also three
appendices ; a short bibliography of works relating to Wilts and illustrating
its dialect ; a MS. vocabulary of the end of the last century ; and a
list of Wilts words, from the Monthly Magazine.
Favourable notices have appeared in the Saturday Review, May 5th,
1894; Notes and Queries, May 12th, 1894; Glasgow Herald, March
22nd, 1894 ; Scotsman, March 26th, 1894 ; and The Speaker, April 7th,
1894.
A Genealogical and Biographical Record of the Savery Families
descended from early immigrants to New England and Phila-
delphia, &c., by A. W. Savary, M.A. Boston, U.S.A., 1893. This is
a nicely got up large 8vo book of 266 pp., with twenty-one plates— chiefly
portraits of American members of the different branches of the Savery
family — dealing with the various ramifications of the family in the United
States and Canada, and also giving details of their earlier history in
England. It is so far interesting to Wiltshiremen that one chief branch
of the family seems to have sprung originally from Hannington and the
neighbouring parishes. Indeed, the name Savory, Savary, or Savery, is
found in old registers of a good many North Wilts parishes.
Wiltshire Books, Pamphlets, and Articles. 321
Early Days of Marlborough College. Amongst the books apparently
called into existence by the occurrence of the Jubilee of Marlborough College
in 1893 is " The Early Days of Marlborough College, or Public School
Life between forty and fifty years ago, to which is added a Glimpse of
old Haileybury ; Patna during the Mutiny ; a Sketch of the Natural
History of the Eiviera ; and Life in an Oxfordshire Village : by Edward
Lock wood, Indian Civil Service (retired), author of 'The Natural History
of Monghyr.' Illustrated. London. 1893." Square 8vo.
The author appears to have had but a poor time at Marlborough, and
he takes advantage of every opportunity that offers to talk about anything
else in heaven or earth rather than Marlborough. The book is plentifully
besprinkled with illustrations, but what the mammoth which meets us on
p. 4, or the " Skeleton of a Fish Lizard," or the Andalusian Quail, or the
Koller, or the Spanish Bull Fight have to do with Marlborough or its
College it is difficult for anyone but the author to say.
Stonehenge, by the Eev. E. H. Goddard, forms part of the 6d. Handbook
to Woodhouse Park, London, and the full-sized model of " Stonehenge as it
was," therein erected, opened to the public on May 19th, 1894. Its twenty-
eight pages contain, as concisely as possible, the chief facts as to the history
of the structure ; the various theories of its origin and use ; the petrology of
its stones ; the means by which they were worked and erected ; the barrows
and cursus ; and the arguments for the different dates to which it has been
assigned.
The "Origin of Stonehenge " by Struthio (H. W. Estridge, Minety
House, Malmesbury), price Qd., is not an archaeological treatise, but a small
pamphlet of thirteen pages containing an imaginative story of the last
Emperor of Atlantis and his wife, as a mysterious memorial of whose
greatness Stonehenge was set up, just before the general submergence of the
empire.
Wiltshire Notes and Queries, No. 4, for December, 1893, contains a
short account of Marshwood House, Dinton, with an illustration, by A. W.
Whatmore ; seven pages of Wiltshire Folk Lore ; jottings of various kinds ;
The Hyde Family and Trowbridge ; children's games— none of which,
however, seem to have any special connection with Wiltshire ; several extracts
from Sritton's Beauties, Wayleris History of Marlborough, &c., and old
Magazines ; seven pages of queries, and fourteen of replies — some containing
matter of considerable genealogical and historical interest.
No. 5, March, 1894, has a photo of the Westbury White Horse as a
frontispiece, with a short account of it ; genealogical notes on Dugdale of
Wilts, by Mr. A. Schomberg ; and a continuation of " Children's Games " — iu
VOL. XXVII. NO. LXXXI. Z
Wiltshire Books, Pamphlets, and Articles.
which, as in the preceding number, the games are chiefly the games of educated
children. A note on Clarendon Palace with a reproduction of Stukeley's
view of the ruins follows, and then come eight pages of reprints of notices of
matters concerning Wiltshire from the Gentleman's Magazine. These are
of much interest, and are to be continued in future numbers. Notes on old
rhymes ; the last use of the pillory in Wilts ; a Wilts inventor ; Mr. J. Browne's
antediluvian theory of Stoneheuge ; a pretty little view of Purton, from
No. 36 of Marshall's Select Views in Great Britain ', and queries and
replies on various matters complete the number.
Salisbury Field Club, Transactions (vol. I., pt. v.), lately issued, contains,
in addition to the report of the annual meeting, accounts of excursions to the
New Forest, to Grateley and Ludgershall, and Bradford-ou-Avou, &c., the
will of Lady Mary Lisle, of Thruxton, Hants, a transcript of part of an in-
teresting survey of the Close, Salisbury, in 1649, by Mr. A. R. Maiden, and
some early churchwardens' and overseers' accounts of East Knoyle, with
wonderful examples of phonetic spelling, by the Rev. R. W. Milford.
Sherston. Good Words for May, 1894, has a paper by the Very Rev. Dean
Spence, entitled " The City of the White Walls," illustrated with three sketches
of Sherston, by Herbert Railton ; in which the author argues that the " White
Town" mentioned in the poem of Llywarch Hen as sacked and destroyed
immediately after the great British defeat at Deorham (A.D. 577) waa
" Sceorstane," meaning the " White or Bright Stone," the modern Sherston
Magua — near which he says the stones marking the ford by which the Roman
Foss Way crossed the Avon, as well as the earthworks of the military station
adjoining, are still visible— the spot still bearing the name of " White Walls."
Wilts Corporation Plate. The Illustrated Archaeologist, March, 1894,
has a short illustrated paper on this subject, which will appear in a more
complete and extended form in a future number of the Wilts Archaeological
Magazine.
The Jutes and the Wansdyke. Under this title Mr. F. M. Willis has a
short paper in the Antiquary for June, 1894, in which he argues " That the
Jutes had a strong colony on our east coast even prior to the coming of Julius
Caesar ; (2) that after the departure of the Romans they formed fresh
settlements in other parts of the country, notably in Oxfordshire, Gloucester-
shire, and Worcestershire ; (3) that to them we may attribute that great
archa3ological puzzle, the Wansdyke." His arguments are entirely ety-
mological, founded on the supposed resemblance of place-names in Oxfordshire
and Gloucestershire and along the line of the Wansdyke with others supposed
to be of Jutish origin in Kent and Hants. The making of the Wansdyke
itself he refers to .ZEsc, the son of Hengest,
Wiltshire Books, Pamphlets, and Articles. 323
Lacock Abbey, In the Building Ncivs for July 21st, 1893, appeared a short
account of Lacock Abbey by Mr. Harold Brakspear, A.R.I.B.A., accompanied
by a series of excellent measured drawings of the abbey and its details, which
we hope some day to see reproduced in the Magazine.
Picturesque Salisbury is a small pamphlet lately issued as an advertisement
by Mr. E. J. Orchard, chemist, with twelve views of the city and neighbourhood.
Salisbury Cathedral. A short paper by "an Old Chorister," appears in the
Organist and Choirmaster, No. 1, May^ 1893.
Caston Court. The Lady, January 4th, 1894, has.au article on " Corsham
and its surroundings," with an illustration of this old farm-house.
Calnc Church. The Illustrated Church News for February 17th, 1894, has
an article on this Church with two illustrations of the building.
A Wiltshire Ballad. The Newbery House Magazine, March, 1894, con-
tains " A Wiltshire Ballad " of forty lines by Alan Brodrick, written in
dialect; but surely "thic" is never plural, and "byre" hardly belongs to
the vulgar tongue of Wilts.
Biographical Notices. The Law Gazette, July* 189,3, has a. portrait and
biographical note on Judge Caillard. The Religious Review of Reviews,
March, 1894, gives a portrait of Earl Nelson and a sketch at some length
written by T. C. Collings. Vanity Fair, September, 1893, has portrait and
sketch of the Duke of Beaufort. The Christian Globe, April 27th, 1894,
contains portrait and sketch of the career of the Rev. George Short, of
Salisbury, President of the Baptist Union. The Devizes Gazette May 18th,
1893, reprints from the Daily Telegraph a sketch of the life of Maria,
Marchioness ef Ailesbury.
Other books by Wiltshire authors, lately issued, are : —
A Noble Sacrifice. A Temperance Tale. By Emily Grace Harding. London :
Walter Scott, 1894. Noticed in Salisbury Journal, March 17th, 1894.
The Little Squire. By Mrs. H. de la Pasture (Burton Hill, Malmesbury).
A study of child life. Noticed in Devizes Gazette, March 22nd, 1894.
Parochial Self-Government in Rural Districts, By H. C. Stephens, M.P., of
Cholderton Lodge. London: Longma-nsj 1893. Noticed in Salisbury
Journal, July 1st, 1893.
The Autobiography of an old Passport. By Rev. A. C. Smith. London :
Digby, Long, & Co., 1893. Noticed in Daily Telegraph, August 17th,
1893, and Devizes Gazette, September 7th, 1893.
324 Additions to Museum and Library.
The Path to Freedom. By Canon E. K. Bernard. London : J. Nisbet & Co.,
1894. Five sermons on the Epistle to the Galatians. Noticed in Salisbury
Journal, July 1st, 1893.
Come back from the Dead. By Christopher Howard (Mrs. Withers).
Digby, Long, & Co. (Novel founded on Salisbury legend of a lady buried
in a trance who was roused by sexton cutting off her ring.) Noticed in
Salisbury Journal, November 18th, 1893.
Measurement of Light and Colour Sensations. By J. W. Lovibond
(Salisbury). London: Gill and Son. Noticed in Salisbury Journal,
September 23rd, 1893.
E. H, GODDARD.
to tt«ttm rnifo
THE MUSEUM.
Presented by Mr. G. ASHLEY DODD :— Puffin, found at Codford, November
20th, 1893.
Presented by Mr. J. W. BROOKE :— Marlborough token, Oliver Shropshire.
Presented by Mrs. CHALMERS :— Boar's tusk, from Potterne.
Presented by Mr. COWABD : — Ancient horseshoe and hammer-head found under
an old road at Roundway.
Presented by THE SWTNDON BEIOK AND TILE COMPANY :— The greater part
of the skeleton of a Pleiosaurus, from the Kimmeridge Clay of Swindon ;
and an ammonite.
Presented by Mr. G. HOLLO WAY :— Fragment of Pottery from "Blackberries"
allotment, Potterne.
Presented by Mr. H. N. GODDAED :— Ancient key, from Oldbury Hill.
Presented by Mr. W. STBATTON : — The collection of objects found in and around
the tumulus on Cold Kitchen Hill, 1893, enumerated on page 284 ; also a
socketed bronze celt, from Kingston Deverill.
Deposited on loan by Mr. H. WOOLCOTT : — Fragments of Roman crossbow,
hammer-head, and bone handle of dagger, from an interment on Burbage
Down.
Purchased :— second examples of Wilts seventeenth century tokens— Corsham,
Edith Ad Dad Woodman ; Sarum, Henry Mattershaw ; unpublished War-
minster token, W.B.
THE LIBRARY.
Bequeathed by the late Mr. J. WAYLEN : — Seventeen bound volumes of " Wilts
Tracts," containing the following items new to the Library : — The Battle of
Additions to Museum and Library. 32 5
Eddington, or British Liberty, a Tragedy (by John Perm), 1796. Malraes-
bury, registration appeal, Gale v. Chubb, Letter to Electors by H. Gale, 1846.
Archdeacon Daubeney, charge, 1805. Bishop Burgess, ditto, 1829. Bishop
Burnel, sermon, 1706. Bishop Shute Barrington, Letter to Clergy, &c., 1789.
Thomas Parsons, Funeral Sermon on Mrs. Elizabeth Phillips, 1799. Sir
Stephen Fox, Kt., Memoirs of, 1717. Wiltshire New Phenomenon or
Free-thinking Christian Philosopher, 1752. Rev. J. Prince, Visitation Sermon
at East Lavington, 1809. Devizes Miscellany, 1852, odd numbers. Meeting
of agricultural labourers in North Wilts, 1846. Legend of Silbury Hill,
from Belgravia Annual. The Pope's Palace, by Eev. C. Lucas. Ruth
Pierce, or Evil Consequences of Lying. The Authorship of the Letters of
Junius elucidated, J. Britton, 1848. Bishop Talbot, charge, 1716. Letter
to the Bishop of Salisbury by Rev. H. Hoare, 1842. Letter by the
Rev. J. H. Hastings, on absolution, 1851. Report of trial for libel,
Merriman v. Woodman. 1836. County Lunatic Asylum, three first reports,
1852-4. Antiquities of Marlborough College, by the Rev. G. E. L. Cotton,
1855. Vital Statistics of the City of Salisbury, with comments on the
cholera visitation of 1849, by John Winzar, 1850. A scramble for a curacy
one hundred years ago. English Etymologies, by H. Fox Talbot, review of.
1846. J. Britton, Catalogue of Wilts Topography. Baptists in England
two hundred years ago. Historical Memoirs of the Baptist Church in Calne,
by Isaac Taylor, 1776. Unitarians, discourse to, by John Howe, 1799.
Memoir of Admiral Sir Philip Durham (M.P. for Devizes), 1846. Appendix
to Life of Bishop Seth Ward, 1697. The Alcohol Question, by Dr. F. E.
Anstie, 1862. An Answer to the Fallacies of Drs. Inman and Anstie,
1863. Abury Illustrated, by W. Long, with addenda and notes, 1858.
Refutation of Doctrine of Transubstantiation, by Rev. C. Lucas, n.d.
Bishop Burnet, new preface and additional chapter to 3rd Ed. of Pastoral
Care, 1712. W. Itchener, Rector of Christian Malford, Defence of the Canon
of the Old Testament, 1723. J. Barclay, Sermon at Presbyterian Chapel,
Malmesbury, 1807. Mute Disciple, Devizes. Farmer B— . J. Russell,
Funeral Sermon on Mr. Manning Evans, Melksham, 1840. Memoir of G.
Smith, of Trowbridge. J. Clark, Funeral Sermon on Mrs. Joanna Turner,
and Elegiac Poem, 1784. F. Skurray, of Horningsham, Sermon, 1803.
W. Jay, Funeral Sermon on Mrs. Eliza Berry, Warminster, 1812. Sermon,
Endless Street Chapel, Salisbury, 1815. Admiral J. H. Tayler, of Devizes,
Floating Breakwaters, 1862. Life of John Davis, 1844. Circumstantial
Account of the unfortunate Young Lady, Miss Bell, otherwise Sharpe, 1760.
W. Dods worth, Guide to Salisbury Cathedral, &c., 1792. Local Annals of
Devizes. Memoir of M. Dodson (of Marlborough), 1800. The Miseries of
the Miserable, wool Trade, 1739. J. Stonehouse, Admonitions against
Swearing, &c., 1805. Sermon at Salisbury before Governors of Infirmaryr
1771. J. Stennet, Sermon to Ministers met together at Bratton, 1752.
J. Bowden, Sermon at Ordination of S. Billingsley, at Marlborough, 172&.
Coleridge and Brabant. Office for Laying Foundation of New Church at
Zeals, 1845. John Priaulx, D.D., Brief Account of Office of Dean Rural,
1666, ed, by W. Dansey, 1832. The Haunted Farmer, or the Ghost of the
Granary ; poem ; 1800. Longbridge Devcrill Church, Sermon at the
326 Additions to Museum, and Library.
re-opening, 1853. W. L. Bowles, Answer to Question " Of what use are
Cathedral Establishments?" &c., 1833 : Song of the Battle of the Nile,
1799 : Hope : an allegorical poern, 1796. J. Wiche, Sermon at Salisbury
on Rebellion of 1745. E. Popham, Assize Sermon, 1791. T. Dray ton, two
Sermons at Wilton, 1756. Sermons at Wiltshire Feast, T. Pierce, 1658 :
S. Masters, 1684. Bishop Hoadley, Charge, 1721. Dr. H. Chalmers,
Sermon, 1648. Dr. D. Whitby, three Sermons at Salisbury, 1680-83.
W. Garrett, Persuasive to Study of Revelations, 1698. Funeral Sermon oil
Rev. J. Biggs, of Devizes. Declaration of Parliament, September 27th,
1649. Libel Case : Gorges Lowther and J. T. Batt ; proceedings. Sermons
on Death of Mr. Davis, of Horuingsham, by F. Skurray, 1807. Sermon at
Devizes, 1832, by Rev. C. Lucas. J. Frearson, The Fatal Flood : a poem,
1841. Tricks and Triumphs, or the Borough degraded, Devizes, 1842.
Letter of Lord Marquesse of Hertford to the Queen, &c., 1641. Letter
concerning the taking of Marlborough, 1642. Archdeacon Creede, Sermon,
Judah's Purging, 1660. Bishop Buruet, Funeral Sermon on Hon. R.
Boyle, 1692. Bishop Ward, Funeral Sermon on Duke of Albernarle, 1670.
Dr. H. Chambers, Funeral Sermon on Mr. J. Graille, of Tidworth, 1655.
E. Young, Assize Sermon, Salisbury, 1693. J. Kelsey, Sermon at Conse-
cration of a Chapel in house of J. Collins, at Chute, 1673. Ludlow no Lyar,
&c., 1692. Refutation of Heresies prevalent at Lambourn, &c., 1694. Earl
of Pembroke's Speech in House of Peeres, 1648. Newes from Pembroke
and Montgomery, or Oxford Manchester'd, 1648. The manner of the election
of Philip Herbert, Earle of Pembroke, for Berkshire, &c., 1649. Ordinance
of Parliament to associate Counties of Wilts, Somerset, Dorset, &c., 1644.
Charge of James Mountagu to Grand Jury, Devizes, 1720. Letter to an
M.P. proposing to abolish the Ten Commandments, 1738. Account of Pro-
ceedings against Rebels in Duke of Monmouth's Rebellion, 1716. Gillman's
Devizes Public Register, &c., 1858, 1859. T. E. Fuller, Funeral Sermon on
Rev. Jacob Jones, Melksham, 1857. Dean Greene, Sermon on first anni-
versary of the Infirmary, Salisbury, 1767. T. Broughton (Prebendary of
Sarum), Defence of Commonly Received Doctrine of Human Soul, 1766.
Bishop Talbot, Assize Sermon, Salisbury, 1716. Archdeacon Coxe's Letters
, to J. Benett on Tithe Commutation. Reply of J. Benett, 1715. J. Ryland,
Sermon at Annual Meeting of Baptist Churches at Salisbury, 1798. Bishop
Barrington, Letter to Clergy with Directions as to Orders, Institutions, &c.,
4to, 1790. Bill for the Better Relief and Employment of the Poor in the
County of Wilts, 1763. Three Tracts published at Amsterdam under name
of Gen. Ludlow's Letters, 4to, Lond., 1812. J. Filkes, Funeral Sermons on
J. Wright, and Mrs. Sarah Wright, of Devizes, 1713 and 1714. Easton's
Conjectures on Stoneheuge, fourteenth ed., 1826. Recollection of Remark-
able Events connected with the City of New Sarum, 1817. Historical
Associations of Malmesbury Abbey, Michael. Life of Bishop Jewell. H.
M. Grover, a Voice from Stonehenge. H. M. Gunu, Memorial of the Non-
conforming Clergy of Wilts and East Somerset, in 1662, 1862. C. Gillman,
Short History of St. Mary's Chapel, Devizes, 1888, Memoir of Charles
Atherton, of Calne, 1875. Is the Bible Society Contrary to the Bible and
Hostile to the Church ? 1843. Sir John Stonhouse, of Great CheverelJ.
Additions to Museum and Library, 327
Materials for Talking with Children on Religion, 1795. J. G. Fuller, Brief
History of the Western Association, 1843. Letter to Landholders of the
County of Wilts on Alarming State of the Poor, 1793. A Briton's Address
to his Countrymen on the Alarming State of the Nation : poem, 1803.
Devizes Almanack, 1776. E. J. Phipps, Preparation for Church Catechism,
n.d. Treatise on the Ananas or Pine Apple, by Adam Taylor, Devizes, 1769.
The New Art of Thriving, or the Way to Get and Keep Money, Devizes.
Sarum : a poem, 1776. Memoirs of Rev. John Clark, by W. Jay, 1810.
C. Lucas, John Buckland and the Bull, 1858. Devizes Petition in behalf
of Queen Caroline. Circular Letter to Wilts and East Somerset Association
at Brat ton, 1863, and Westbury Leigh, 1864. First and Second Letters
to Protestant Dissenters met at Devizes, 1789. L. Twells, Answer to
Enquiry as to Demoniacks, 1737. J. Griffith, Charge at Ordination of W.
George, 1750. Bishop Atterbury's Vindication, &c., and Will of Lord
Clarendon, 1733. R. Eyre, Sermon, Thanksgiving Day, 1713. Thomas
Chadlicot, Speech at Bishops Cannings. J. Hoadley, Sermon at Salisbury,
1707. J. Kelsey, Concio, &c.
Presented by THE AUTHOR :— Life of William, Earl of Shelburne, 1st Marquess
of Lansdowne, by Lord E. Fitzmaurice ; three vols., 1875-6.
Prebented by THE AUTHOR :— The Temple of the Andes (Peruvian Monuments),
4to, 1884, by R. Inwards, F.R.A.S.
Presented by Mr. G. E. DAETNELL :— Richard Jefferies, the Man and his Work,
by J. L. Veitch ; pamphlet, 1894. Richard Jefferies and his Home in
Wiltshire, by Bertha Newcombe, from Sylvia's Journal, 1894. Records
of Salisbury Infirmary, 1766—1893, pamphlet.
Presented by SIR THOMAS FOWLER, Bart, :— Memoir of Sir R. N. Fowler, Bart.,
M.P., by Rev. J. S. Flynn, 1893.
Presented by the Rev. E. H. GODDARD : — Wiltshire Words : a Glossary of the
Words used in the County of Wilts, by G. E. Dartnell and the Rev. E. H.
Goddard. Kelly's Directory of Wilts, 1880. St. Editha sive Chronicon
Vilodunense, 1883. Death and Resurrection ; The claims of the Priesthood
considered ; The Two Blasphemies ; The Outskirts of Revelation, by the
Rev. H. Harris. J. Du Boulay, Evidences of Rational Evangelism, 1875.
Appeal for the Preservation of Inglesham Church. Handbook to Stonehenge
Restored, in Woodhouse Park.
Presented by Mr. W. CUNNINGTON, F.G.S. : — Fine vellum deed, with Great
Seal of Queen Anne, concerning the manor and advowson of Hilperton, &c.
J. and E. Waylen, History of Nonconformity in Devizes, 1877. J. Waylen,
History of Quakers of Wilts, and Mornings at Bowood. G. A. Rowell,
Lecture on the storm in Wiltshire, 1859.
Presented by THE AUTHOR, Mr. S. J. Elyard :— Some old Wiltshire Homes,
1894.
Presented by THE AUTHOR, Mr. C. W. Holgate : — Index of Surnames of Win-
chester Commoners, 1800—1835, 1893.
Presented by THE AUTHOR, Judge A. W. Savary :— Families of Savory or
Savery, U.S.A.
Presented by THE AUTHOR, Mr. H. W. Estridge :— The Origin of Stonehenge.
328 Additions to Museum and Library.
Presented by THE AUTHOB, Mr. E. J. Orchard : — Picturesque Salisbury.
Pamphlet.
Presented by Mr. W. H. LONG, M.P. :— Kite's Monumental Brasses of Wiltshire.
Presented by Miss NIGHTINGALE : — Contributions towards the History of Early
English Porcelain, by J. E. Nightingale, 1881.
Presented by Mr. A. SCHOMBEEG :— R. Colborne, of Chippenham, The Plain
English Dispensatory, 1753. Ed. Wells, a Treatise of Antient and Present
Geography, 1717.
Presented by Mr. C. GILLMAN : — History of the Oldest Free Church in England
(Horningshan Chapel). Fifteen numbers of the Devizes Register.
By Exchange :— Memoirs of the Life and Writings of Rev. A. Collier, of Langford
Magna, by R. Benson, 1837. Pewsey Enclosure Act, 1775. Rev. Thomas
Twining, of Trowbridge, Sermons and Biographical Sketch, 1801. — T. J.
Elliott, The Land Question illustrated by experience on the Wilton House
Home Farm. The Laud Scare, illustrated by Wilton House Home Farm.
John Large, Secrets of Farming, 1863. Diaries and Correspondence of
James Harris, 1st Earl of Malmesbury ; four vols., 1844-45. Couper's
Robin's Lays, Trowbridge, 1881. The Illustrated Archaeologist, 1893 and
1894. Warner's Excursions from Bath, 1801. Dr. Sacheverell's Tryall,
1710. Bird's History of Malmesbury, 1876. Transactions East Riding
Antiq. Society for year 1893. Philipp's Cartularium Saxonicum Malmes-
buriense. Diocesan History of Salisbury, S.P.C.K. Prof. Skeat, Five
Reprinted Glossaries, Wilts Words, &c., 1879.
Purchased: — G. A. Ellis, Historical Enquiries into character of Edward Hyde,
Lord Clarendon, 1827. C. Harrison, The Church at Bird Bush (Donhead
St. Mary), 1853. F. Skurray, Sonnets on various subjects, 1845. W.
Jerdan, Works and Sketch of Life of G. Herbert, 1853. Leslie Stephen,
Life of Henry Fawcett, 1886. F. S. Russell, Memoir of Earl of Peter-
borough and Monmouth, 1887. Dark, a Tale of the Down Country.
Memoir of Stafford Brown, Yicar of Westbury, 1863. Autobiography of
Rev. W. Jay, 1855. J. S. Harford, Life of Bishop Burgess, 1840. Kelly's
Wiltshire (County Topographies), 1875. E. Lockwood, The Early Days of
Marlborough College, 1893. Dr. J. Merewether, Diary of a Dean, Silbury,
&c., 1851. H. S. Salt, Richard Jefferies, a Study, 1894. Thomas Hobbes,
of Malmesbury, True Ecclesiastical History from Moses to the time of
Martin Luther, in verse, 1722. W. L. Bowles, volume of Pamphlets.
Bethesda Baptist Church, Trowbridge, Brief Sketch of. T. Mann, Brief
History of Tabernacle Church, Trowbridge. W. F. Finlasou, Dissertation
on Hereditary Dignities, with special reference to Earldom of Wiltes, 1869.
Registers of Voters, N. Wilts, 1841, 1842, 1865, 1870, 1871. Poll Book,
Wilton, 1772.
POBTEAITS presented by Mrs. CUNNINGTON : — Catherine Hyde, Duchess of
Queensberry. G. Poulett Scrope. John Aubrey. Ann Hyde. Lord
Herbert, of Lea (2). Countess of Clarendon. Lord Herbert. Mrs. Hyde.
Henry Herbert, Earl of Pembroke. Lord Carnarvon. Philip, Earl of
Pembroke (3). Duchess of Albemarle. Henry Hyde, Earl of Clarendon.
Marchioness of Carnarvon. Thomas, Lord Herbert. Miss Davis. Countess
Additions to Museum and Library. 329
of Suffolk. Tobias Crisp. Mrs. Howard. Eobert, Bishop of Salisbury.
Bishop Moberly. Bishop Brian Duppa. Bishop Davenant. Bishop Fisher.
Bishop Burgess. Edward Seymour, Duke of Somerset. Sir John Hynde
Cotton. Queen Jane Seymour. Ann Stanhope, Duchess of Somerset.
William Seymour, Earl of Hertford. Elizabeth Allington, Lady Seymour.
Francis, Lord Seymour, of Trowbridge. Frances, Lady Seymour, of Trow-
bridge. Major John Wildman. Daniel Burgess (2). Earl of Ailesbury .
Frances Thynne, Duchess of Somerset. Thomas Moore. Earl of Shelburne
(2). Lord Henry Petty. Sir Orlando Bridgman. James Abercrombie.
Isaac Barre. Rev. Joseph Townsend. Marquis of Lansdowne (2).
Jeremy Bentham. Marquis of Lansdowne. John Bradshaw. William
Beckford. Lord Folkestone. Lord Holland. James Ley, Earl of
Marlborough. Francis, Lord Cottington. Edmund Ludlow (2).
Lord Malmesbury. Christopher Wren, Dean of Windsor. Sir Henry Coker.
Col. John Penruddocke. William, Earl of Stirling. Col. Fiennes. Sir
John Danvers. Ralph, Lord Hopton. Henry Hunt. John Methuen.
Thomas, Lord Seymour, of Sudeley. Queen Catherine Parr. Samuel
Wilton. Col. Lumsford. Sir E. Malet. Photos of other Wilts Portraits.
ENGBAVINGS, WOODCUTS, &c., presented by Mrs. CUNNINGTON : — Tilsit Church.
Staircase at Amesbary. Lord Arundel in Battle with Turks. Devizes Corn
Exchange. Bookplates of Edward Wilton. Beckhampton Down in a Fog.
St. John's Church, Devizes. Bishops Cannings Church. Etchilhampton
Church, Tomb, &c. Market Place, Devizes. Devizes Castle, 1892. Model
Farm, Longleat. Fonthill Abbey (3). Trafalgar House. Tomb of Duke
of Buckingham in Britford Church. Gorges Tomb in Salisbury Cathedral
(3). Bishopstone Church (3). Stone Monuments in Khassia Hills. Ditto
at Malta. Tomb of W. Beckford. Fountain in Berkeley Square, given by
Lord Lansdowne. FSte in Tottenham Park. Lord Hertford's House at
Marlborough. Grammar School at Marlborough. Marlborough Mound.
St. Mary's, Marlborough. Tottenham Park. Ramsbury Manor. Salisbury,
North-east Prospect. Tomb in Salisbury Cathedral. Trowbridge Church,
North-east view and two interiors, Tower under repair, Rectory, National
Schools, " Castle." Wilton Church, interior, pulpit, Monument of Sir
Thomas Long. Lake in garden at Studley. Everley old and new Churches.
New Swindon Institute.
Presented by Mr. H. E. MEDLICOTT :— Photo of old chariot more than one
hundred years old, belonging to the late Mrs. Penruddocke, of Fyfield.
Presented by Mr. H. BBAESFEAB :— Photo-litho drawings of Lacock Abbey,
from Building News. Original drawing of Hill Deverill House, old
buildings.
Presented by Rev. the Hon. B. P. BOUVEBIB : — Two drawings of sundial from
Ivy Church.
Presented by Mr. B. H. CUNNIHGTON :— Drawings of urns, &c,, found at
Broomsgrove.
END OF VOL. XXVII.
HURRY & PEARSON, Printers and Publishers, Deyizes.
>- o
i—4
O CD
i— I
m os
fc
CO O
(M C O "S »0
i— X T? OS CO
& lll.iies
i_~ O2 bi 43 43 ft x
D ^
CO <N O CO
rH OS IO rH
I— t rH
X <N CO r-i
CM O <N CO CO
* jg •• • oo oo co oo
CO Oi
(M CO
h-M _LJ ® U-l
tf ^)§§
o e3^
g H-l r-H -fi — -
g^l^ s°«cc
-s 2 fl.^'s^'-'^N^^0*
li ill
ii HI
«« 9? — 4 o o
§-° -S43J
KEPORT
ON THE
TRANSCRIPTION
AND
PUBLICATION
OF
PARISH REGISTERS, &c.
PUBLISHED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE CONGRESS OF*
AKCII^EOLOGICAL SOCIETIES IN UNION WITH THE
SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES.
18U2
Report on the Transcription and Publica-
tion of Parish Registers, etc.
The Congress of Archaeological Societies in union with the Society
of Antiquaries desires to call the attention of the public and especially
of those interested in antiquarian research, to the extreme importance
of duly preserving and rendering accessible the Registers and other
Parish Records of the United Kingdom.
These contain matter of the greatest value not only to the
genealogist, but also to the student of local history, and through these
to the general historian ; it is to be regretted that sufficient care has
not been taken in the past of these documents, which have too often
been thoughtlessly destroyed.
Many Registers have already been copied and published, and every
year adds to the list, and the Congress is in hope that these suggestions
may lead to a still greater number being undertaken.
As the older writings are in a different character from that used at
the present time, they are not easily deciphered, and require careful
examination, even from experts. It is extremely desirable therefore
that they should be transcribed, not only to guard against possible loss
or injury, but in order to render them more easily and generally
accessible to the student.
The Committee appointed by the Congress of 1889 for the purpose
of considering the best means of assisting the transcription and
publication of Parish Registers and Records was constituted as follows:
EDWIN FRESHFIELD, LL.D., V.P.S.A., Chairman.
The Rev. Canon BENIIAM, B.D.,
F.S.A.
R. S. FABER, M.A.
(Hon. Sec. Huguenot Society.)
W. J. HARDY, F.S.A.
J. J. HOWARD, LL.D., F.S.A.
(Maltravers Herald.)
G. W. MARSHALL, LL.D., F.S.A,
(Rouge Croix.)
G. H. OVEREND, F.S.A.
(Public Record Office.)
Rev. W. SPARROW SIMPSON, D.D.,
F.S.A. (St. Paul's Cathedral).
MILL STEPHENSON, B.A., F.S.A.
(Hon. Sec. Surrey Archceo. Soc.)
RALPH NEVILL, F.S.A. (Hon. Sec.)
The Congress trust that the following paper of Suggestions drawn
up by the Committee may prove useful to those anxious to assist in the
preservation, transcription and, where possible, publication of the
documents referred to.
Suggestions as to Transcription,
LIMITS OF DATE.
It is evident that there is most reason for transcribing the oldest
Registers, but those of later date are also of great value, and it is
suggested that 1812, the date of the Act of 52 Geo. Ill, cap. 146,
is a suitable point to which copies may be taken.
CHARACTER OF WRITING.
In transcribing, great care must be used to avoid mistakes from the
confusion of certain letters with modern letters of similar form.
An alphabet is adjoined giving some of the ordinary characters,
but Registers vary, and the manner in which the capital letters are
formed is of infinite variety. It may be noted that capital F resembles
two small ffs, but there is no reason whatever for printing it in the
latter way ; G is a difficult letter running into C and T ; K and R are
formed exactly alike, except that the direction of the top loop is always
reversed ; W is formed as two U's or two Vs.
Great help in deciphering names may be gained from a study of
existing local names. It must, however, be borne in mind that the
same name may be continually spelt in different ways, and may undergo
considerable changes in the course of time or from the hands of
different scribes.
In copying dates it must be remembered that down to 1752, the
year began on the 25th of March and not on the 1st of January.
METHOD OF TRANSCRIPTION.
There can be no doubt that a verbatim et literatim transcription is
of far more value than any other form ; it is otherwise impossible to be
sure that some point of interest and importance has not been over-
looked ; the extra trouble of making a complete transcript is small,
and the result much more satisfactory. In any case the names should
be given literatim and all remarks carefully copied, with some indi-
cation, where possible, as to the date of the remark. Other records,
such as Churchwardens' Accounts, should certainly not be transcribed
and printed otherwise than in full. It is far better in both cases to do
a portion thoroughly than the whole imperfectly.
KEVISION AND COLLATION OF COPIES.
The decipherment of old Registers is, as already pointed out, a
work of considerable difficulty, and it is therefore strongly recom-
mended that in cases where the transcribers have no great previous
experience, they should obtain the help of some competent reader to
collate the transcript with the original.
It should be remembered that in many cases transcripts are pre-
served in the Bishops' Registries and a reference to these will often
fill up a void, clear up a difficulty or supply an omission. It occasionally
happens that the original Registers are preserved as well as later
Transcripts ; in such cases, the two should be collated and all variations
noted.
PUBLICATION.
With regard to the publication of Registers, the Committee have
carefully considered the question of printing in abbreviated or index
form and have come to the conclusion to strongly recommend that the
publication should be in full, not only for the reasons given for
transcription, but because the extra trouble and expense is so small
and the value so very much greater.
There seems, however, no objection, in either case, to the use of
contractions of formal words of constant recurrence. A list of some of
these is adjoined :
Bap.: baptized. Bac. : bachelor.
Mar. : married. Spin. : spinster.
Bur. : buried. Wid, : widow or widower.
Dau. : daughter.
With regard to entries of marriage after Lord Hardwicke's Act of
1752, it is suggested that the form of entry may be simplified by the
omission of formal phrases, but care should be taken not to omit any
record of fact, however apparently unimportant, such for instance as
the names of witnesses, ministers, occupation, etc.
It is essential in all cases that an Index should be given and that
the Christian names should be given with the surnames.
It is believed that many Registers remain unprinted owing to an
exaggerated idea of the cost of printing and binding. Reasonable
estimates for these might, probably, often be obtained from local
presses which would be interested in the publication.
No absolute rule as to size and type can be laid down, but on this
and other questions the Standing Committee will always be glad to
give advice. It is probable that demy octavo or foolscap quarto will
be found the most convenient sizes.
A Standing- Committee has been appointed by the Congress for the
purpose of giving advice and distributing to the various Societies in
Union such information and lists as may be of common value to all.
Societies in Union are strongly urged to form their own Committees
to take steps to secure the printing of the many Transcripts that
already exist unpublished, and to promote further Transcription.
By permission of G. W. Marshall, Esq., LL.D. (Rouge Croix, College of
Arms), the accompanying list of Printed Registers has been prepared
from the Calendar privately printed by him in 1891. A revised and
augmented edition of this Calendar is in progress, and will contain full
references to all known printed Registers, Transcripts and Collections,
whether complete or consisting of extracts.
The Committee also issue a list of MS. Transcripts and propose to
prepare and issue further lists from time to time. They therefore ask
that information may be sent to them, or to the Secretaries of County
Societies, of any Transcripts in private hands. The inclusive dates of
Baptisms, Marriages and Burials should be given, and any complete
Transcript will be calendared, although extending over a short period
only, but Extracts will not be admissible.
The Committee suggest that lists of existing Transcripts, with full
particulars of the location of the Transcript, should be kept by the
County Societies, and where possible, in order to avoid risk of loss, it
is very desirable that such Transcripts should be deposited, either
temporarily or permanently, in the Libraries of the Societies.
It is believed that the publication of a series of Registers, supple-
mental and extra to their Transactions, would add to the attractiveness
and usefulness of the Societies without being a serious burden to their
funds. By combination and organization a considerable body of out-
side subscribers may probably be secured for such a series, and the
cost of distribution of circulars, etc., may be materially reduced by
such a plan as the issue, by the Central Committee, of an annual
circular containing lists of Registers in course of publication. Such a
circular might be distributed by the local Societies and published in
their Transactions and elsewhere.
The Standing Committee will be very glad to receive suggestions
from Local Committees and others.
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
List No. 1. — Parish Registers printed as separate works.
j? No. 2. — Parish Registers printed in other works.
?j No. 3. — Original Registers and Bishops' Transcripts
in the British Museum Library.
„ No. 4. — Registers of other Churches in all classes,
„ No. 5. — Parish Registers transcribed in MS.
No. 1,~ A List of Parish Registers that have been,
printed as separate works.
Extracted by permission from " Parish Registers? privately printed by
Geo. W. Marshall, Esq., LL.D., 1891, and continued to date.
NOTE. — Those printed at Middle Hill for Sir Thomas Phillips are very rare,
and many others, such as those by Mr. Crisp, were privately printed and are scarce,
BEDS. HAYNES, 1596-1812, Wm. Briggs, M.A., pr.
BERKS. BEADING, St. Mary, 1538-1812, Rev. G. P. Crawfurd,
2 vols.
WELFORD, Bap. 1562, Mar. 1603, Bur. 1559-1812, Mrs.
Batson Olney, 1892, 4to
BUCKS. GREAT HAMPDEN, 1557-1812, E. A. Ebblewhite 1888, fol.
CAMBRIDGESHIRE. ABINGTON PIGOTTS, 1653-1812, Rev. W. G. F.
Pigott Norwich, 1890, 4to
CHESHIRE. EASTHAM, 1598-1700, F. Sanders Lond. 1891, 8vo
LEYLAND, 1653-1710, B.T. 1622-1641, W.S. White, 1892,
PRESTBURY, 1560-1636, J. Croston 1881, 8vo
CORNWALL. MADRON, Bap. 1592-1726, Mar. 1577-1678, Bur. 1577-
1681 G. B. Millett, Penzance, 1877, 4to
ST. COLUMB Major, 1539-1780, A. J. Jewers 1881, 8vo
DENBIGHSHIRE. KEGIDOG alias ST. GEORGE, 1694-1749, F. A. Crisp
1890, fol.
DERBYSHIRE. WEST HALLAM, Rev. C. W. Kerry 1887, 8vo
DORSET. ASHMORE, 1651-1820, E. W. Walsin 1891, 4to
NORTH WOOTON, Bap. 1539-1785, Mar. 1542-1760, Bur.
1698-1785, Rev. C. H. Mayo. pr. 1887, 8vo
DURHAM. DENTON, 1586-1662, J. R. Walbran Ripon, 1842, 8vo
DURHAM, St. Oswald, 1538-1751, A. W. Headlam
Durham, 1891, 8vo
GAINFORD, Index, Bap. 1560-1784, Mar. 1569-1761, Bur.
1569-1784. J. R. Walbran, 3 parts Lond. 1889, 8vo
ESSEX. BOBBINGWORTH, Bap. 1559-1782, Mar. 1559-1753, Bur.
1558-1785, F. A. Crisp, pr. 1884, fol.
COLCHESTER, St. Leonard, 1670-71, F. A. Crisp, 1885, fol.
GREENSTED, 1558-1812, F. A. Crisp, pr. 1892, fol.
LAMBOURNE, 1582-1709, F. A. Crisp, pr. 1890, fol.
MORETON, 1558-1759, F. A. Crisp, pr. 1891, fol.
ONGAR, 1558-1750, F. A. Crisp, pr. 1886, fol.
SOUTH WEALD, 1539-1573, R. Hovenden, F.S.A. 1889, 8vo
STAPLEFORD TAWNEY, 1558-1 752, F. A. Crisp 1892, fol.
STIFFORD, 1568-1783, F. A. Crisp, pr. 1885, fol.
STOCK HARVARD, 1563-1700, E. P. Gibson 1881, 8vo
GLAMORGAN. LLANTRITHYD, 1571-1810, H. S. Hughes 1888, 8vo
GLO'STER. BRETFORTON, Mar. 1538-1752, Sir T. Phillips Lond. 8vo
KEMPSFORD, 1653-1700, F. A. Crisp, pr. 1887, fol.
MICKLETON, 1594-1736, Sir T. Phillips, pr. 8vo
HANTS. COLMER, 1563-1812, Rev. T. Hervey 1886, 8vo
PRIORS' DEAN, 1538-1812, see Colmer.
IRELAND. CORK, Christ Church, 1643-1668, R. Caulfield 1887, 8vo
KENT. CANTERBURY CATHEDRAL, 1564-1878, R. Hovenden,
Harleian Soc. vol. 2. 1878, 4to
CANTERBURY, St. Peter, 1560-1800, J. M. Cowper,
Canterbury, 1888 8vo
„ St. Alphege, 1558-1800, J. M. Cowper, 1889
,, St. Dunstan, 1559-1800. J. M. Cowper, 1890
„ St. George, 1538-1800, J. M. Cowper, 1891
St. Mary Magdalene, 1559-1800.
J. M. Cowper, 1890
St. Paul, 1562-1800, J. M. Cowper 1892
CHISLET, 1538-1751 , R. Hovenden, F.S.A. Lond. 1887, 8vo
ELMSTONE, 1552-1812, Rev. C. H. Wilkie 1891, 8vo
KINGSTONE, 1558-1812, Rev. C. H. Wilkie 1892, 8vo
LEE, 1559-1754, Duncan and Barron Lee, 1888, 8vo
LEWISHAM, 1558-1750, L. L. Duncan Lond, 1891, 8vo
MAIDSTONE, Mar. 1542-1620, Rev. J. Cave-Browne
Lond. 1890, 8 vo
ROCHESTER CATHEDRAL, 1657-1837, T. Shindler M.A.
to be pub. 8vo
LANCASHIRE. COLTON-IN-FURNESS, 1622-1812, Rev. A. Williams
and J. P. Burns Lond. 1891
LEIGH, 1559-1624, J. H. Stanning Leigh, 1882, 8vo
ROCHDALE, 1582-1641, H. Fishwick, 2 vols. 1888-9, 8vo
SADDLEWORTH, 1613-1751, J. Radcliffe 1887, 8vo
ULYERSTOX. 1545-1812, Bardsley and Ayre 1886, 4to.
LEICESTERSHIRE. NEWTON LINFORD. 1677-1679, F. A. Crisp 1884, fol.
LINCOLNSHIRE. GREAT GRIMSBY, 1538- 1812, G. S. Stephenson, M.D;
Great Grimaby, 1889, 8vo
HORNCASTLE, 1559-1639, Rev. J. C. Hudson 1892, 4to
IRBY-UPON-HUMBER, 1558-1785, F. A. Crisp 1890, fol.
STUBTON, 1577-1628, F. A. Crisp, pr. 1883, fol.
LONDON. ALL HALLOWS, London Wall, 1559-1675, Jupp and
Hovenden Lond. 1878, 4to
GRAY'S INN CHAPEL, Marriages, Jos. Foster, Coll : Geneal.
ST. ANTHOLIN, 1538-1754, Harl. Soc. vol. viii.
ST. BOTOLPH, Bishopsgate, 1558-1753, A. W. C. Hallen,
2 vols. 1886, 8vo
ST, CHRISTOPHER-LE-STOCKS, 1558-1781
E. Freshfield, 1882, 4to
ST. DIONIS BACKCHURCH, 1538-1754, Harl. Soc. vol. iii.
ST. EDMUND the KING (Lombard Street), Wm. Briggs, pr.
ST. GEORGE, Hanover Square, Mar. 1725-1809, Harl. Soc.
vols. xi. xii. and xv.
ST. JAMES, Clerkenwell, Bap. and Mar. 1551-1754. Harl.
Soc. vols. ix. x. xiii.
ST. JOHN BAPTIST, on Walbrook, Bap. 1682-1754, Bur.
1686-1754, Harl. vol. viii. 1890
ST. MARY ABBOTS, Kensington. 1539-1675, Harl. Soc.
vol. xvi.
ST. MARY ALDERMARY, 1558-1754, Harl. Soc. vol. v.
ST. MARY WOOLCHURCH Haw. See St. Mary Woolnoth.
ST. MARY WOOLNOTH, 1538-1760, Brooke and Hallen
1886, 8vo
ST. MICHAEL, Cornhill, 1546-1754, Harl. Soc. vol. vii.
ST. NICHOLAS ACON, 1539-1812, W. Briggs Leeds, 1890
ST. PETER, Cornhill, Bap. and Bur. 1538-1774, Mar.
1538-1754, Harl .Soc. i. and iv.
ST.-THOMAS-THE-APOSTLE, Bap. and Bur. 1558-1754, Mar.
1558-1672, Harl. Soc. vol. vi.
SOMERSET HOUSE CHAPEL, 1714-1776, J. Coleman
1862, 8vo
WESTMINSTER ABBEY, 1606-1875, Harl. Soc. vol. x.
MIDDLESEX. STAINES, 1664-1694, F. A. Crisp, pr. 1887, fol.
MONTGOMERYSHIRE. TREF EGLWYS, 1695-6, Sir T. Phillips, pr. 12mo
NORFOLK. BIRCHAM NEWTON, 1562-1743, R. Hewlett 1888, 8vo
BURGH, 1563-1810, Rev. E. T Yates 8vo
MARSHAM, 1538-1836, A. T. Michell, Norwich, 1889, 8vo
NORTH ELMHAM, 1536-1631, Rev. A. C. Legge 1888, 8vo
NOTTS. CARBURTON, 1528-1812, G. W. Marshall, LL.D. 1888, fol.
EDWINSTOWE, 1634-1758, G. W. Marshall 1891, 8vo
PERLETHORPE, 1528-1812, G. W. Marshall 1887, fol.
OXFORDSHIRE. DUCKLIXGTON,' Index, 1550-1880, Rev. W. D. Macray
Oxford, 1881, 8vo
SALOP. BROSELEY, 1570-1750, A. F. C. C. Langley, 2 vols.
Lond. 1889-90, 8vo
SCOTLAND. MUTHILL, 1697-1847, A. W. C. Halien 1887, 8vo
SOMERSET. WEDMORE, 1561— Bap. 1812, Mar. 1839, Bur. 1860.
WELLOW, Index, 1570-1887, C. W. Empson 1889, 8vo
WILTON, 1558-1837, J. H. Spencer Taunton, 1890, 8vo
STAFFORDSHIRE. WALSALL, 1570-1649, F. W. Willmore, 1890, 8vo
SUFFOLK. BRUNDISH, Bap. 1562-1765, Mar. 1563-1749, Bur. 1563-
1785, F. A. Crisp, pr. 1885, fol.
CARLTON, 1538-1885, F. A. Crisp, pr. 1886, fol.
CHILLESFORD, F. A. Crisp, pr. 1886, fol.
CULPHO, 1721-1886, F. A. Crisp, pr. 1886, fol.
ELLOUGH, 1540-1812, F. A. Crisp, pr. .1886, 8vo
FROSTENDEN, 1538-1791, F. A. Crisp, pr. 1887, fol.
KELSALE, 1538-1812, F. A. Crisp, pr. 1887, fol.
PAKENHAM, 1564-1766, F. A. Crisp, pr. 1888, fol.
TANNINGTON, 1539-1714, F. A. Crisp, pr. 1884, fol.
THORINGTON, 1561-1881, T. S. Hill Lond. 1884, 8vo
SURREY. WANDSWORTH, 1603-1787, J. T. Squire 1889, 8vo
WINDLESHAM, Bap. 1677-1783, Mar. 1695-1753, Bur.
1695-1783, W. W. Glanville-Richards 1881, 8vo
SUSSEX. EDBURTON, 1558-1673, Rev. C. H. Wilkie 1884, 8vo
„ „ Index, F. A. Crisp, pr. 1887, 8vo
WARWICKSHIRE. BIRMINGHAM, St. Martin, 1554-1653 1889. 8vo
LEEK WOTTON, 1685-1742, Sir T. Phillipps 8vo
„ „ Index to ditto, F. A. Crisp 1887, 8vo
WILTS. BROAD CHALKE, 1538-1780, Itev. C. G. Moore 1880, 8vo
DURNFORD, 1574-1650, Sir T. Phillips 1823, 8vo
STOURTON, 1570-1800, J. H. Ellis, Harl. Soc. vol. xii.
WORCESTERSHIRE. BROADWAY, Bap. and Bur. 1680-1771, Sir T.
Phillips.
YORKS. CALVERLEY, 1574-1720, S. Margerison, 3 vols.,1880-9,8vo
ECCLESFIELD, Bap. 1599-1619, Mar. 1558-1621, Bur.
1558-1603, A. S. Gatty, F.S.A. Lond. 1878, 4to
HAWNBY, 1653-1722, Miss Thoyts Olney, 1890, 4to
HULL, God's Hospital Chapel, from 1695, SirT. Phillips
INGLEBY GREENHOW, 1539-1800, J. Blackburnel889, 8vo
KIRKBURTON, 1541-1654, F. A. Collins, Exeter, 1887, 8vo
MORLEY, see Topcliffe.
Roos, R. B. Machell, Hull, 1888, 8vo
ROTHERHAM, 1542-1563, J. Guest 4to
TOPCLIFFE and MORLEY, Bap. 1654-1830, Bur. 1654-
18&8, W. Smith Lond. 1888, 8vo
No. 2.— Parish Registers printed in books and
periodicals.
CHESHIRE. MACCLESFIELD, 1512-1620, Par. Mag. from 1886 4to
DERBYSHIRE. CROXALL, 1586-1812, R. Ussher, Hist, of Croxall.
WEST HALLAM, Rev. C. W. Kerry,
Jour. Derby Arch. Soc. 1887
ESSEX. THEYDON MOUNT, 1564-1815, J. J. Howard, LL.D. &
H. F. Burke, Theydon Mount and its Lords, &c.
GLO'STERSHIRE. HAMPNETT, Mar. 1737-1754, Glouc. Notes and
Queries, vols. i. and ii.
MAISEMOKE, Bap., 1600-1663, Mar. 1557-1590, Bur.
1538-1599, Glouc. N & Q., vol. iv.
PEBWORTH, Mar. 1595-1700, Glouc. N & Q., vol. iv.
HEREFORDSHIRE. UPTON BISHOP, Mar. 1571-1883, Rev. F. T.
Havergal, Records of Upton Bishop.
LANCASHIRE. BOLTON, 1573-1712. Bolton Weekly Journal.
OLDHAM, 1558-1658, Local Notes and Gleanings.
Oldham, 1887, 8vo
PRESTON, 1611-1631, Tom C. Smith, Records of Par. Ch.
of Preston Preston, 1892, 4to
LEICESTERSHIRE. SHACKERSTON, 1558-1630, Leic. Architec. Soc.,
vol. v.
SOMERBY, 1601-1715, Leic. Architec. Soc., vol. v.
LINCOLNSHIRE. HORNCASTLE, from 1639, J. C. Hudson (see also
No. 1 list), Par. Mag., 1892.
LONDON. BERMONDSEY, from 1598, Genealogist, New Ser.
ST. MARY-LE-STRAND, Mar. 1605-1625, Genealogist, New
Ser. iv. and v.
NORFOLK. BURGH, 1563-1810, see No. 1 list and Norf. Archseol. Soc.
Proc.
NOTTS. CARLTON IN LINDRICK, from 1539, Par. Mag. 1886-8.
OXFORDSHIRE. DUCKLINGTON, Index 1550-1880, N. Oxford Archeeol.
Soc. (see List 1) 1880
OXFORD, CHRISTCHURCH, 1633-1884, Misc. Geneal. et
Herald: 2nd Ser., vol. i.
STAFFORDSHIRE. WEST BROMWICH, Bap. and Bur. 1608-1616, Par.
Mag. 1879
WARWICKSHIRE. BIRMINGHAM, ST. MARTIN, 1554-1653, Midland
Antiquary, vol. iii. (see also List 1).
YORKS. ALLERSTON, see Ebberston.
ACKWORTH, 1558-1599, Yorks. Notes and Queries, vol. i.
BRADFORD, from 1596, Bradford Antiquary (in progress).
10
YORKS. BURNSALL, 1558-1740, Rev. W. J. Stavert, Par. Mag.
(continued) (in progress).
DEWSBURY, 1538-1599, S. J. Chadwick, Par. Mag. 1892.
EBBERSTON (and Allerston), Par. Mag. from 1887 4to
HALIFAX, 1538-1541, W. J.Walker, Registers of Halifax
1885, 4to
ROTHERHAM, 1542-1563, J. Guest, Hist. Notices of
Rotherham.
STAVELEY, Bap. 1582-1653, Mar. 1584-1652,
Bur. 1582-1638 Par. Mag. 1885
YORK MINSTER, Bur. 1634-1836, York Archeeol. Jour.,
vol. j., Mar. 1681-1762, vol. iL, Bap. 1686-1804,
vol. vi.
No. 3.— Original Registers and Bishops' Transcripts
in the British Museum Library.}
ORIGINAL REGISTERS.
BERKS. STEVENTON, 1556-1599, Harl. MS. 2395.
CAMBRIDGESHIRE. PAPWORTH EVERARD, 1565-1692, Add. MS.
31854.
LEICESTERSHIRE. SOMERBY, 1601-1715, Add. MS. 24802 (see No. 1
List).
MIDDLESEX. STAINES, Bap. and Bur. 1653-1691, Mar. 1653-1660,
Egerton MS. 2004
WILTS. ALDERBURY, 1606-1669, Add. MS. 27441.
BISHOPS' TRANSCRIPTS.
ESSEX. AVELEY, 1636-1813, Add. MS. 28737.
BARLING, 1768, Add MS. 32344.
KENT. BOXLEY, 1585-6, 1599-1600, Add. MS. 32344,
BROOKLAND, 1615, Add. MS. 32344.
FAVERSHAM, 1730-1731, Add. MS. 32344.
RING WOULD, 1636, Add. MS. 32344.
UPCHURCH, 1612, 1661, Add. MS. 32344.
LANCASHIRE. CHILD WALL, 1670, Add. MS. 32344.
SHROPSHIRE. HIGH ERCALL, 1630, 1632-4, 1636, 1663-4,
Add: MS. 32344.
STAFFORDSHIRE. BOBBINGTON, 1662-1812, Add. MS. 28738.
UTTOXETER, 1762-1766, Add. MS. 32344.
11
No. 4.— Registers of other Churches.
Printed Registers.
KOMAN CATHOLIC.
BERKS. UFTON COURT, 1741-1828, F. Crisp, pr. 1889, fol.
BUCKS. WESTON UNDERWOOD, 1710-1785. F. Crisp, pr. 1887, fol.
SURREY. WOBURN LODGE, WEYBRIDGE, 1750-1874, F. Crisp, pr.
1888, fol.
WORCESTERSHIRE. WORCESTER, Bap. 1 685-1837. F. Crisp, 1887, fol .
NONCONFOBMIST.
CAMBRIDGESHIRE. WISBECH, Reg. Gen. Baptist Ch., W. Winkley
1860, 8vo
YORKSHIRE. COLEY, see Northowram.
DONCASTER, Friends, Mar. 1794-1865, C. H. Hatfield,
Hist. Not. of Done. Series 2.
KEIGHLEY, Friends, Yorkshire Notes and Queries, vol. ii.
NORTHOWRAM, Noucon. 1644-1752, J. H. Turner, 1881, 8vo
FOKEIGN CHTJKCHES.
CAMBRIDGESHIRE. THORNEY, French Colony, 1654-1727, Rev. R.
H. Warner, Hist, of Thorney Abbey.
HANTS. SOUTHAMPTON, Walloon Church, 1567-1779,
Huguenot Soc., vol iv., 4to
IRELAND. DUBLIN, Huguenot Church, Hug. Soc., vol. vii., in press
KENT. CANTERBURY, French Church, Hug. Soc., vol. v., part i.,
1891, part ii., in press
DOVER, French Church, F. A. Crisp 1888, fol.
LONDON. AUSTIN FRIARS, Dutch Church, 1571-1874, W. J. C.
Moens, F.S.A. Lymington, 1884, 4to
NORFOLK. NORWICH, Walloon Church, 1595-1611, Hug. Soc., vol. i.,
part ii. Lymington, 1888, 4to
YORKSHIRE. SANDTOFT, French Prot. Church, 1642-1685, Yorks
Archeol. Jour., vol. vii.
MS. Transcripts.
ESSEX. COLCHESTER, Dutch Church. Bap. 1645-1728, W. J. C.
Moens, F.S.A.
GLOUCESTERSHIRE. RODBOROUGH, Diss. Prot., Bap. 1762-1837,
Rev. R. H. Clutterbuck, F.S.A.
12
LONDON. BUNHILL FIELDS, Bur. 1713-1826, Chester MSS.
SURREY. CAPEL, Friends (Pleystowe Reg.) Births 1651-1819, Mar.
1666-1676, Bur. 1664-1849, A. Ridley Bax.
REIGATE, Friends, Births 1667-1675, Mar. 1665-1676
Bur. 1664-1677, A. R. Bax.
SOCIETY OF FRIENDS.— A Digest of the Registers of Births, Mar-
riages, Deaths and Burials of Members (principally) of
the Society of Friends in England and Wales, from the
rise of the Society, circa 1650 to 1837, arranged in geo-
graphical areas called Quarterly Meetings, the entries for
each Quarterly Meeting being also arranged alpha-
betically and chronologically.
Central Offices, Devonshire House, E,C.
No. 5.— A List of MS. Transcripts,
This List is for general information, to prevent the duplication of
transcription and facilitate publication ; many of the owners of the
transcripts wish it to be understood that they will not undertake to
make searches, give extracts, or enter into correspondence. The names
given are those of the present owners ; the Chester MSS. are at the
College of Arms,
BEDFORDSHIRE. MILTON ERNEST, 1538-1678, Chester MSS.
BERKS. BEENHAM, from 1561.
BURGHFIELD, Bap. 1562-1643, Mar. 1559-1643, Bur.
1559-1635, the Rector.
DENCHWORTH, from 1538 (old), Miss Thoyts.
ENGLEFIELD, 1561-1889, A. A. Harrison.
FRIBSHAM, Bap. 1711-1768, Mar. 1711-1720, Bur. 1721-
1768, Index, Miss Thoyts.
PURLEY (old), Miss Thoyts.
STREATLY, from 1679, the Rector.
SULHAMSTEAD ABBOTS, 1603-1810, Miss E. Thoyts.
SULHAMSTEAD BANISTER, 1660-1787, Miss E. Thoyts.
UFTON, 1636-1736, the Rector (by Miss Thoyts).
CHESHIRE. BRERETON-CUM-SMETHWICK, 1538-1620, C. J. Bradshaw
CHESTER, St. Bridgit, Bap. 1560-1638, Mar. 1560-1637,
Bur. 1560-1666, Brit. Mus., Harl. MS. 2177.
CHESTER, St. Mary-on-the-Hill, Bap. 1547-1572, Mar.
1547-1551, Bur. 1547-1553, Harl. MS. 2177.
13
CHESHIRE. CHESTER, St. Olave, Bap., Mar. and Bur. 1611-1644, and
Bur. 1G54-1673, Harl. MS. 2177.
CHESTER, Trinity, 1598-1653, Harl. MS. 2177>
DEVON. ALWINGTON, Bap. and Mar. 1550-1716, Bur. 1550-1775,
Chester MSS.
BRADFORD, 1559-1812, Chester MSS.
HARTLAND, Bap. 1557-1812, Mar. 1557-1837, Bur. 1577-
1866, Chester MSS.
HOLLACOMBE, 1638-1738. Chester MSS.
LITTLEHAM, 1538-1812, Chester MSS.
MAMHEAD, 1549, Rev. W. C. Plenderleith.
NEWTON, St. Petrock, 1578-1812, Chester MSS.
PARKHAM, 1537-1812, Chester, MSS.
SHAUGH PRIOR, 1565-1887, MS. Coll. Arms.
SHEBBEAR, 1576-1812, Chester MSS.
DORSET. HALSTOCK, Bap. 1698, Mar. 1701, Bur. 1698-1812,
Rev. R. F. Meredith (Indexed).
DURHAM. DENTON, Bap. 1673-1714, Mar. 1673-1715, Bur. 1673-1717,
Rev. J. Edleston (earlier Register printed).
GAINFORD, Bap. 1784-1841, Mar. 1754-1837, Bur. 1784-
1852, Rev. J. Edleston (earlier Register printed).
WHORLTON. Bap. 1626-1724, Mar. 1713-1724, Bur. 1669-
1724, Rev. J. Edleston (Indexed).
ESSEX. DEBDEN, 1557-1777, Chester MSS.
STANSTED MONTFICHET, 1558-1760 (per J. J. Green), Brit.
Mus.
GLO'STERSHIRE. KING STANLEY, Bap. 1573-1812, Mar. 1573-1813,
Bur. 1573-1881, Rev. R. H. Clutterbuck, F.S.A.
LEONARD STANLEY, Bap. 1575-1600, Mar. 1570-1613, Bur.
1571-1664, and 1773-1812, Rev. R. H. Clutter-
buck, F.S.A.
HANTS. ASHE, Bap. 1607, Mar. 1606, Bur. 1618-1720), Rev. F. W.
Thoyts.
DUNMER, 1540-1889, S. Andrews (Index in progress.)
EASTROP, 1750-1888, S. Andrews (Indexed).
KNIGHTS ENHAM, Bap. 1683-1812, Mar. 1697-1805, Bur.
1758-1812, Rev. R. H. Clutterbuck, F.S.A.
STEVENTON, 1604-1888, S. Andrews.
UPTON GREY, 1558-1837, Miss G. T. Martin.
HERTS. ST. ALBAN'S ABBEY, 1558-1689, Chester MSS.
WESTON, Bap. and Bur. 1539-1760, Mar. 1539-1757,
M. R. Pryor.
KENT. BECKENHAM, 1538-1716, A. 0. Barren.
BECKENHAM, Bap. 1717-1784, Mar. 1717-1790, Bur.
1717-1785, L. L. Duncan, F.S.A.
IJBIBLUHUBST, 1558-1760, L. L. Duncan, F.S.A.
14
KENT. DAVIXGTOX, Index 1549-1862, B. M. Add. MS. 28837.
(continued) MAIDSTONE, 1542-1740, Rev. J. Cave-Browne (part pub.).
HARDEN, Canon Benham.
MARGATE, Canon Benham.
ORPINGTON, 1560-1754, H. C. Kirby.
PRESTON (Faversham), 1559-1812, Rev. J. Russell Cooke.
THANET, St. Peter, 1582-1777, Soc. of Antiq. MS. (by
Cauon Benham).
THANINGTON, Mar. 1558-1737, J. M. Cowper.
LANCASHIRE. OLDHAM, Bap. 1558-1611. MS. Coll. Arms.
WASHINGTON, 1st Register Warrington Museum.
LON DON. ALL HALLOWS, Lombard Street, 1550-1867, Chester MSS:
BUNHILL FIELDS, Bur. 1713-1826, Chester MSS.
CHARTERHOUSE CHAPEL, Bap. 1696-1812, Mar. 1671-1754,
Bur. 1695-1812, Dr. F. Collins.
CHAPEL ROYAL, Whitehall, 1704-1867, Chester MRS.
CHELSEA, Mar. 1559-1754, Chester MSS.
MERCERS' CHAPEL, 1641-1833, Chester MSS.
ROLLS' CHAPEL, 1736-1826, Chester MSS.
ST. BENET, Gracechurch, 1558-1866, Chester MSS.
ST. LEONARD, Eastcheap, 1538-1812, Chester MSS.
TEMPLE CHURCH, complete, Chester MSS.
WESTMINSTER, St. Margaret, complete, Chester MSS.
MIDDLESEX. EPPING, 1538-1750, W. C. Metcalfe, F.S.A. (indexed to
1667).
NORFOLK. ANTINGHAM, 1679-1812, Rev. F. Procter.
BACTON, 1558-1812, Rev. F. Procter.
BRADFIELD, 1725-1812, Rev. F. Procter.
BUNSTEAD, 1561-1812, Rev. F. Procter.
CASTLE ACRE, Bap. 1695-1699, Mar. 1710-1748. Bur.
1695-1698, Rev. J. H. Bloom.
GARVESTON, 1539-1812, Chester MSS.
HORSEY, Bap. and Bur. 1559-1812, Mar. 1571-1677, Rev.
F. Procter.
INGHAM, Bap. and Bur. 1800-1812, Mar. 1800-1838 (the
register burnt), Rev. F. Procter.
MUNDESLEY, 1724-1744, and 1756-1812, Rev. F. Protcer.
PALLING, 1779-1812 (Register lost), Rev. F. Procter,
SWAFIELD, 1660-1812, Rev. F. Procter.
THORPEMARKET, 1537-1739, Rev. F. Procter.
THUXTON, complete, Chester MSS.
WAXHAM, 1780-1812 (Register lost), Rev. F. Procter.
WEST SOMERTON, 1736-1812, Rev. F. Procter.
WESTWICK, Bap. and Bur. 1642-1812, Mar. 1642-1836,
Rev. F. Procter.
WINTERTON, with E. Somerton, 1717-1812 (after fire),
Rev. F. Procter.
13
NORTHANTS. LILFORD, 15G4-1777, Chester MSS.
WADENHOE, complete, Chester MSS.
NOTTS. CARLTON-IN-LINDRICK, Mar. 1559-1754, Bap. and Bur.
1559-1678, G. W. Marshall LL.D., Coll. Arms.
RATCLIFFE-ON-SOAR, 1597-1773, Rev. E. F. Taylor.
SUTTON, St. Ann, 1560-1759. Rev. E. F. Taylor.
OXFORD. OXFORD, All Saints, 1559-1866, Chester MSS.
OXFORD, St. Giles, Mar. 1559-1754, Bap. 1576-1769, Bur.
1605-1768, Chester MSS.
OXFORD, St. Mary Magdalen, 1600-1726, Chester MSS.
OXFORD, St. Mary the Virgin, 1599-1866, Chester MSS.
OXFORD, St. Peter-in-the-East, 1559-1866, Chester MSS.
RUTLAND. EDITH WESTON, Bap. 1585, Mar. and Bur. 1586-1836,
Rev. A. Trollope.
HAMBLEDON, Bap. and Bur. 1558-1812, Mar. 1558-1846,
Rev. Geo. Gibb.
LUFFENHAM (NORTH), Bap. 1572-1748, Mar. and Bur.
1565-1749, Rev. P. G. Dennis.
LYNDON, Bap. and Bur. 1580-1813, Mar. 1580-1837,
Rev. T. K. B. Nevinson.
THISTLETON, Rev. M. A. Thomson.
SHROPSHIRE. QUATFORD, 1636-1811, Brit. Mus. Add. MS. 28740.
SOMERSET. BANWELL, 1568-1797, Chester MSS.
STAFFORDSHIRE. CLENT, 1562-1812, J. Amphlett.
INGESTRE, 1691-1733 (per C. J. Bradshaw).
SURREY. BANSTEAD, Bap. and Mar. 1547-1750, Bur. 1547-1789,
F. A. H. Lambert, F.S.A.
BEDDINGTON, Mar. 1538-1754, R. Garraway Rice, F.S.A.
COULSDON, Mar. 1655-1753, R. Garraway Rice, F.S.A.
FARLEIGH, Bap. and Bur. 1678-1812, Mar. 1679-1810,
R. Garraway Rice, F.S.A.
GODALMING, Bap. 1582-1625, Mar. and Bur. 1583-1625,
Ralph Nevill, F.S.A.
HORLEY, Bap. 1630-1700, Mar. 1630-1753. Bur. 1599-
1700, A. R. Bax.
MITCHAM, 1563-1678, Chester, MSS.
RICHMOND, 1583-1812, J. Challenor Smith.
WOLDINGHAM, Bap. 1766-1812, Mar. 1769-1810, Bur.
1765-1811, R. G. Rice.
SUSSEX. ARDINGLY, 1558-1724 (by Rev. J. H. L. Booker), The
Rector, Indexed and annotated.
BALCOMBE, Bap. 1554, Mar. 1539, Bur. 1540-1746 (by
Rev. J. H. L. Booker), The Rector.
CRAWLEY, Mar. 1688-1750, R. Garraway Rice.
DITCHLING, Bap. 1557 and Mar. and Bur. 1556-1750,
Capt. Attree, R.E. Indexed.
16
SUSSEX. EAST GRIXSTEAD, Bap. 1558-1760, Mar. 1559-1760. Bur.
1574-1760, R. Payne Crawfurd.
EDBURTON, 1558-1673, Sussex Arch. Soc. (see No. 1 List).
HORSHAM, Bap. and Bur. 1540-1761, Mar. 1541-1753,
R. Garraway Rice.
ITCHINGFIELD, Mar. 1700-1812, R. Garraway Rice.
NUTHURST, Mar. 1653-1754, R. Garraway Rice.
NUTHURST, Bap. and Bur. 1636, B. M. Ayscough,MS. 1677
WIVELSFIELD, Bap. and Bur. 1559-1780, Mar. 1559-1753,
Capt. Attree, R.E.
WARWICKSHIRE. FILLONGLEY, 1538-1653, Rev. A. B. Stevenson.
LILLINGTON, Bap. 1540-1573, Mar. 1541-1573, Bur.
1539-1575, Rev. J. Edleston.
WILTS. CHERHILL, 1690-1891, Rev. W. C. Plenderleith.
• EAST KNOYLE, 1538-1892, Rev. R, N. Milford (indexed).
SEAGRY, Bap. and Bur. 1610-1811, Mar. 1611-1753, (old
Trans.), D. Hipwell.
WORCESTERSHIRE. HAGLEY, 1538-1889. Parish and W. Wickham
King1, Indexed.
HAGLEY, 1538-1831, (Copy of J. Noakes), J. Amphlett.
OLD-SWINFORD, 1602-1656, W. W. King-.
PEDMORE, 1539-1886, Parish and W. W. King.
YORKSHIRE. BATLEY, Bap. and Bur. 1559-1812, Mar. 1559-1803,
Mich. Sheard.
EGTON,Mar. 1622-1761, Bap. and Bur. 1622-1779.
FARNHAM, 1570— Bap. and Mar. 1721, Bt.r. 1720, Dr.
F. Collins.
HEMSWORTH. 1553-1688, Rev. J. H. Bloom, M.A.
KIRBY FLEETHAM, 1591-1718, Chester, MSS.
KIRKDALE, 1580-1762, Chester, MSS.
KNARESBOROUGH, 1561— Bap. 1767, Mar. 1751. Bur. 1764,
Dr. F. Collins.
MIRFIELD, 1559-1606, Par. Church.
SHEFFIELD, Bap. 1559-1603, Rev. C. V. Collier.
SHEFFIELD, Bap. by Rev. Jollie, 1681-1704, Brit. Mus.
Add. MS. 24486.
WINTRINGHAM, 1558-1700, Chester, MSS.
WRAGLEY, 1538- Rev. E. Sankey.
YORK, St. Martin cum Gregory, 1540-1780, Indexed to
1740, Rev. E. Bulmer.
Harrison & Sons, Printers in Ordinary to Her Majesty, St. Martin's Lane.
DA
670
W69W5
v»27
The Wiltshire archaeological
and natural history
magazine
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE
CARDS OR SLIPS FROM THIS POCKET
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARY